Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

The true weight thread

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

The true weight thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-02-19 | 08:24 PM
  #26  
Chuckk's Avatar
Groupetto Dragon-Ass
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 1,586
From: Lostin Austin, TX
A way to measure bike weight is to weigh yourself on the bathroom scale, then weigh yourself holding the bike.
Maybe not accurate to 1/100 of an ounce, but might point out if there's a large discrepancy with reality.
Chuckk is offline  
Reply
Old 01-02-19 | 08:38 PM
  #27  
Clark W. Griswold
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 18,248
Likes: 6,624
From: ,location, location

Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26

Originally Posted by nomadmax
Anybody have any experience with the Park Tool hanging scale? I'm thinking of getting one.
Have used one in various shops for years. It works well and is easy to use and clamps nicely in a Park Tool stand. There is a part of me that wants one at the house but I so infrequently weigh things or care too much but I know if I have one I would probably weigh stuff more. Granted I have more important tools to purchase first and some bikes to get finished and buy a new.
veganbikes is offline  
Reply
Old 01-02-19 | 08:54 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 681
Likes: 82
From: Bowie Texas

Bikes: Origin-8 Lactic Acid Giant Escape 2 Centurian Lemans 12 Kuwahara Tandem 1989 Ironman Expert 1988 Ironman Master

Originally Posted by Chuckk
A way to measure bike weight is to weigh yourself on the bathroom scale, then weigh yourself holding the bike.
Maybe not accurate to 1/100 of an ounce, but might point out if there's a large discrepancy with reality.
That's what I have done but its a double disappointment. First one is when I get on the scale without the bike and it reads more than it should. Then when I add the bike its heavier than I thought too. Its the scale! Its faulty! That's my story and I'm sticking to it!
TXsailor is offline  
Reply
Old 01-02-19 | 08:57 PM
  #29  
Chombi1's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,900
Likes: 1,125
Originally Posted by veganbikes
Have used one in various shops for years. It works well and is easy to use and clamps nicely in a Park Tool stand. There is a part of me that wants one at the house but I so infrequently weigh things or care too much but I know if I have one I would probably weigh stuff more. Granted I have more important tools to purchase first and some bikes to get finished and buy a new.
At the least, the dedicated bike scale beats trying to weigh your bike with your bathroom scale, doing the body weight subtraction (just never seem to be that accurate). But best thing is, you don't have to keep trying to find out who put away the digital luggage scale after the family went on that last big vacation plane ride....
Chombi1 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-02-19 | 09:37 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 10,304
Likes: 9,834
From: Utah

Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,

Weighing for me is just to give another point of comparison between the bikes. The scale I use is consistent but I don't know how accurate. But it serves what I want which is to give me weights comparative for all the bikes.




One pointless goal this winter is to get my newly picked up Lemond Versailles with it's carbon/steel frame to weigh less than my other all steel Lemonds. That means I have to beat the 18 lbs 7 ozs of the GP&GS Lemond. Right now the Versailles is 20 lbs 2 oz. I know I can pick most of that up by replacing the Bontrager Wheels with some inexpensive Fulcrum Racing 3s. No real reason to do this other than because....
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
jamesdak is offline  
Reply
Old 01-03-19 | 12:45 AM
  #31  
cinco's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 568
Likes: 34
From: Colorado

Bikes: Forty of them

Originally Posted by Fahrenheit531
HAHAHAHA due to the reflection I kept reading that as 13.89 lbs and thought this a supremely clever joke post. Was trying to figure out what might really be hanging on there, just out of frame. My favorite was a big ol' fish.
An Eisentrout perhaps?
cinco is offline  
Reply
Old 01-03-19 | 01:35 AM
  #32  
Andy_K's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 15,103
Likes: 4,733
From: Beaverton, OR

Bikes: Yes

I knew there had to be a better way to hang my fish scale. I came up with this tonight while I was waiting for the glue to dry on a tube I was repairing.



As a bonus, now I (and you!) know how much my Serotta weighs.
__________________
My Bikes
Andy_K is offline  
Reply
Old 01-03-19 | 03:16 AM
  #33  
trailangel's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 4,849
Likes: 750
From: Pasadena, CA

Bikes: Schwinn Varsity

Must show bike with pedals on or off.
19.89 lbs = pedals off.
trailangel is offline  
Reply
Old 01-03-19 | 03:37 AM
  #34  
styggno1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Steel is real
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 1,505
From: Stockholm, Sweden

Bikes: 40 - accumulated over (now - more than) 40 years

Why would one weigh a bike without pedals? Does one use it without pedals? Then it would be OK of course... This is the true weight thread.

The only variable I would think is interesting to know is frame size - and given in c/c.
styggno1 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-03-19 | 05:14 AM
  #35  
Chombi1's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,900
Likes: 1,125
Why the heck would anyone keep a bike around without pedals??
__________________
72 Line Seeker
83 Davidson Signature
84 Peugeot PSV
84 Peugeot PY10FC
84 Gitane Tour de France.
85 Vitus Plus Carbone 7
86 ALAN Record Carbonio
86 Medici Aerodynamic (Project)
88 Pinarello Montello
89 Bottecchia Professional Chorus SL
95 Trek 5500 OCLV (Project)
Chombi1 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-03-19 | 05:16 AM
  #36  
merziac's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 16,095
Likes: 9,459
From: PDX

Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2

Originally Posted by styggno1
Why would one weigh a bike without pedals? Does one use it without pedals? Then it would be OK of course... This is the true weight thread.

