Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

C-Record Bottom Bracket Differences?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

C-Record Bottom Bracket Differences?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-06-18 | 09:38 AM
  #1  
Soylent's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 288
Likes: 11
From: Central California
C-Record Bottom Bracket Differences?

This has been discussed before but it is still not clear to me. I am looking for a c-record bottom bracket, italian threading which would be 111 mm to use with the c-record cranks. I have seen several available recently with slightly different markings.

70-SP and 70-SPc.

I understand that 70 is the Italian width and that S is strada and P is pista. The "c" is supposedly for corsa or c-record. So what is 70-SP? Is that a later designation? Is it for the early 90s Record crank (not for the c-record cranks)? Or are they exactly the same? Then there is the issue of finding the right cups and bearings.
Soylent is offline  
Reply
Old 04-06-18 | 02:59 PM
  #2  
Old Fireleg's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 269
Likes: 71

Bikes: '76 Colnago Super NR,'83 Romani Aero KL/SP SR, '85 Mino Denti Aero Master CR, '86 ALAN Cyclo-cross DA, '89 Bottecchia SLX CR, '90 Colnago Master Piu CR

Originally Posted by Soylent
This has been discussed before but it is still not clear to me. I am looking for a c-record bottom bracket, italian threading which would be 111 mm to use with the c-record cranks. I have seen several available recently with slightly different markings.

70-SP and 70-SPc.

I understand that 70 is the Italian width and that S is strada and P is pista. The "c" is supposedly for corsa or c-record. So what is 70-SP? Is that a later designation? Is it for the early 90s Record crank (not for the c-record cranks)? Or are they exactly the same? Then there is the issue of finding the right cups and bearings.
I have no information about this.
Perhaps the explanation is that when Chorus (B), Athena (G) and Cd'A (A) sets come out, they also have an axle length of 111 mm, with a distinctive mark. And then they put "c" on the Record axis, which was previously not marked with extra "c" as the only 111 mm axis. But that's just my assumption ...

According to this logic, SP was the former and SPc is later. I have a first generation C-record crank (11) with the original 14 ball BB. Tomorrow I'll check Sp or SPc and I'll write it down.

I'm copying a contemporary brochure here, unfortunately not C-record, but there are almost everything in the older axes. Maybe someone can use it.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
cbb1.jpg (164.8 KB, 204 views)
File Type: jpg
cbb2a.jpg (121.7 KB, 199 views)
File Type: jpg
cbb2b.jpg (143.2 KB, 195 views)
File Type: jpg
cbb2c.jpg (109.9 KB, 195 views)
File Type: jpg
cbb3a.jpg (164.0 KB, 194 views)
File Type: jpg
cbb3b.jpg (191.0 KB, 199 views)

Last edited by Old Fireleg; 04-06-18 at 03:12 PM.
Old Fireleg is offline  
Reply
Old 04-06-18 | 03:54 PM
  #3  
JohnDThompson's Avatar
Old fart
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,354
Likes: 5,263
From: Appleton WI

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Originally Posted by Soylent
This has been discussed before but it is still not clear to me. I am looking for a c-record bottom bracket, italian threading which would be 111 mm to use with the c-record cranks. I have seen several available recently with slightly different markings.

70-SP and 70-SPc.

I understand that 70 is the Italian width and that S is strada and P is pista. The "c" is supposedly for corsa or c-record. So what is 70-SP? Is that a later designation? Is it for the early 90s Record crank (not for the c-record cranks)? Or are they exactly the same? Then there is the issue of finding the right cups and bearings.
"70-SP" is pre-1990 C-Record; "70-SP C" is post-1990 C-Record. Note that they use different ball sizes and are thus not interchangeable and need the proper corresponding cups.


Source: Sutherland's 6th Edition

Last edited by JohnDThompson; 04-06-18 at 04:00 PM.
JohnDThompson is online now  
Reply
Old 04-06-18 | 04:51 PM
  #4  
Old Fireleg's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 269
Likes: 71

Bikes: '76 Colnago Super NR,'83 Romani Aero KL/SP SR, '85 Mino Denti Aero Master CR, '86 ALAN Cyclo-cross DA, '89 Bottecchia SLX CR, '90 Colnago Master Piu CR

Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
"70-SP" is pre-1990 C-Record; "70-SP C" is post-1990 C-Record. Note that they use different ball sizes and are thus not interchangeable and need the proper corresponding cups.


