Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Keeper?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-05-21 | 08:23 PM
  #126  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,940
Likes: 363
Originally Posted by repechage
25 rally’s did not exist when I got these tires!
I bought a case. I would have purchased 25’s if they were around.
Basically at import cost - not complaining.

Interesting that others observed Giros chunking
It came as a surprise to me when I found them on-line. I was settling for the 23 Rallys after the old Giro that was 22 only. That little bit of extra air volume and contact patch is most welcome. I cannot ride as high/hard air pressures and the young'uns here require. Nothing way low, usually between 95-100 is plenty for this OG.

Bill the Decrepit OG
qcpmsame is offline  
Reply
Old 03-05-21 | 08:38 PM
  #127  
seedsbelize's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 15,315
Likes: 903
From: Tixkokob, Yucatán, México

Bikes: 79 Trek 930, 80 Trek 414, 84 Schwinn Letour Luxe (coupled), 92 Schwinn Paramount PDG 5

Originally Posted by Drillium Dude
I'm assuming you were refunded the difference - or did they try to make you use it as "store credit"?

For now, I'll try to make these work, but I don't think I'm going to like a max of 105psi out back

DD
Yes. Refunded. But I have another issue. Over at Totally Tubular, they are espousing very low pressures on tubulars. And you can't get them high enough. You must be riding very good roads.
seedsbelize is offline  
Reply
Old 03-05-21 | 08:40 PM
  #128  
Road Fan's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 17,195
Likes: 761
From: Ann Arbor, MI

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Originally Posted by qcpmsame
It came as a surprise to me when I found them on-line. I was settling for the 23 Rallys after the old Giro that was 22 only. That little bit of extra air volume and contact patch is most welcome. I cannot ride as high/hard air pressures and the young'uns here require. Nothing way low, usually between 95-100 is plenty for this OG.

Bill the Decrepit OG
Bill, if that's decrepit, then I've been decrepit since about the age of 18, since I started filling my tubulars that way about 1970 or so.
Road Fan is offline  
Reply
Old 03-05-21 | 08:52 PM
  #129  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,940
Likes: 363
Originally Posted by Road Fan
Bill, if that's decrepit, then I've been decrepit since about the age of 18, since I started filling my tubulars that way about 1970 or so.
I've been decrepit for quite a while now
qcpmsame is offline  
Reply
Old 03-05-21 | 08:54 PM
  #130  
Road Fan's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 17,195
Likes: 761
From: Ann Arbor, MI

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Originally Posted by qcpmsame
It came as a surprise to me when I found them on-line. I was settling for the 23 Rallys after the old Giro that was 22 only. That little bit of extra air volume and contact patch is most welcome. I cannot ride as high/hard air pressures and the young'uns here require. Nothing way low, usually between 95-100 is plenty for this OG.

Bill the Decrepit OG
Bill, if that's decrepit, then I've been decrepit since about the age of 18, since I started filling my tubulars that way about 1970 or so.
Road Fan is offline  
Reply
Old 03-05-21 | 11:23 PM
  #131  
Drillium Dude's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned.
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,292
Likes: 4,863
From: PAZ
Originally Posted by seedsbelize
Yes. Refunded. But I have another issue. Over at Totally Tubular, they are espousing very low pressures on tubulars. And you can't get them high enough. You must be riding very good roads.
Well, I will give it a go at 105 just to see what it feels like, but since I'd already detected a little "squishiness" at 120 I'm not too hopeful. And yeah, I know the trend seems to be lower pressures - but on fatter tires. These are only 25s, and the biggest I can fit, too. In any case, I'm out for a different riding experience and prefer Ferrari over Cadillac handling

DD
Drillium Dude is offline  
Reply
Old 03-06-21 | 08:27 AM
  #132  
Road Fan's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 17,195
Likes: 761
From: Ann Arbor, MI

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

DD, for me it's not a trend. I started riding tubulars on the streets of Chicago when I was 18 and bought a bike with tubulars. It took a while to learn how and where I could get enough pressure to harden the tire (21 mm cottons, I was afraid of destroying the skinny little rims in the first month of riding). I also noticed harshness and did not have the spare $$ start fine tuning my tire selection. I didn't even own a capable pump, beyond the Silca Impero that came with the bike. I tried just bleeding down the tires a tiny bit, and whatever I accomplished helped the ride a lot and did not make it feel slower. I also did not start destroying rims. After I had a Silca Pista, I could see the pressure, and the good spot was between 90 and 100. That's just the way it worked.