The only variable I would think is interesting to know is frame size - and given in c/c.
Manufacturers list without pedals so.....

Guess we could use plastic ones that weigh half of a real one.
merziac is online now  
Reply
Old 01-03-19 | 05:39 AM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 687
Likes: 114
From: north NJ

Bikes: Miyata 710, Univega Viva Sport, Centurion LeMans, Peugeot U09

Originally Posted by Chuckk
A way to measure bike weight is to weigh yourself on the bathroom scale, then weigh yourself holding the bike.
Maybe not accurate to 1/100 of an ounce, but might point out if there's a large discrepancy with reality.
Yup. I did that with my bikes and it worked fine. At least its a good basis for comparison of what I have, bike to bike.
kross57 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-03-19 | 05:52 AM
  #38  
Senior Member
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 2,529
Likes: 1,976
From: SW Ohio
Originally Posted by veganbikes
Have used one in various shops for years. It works well and is easy to use and clamps nicely in a Park Tool stand. There is a part of me that wants one at the house but I so infrequently weigh things or care too much but I know if I have one I would probably weigh stuff more. Granted I have more important tools to purchase first and some bikes to get finished and buy a new.
nomadmax is offline  
Reply
Old 01-03-19 | 06:34 AM
  #39  
SJX426's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 10,106
Likes: 2,757
From: Fredericksburg, Va

Bikes: ? Proteous, '65 Frejus TDF, '73 Bottecchia Giro d'Italia, '83 Colnago Superissimo, '84 Trek 610, '84 Trek 760, '88 Pinarello Veneto, '88 De Rosa Pro, '89 Pinarello Montello, 'Litespeed Catalyst'94 Burley Duet, 97 Specialized RockHopper, 2010 Langster

[MENTION=484927]nomadmax[/MENTION] - Yes, I have one. I am disappointed with the significant digit read out for Kg, one more would have been useful to me.

P1040471, on Flickr

May be hare to read but it is 21.15. Frame size is 58.

P1040467, on Flickr
20.5 Inch frame

P1040468, on Flickr
60cm frame

P1040469, on Flickr
61cm frame

P1040470, on Flickr
60cm frame
__________________
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.

Last edited by SJX426; 01-03-19 at 06:46 AM.
SJX426 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-03-19 | 09:17 AM
  #40  
Chuckk's Avatar
Groupetto Dragon-Ass
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 1,586
From: Lostin Austin, TX
I believe published catalog bicycle weights have been without pedals for at least the last 20 years.
"Who knows what kind of pedal system the owner wants to use?" was the justification.
Made the bike lighter, saved the manufacturer money, and let the shop sell something high markup.
There was one year when there were several bike weights were published WITHOUT WHEELS, which were optional.....
"Who knows what level wheels the customer wants on their bike?"
Made the specs and price great, but I don't think it went over well.
Chuckk is offline  
Reply
Old 01-03-19 | 09:55 AM
  #41  
Chombi1's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,900
Likes: 1,125
Originally Posted by Chuckk
I believe published catalog bicycle weights have been without pedals for at least the last 20 years.
"Who knows what kind of pedal system the owner wants to use?" was the justification.
Made the bike lighter, saved the manufacturer money, and let the shop sell something high markup.
There was one year when there were several bike weights were published WITHOUT WHEELS, which were optional.....
"Who knows what level wheels the customer wants on their bike?"
Made the specs and price great, but I don't think it went over well.
Have not bought a new bike since the 80's. Every one my brother and I bought brand new back then always had pedals. I'm pretty sure the manufacturers weighed their bikes with pedals back then. Only "variable was, the size they weigh, which some manufacturer state on their brochures.
I guess they normally sell bikes today sans pedals??
Chombi1 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-03-19 | 09:55 AM
  #42  
styggno1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Steel is real
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 1,505
From: Stockholm, Sweden

Bikes: 40 - accumulated over (now - more than) 40 years

Checked the scale today. Several "hangings" after each other. Used a carefully measured liter of water and it came in a gram under a kilo every time. That eases my mind about the scale.

Here is my 1971 Masi/Ferretti/Monark (ex Pettersson bike). It is a 59 c/c frame, with 28 spoke wheels and a lot of drilling done here and there. It also has Cobra/Omas ergal parts for the rear derailleur and crankarms. Pista pedals. It is set up as a time trial bike. Steel pedal and bottom bracket axles. As found apart from sliding the saddle a tad forward, taking off the spare tube under the saddle and removing the Campagnolo pump "umbrella".






Note - drilled handlebar.






9,455 kg = 20 lb 13,5 oz = 20,84 lb

Last edited by styggno1; 01-03-19 at 10:20 AM.
styggno1 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-03-19 | 10:08 AM
  #43  
styggno1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Steel is real
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 1,505
From: Stockholm, Sweden

Bikes: 40 - accumulated over (now - more than) 40 years

Checked the Merckx MX Leader (59 c/c frame) with 2009-2010 Super Record 11.





9,440 kg = 20 lb 12,98 oz = 20,81 lb

This one has potential if wanting to go lighter. Seatpost, pedals, stem and bar... But that will not happen as they are beautiful and I am overweight
styggno1 is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Essthreetee
Classic and Vintage Sales
6
09-18-16 05:31 PM
Essthreetee
Classic and Vintage Sales
3
10-03-15 12:34 PM
ziqpy
Folding Bikes
3
11-04-14 11:39 AM
homebrewk
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
73
12-28-11 06:33 PM
BayAreaUser
Road Cycling
8
03-03-11 11:56 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.