Source: Sutherland's 6th Edition
There are some interesting data in this table.

1. Isn't 11-7/32 at SPc?
2. 109 mm axis lenght with 1 or 2 chain rings?
3. 70-SS with 109 mm and 14-3/16?
4. I've seen 68-SP without "c", this is not listed in the table

I'm not an expert, I just ask.

Last edited by Old Fireleg; 04-06-18 at 05:01 PM.
Old Fireleg is offline  
Reply
Old 04-06-18 | 05:33 PM
  #5  
JohnDThompson's Avatar
Old fart
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,354
Likes: 5,263
From: Appleton WI

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Originally Posted by Old Fireleg
There are some interesting data in this table.

1. Isn't 11-7/32 at SPc?
No, earlier Record bottom brackets used 11 1/4" balls on each side. I don't have a post-1990 Campagnolo bottom bracket to check, but I do have a Zeus 2000 titanium bottom bracket that uses 14 7/32" balls on each side, so I don't find that implausible.

2. 109 mm axis lenght with 1 or 2 chain rings?
I haven't tried C-Record with a single ring. But the 109mm SP and SS spindles are noted to be the same.

3. 70-SS with 109 mm and 14-3/16?
I do have a C-Record 68-SS bottom bracket that measure 109mm and uses 14 3/16" balls.

4. I've seen 68-SP without "c", this is not listed in the table
That was on the previous page:


Source: Sutherland's 6th Edition

Last edited by JohnDThompson; 04-06-18 at 05:43 PM.
JohnDThompson is online now  
Reply
Old 04-06-18 | 05:50 PM
  #6  
Soylent's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 288
Likes: 11
From: Central California
John and Fireleg,

Thank you for those charts. They will be quite helpful as many of the spindles are offered without the cups. Obtaining the correct cups and balls could be very frustrating by going by a sellers description alone.
Soylent is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-18 | 12:27 PM
  #7  
Soylent's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 288
Likes: 11
From: Central California
Originally Posted by Old Fireleg

1. Isn't 11-7/32 at SPc?
Interesting. I just found a 70-SPc for sale with cups and balls in cages. There are 11 balls in each cage. Maybe mismatched by the owner?

John- Does your Sutherlands mention any specifics on the thick cups? Are they all the same regardless of ball size? Do you only need to match the right spindle with the right cup(thick vs thin)?

Last edited by Soylent; 04-07-18 at 12:36 PM.
Soylent is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-18 | 12:39 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 786
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
No, earlier Record bottom brackets used 11 1/4" balls on each side. I don't have a post-1990 Campagnolo bottom bracket to check, but I do have a Zeus 2000 titanium bottom bracket that uses 14 7/32" balls on each side, so I don't find that implausible.
According to the table, the axles for 3/16" and 7/32" balls are otherwise dimensionally identical. Perhaps the extra 1/16" of width of the later BBs is taken up in the cups?

Anyway, it seems plausible to me then that the SPc designation is to differentiate the later axles from the earlier SP for 3/16" balls. I think that's also the point they stopped calling the group C-Record or Record Corsa, but had reverted to simply Record.
Ghrumpy is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-18 | 01:06 PM
  #9  
JohnDThompson's Avatar
Old fart
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,354
Likes: 5,263
From: Appleton WI

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Originally Posted by Soylent
Does your Sutherlands mention any specifics on the thick cups?
No, there's a lot on spindles, but nothing on whether the cup thickness differs in the various C-Record bottom brackets.

Are they all the same regardless of ball size? Do you only need to match the right spindle with the right cup(thick vs thin)?
In general, the races are ground to match a specific ball size, so my intuition is "no, you need to match the spindle with the cups." Sutherland's does offer this advice:


Source: Sutherland's 6th Edition
JohnDThompson is online now  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Shrevvy
Classic & Vintage
22
03-15-24 10:20 AM
Soylent
Classic & Vintage
4
09-19-17 01:09 AM
Spaghetti Legs
Classic & Vintage
12
03-24-17 07:17 PM
1960frejus
Bicycle Mechanics
10
06-05-13 09:06 PM
alabamatx
Bicycle Mechanics
7
12-06-12 11:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.