Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Converting Trek to triple chainring?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Converting Trek to triple chainring?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-11-18 | 05:19 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Schroon Lake NY

Bikes: Trek 560 Pro, Trek 420

Converting Trek to triple chainring?

I have a 1984 trek 420 that currently has a double chainring. I want to install a Sakae CX triple. I'd also like to use a cartridge bottom bracket. The Vintage Trek sight says to use a 127.5mm axle that may require a 2mm spacer on the right bottom bracket end. That is with a Sugino AT crankset (triple). Does anybody know if it would be the same with the Sakae CX triple?
drtyrrel is offline  
Reply
Old 03-11-18 | 07:20 AM
  #2  
shoff535's Avatar
Junior Member
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 140
Likes: 45
From: Dallas

Bikes: Current Stable: 1973 Mercian Vincitore;1985 CIOCC Designer'84;1988 Raleigh "531c USA" ;1990 LeMond Maillot Jaune Z Team; 1991 Fuji Titanium;1996 Calfee LunaPro-Lemond Z team Tribute Replica; 2013 Wilier Zero.Seven

I'm not sure why you would need a spacer. The important thing is to observe the chain line, if it's too close to the frame, then I suppose the spacer is needed.
I converted an old Raleigh from a double to a triple and the only changes that I needed to make were (aside from the crank/chainring, front and rear derailleurs) was I swapped out the 113mm bb assembly (which was loose ball bearings style to the longer axle sealed cartridge version 122.5...IIRC
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Raleigh-frontderail.jpg (149.7 KB, 141 views)
File Type: jpg
Raleigh-reardrail.jpg (188.6 KB, 139 views)
shoff535 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-11-18 | 07:29 AM
  #3  
jcb3's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 604
Likes: 18
From: Irvine, CA
Another symptom is chainrub on the middle chainring when on the small. I did a couple conversions and pushing the crank farther out helped.

I did a triple conversion on an early 80s Trek 700 with a early shimano 600 double with a triplizer and found the 127.7 was too wide and a 124 worked better.

My experience with triples is to have a variety of spindles to work on the fit. I picked them up at various swap meets, and some are bad, but thats ok for fitting up the triple.
jcb3 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-11-18 | 07:45 AM
  #4  
wrk101's Avatar
Thrifty Bill
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 23,645
Likes: 1,109
From: Mans of NC & SW UT Desert

Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more

Many of those older cranksets used asymmetric bottom brackets. So a spacer allows a modern cartridge BB to mimic the asymmetric.
wrk101 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-11-18 | 08:01 AM
  #5  
jonwvara's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,058
Likes: 943
From: Washington County, Vermont, USA

Bikes: 1973-4 Gitane Tour de France, early 1970's Lejeune, 1970 Italvega Super Speciale, 2010 Surly Long Haul Trucker 26

Originally Posted by jcb3

My experience with triples is to have a variety of spindles to work on the fit. I picked them up at various swap meets, and some are bad, but thats ok for fitting up the triple.
The empirical approach described above is a good one. Find a used cartridge that you're pretty sure will be too long. Try the local bike co-of if there's one near you. You're not going to ride with it, so it doesn't matter if the bearings are bad, provided that the threads on the cups are in good shape. Install the "test cartridge" in the BB shell and bolt the crankset to it. See how much clearance you have between the inner ring and the chainstay. You want at least 2mm of clearance, but probably no more than 4mm.

As an example, say you install a 127mm cartridge and have 6mm of clearance. (You can use an allen wrench as a feeler gauge for this.) In that case, you want a cartridge that's about 3mm shorter on the drive side. That means it will also be 3mm shorter on the non-drive side, or 6 mm shorter overall. Remove the test cartridge and replace it with a 120-122mm one that you've purchased new.

