How dangerous is this?
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
How dangerous is this?
Looking for options other than drilling back hole of fork. Was able to attach recessed nut and tighten to the stub that made it through the first hole. Am I better off using a standard nut, extending the stub with a coupler and exiting out the rear hole or am I simply playing with fire and need to find a nutted brake set?
#2
Senior Member
don't do what you just did (except to check fit of the brakes). go get a coupler for like $2 and use that. I did the same on my semi-pro. front brake on rear, rear brake with coupler extension.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,744
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,868 Times
in
1,439 Posts
Check this thread for an alternative solution:
Retro Roadie braking joy
You can get a long pivot bolt for under $10 on eBay, and if you don't forget to take out the set screws it doesn't take much longer than changing out brake pads. The coupler solution will work, and there's less risk of screwing up your brake that way, but replacing the pivot bolt is just such a clean solution.
Retro Roadie braking joy
You can get a long pivot bolt for under $10 on eBay, and if you don't forget to take out the set screws it doesn't take much longer than changing out brake pads. The coupler solution will work, and there's less risk of screwing up your brake that way, but replacing the pivot bolt is just such a clean solution.
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
#4
Strong Walker
What kind of of fork is that that doesn't have a rear hole drilled? The forces on a front brake are huge and a double-hole fixation is so much more stable. A construction that puts "bending load" on a threaded bolt is inherently a bad idea.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
Posts: 9,579
Bikes: '65 Frejus TDF, '73 Bottecchia Giro d'Italia, '83 Colnago Superissimo, '84 Trek 610, '84 Trek 760, '88 Pinarello Veneto, '88 De Rosa Pro, '89 Pinarello Montello, '94 Burley Duet, 97 Specialized RockHopper, 2010 Langster, Tern Link D8
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1608 Post(s)
Liked 2,216 Times
in
1,103 Posts
Probably will fail with first use. Dangerous? Well that is dependent on why you are using the brake!
__________________
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
#8
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,786
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3588 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
It probably is drilled all the way through, it just appears that the OP is trying to mount a caliper intended as a rear caliper into the fork. Front calipers have longer pivots that reach all the way through the crown.
#9
Full Member
Thread Starter
The fork does have a hole in the back it's just not large enough for the recessed nut to fit. Some have suggested drilling the hole larger and using a longer recessed nut. I prefer not altering the fork.
The brake set I'm using is recessed. I'm actually using the rear brake up front as it was too short for the back. Neither the rear nor the front brakes are long enough for the front.
I'm leaning towards the coupler solution vs disassembling the brake and replacing mounting screw with a longer one assuming it will be sufficiently strong to support the forces. Mechanical engineers?
The brake set I'm using is recessed. I'm actually using the rear brake up front as it was too short for the back. Neither the rear nor the front brakes are long enough for the front.
I'm leaning towards the coupler solution vs disassembling the brake and replacing mounting screw with a longer one assuming it will be sufficiently strong to support the forces. Mechanical engineers?
Last edited by tarsi; 03-29-18 at 08:00 AM. Reason: Typo
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 512
Bikes: 1970s Coppi/Fiorelli beater, 1973 Raleigh Competition, 1972 Bob Jackson, 1970 Cilo Sprint-X, 1985 Fuji Touring Series IV, 1969 Legnano Roma
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 217 Post(s)
Liked 198 Times
in
129 Posts
The fork does have a hole in the back it's just not large enough for the recessed nut to fit. Some have suggested drilling the hole larger and using a longer recessed nut. I prefer not altering the fork.
The brake set I'm using is recessed. I'm actually using the rear brake up front as it was too short for the back. Neither the rear nor the front brakes are long enough for the front.
I'm leaning towards the coupler solution vs disassembling the brake and replacing mounting screw with a longer one assuming it will be sufficiently strong to support the forces. Mechanical engineers?
The brake set I'm using is recessed. I'm actually using the rear brake up front as it was too short for the back. Neither the rear nor the front brakes are long enough for the front.
I'm leaning towards the coupler solution vs disassembling the brake and replacing mounting screw with a longer one assuming it will be sufficiently strong to support the forces. Mechanical engineers?