I never timed myself, so I don't know if harder was faster (typical roadie wisdom, even in the 1970s), or if a little softer was faster (Bicycle Quarterly wisdom). I just know I liked the 95 psi area a lot better than 110 and up.
Road Fan is offline  
Reply
Old 03-06-21 | 10:09 AM
  #133  
seedsbelize's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 15,315
Likes: 903
From: Tixkokob, Yucatán, México

Bikes: 79 Trek 930, 80 Trek 414, 84 Schwinn Letour Luxe (coupled), 92 Schwinn Paramount PDG 5

I'm finding that, with higher pressures (110) the tire (almost) skates over the bumps in the chipseal. Higher than that might be better, but the top rating of the tire is 110. I'm not seeing a lot of difference at 90. But it's a 22mm tire. The 25mm at 90 feels squishy, and I have never enjoyed that sensation. On a side note, I forgot to check the front tire of my town bike, yesterday, and rode it at around 25 psi. A lovely ride. Another 25mm tire. Even my town bike is a road bike, with upright bars.
seedsbelize is offline  
Reply
Old 03-06-21 | 06:14 PM
  #134  
Drillium Dude's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned.
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,292
Likes: 4,863
From: PAZ
Originally Posted by seedsbelize
I'm finding that, with higher pressures (110) the tire (almost) skates over the bumps in the chipseal. Higher than that might be better, but the top rating of the tire is 110. I'm not seeing a lot of difference at 90. But it's a 22mm tire. The 25mm at 90 feels squishy, and I have never enjoyed that sensation. On a side note, I forgot to check the front tire of my town bike, yesterday, and rode it at around 25 psi. A lovely ride. Another 25mm tire. Even my town bike is a road bike, with upright bars.
Perhaps this is just a feeling I'll have to adapt to. It's just a little disconcerting, always feeling like the back tire is going to bottom out and ding/dent the rim - or worse. Anyway, today I decided to get in one last run before the forecast turns again to rain (and I head out of town Monday); wanted to get a feel for the brakes after I swapped out the CLB alloy housings for standard grey Campy offerings instead. The good news is the braking has a much more direct feel. I gave the tires 105psi and although I noticed no issues on the front (except I could visibly see the deflection of the sidewalls when standing up and putting weight on the front wheel - and the funny creaky sound which is still there when I do the same) the rear did feel like it wanted to bottom out whenever I went over a root bump or crack.

Still and all, the experience of riding this bike is awesome, and some of that comes from the tubular wheelset, for sure. For one thing, the wheels being lighter, they spin up quickly - and take less effort to do so. They also keep going with less effort. The next true test will be to take them up a long, long climb and see how they feel climbing while seated - I already know what it feels like standing up and making an effort.

So, I'm not giving up on them because I'm seeing the beneficial side already; just wish I'd gotten the tires I ordered and didn't have to be concerned currently about being careful with lower-than-used-to pressures.

From today's ride:



DD
Drillium Dude is offline  
Reply
Old 03-10-21 | 12:16 PM
  #135  
SJX426's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 10,106
Likes: 2,757
From: Fredericksburg, Va

Bikes: ? Proteous, '65 Frejus TDF, '73 Bottecchia Giro d'Italia, '83 Colnago Superissimo, '84 Trek 610, '84 Trek 760, '88 Pinarello Veneto, '88 De Rosa Pro, '89 Pinarello Montello, 'Litespeed Catalyst'94 Burley Duet, 97 Specialized RockHopper, 2010 Langster

WRT the comment about the bump due to the valve not seating in the rim. I am in the process of reading "The art of Wheel Building" where the author states that this is sometimes a problem. His solution or minimizing the impact, is to champfer the valve hole. The example picture shows material being removed toward the side wall of the rims.

hoping to get out today for a ride later. Temps should be really good!
Enjoy the ride!
__________________
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
SJX426 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-10-21 | 04:35 PM
  #136  
Dean51's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 670
Likes: 344
From: Olympic Peninsula, WA

Bikes: '8? Ciocc Mockba 80, '82 Ron Cooper, '84 Allez, '86 Tommasini Racing, '86? Klein Quantum, '87 Ciocc Designer 84, '95 Trek 5500, '98 Litespeed Classic, '98 S-Works Mtb, 2017 Storck TIX

Originally Posted by SJX426
WRT the comment about the bump due to the valve not seating in the rim. I am in the process of reading "The art of Wheel Building" where the author states that this is sometimes a problem. His solution or minimizing the impact, is to champfer the valve hole. The example picture shows material being removed toward the side wall of the rims.

hoping to get out today for a ride later. Temps should be really good!
Enjoy the ride!
I chamfered the valve hole on one of my tubular wheel sets to address "the bump". I was reluctant to remove too much material, but it made an improvement.

Dean
__________________
Roll Me Up and Smoke Me When I Die
Dean51 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.