Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

1988/87 Cannondale road bike

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

1988/87 Cannondale road bike

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-08-18, 06:07 PM
  #26  
aka: Mike J.
Thread Starter
 
treebound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: between Milwaukee and Sheboygan in Wisconsin
Posts: 3,405

Bikes: 1995 Trek 520 is the current primary bike.

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Liked 58 Times in 39 Posts

I find myself coin flipping now between these two bikes, the Cannondale and the Trek 1000. Both are 12 speeds, Trek has 170mm cranks, C’dale has 175mm cranks, C’dale is a little taller at the top tube and had about a 4cm shorter wheelbase, the stem on the Trek is at max height so if I want more height on the bars I’ll have to swap stems. The Trek is about a pound or two lighter based on the handheld luggage scale.
I’m planning on bringing the Cannondale to work for a lunchtime lap to get a better feel for how it rides and handles.
No pressure right now to purge a bike so no real hurry to decide between them unless something else catches my eye and I need to build the bike funds.

Anyway, had a few minutes today to pull both bikes out and compare them side by side, just thought it would be fun to share a photo.
__________________
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Life happens, don't be a spectator.

Last edited by treebound; 09-27-18 at 12:42 PM. Reason: typos
treebound is offline  
Old 09-08-18, 06:10 PM
  #27  
aka: Mike J.
Thread Starter
 
treebound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: between Milwaukee and Sheboygan in Wisconsin
Posts: 3,405

Bikes: 1995 Trek 520 is the current primary bike.

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Liked 58 Times in 39 Posts
(Sorry for the typos, my phone browser isn’t behaving for editing.)
__________________
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Life happens, don't be a spectator.
treebound is offline  
Old 09-08-18, 06:10 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Center of Central CA
Posts: 1,582
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 897 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 8 Posts
I wish I had your problems. Is the weight difference mostly due to the wheels? And maybe the seat that Cannondale is sporting? I would think the weights would be rather similar.
Colnago Mixte is offline  
Old 09-08-18, 07:11 PM
  #29  
aka: Mike J.
Thread Starter
 
treebound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: between Milwaukee and Sheboygan in Wisconsin
Posts: 3,405

Bikes: 1995 Trek 520 is the current primary bike.

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Liked 58 Times in 39 Posts
Could be a little from the tires, wheels and rims seem comparable. Saddle could be a good chunk of the weight difference.

I paid too much for the Cannondale but couldn’t pass it up due to the condition it was in. And I got dumb lucky on the Trek (right place, right time, and previous owners were moving and the first in line buyer was a no-show), Trek’s tires I found at Goodwill a year or so ago (dumb lucky again), white saddle I had in a spare parts bin.
__________________
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Life happens, don't be a spectator.
treebound is offline  
Old 09-27-18, 12:55 PM
  #30  
aka: Mike J.
Thread Starter
 
treebound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: between Milwaukee and Sheboygan in Wisconsin
Posts: 3,405

Bikes: 1995 Trek 520 is the current primary bike.

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Liked 58 Times in 39 Posts

The Cannondale is currently winning the coin flip based on the last couple lunch laps. Looking at max tires sizes, it looks like the Trek has less room, might be able to sneak a 25mm tire on there but the brake arm clearance might be an issue if the tire is much taller than the current 23mm tire. The Cannondale looks like it would be happy with a 25 and just might be able to sneak a 28mm tire onto it. The 23’s currently on the Cannondale are a bit soft or compliant and I’m concerned about pinch flats. I did find some 10mm Velox in a drawer at home so I put that onto the rear rim of the Cannondale and so far it seems to have stopped the tubes from getting holes on the rim side.

Speedwise it seems like both bikes are comparable if I look at my Strava segment times between the bikes. But the Cannondale just feels better to me even though it is taller.

oh well, just rambling through some thoughts, have a good next ride everyone.
__________________
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Life happens, don't be a spectator.
treebound is offline  
Old 09-27-18, 01:53 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
OldsCOOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 13,319

Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 660 Post(s)
Liked 601 Times in 314 Posts
Originally Posted by Colnago Mixte
I've got the 1988 Criterium model, I don't think it had a name. The plastic top tube cable guides are long gone. Many fast rides on this bike since the 80's. IIRC the frame's geometry was designed by Davis Phinney, the winning-est crit rider of the late 1980's. I entered my first race on the bike in 1988, and won.