#11
Senior Member
So you're gonna get an m6 coupler nut and an m6 bolt to screw into the coupler from the back? Assuming they're all steel and graded you should be fine strength-wise, in fact there will be a lot more metal with the coupler nut and an m6 bolt in there. For more strength you can get a grade 8.8 bolt rather than an ungraded one.
Sheldon Brown suggests exactly what you've done but John Allen added a note about how this doesn't counteract the tendency of the brake to rotate forward. Personally I think if the fork crown is thick and you really torque the brake nut down it would be strong enough to resist this force but I am not a mechanical engineer which is why I would just drill the back hole of the fork out.
Sheldon Brown suggests exactly what you've done but John Allen added a note about how this doesn't counteract the tendency of the brake to rotate forward. Personally I think if the fork crown is thick and you really torque the brake nut down it would be strong enough to resist this force but I am not a mechanical engineer which is why I would just drill the back hole of the fork out.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,674
Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma
Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1372 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,751 Times
in
938 Posts
How dangerous is this?
__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
#13
Senior Member
So you're gonna get an m6 coupler nut and an m6 bolt to screw into the coupler from the back? Assuming they're all steel and graded you should be fine strength-wise, in fact there will be a lot more metal with the coupler nut and an m6 bolt in there. For more strength you can get a grade 8.8 bolt rather than an ungraded one.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18377 Post(s)
Liked 4,512 Times
in
3,354 Posts
Depending on the brake, you can buy new pivot bolts.
Somewhere halfway down the page, there are some at Toronto Titanium.
Paul Brakes, Titanium Dura Ace, CNC Bike Brakes, Brake Post Studs
If you have the brake model number, you can also look up on Shimano's part diagrams, then search for the part number to find OEM parts.
Somewhere halfway down the page, there are some at Toronto Titanium.
Paul Brakes, Titanium Dura Ace, CNC Bike Brakes, Brake Post Studs
If you have the brake model number, you can also look up on Shimano's part diagrams, then search for the part number to find OEM parts.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18377 Post(s)
Liked 4,512 Times
in
3,354 Posts
Recessed Brake Nuts.
That photo was apparently from E-Bay. I would assume most bike shops would also sell them.
TorontoCycles also has them in Titanium. Same link as above. Lengths from 13mm to 60mm.
Paul Brakes, Titanium Dura Ace, CNC Bike Brakes, Brake Post Studs
That photo was apparently from E-Bay. I would assume most bike shops would also sell them.
TorontoCycles also has them in Titanium. Same link as above. Lengths from 13mm to 60mm.
Paul Brakes, Titanium Dura Ace, CNC Bike Brakes, Brake Post Studs
#19
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,194
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1565 Post(s)
Liked 1,296 Times
in
866 Posts
I just wanted to address any concerns that the bolt needs to be supported at two points, some distance apart.
Actually, it does not. There should be no rocking at all, nor any bending loads fed into the bolt at all, IF the bolt is tensioned near spec, and if the (usually toothed) support surface is of the specified diameter.
For any bending load or rocking to affect the bolt would require that the bolt was not tensioned fully, or that the washer surface was somehow of reduced area, since the bolt's pre-load tension is fully sufficient to prevent the mounting surface of the caliper (at the toothed washer) from ever moving. Again though, the mounting surface of the caliper centerbolt's "hub" must be of at least the original diameter to assure that the bolt's specified tension prevents it from ever rocking in response to the heaviest braking loads.
The Cheltenham-Pedersen that I have raced for over 20 years mounts it's front caliper to a sheet-metal plate of sorts, with the nut capturing just the thickness of that plate. The rather thin plate itself flexes, but the caliper mounting sure doesn't!
Looking at the installation, my only concerns are that at least four threads are engaged, and that the nut meeting the inside of the steer tube is not perhaps preventing the nut from being torqued properly, though at the nut's small diameter there I don't think that there would be any excess of friction resisting the nut being fully torqued.
One might also speculate of the possibility that the steer tube and crown could somehow be weakened by the localized stress of the nut pressing against the inside, but that seems unlikely and a washer could be used if either of these remote potential "issues" was a concern.
So I am giving this installation a thumbs-up.
Actually, it does not. There should be no rocking at all, nor any bending loads fed into the bolt at all, IF the bolt is tensioned near spec, and if the (usually toothed) support surface is of the specified diameter.