Don't worry about precision too much--there's a fair amount of leeway here. When in doubt, it's better to go a little short than a little long. If the inner ring is too close to the chainstay, you can always increase the clearance by adding a 1 or 2mm spacer under the drive side cup. But if it's too long you have to live with it or get a shorter spindle.
__________________
www.redclovercomponents.com

"Progress might have been all right once, but it has gone on too long."
--Ogden Nash
jonwvara is offline  
Reply
Old 03-11-18 | 06:10 PM
  #6  
Road Fan's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 17,196
Likes: 761
From: Ann Arbor, MI

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

To check whether a given BB combination will work, I agree you have to look at clearance between the inner chainring and the chainstay, but you also have to look at the chainline, i.e. the distance from the center of the downtube or seat tube and the center of the middle chainring.
Road Fan is offline  
Reply
Old 03-12-18 | 03:33 AM
  #7  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Schroon Lake NY

Bikes: Trek 560 Pro, Trek 420

Thank you everybody. I do have the axle that came with the triple crank. I'll try that first to get an idea of the length I need. Should the distance from the downtube center to the center of the middle chain ring line up with the middle of the rear derailleur?
drtyrrel is offline  
Reply
Old 03-12-18 | 05:37 AM
  #8  
jonwvara's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,058
Likes: 943
From: Washington County, Vermont, USA

Bikes: 1973-4 Gitane Tour de France, early 1970's Lejeune, 1970 Italvega Super Speciale, 2010 Surly Long Haul Trucker 26

Originally Posted by Road Fan
To check whether a given BB combination will work, I agree you have to look at clearance between the inner chainring and the chainstay, but you also have to look at the chainline, i.e. the distance from the center of the downtube or seat tube and the center of the middle chainring.
Right, the correct chainline would be something like 43 mm between the center of the middle ring and the center of the seat tube. But clearance is easier to measure, and in my experience getting the clearance right also means that the chainline will be right. Shamelessly empirical, as I said, but there's no need for a high degree of precision with this.
__________________
www.redclovercomponents.com

"Progress might have been all right once, but it has gone on too long."
--Ogden Nash
jonwvara is offline  
Reply
Old 03-12-18 | 08:01 AM
  #9  
oddjob2's Avatar
Still learning
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 11,529
Likes: 88
From: North of Canada, Adirondacks

Bikes: Still a garage full

Originally Posted by drtyrrel
Thank you everybody. I do have the axle that came with the triple crank. I'll try that first to get an idea of the length I need. Should the distance from the downtube center to the center of the middle chain ring line up with the middle of the rear derailleur?
If you have the original BB axle from your triple, measure it end to end and obtain a UN-26 or other BB cartridge of the approximately the same length. Better to be 1-3 millimetrs wide than too short.

Good luck.
oddjob2 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-12-18 | 09:02 AM
  #10  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Schroon Lake NY

Bikes: Trek 560 Pro, Trek 420

The triple came off a Schwinn La tour Luxe and it's going on a Trek 420. Not sure if the axle is the same width as what the Trek would have had with a triple.
drtyrrel is offline  
Reply
Old 03-12-18 | 10:04 AM
  #11  
oddjob2's Avatar
Still learning
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 11,529
Likes: 88
From: North of Canada, Adirondacks

Bikes: Still a garage full

Originally Posted by drtyrrel
The triple came off a Schwinn La tour Luxe and it's going on a Trek 420. Not sure if the axle is the same width as what the Trek would have had with a triple.
Per Sheldonbrown.com

"The spindle length mainly depends on what kind of crankset you'll be using, and doesn't have much to do with the frame. "

https://www.sheldonbrown.com/bbsize.html
oddjob2 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-12-18 | 10:19 AM
  #12  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Schroon Lake NY

Bikes: Trek 560 Pro, Trek 420

Thanks for that info oddjob2. I'll try that axle first . If it fits I might just use that instead of a cartridge.
drtyrrel is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tomtomtom123
Bicycle Mechanics
15
03-12-18 01:12 PM
JC_Fixie
Bicycle Mechanics
5
03-23-11 03:18 PM
Andy727
Bicycle Mechanics
5
12-15-10 04:07 PM
retnav94
Bicycle Mechanics
4
12-06-10 12:23 PM
mazdaspeed
Bicycle Mechanics
2
09-08-10 01:58 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.