Vintage Weight Weenie.
#27
Knows Bigfoot's Momma
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,540
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
Bikes: yeah; got a couple...
I dunno... If we're going to build vintage weight weenie bikes, shouldn't we make them functional, and able to support our own weight safely? A 16 pound hillclimber that you can ride, makes more sense to me than a 13 pounder that you need to drive to the scales.
__________________
nice lugs baby!
nice lugs baby!
Last edited by TheOtherGuy; 10-18-05 at 09:53 AM.
#29
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,212
Likes: 3,123
Originally Posted by USAZorro
What was used on that Panasonic road bike that they showed that weighed about 10 pounds total?
#30
Thread Starter
juneeaa memba!


Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,631
Likes: 5
From: boogled up in...Idaho!
Bikes: Crap. The box is not big enough...
The wheels at the shop, I'm pretty sure, are early Weyless instead of Hi-E. Pretty light, although the owner wouldn't put a price on 'em. I can probably brow-beat 'em outta there, but I need to bring my scale down to see just how light they are. I've never seen a Maillard Course; I suppose they were all aluminum? and Record Seta Extras are very hard to come by...the lightest tires at my immediate fingertips are either CX's or very light panaracer TT's. (actually, I think I have just one tt, I carry it around as a spare. If I can find another then that would be a good weight weenie choice, and still sorta rideable...)
#31
Seņor Member



Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 18,485
Likes: 1,565
From: Hardy, VA
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Originally Posted by T-Mar
I believe you are referring to the Panasonic Ultralight track bicycle. The bicycle actually used mostly standard parts that were lightened by various metal removal methods. Rims were drilled with 3 extra holes between each of the 24 spoke holes. Hub webs were reduced and the bearings exposed. Hollow axles with half width nuts. Sugino crankset milled front and back and spider drilled through at the normal flute locations. Chainwheel thickness reduced and inner web removed. Lower webs of Mikashima pedals removed. Wall thickness of seat post reduced. Thickness of saddle base reduced and cutouts incorporated. Stem extension drilled and bottom of stem blocked to allow use of super short expander bolt. I have been unable to locate details on the frame tubing other than it was CrMo, double butted with extensive lug cutouts. I believe there was a later version that used a Dura Ace 10mm drivetrain to reduce the weight even further.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
#32
Knows Bigfoot's Momma
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,540
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
Bikes: yeah; got a couple...
Originally Posted by luker
...I've never seen a Maillard Course; I suppose they were all aluminum?...
Here's one: Maillard alloy freewheel
This one weighs in at exactly 129 grams.
__________________
nice lugs baby!
nice lugs baby!
#33
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 8
Here's an interesting crank for your project, a Topolino:
https://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...MEBI%3AIT&rd=1
https://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...MEBI%3AIT&rd=1
#34
Thread Starter
juneeaa memba!


Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,631
Likes: 5
From: boogled up in...Idaho!
Bikes: Crap. The box is not big enough...
you are exactly right! I have some topline mountain cranks - a pair on my hardtail, and a pair in reserve. They were some of the lightest cranks on the planet in the early '90's - I suppose that they might compare well with modern stuff. They had a smallish maintenance issue: they broke when you hammered on 'em sometimes (I never broke mine, tho). I'd forgotten that I even used 'em...I'll watch this pair.





