Any NON-UGLY threadless stems?
#4
Sunshine
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 18,709
Likes: 10,247
From: Des Moines, IA
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
I think basic Alloy 7 UL stems are 'non-ugly', but others might dry heave at them.
I like em because they are simple, lightweight, decal can be easily removed, come in -7 and -17 degree, and are not bulky.

#6
Full Member


Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 406
Likes: 379
From: NYC
Bikes: '90 Cannondale ST1000; 2018 Cannondale SuperSix Evo Hi-Mod; 2022 Cannondale Topstone 2L
I agree with bboy about the Velo Orange offering. I also find Cannondale's One Stem to be incredibly simple and pleasant. Nice smooth transitions from the main body to where the bolts screws in. The only knock against it is that it's only offered in black. I'd also group the Wren stem in with that Cannondale One Stem. This Blue Lug Select, Dixna made stem is also quite pleasing.
#7
Junior Member

Joined: Aug 2024
Posts: 114
Likes: 78
From: Brooklyn, NY
Bikes: 1988 Pinarello Cadore, 1985 Mercian King of Mercia
Had a silver and black one of these on my last threadless stem bikes.
Nitto x Fairweather MT-31
https://global.bluelug.com/fairweath...em-silver.html


Nitto x Fairweather MT-31
https://global.bluelug.com/fairweath...em-silver.html


#8
This Nitto example shimmed down from 28.6 for the 25.4 steerer won’t win any aesthetic awards but to me it’s not completely out-of-place on my c. 2005 Alberto Masi. If I cared more I’d remove the branding but it’s what it is.

In my mind this is what threadless stems are up against and this is about as good as it gets…

Nitto also do what I reckon is a pretty fine CNC-machined threadless stem which looks ok in certain situations…


In my mind this is what threadless stems are up against and this is about as good as it gets…

Nitto also do what I reckon is a pretty fine CNC-machined threadless stem which looks ok in certain situations…

__________________
Nothing quite says wall hanger like drillium toe straps
Nothing quite says wall hanger like drillium toe straps
#10
feros ferio

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 22,403
Likes: 1,871
From: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
I still so no real benefit and a major disadvantage in height adjustment to threadless.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#11
Senior Member
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 5,093
Likes: 4,590
From: USA - Pittsburgh / Southwest PA
Bikes: Cannondale - Gary Fisher - Giant - Litespeed - Schwinn Paramount - Schwinn (lugged steel) - Trek OCLV
it’s not even close
#12
But the weight savings are about as significant as any other thing you can do to a bike.
#13
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 809
Likes: 132
What makes a threadless stem ugly? Knowing that will help answer your question.
I think basic Alloy 7 UL stems are 'non-ugly', but others might dry heave at them.
I like em because they are simple, lightweight, decal can be easily removed, come in -7 and -17 degree, and are not bulky.

I think basic Alloy 7 UL stems are 'non-ugly', but others might dry heave at them.
I like em because they are simple, lightweight, decal can be easily removed, come in -7 and -17 degree, and are not bulky.

#15
Tinker-er



Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 1,570
From: Mid-Atlantic
Bikes: 1956 Rudge; 1981 Miyata; 1994 Breezer; 1987 Raleigh Mtn Trials; 1952 R.O. Harrison; 1994 Concorde; 1949 Rotrax; 1964 A.S. Gillott; Early 60s Frejus; ~1979 RRB track; Unknown Interwar track
The Steel Salsa Moto ones look nice to me. The old Specialized S-Works from about 1995 looked awesome.
Phil
Phil
#16
Happy banana slug

Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,560
Likes: 2,509
From: Arcata, California, U.S., North America, Earth, Saggitarius Arm, Milky Way
Bikes: 1984 Araya MB 26L, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper Sport, 1993 Hard Rock Ultra, 1994 Trek Multitrack 750, 1995 Trek Singletrack 930
You need an allen wrench and spacers for threadless, and an allen wrench for quill. I've never needed a mallet.
#17
Senior Member


Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 14,171
Likes: 5,299
From: Portland, OR
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
#18
#19
Junior Member

Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 193
Likes: 130
From: New Orleans
Bikes: Aerotek 4000, Trek 950, Huffy Nel Lusso
The most beautiful threadless stem I've seen is the Nitto UI-87. Hard to find a picture that captures it, but I swiped this picture from here.

Much more impressive in person if you can appreciate the CNC aesthetic. Thomson stems aren't bad but the Nitto is more elegant.

Much more impressive in person if you can appreciate the CNC aesthetic. Thomson stems aren't bad but the Nitto is more elegant.
#22
So your quill stem bolt is so un-tight that the wedge just falls out of the bottom when you loosen the bolt, no matter how long it has been there?
"If the bolt is loose but the stem will not come out, strike the bolt using a mallet and punch. This will break the wedge free from the head tube."
https://www.parktool.com/en-us/blog/...on-quill-stems
Torque wrenches are never needed for quill and it it's properly greased and not tightened far more than needed, any old object of weight works just fine. No mallet needed. I love that I can change height mid ride and the adjustment is typically a lot more than can be had with most stock threadless steerers. (And no spacers on top when the quill is slammed.)
I guess I don't understand why someone would need to change their stem height on a ride other than when they are fitting the bike. But I'll add another advantage of threadless: On small bikes, the shorter steerer will often not allow a quill stem to go as far down as a threadless stem due to a taper on the inside of the steerer.
I like threadless and quills, but it is strange how people re-invent the universe to make one seem better than the other.
#23
I know they have practical and mechanical advantages.
I just think they are inherently ugly.
Yep, all of ‘em.
Even the ones on the bikes I own.
I just think they are inherently ugly.
Yep, all of ‘em.
Even the ones on the bikes I own.
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
#24
I don't know.

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 1,233
From: South Meriden, CT
Bikes: '90 B'stone RB-1, '92 B'stone RB-2, '89 SuperGo Access Comp, '03 Access 69er, '23 Trek 520, '14 Ritchey Road Logic, '09 Kestrel Evoke, '08 Windsor Tourist, '17 Surly Wednesday, '89 Centurion Accordo, '15 CruX, '17 Ridley X-Night, '89 Marinoni
the Ritchey Comp with the cast (machined?) plate is nice. Still ugly?

















