Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Comparing 1" quill stems

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Comparing 1" quill stems

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-16-25 | 01:43 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Full Member
Community Builder
 
Joined: Aug 2024
Posts: 297
Likes: 103
From: Appleton, Wisconsin
Comparing 1" quill stems

When a stem measurement is given stating to minimun insertion point, it's this distance, correct?


Last edited by coolhandjjl; 11-16-25 at 01:47 PM.
coolhandjjl is offline  
Reply
Old 11-16-25 | 02:13 PM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2025
Posts: 133
Likes: 131
According to yours and this other sketch, both seem to be correct:


Whether everyone plays by the same rules is another story?
stemwinder is offline  
Reply
Old 11-16-25 | 02:17 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Full Member
Community Builder
 
Joined: Aug 2024
Posts: 297
Likes: 103
From: Appleton, Wisconsin
Great diagram. Thanks!
coolhandjjl is offline  
Reply
Old 11-16-25 | 04:41 PM
  #4  
bulgie's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,702
Likes: 5,483
From: Seattle
Those aren't 1" stems though, they are 7/8" (22.2 mm), unless possibly French (22.0 mm) or Schwinn/BMX (0.833").

Inch quill stems exist, they fit in 1-1/8" ("OS") threaded steerers. Rare, because threaded went away a short time after 9/8" steerers became a thing. There was a brief window there, where steerers were OS but still threaded and used with quill stems.

Measuring the height of a stem that way is illogical, but of course people do illogical things all the time. If that's the accepted, conventional way to measure, then I won't fight it. But the only logical way is to measure the height to the centerline of the handlebar clamp. Otherwise two stems with the same height measurement (measured your way) could put the bars at wildly different heights. Like many inches difference, if the extension tube is angled up like a dirt-drop, versus angled down like a track bike. The height of the bar is what matters, not how long the quill tube is.

You could measure to the height of the horizontal line through the handlebar, but that's not really a measurement of the stem itself, since it depends on the head tube angle, which varies some between bikes. So I think stems should be measured to the line through the handlebar center that's perpendicular to the quill. So you can measure it right on the stem itself, without knowing what the head tube angle will be after it's mounted.

But that's just me. The important thing is to say how the measurement was taken, otherwise the number is fairly useless.

bulgie is offline  
Reply
Old 11-16-25 | 05:46 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Full Member
Community Builder
 
Joined: Aug 2024
Posts: 297
Likes: 103
From: Appleton, Wisconsin
Yah, should have said stems for 1” steerer tubes. Sorry. I figured since this was in the vintage forum, that would be clear.
coolhandjjl is offline  
Reply
Old 11-16-25 | 06:59 PM
  #6  
bulgie's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,702
Likes: 5,483
From: Seattle
Note Nitto measures them different ways depending on the model, quite illogical! (I wanna say "stupid" but maybe they have reasons?)


Even with the classic "7" shape stems, they measure 'em two different ways. Note the Extension measurement, in pink, gives you a different number for the same size stem, they way they measure in the first drawing on the left compared to the 2nd drawing (top row middle). The difference is 5 mm. WOEWTT? (what on earth were they thinking?)

To get the length from the min.insert line on these, you'd have to know how far up from the bottom they put their line. I think it's about 65 mm, but I haven't measured one lately so don't trust me on that.

I still have a lot of respect for Nitto, but a bit less due to this crazy measuring system (or set of systems!)

Back before the "New Pearl" ("NP"), when their top of the line was just called Pearl, this is how they were measured (drawing from the box a Pearl came in):



Note it's measured perpendicular to the quill, which is the method I prefer, but measuring along the extension (whether horizontal or not) is also OK, as long as you tell people which you're using. Nitto uses both!
bulgie is offline  
Reply
Old 11-16-25 | 07:00 PM
  #7  
bulgie's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,702
Likes: 5,483
From: Seattle
Originally Posted by coolhandjjl
Yah, should have said stems for 1” steerer tubes. Sorry. I figured since this was in the vintage forum, that would be clear.
Inch quill stems for 9/8" steerers are about 35 years old now, quite obsolete. Lot of newer stuff than that gets talked about here.
bulgie is offline  
Reply
Old 11-17-25 | 12:02 AM
  #8  
Full Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 434
Likes: 296
From: North Seattle

Bikes: Davidson ’81

That Nitto drawing is wild. I thought Cinelli was silly for measuring along the top of the quill instead of perpendicular...but at least they are consistent
C9H13N is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.