Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Cold setting risks

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Cold setting risks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-25-21, 08:10 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
bikemig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435

Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones

Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times in 2,079 Posts
Originally Posted by TullySteve
I'm not 100% certain on the original year. I bought it around 74 from a guy who raced a year or two (don't remember). I know the original equipment (still have most of it) and that puts it in around that year. (FWIW: Campy Nuovo Record der/levers; Mafac racer brakes; Normandy Competition Luxe hubs/Weinman rims; Pivo stem; Brooks pro saddle (lost in a move, damn!); Stronglight bb/crank/headset. Atom pedals). I'm not clear on the steel differences: if it happens to be 531 rear will it not take kindly to cold setting?
Nah you can set it if its Reynolds. From 1970 to '73, the rear triangle was not Reynolds per the catalogs but I don't know whether it is hi tensile steel or not. It would not surprise me if it were though. If it is, then you will find it easy to spread the rear triangle. I think the '74 is also not full Reynolds. The catalog is not as clear as it could be on this but there is a poster here with a '74 and the sticker was Reynolds 531 main frame and fork.

https://www.velo-pages.com/main.php?g2_itemId=33193

Does your bike still have the Reynolds sticker? A pic would help here.

If you have all the original stuff, I'd be tempted to do a resto mod.

Last edited by bikemig; 06-25-21 at 08:15 AM.
bikemig is offline  
Old 06-25-21, 08:44 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 65

Bikes: 1973 Moto Grand Record (project); 1990s Moser Leader AX; 1982(?) Specialized Rockhopper beater city bike.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times in 16 Posts
Originally Posted by bikemig
Nah you can set it if its Reynolds. From 1970 to '73, the rear triangle was not Reynolds per the catalogs but I don't know whether it is hi tensile steel or not. It would not surprise me if it were though. If it is, then you will find it easy to spread the rear triangle. I think the '74 is also not full Reynolds. The catalog is not as clear as it could be on this but there is a poster here with a '74 and the sticker was Reynolds 531 main frame and fork.

https://www.velo-pages.com/main.php?g2_itemId=33193

Does your bike still have the Reynolds sticker? A pic would help here.

If you have all the original stuff, I'd be tempted to do a resto mod.
Unfortunately almost all the decals are gone, including the Reynolds sticker. There are just a few artifacts on the downtube, and the headtube sticker (not a physical badge) is still intact. I do not still have the Campy rear der (I had swapped it out for a Suntour with a wider range cluster for hilly riding and touring with panniers. I think I know where it is in my old barn unless the new owners really cleaned out!) or the Brooks saddle, or that original gear cluster. When it was in better shape 20 years ago I looked into resto and was not encouraged about its value due to not being "top of the line", and with kids & such that was the end of that. I'm more interested in using it for my riding style now, not a restoration. At the risk of being asked to leave this forum thread LOL.
TullySteve is offline  
Old 06-25-21, 10:56 AM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
bikemig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435

Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones

Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times in 2,079 Posts
The important thing is that it is your bike and you know what kind of riding you do so get it on the road. I'm suggesting that 2 x 7 gearing, 126 OLD wheels, and a crank you can run smaller rings on (say a Stronglight 99) may do the job for you as well.
bikemig is offline  
Old 06-25-21, 11:08 AM
  #29  
Full Member
 
ZudeJammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 170

Bikes: Fuji Touring Series V 1985, Motobecane Grand Touring 1982, Specialized Stumpjumper 1993, Raleigh International 1972, Raleigh Grand Prix 1972, Kuwahara Count 1983, Trek Cirrus 1987, Shogun 2001 1983, Cannondale SM700 1990

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 90 Post(s)
Liked 174 Times in 96 Posts
Baby steps with the SB method of leveraging of the frame or you will overbend, I went back and forth a bunch taking a 531 frame from 110 to 130 because I was not patient enough. Luckily the frame rides great so overbending a tiny bit shouldn't matter. (used the RJ diy tool method of alighting the dropouts too)
ZudeJammer is offline  
Old 06-25-21, 12:31 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
gearbasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Sitting on my butt in front of a computer
Posts: 1,566
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 452 Post(s)
Liked 907 Times in 383 Posts
I slightly over bent one frame was able to bend it back with fairly light pressure using only my hands. It was like the frame wanted to go back.
gearbasher is offline  
Old 06-25-21, 04:29 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
scarlson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Medford MA
Posts: 2,089

Bikes: Ron Cooper touring, 1959 Jack Taylor 650b ladyback touring tandem, Vitus 979, Joe Bell painted Claud Butler Dalesman, Colin Laing curved tube tandem, heavily-Dilberted 1982 Trek 6xx, René Herse tandem

Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 964 Post(s)
Liked 1,451 Times in 723 Posts
They're always easier to push together than they are to spread apart. Just my experience. And 531 will be harder, but you can do it just fine. Just helps to know what to expect.