These frames do tend to beat you up though. They're screaming fast when you first jump on, but the lack of flex starts to bother my joints after an hour or so, always did, even in my late 20's. They are no the compromise, criterium crushing speed machines of the era. I have done a century ride on it, but would use something else next time.

I would try to get some nice comfortable tires, maybe GP 4000's and a box-style rim. I doubt you have room for anything bigger than 25's though, and maybe not even that much. Enjoy all that speed and stiffness!
I have 5 seasons on my frameset build ‘88 Criterium Series. Nothing rides like it. I have 2 other topshelf vintage racers but this one is so quick and fits me like an extra limb of my body. The handling is intuitive. Mine weighs 19# and a few ounces with Vuelta Corsa Lite wheels and super quick Michelin tires. It has the aluminum Sakae Fx fork. So smooth on new pavement, so rough on bad pavement. Furthest I’ve gone is 70mi. What a bike. Wow.
OldsCOOL is offline  
Old 09-27-18, 02:39 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Bikerider007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: AZ/WA
Posts: 2,403

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 460 Post(s)
Liked 54 Times in 30 Posts
I feel the same way about my 88' Klein. It just outperforms my steel stuff. As much as I like them once in a while, it's my go to.
Bikerider007 is offline  
Old 09-27-18, 04:23 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Chr0m0ly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Back in Lincoln Sq, Chicago...🙄
Posts: 1,609

Bikes: '84 Miyata 610 ‘91 Cannondale ST600,'83 Trek 720 ‘84 Trek 520, 620, ‘91 Miyata 1000LT, '79 Trek 514, '78 Trek 706, '73 Raleigh Int. frame.

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Liked 370 Times in 219 Posts

Yup! You’re looking at 28’s on a Black Lightning! 😈
Took it out for 4 hours last Saturday. I’m beat up and sore, but it’s the position more than the road shock. I think the whole “Cannondales are harsh” thing is just silly. Hands and feet are excellent shock absorbers! And pneumatic tires! A literal cushion of air. This came on 23’s and it was still a great ride. ENJOY IT!!

Chr0m0ly is offline  
Old 10-13-18, 02:39 PM
  #34  
aka: Mike J.
Thread Starter
 
treebound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: between Milwaukee and Sheboygan in Wisconsin
Posts: 3,405

Bikes: 1995 Trek 520 is the current primary bike.

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Liked 58 Times in 39 Posts

The yellow/white Trek 1000 is gone to a new owner, replaced it with a Novara Randonee (not sure of the model year yet, gearing is 3x8 with Sora brake shifters).

Then did some more horse trading and wound up with a set of Panaracer 700x25c tires which are now on the Cannondale. The ride of the ‘dale seems to feel better to me now.

added pic is of the Novara
__________________
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Life happens, don't be a spectator.
treebound is offline  
Old 10-13-18, 03:27 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
masi61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 3,694

Bikes: Puch Marco Polo, Saint Tropez, Masi Gran Criterium

Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1172 Post(s)
Liked 446 Times in 319 Posts
Originally Posted by treebound
I just picked up a Cannondale road bike, but I’m having trouble figuring out exactly what model it is. Per a Vintage Cannondale website the s/n works out to be an early 1988 size 60 frame. But the 1988 catalog shows those with 7-speed,
and the 1987 catalog scans show 6-speed but nothing with a 100% match. Closest is the Black Lightening model, but the decals and crank don’t match this one.

One pic attached, I can add more later once I’m back on wifi.

SunTour Blaze matching component group on this one. I guess everything could have been swapped out.

The size 60 frame looks to be center to top, but with the post slammed the bike is a functional fit for me. This thing looks like it was bought new and has very little use on it.