For any bending load or rocking to affect the bolt would require that the bolt was not tensioned fully, or that the washer surface was somehow of reduced area, since the bolt's pre-load tension is fully sufficient to prevent the mounting surface of the caliper (at the toothed washer) from ever moving. Again though, the mounting surface of the caliper centerbolt's "hub" must be of at least the original diameter to assure that the bolt's specified tension prevents it from ever rocking in response to the heaviest braking loads.
The Cheltenham-Pedersen that I have raced for over 20 years mounts it's front caliper to a sheet-metal plate of sorts, with the nut capturing just the thickness of that plate. The rather thin plate itself flexes, but the caliper mounting sure doesn't!
Looking at the installation, my only concerns are that at least four threads are engaged, and that the nut meeting the inside of the steer tube is not perhaps preventing the nut from being torqued properly, though at the nut's small diameter there I don't think that there would be any excess of friction resisting the nut being fully torqued.
One might also speculate of the possibility that the steer tube and crown could somehow be weakened by the localized stress of the nut pressing against the inside, but that seems unlikely and a washer could be used if either of these remote potential "issues" was a concern.
So I am giving this installation a thumbs-up.
Last edited by dddd; 03-29-18 at 07:57 PM.
#20
Senior Member
be fun to test. and lo! i happen to have a pocket lab! if i get a chance ill test the acceleration of a brake with the bolt with 2 points vs 1 point. might be able to get to it tomorrow if I remember to bring it in to work. (sticks in bag now). easy enough to see if one has larger amplitude vibrations than the other.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,829 Times
in
1,995 Posts
M6 coupling nuts can vary in length, the examples I have used required a bit of grinding to reduce the length a wee bit. I grind both ends to assist in the nut fitting against the inside of the steerer. The finish off with a chrome plated button head cap screw, to add strength and provide a nice finish.
#22
Full Member
Thread Starter
Picked up a coupling today and it fit inside the fork without grinding.
To maximize amount the caliper rod goes into the coupling, I removed the toothed washer that usually goes between the caliper and the fork. Is there any problem with doing this? Is it preferable to use the washer and not have the mounting rod go as deep into the coupling?
I've included a picture of the rear brake with the toothed washer to help clarify what I am talking about.
To maximize amount the caliper rod goes into the coupling, I removed the toothed washer that usually goes between the caliper and the fork. Is there any problem with doing this? Is it preferable to use the washer and not have the mounting rod go as deep into the coupling?
I've included a picture of the rear brake with the toothed washer to help clarify what I am talking about.
Last edited by tarsi; 03-30-18 at 08:01 AM. Reason: updated photo
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 512
Bikes: 1970s Coppi/Fiorelli beater, 1973 Raleigh Competition, 1972 Bob Jackson, 1970 Cilo Sprint-X, 1985 Fuji Touring Series IV, 1969 Legnano Roma
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 217 Post(s)
Liked 198 Times
in
129 Posts
Picked up a coupling today and it fit inside the fork without grinding.
To maximize amount the caliper rod goes into the coupling, I removed the toothed washer that usually goes between the caliper and the fork. Is there any problem with doing this? Is it preferable to use the washer and not have the mounting rod go as deep into the coupling?
I've included a picture of the rear brake with the toothed washer to help clarify what I am talking about.
To maximize amount the caliper rod goes into the coupling, I removed the toothed washer that usually goes between the caliper and the fork. Is there any problem with doing this? Is it preferable to use the washer and not have the mounting rod go as deep into the coupling?
I've included a picture of the rear brake with the toothed washer to help clarify what I am talking about.
#24
Senior Member
#25
Semper Fi
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,942
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1172 Post(s)
Liked 358 Times
in
241 Posts
See them regularly on door closers and other hardware applications such as bathroom accessories and partitions. Lowe's and Home Depot will have them in their hardware fastener section.
Bill
__________________
Semper Fi, USMC, 1975-1977
I Can Do All Things Through Him, Who Gives Me Strength. Philippians 4:13
Semper Fi, USMC, 1975-1977
I Can Do All Things Through Him, Who Gives Me Strength. Philippians 4:13