Going out now to ride on my Ron Cooper, spread from 126 to 135 and I've done 6 months of loaded touring since then.
__________________
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
scarlson is offline  
Old 07-01-21, 02:15 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 65

Bikes: 1973 Moto Grand Record (project); 1990s Moser Leader AX; 1982(?) Specialized Rockhopper beater city bike.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times in 16 Posts
Originally Posted by bikemig
Nah you can set it if its Reynolds. From 1970 to '73, the rear triangle was not Reynolds per the catalogs but I don't know whether it is hi tensile steel or not. It would not surprise me if it were though. If it is, then you will find it easy to spread the rear triangle. I think the '74 is also not full Reynolds. The catalog is not as clear as it could be on this but there is a poster here with a '74 and the sticker was Reynolds 531 main frame and fork.

https://www.velo-pages.com/main.php?g2_itemId=33193

Does your bike still have the Reynolds sticker? A pic would help here.

If you have all the original stuff, I'd be tempted to do a resto mod.
Well I was successful using the threaded rod through the dropouts method. I took a few days just nudging it along. I think I went out to around 165 before it came back to 130. Using a string (no other tools available here), the frame appears to be fairly symmetrical. Now I need to align the dropouts.
TullySteve is offline  
Likes For TullySteve:
Old 07-01-21, 03:31 PM
  #33  
framebuilder
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Niles, Michigan
Posts: 1,471
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 615 Post(s)
Liked 1,916 Times in 656 Posts
Originally Posted by TullySteve
Well I was successful using the threaded rod through the dropouts method. I took a few days just nudging it along. I think I went out to around 165 before it came back to 130. Using a string (no other tools available here), the frame appears to be fairly symmetrical. Now I need to align the dropouts.
Let me suggest a DIY method that is superior to the string method. Perhaps you can get an inexpensive 4 foot aluminum level - the kind that are sold in places like Lowes and Home Depot. You can do a lot more with a level (or any straight piece of metal) than you can with string. Unfortunately the inferior string method is always mentioned when the subject of DIY alignment comes up.

Your 1st goal is to see if either your seat or down tube are leaning over to one side or the other. It can help if you have your bottom bracket cups without the axle screwed into your bottom bracket shell. These can be a truer data point than the face of your BB shell. Your level placed against these cups can allow you to measure any alignment discrepancies. A clamp to hold the level against the cup along side the seat tube can be helpful if you don't have 3 hands. Measure the distance from the level to the seat tube close to the BB shell. Now measure the distance of the seat tube up by the seat lug. Of course they should agree. If not then you should bend the seat tube until it is straight up. This alignment is important if your shoes are cleated into pedals to avoid aggravating your knees. If you can't do this then don't bother with a string method because that system only works (barely) if the front triangle is aligned. After bending the seat tube straight, now check the down tube the same way. Start with a measurement near the BB and then up by the head tube. Bend as necessary. Now you are ready to check the rear triangle.

Place your 4' level against the head tube and seat tube. It is best if your level is as close as possible to the down tube but not of course on a lug. Now measure the distance from the edge of the level to the inside face of the dropout. Flip the level to the other side and measure again. Of course they should agree or bend the chain stays until the dropouts are the same distance from the level as well as being whatever distance you require. 130mm?

There are various methods to check if your head tube is twisted including sighting along the head and seat tube to see if they look parallel. If you have a flat surface, you can try to get a 4 point touch with 4 blocks under the ends of both the seat and head tube.

It is possible to make your level a more useful alignment tool by taping a M5 hole at one end and using the bolt as a distance tool instead of a small ruler held against the level (to solve the problem of not having 3 hands available). The bolt can be improved by sharpening the end to a rounded point.

If all of this seem like too much, than of course you should take it to a frame builder that has all the right equipment and knowledge to do the job properly. The fork in particular can be very difficult to check the alignment without fixtures.
Doug Fattic is offline  
Likes For Doug Fattic:
Old 07-02-21, 08:28 AM
  #34  
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times in 1,579 Posts
I've used the string method thus far, but good stuff for next time I have to check alignment/adjust spacing. Thanks Doug Fattic !
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.