Chain Length....
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 2,032
Likes: 2,023
Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, '72 Peugeot PX-10, 78 Raleigh Comp GS, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem
Chain Length....
OK, I used the big chainring-largest cog +1", bypassing the DR to determine chain length. But this doesn't seem to look right- it's on the largest cog and 42T chainring (I'm running 45, 42, 30...). Should the DR be extending this far forward, or do I need to add a link or 2? (It is shifting fine, BTW...). Thx
#2
Senior Member


Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 14,160
Likes: 5,286
From: Portland, OR
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Will the bottom pulley swing forward another inch? If so, I'd say you dialed this in perfectly. Looks isn't the issue. You want the chain long enough to allow for a hiccup on the freewheel/cassette and not tear up the derailleur. (That torn up derailleur leads to all sorts of other bad consequences.) But a chain longer than that leads to sloppier shifting on the smaller cogs. Now, if this derailleur is at its limit for swing forward, add links!
If to your eyes, this doesn't look right, well good. A reminder this is a gear you do not want to be in.
If to your eyes, this doesn't look right, well good. A reminder this is a gear you do not want to be in.
#3
Senior Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 549
From: Pacific Northwest
Bikes: ‘87 Marinoni SLX Sports Tourer, ‘79 Miyata 912 by Gugificazione
OK, I used the big chainring-largest cog +1", bypassing the DR to determine chain length. But this doesn't seem to look right- it's on the largest cog and 42T chainring (I'm running 45, 42, 30...). Should the DR be extending this far forward, or do I need to add a link or 2? (It is shifting fine, BTW...). Thx


#4
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 872
Likes: 601
From: Concord, NC
Bikes: 1984 Bianchi Tipo Corsa, 1985 Cannondale SM600 (24/26)
Will the bottom pulley swing forward another inch? If so, I'd say you dialed this in perfectly. Looks isn't the issue. You want the chain long enough to allow for a hiccup on the freewheel/cassette and not tear up the derailleur. (That torn up derailleur leads to all sorts of other bad consequences.) But a chain longer than that leads to sloppier shifting on the smaller cogs. Now, if this derailleur is at its limit for swing forward, add links!
If to your eyes, this doesn't look right, well good. A reminder this is a gear you do not want to be in.
If to your eyes, this doesn't look right, well good. A reminder this is a gear you do not want to be in.
You know what you've set up, just be cautious.
#5
ambulatory senior

Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 6,451
Likes: 4,515
From: Peoria Il
Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.
We're it me I would make sure it was long enough for big-big but I am a forgetful old man who may choose the wrong gear. If you don't have that issue pedal on!
#6
Senior Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 549
From: Pacific Northwest
Bikes: ‘87 Marinoni SLX Sports Tourer, ‘79 Miyata 912 by Gugificazione
+1 to that ^^^.
I ride often at night with steep hills all over Seattle. It’s easy to forget which ring I’m on when i can’t see it clearly, so I always adjust the chain for safe big-big shifts. There’s no penalty beyond a bit of noise for a slightly too long chain, but as [MENTION=392125]79pmooney[/MENTION] said, there are BIG consequences for a chain that’s too short.
I ride often at night with steep hills all over Seattle. It’s easy to forget which ring I’m on when i can’t see it clearly, so I always adjust the chain for safe big-big shifts. There’s no penalty beyond a bit of noise for a slightly too long chain, but as [MENTION=392125]79pmooney[/MENTION] said, there are BIG consequences for a chain that’s too short.
#7
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 2,032
Likes: 2,023
Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, '72 Peugeot PX-10, 78 Raleigh Comp GS, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem
Yeah, in the photo the front is on the 42t, and I do know that big-big is a no-no, though that doesn't mean at some point if I'm not paying attention it might not happen... But the RD does have an additional 1" of forward pivot from where it is in the photo. But I may just add another link to play it safe....
#8
Yeah, in the photo the front is on the 42t, and I do know that big-big is a no-no, though that doesn't mean at some point if I'm not paying attention it might not happen... But the RD does have an additional 1" of forward pivot from where it is in the photo. But I may just add another link to play it safe....
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
#9
Senior Member


Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,478
Likes: 4,884
From: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, 86 De Rosa Pro, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
FWIW
Ability to do big/big is hard requirement....learned that, but got lucky was going slow and was able to fall gently and not hurt me or drive train
I have grown to really like the small/small chain sizing method.... use it for vintage gear when i am pushing limits and for modern gear
Ability to do big/big is hard requirement....learned that, but got lucky was going slow and was able to fall gently and not hurt me or drive train
I have grown to really like the small/small chain sizing method.... use it for vintage gear when i am pushing limits and for modern gear
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can.
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can.
#10
feros ferio

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 22,398
Likes: 1,865
From: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
I am with the others -- large-large cross-chaining should not lock anything up or bend chain, chainrings, or derailleur. I ran a 48-45-34 / 13-15-17-19-21-24 half-step-plus granny on the PKN-10, with a short cage SunTour Cyclone II rear derailleur, and I accepted a small amount of chain slack in small-small to protect myself in large-large.
Aside: I love half-step-plus-granny gearing, and your 3-tooth drop up front is great with the 2-tooth progression among your smaller cogs.
You are lucky your chain doesn't catch between the chainrings. I did lots of half-steps, 1/3-steps (50-47-44), and half-step-plus-grannies on older cranks, but as Sheldon Brown presciently cautioned me, I could not make a 53-50-39 work with a modern Campag. spider. I settled for a 50-42-39 half-step-plus-overdrive / 1.5-step-half-step, which actually worked out pretty decently.
Aside: I love half-step-plus-granny gearing, and your 3-tooth drop up front is great with the 2-tooth progression among your smaller cogs.
You are lucky your chain doesn't catch between the chainrings. I did lots of half-steps, 1/3-steps (50-47-44), and half-step-plus-grannies on older cranks, but as Sheldon Brown presciently cautioned me, I could not make a 53-50-39 work with a modern Campag. spider. I settled for a 50-42-39 half-step-plus-overdrive / 1.5-step-half-step, which actually worked out pretty decently.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#11
Senior Member


Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,043
Likes: 924
From: Washington County, Vermont, USA
Bikes: 1966 Dawes Double Blue, 1976 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1975 Raleigh Sprite 27, 1980 Univega Viva Sport, 1971 Gitane Tour de France, 1984 Lotus Classique, 1976 Motobecane Grand Record
Yeah, the big-big problem with a too short chain is just too dangerous of a beast to mess with. I did it once...once! You're riding along, going up a hill, feeling like you need a lower gear, shift to a bigger cog without realizing you're in the big chainring, and WHAMMY! Your drive train just exploded -- chain into the spokes, probably cutting a few of them, bent hanger, and your derailleur has twisted itself into a pretzel. It doesn't even necessarily feel like you're forcing the shift -- it didn't for me -- the forces at work are just much more powerful than you'd imagine.
__________________
www.redclovercomponents.com
"Progress might have been all right once, but it has gone on too long."
--Ogden Nash
www.redclovercomponents.com
"Progress might have been all right once, but it has gone on too long."
--Ogden Nash
#12
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 2,032
Likes: 2,023
Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, '72 Peugeot PX-10, 78 Raleigh Comp GS, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem
Aside: I love half-step-plus-granny gearing, and your 3-tooth drop up front is great with the 2-tooth progression among your smaller cogs.
You are lucky your chain doesn't catch between the chainrings. I did lots of half-steps, 1/3-steps (50-47-44), and half-step-plus-grannies on older cranks, but as Sheldon Brown presciently cautioned me, I could not make a 53-50-39 work with a modern Campag. spider. I settled for a 50-42-39 half-step-plus-overdrive / 1.5-step-half-step, which actually worked out pretty decently.
You are lucky your chain doesn't catch between the chainrings. I did lots of half-steps, 1/3-steps (50-47-44), and half-step-plus-grannies on older cranks, but as Sheldon Brown presciently cautioned me, I could not make a 53-50-39 work with a modern Campag. spider. I settled for a 50-42-39 half-step-plus-overdrive / 1.5-step-half-step, which actually worked out pretty decently.
The FD shifting is taking a little getting used to. Going from the small ring to the middle I often end up over-shifting to the big ring, and a couple times I've had the chain come off shifting from the middle to the big. Seems like the limit screw has to be set just right so I've got enough trimming to stop rubbing when in big ring/smallest cog, but tight enough to keep it from coming off when making a fast shift from the middle to the big ring. Seems like it's only happened when I've shifted without a lot of load on the pedals.. The 45t ring was originally the inner ring, so it's lacking the little tab to prevent the chain from falling between the arm & the ring- thinking about drilling & tapping so I can put it on. And I just need to get better at finessing my shifting. The Criterium shifters need to be pretty well tightened down to keep from slipping and aren't exactly the lightest shifting. Looking forward to (eventual) Retrofriction levers....
#13
Senior Member


Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 12,565
Likes: 2,739
From: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma
I always cut my chains to accommodate big-big. Failure to do this could lead to absolute destruction of the rear derailleur if someone, say a friend that I loaned my bike to, does not understand the ring to cog relationship.
__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
#14
Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 6,998
Likes: 3,842
From: Wake Forest, NC
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
I have grown to really like the small/small chain sizing method.... use it for vintage gear when i am pushing limits and for modern gear
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QuhHn7HaZcQ
#16
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 22,676
Likes: 2,642
From: CID
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
OP's picture looks fine to me. Yes, it's unusual to see the tension pulley pointing forward, but if you are able to push the cage up further with your finger while it is in the big-big combination before it hits any stops or pulls tight, then you are good.
#18
Senior Member


Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,013
Likes: 1,052
From: Toledo Ohio
Bikes: 1964 Huffy Sportsman, 1972 Fuji Newest, 1973 Schwinn Super Sport (3), 1982 Trek 412, 1983 Trek 700, 1989 Miyata 1000LT, 1991 Bianchi Boardwalk, plus others
Suntour VX-S
I am with the others -- large-large cross-chaining should not lock anything up or bend chain, chainrings, or derailleur. I ran a 48-45-34 / 13-15-17-19-21-24 half-step-plus granny on the PKN-10, with a short cage SunTour Cyclone II rear derailleur, and I accepted a small amount of chain slack in small-small to protect myself in large-large.
Aside: I love half-step-plus-granny gearing, and your 3-tooth drop up front is great with the 2-tooth progression among your smaller cogs.
You are lucky your chain doesn't catch between the chainrings. I did lots of half-steps, 1/3-steps (50-47-44), and half-step-plus-grannies on older cranks, but as Sheldon Brown presciently cautioned me, I could not make a 53-50-39 work with a modern Campag. spider. I settled for a 50-42-39 half-step-plus-overdrive / 1.5-step-half-step, which actually worked out pretty decently.
Aside: I love half-step-plus-granny gearing, and your 3-tooth drop up front is great with the 2-tooth progression among your smaller cogs.
You are lucky your chain doesn't catch between the chainrings. I did lots of half-steps, 1/3-steps (50-47-44), and half-step-plus-grannies on older cranks, but as Sheldon Brown presciently cautioned me, I could not make a 53-50-39 work with a modern Campag. spider. I settled for a 50-42-39 half-step-plus-overdrive / 1.5-step-half-step, which actually worked out pretty decently.
#19
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 813
1" or 2 half-links is the rule I've always heard/used. It's enough.
OP's picture looks fine to me. Yes, it's unusual to see the tension pulley pointing forward, but if you are able to push the cage up further with your finger while it is in the big-big combination before it hits any stops or pulls tight, then you are good.
OP's picture looks fine to me. Yes, it's unusual to see the tension pulley pointing forward, but if you are able to push the cage up further with your finger while it is in the big-big combination before it hits any stops or pulls tight, then you are good.