A few observations that I would add:
1) The fork does not look bent, what you are seeing is the 74 degree head tube geometry. If the frame were more compact for the rider it would make the twitchy handling more intuitive. As is with the too tall frame, I fear it would just make for a punishing ride.
2) The saddle is tilted down is an awkward way - is this how you ride it?
3) The saddle is technically too low, telling me that this bike is probably not the best choice for you fit wise. The proportions as currently set up just look - wrong. Sorry - no offense intended, it is just my sensibility based on notions of proper fit that I have evolved over the years.
4) This frame could be a really nice quick club racing/criterium bike for somebody about 6'2" or taller. Just curious how tall you are.
5) The stem is taller than the seat again making the setup appear awkward. Again, no offense to you, but if it were me I would drop down the stem at least to the level of the saddle. When a stem is higher than the saddle, poor handling can result.
6) The aluminum frame is in excellent condition for sure. It is the little details outlined above that can make or break the actual ride comfort. If the frame were a 55 or 56 instead of the current size, you would be golden.
masi61 is offline  
Old 10-13-18, 04:26 PM
  #36  
aka: Mike J.
Thread Starter
 
treebound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: between Milwaukee and Sheboygan in Wisconsin
Posts: 3,405

Bikes: 1995 Trek 520 is the current primary bike.

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Liked 58 Times in 39 Posts
Saddle position pic was as bought, since has been swapped and adjusted. Agree that the frame could be a size or two smaller, but the reach works for me so the slammed saddle height doesn’t bother me. And at my age I tend to like the comfort of the bars being at saddle height if not a little above.
__________________
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Life happens, don't be a spectator.
treebound is offline  
Old 10-13-18, 04:37 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
masi61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 3,694

Bikes: Puch Marco Polo, Saint Tropez, Masi Gran Criterium

Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1172 Post(s)
Liked 446 Times in 319 Posts
Originally Posted by treebound
Saddle position pic was as bought, since has been swapped and adjusted. Agree that the frame could be a size or two smaller, but the reach works for me so the slammed saddle height doesn’t bother me. And at my age I tend to like the comfort of the bars being at saddle height if not a little above.
Understood treebound. My apologies for being overly opinionated. I'm glad that it is working for you. These USA made frames to me are very beautiful. Right now they are a bit un-loved by some but I think in time that oversized aluminum will come to be given the respect it deserves. Cannondale and Klein were quite artful in making the frame seem more like a "fuselage" and you can see some of the early design innovations in your frame. The cantilever dropouts were a clever idea that for some idea was later abandoned. The smooth welds at the junctions of the oversized tubes makes the paint jobs on these bikes really pop.
I am a SunTour fan as well. How are you liking the vintage components?

Last edited by masi61; 10-13-18 at 04:42 PM.
masi61 is offline  
Old 10-13-18, 04:51 PM
  #38  
aka: Mike J.
Thread Starter
 
treebound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: between Milwaukee and Sheboygan in Wisconsin
Posts: 3,405

Bikes: 1995 Trek 520 is the current primary bike.

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Liked 58 Times in 39 Posts
No apologies needed, without opinions and personal preferences life would be boring.

I like the components, no problem with them at all.

A Klein is on my someday list. When I lived in California for awhile I was at a bike shop in Auburn (up the hill from Sacramento) one day when the regional Klein rep came in with their new mtb frame, the one with the single huge thinwalled tube for a frame. They all took turns flexing the side of the tubing with their thumbs. A couple of the employees wanted to build it up right there and go for a trail ride down along the American river, and a few of the other shop employees just rolled their eyes and walked away not wanting anything to do with it. That was back sometime in the 1990’s or so.

__________________
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Life happens, don't be a spectator.
treebound is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
neikirkdk
Classic & Vintage
11
08-23-18 10:51 AM
NYBosoxfan
Classic & Vintage
3
07-30-18 09:26 AM
2lato
Classic & Vintage
21
04-19-16 10:57 AM
sugargenius
General Cycling Discussion
3
03-25-15 05:13 PM
dwellman
Classic and Vintage Bicycles: Whats it Worth? Appraisals.
10
02-01-11 10:42 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.