Long reach centerpulls
#1
Long reach centerpulls
I need some very long reach centerpulls for my wife's Raleigh mixte because I'm replacing the 27" wheels with 700c tubular wheels. I've found Universal model 61s, Dia Compe 750s, Weinmann Vainqueur 999s and MAFAC Raids. Can somebody with experience with those brakes tell me which would be the best choice?
#2
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 3
My Raliegh Carlton from 1965 with the Weinmans will reach my sew up wheelsets. Toe in and brake shoe choice are probably most important for stopping power. I put Dura ace centerpulls on my wifes Bridgestone 400 and am satisfied with stock pads and will probbly leave alone.
#3
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 601
Likes: 7
From: Atlanta
Bikes: 1982 Schwinn Super Sport S/P, 1984 Miyata 610, 1985 Panasonic LX 1000, Centurion Pro Tour 15 1983
Originally Posted by Dirtdrop
I need some very long reach centerpulls for my wife's Raleigh mixte because I'm replacing the 27" wheels with 700c tubular wheels. I've found Universal model 61s, Dia Compe 750s, Weinmann Vainqueur 999s and MAFAC Raids. Can somebody with experience with those brakes tell me which would be the best choice?
#4
Ferrous wheel
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,388
Likes: 1
From: New Orleans
Bikes: 2004 Gunnar Rock Hound MTB; 1988 Gitane Team Pro road bike; 1986-ish Raleigh USA Grand Prix; mid-'80s Univega Gran Tourismo with Xtracycle Free Radical
I use the Dia Compes on an old Raleigh, with the stock pads, and I like the way they work.
#5
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
I'm a big Mafac fan and have them on several bikes, but I recently got a bike with Weinmann Vainqueur 999. I hate to admit it, but they seem better made. I've never had Universals. The Dia-Compe don't seem as pretty, though they probably work well enough..
#7
feros ferio

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 22,409
Likes: 1,875
From: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Another vote here for either Weinmann 999s or their DiaCompe clones, although I am happy with the Mafac Racer centerpull which graces the front of my UO-8. Whatever you do, get new cable housings, new center wires, and new KoolStop brake pads. Aero brake handles will generally boost your leverage by roughly 10 percent over their nonaero equivalents.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#8
Originally Posted by Dirtdrop
I need some very long reach centerpulls for my wife's Raleigh mixte because I'm replacing the 27" wheels with 700c tubular wheels. I've found Universal model 61s, Dia Compe 750s, Weinmann Vainqueur 999s and MAFAC Raids. Can somebody with experience with those brakes tell me which would be the best choice?
I don't have too much experience with them, but I've got a box full of various ones if you want to paw through them....
__________________
"Love is not the dying moan of a distant violin, it’s the triumphant twang of a bedspring."
S. J. Perelman
"Love is not the dying moan of a distant violin, it’s the triumphant twang of a bedspring."
S. J. Perelman
#9
I think I'll try mrmw's Weinmanns and add some genuine Mathauser pads. Weinmanns were original equipment on the bike. Somebody put some Shimano 600s on on it. They're too short and too modern for a 1975 frame.
#10
Another strong thumbs up for the Wienmann/Dia-Compes. They are really excellent brakes despite their association with suicide levers. The calipers themselves are just great.
Two suggestions...
1) If you are running tires fatter than a true 1 1/4, consider using both QR cable hangers AND levers with QR mechanisms built in. This allows the calipers to open up for a 1 3/8 tire or even a knobbie. I can't picture how to do this on a mixte for the rear brake, but if you need to car rack the bike and need to take the FW on and off a lot, having the double QR system on the front makes life easier.
2) Consider using the Koolstop MTB pads. They allow you to adjust for rim width and toe-in. The latter is a really big deal as it's the difference between silent stopping and raise-the-dead squeeling. They also have a longer braking surface than the older Mathauser pads (or the KoolStop Continental knock offs).
Two suggestions...
1) If you are running tires fatter than a true 1 1/4, consider using both QR cable hangers AND levers with QR mechanisms built in. This allows the calipers to open up for a 1 3/8 tire or even a knobbie. I can't picture how to do this on a mixte for the rear brake, but if you need to car rack the bike and need to take the FW on and off a lot, having the double QR system on the front makes life easier.
2) Consider using the Koolstop MTB pads. They allow you to adjust for rim width and toe-in. The latter is a really big deal as it's the difference between silent stopping and raise-the-dead squeeling. They also have a longer braking surface than the older Mathauser pads (or the KoolStop Continental knock offs).
#11
Originally Posted by pinnah
Another strong thumbs up for the Wienmann/Dia-Compes. They are really excellent brakes despite their association with suicide levers. The calipers themselves are just great.
Two suggestions...
1) If you are running tires fatter than a true 1 1/4, consider using both QR cable hangers AND levers with QR mechanisms built in. This allows the calipers to open up for a 1 3/8 tire or even a knobbie. I can't picture how to do this on a mixte for the rear brake, but if you need to car rack the bike and need to take the FW on and off a lot, having the double QR system on the front makes life easier.
2) Consider using the Koolstop MTB pads. They allow you to adjust for rim width and toe-in. The latter is a really big deal as it's the difference between silent stopping and raise-the-dead squeeling. They also have a longer braking surface than the older Mathauser pads (or the KoolStop Continental knock offs).
Two suggestions...
1) If you are running tires fatter than a true 1 1/4, consider using both QR cable hangers AND levers with QR mechanisms built in. This allows the calipers to open up for a 1 3/8 tire or even a knobbie. I can't picture how to do this on a mixte for the rear brake, but if you need to car rack the bike and need to take the FW on and off a lot, having the double QR system on the front makes life easier.
2) Consider using the Koolstop MTB pads. They allow you to adjust for rim width and toe-in. The latter is a really big deal as it's the difference between silent stopping and raise-the-dead squeeling. They also have a longer braking surface than the older Mathauser pads (or the KoolStop Continental knock offs).
#12
Crawlin' up, flyin' down


Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,755
Likes: 4,411
From: Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley
Bikes: 1967 Paramount; 1982-ish Ron Cooper; 1978 Eisentraut "A"; two mid-1960s Cinelli Speciale Corsas; and others in various stages of non-rideability.
I have a pair of the Dia-Compes that Rivendell sells matched to the non-aero Dia-Compe levers Riv also sells (the ones with a quick-release built into the levers). That set-up with the stock pads was not adequate, and scared the poop out of me at my first encounter with a bottom-of-the-hill stop sign. Switiching the Kool Stop pads made a huge difference, The set-up is now acceptable - not great, but acceptable. It still is not as confidence-inducing as my Shimano dual-pivots with aero levers. (The levers may be the difference at this point, but I have not had a chance to put that theory to the test.)
I'd say with any old-design brake on a rider (as opposed to a show-only bike) anywhere with hills hight that freeway overpasses, you gotta get some Kool Stops or Matthausers. Anbd if you put 'em on Dia Compes, be prepared for sqealing brakes for a while . . . . (Of course, if you ever used old Mafacs, you're already used to that.
)
I'd say with any old-design brake on a rider (as opposed to a show-only bike) anywhere with hills hight that freeway overpasses, you gotta get some Kool Stops or Matthausers. Anbd if you put 'em on Dia Compes, be prepared for sqealing brakes for a while . . . . (Of course, if you ever used old Mafacs, you're already used to that.
)
#13
Originally Posted by bikingshearer
I have a pair of the Dia-Compes that Rivendell sells matched to the non-aero Dia-Compe levers Riv also sells (the ones with a quick-release built into the levers). That set-up with the stock pads was not adequate, and scared the poop out of me at my first encounter with a bottom-of-the-hill stop sign. Switiching the Kool Stop pads made a huge difference, The set-up is now acceptable - not great, but acceptable. It still is not as confidence-inducing as my Shimano dual-pivots with aero levers. (The levers may be the difference at this point, but I have not had a chance to put that theory to the test.)
My understanding of the situation is this....
More mechanical advantage = crisper feel to the brakes but less force applied to the rims
Less mechanical advantage = mushier feel to the brakes but more force applied to the rims.
C-pulls offer significantly less mechanical advantage than dual pivots. That's neither good nor bad. Just dramatically different feeling. Long story short, many people find that c-pulls feel mushier but actually stop with more force.
Here's a test to do on the work stand.. Squeeze the brake lever and look at the brake shoes. You'll see that the c-pull visibly squash the pad. That mushyness that you feel is the really the power of the c-pull caliper. With side pull brakes, you get a more immediate and solid feedback in the lever when you begin to compress the lever. At least, that's what I notice.
#14
feros ferio

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 22,409
Likes: 1,875
From: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Less mechanical advantage = less force applied to the rims.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#16
Originally Posted by pinnah
Do some searching around the web for discussions of canti-lever adjustments with respect to creating different amounts of mechanical advantage.. Canti fans will point out that you can adjust the mechanical advantage with different yolk lengths.
My understanding of the situation is this....
More mechanical advantage = crisper feel to the brakes but less force applied to the rims
Less mechanical advantage = mushier feel to the brakes but more force applied to the rims.
C-pulls offer significantly less mechanical advantage than dual pivots. That's neither good nor bad. Just dramatically different feeling. Long story short, many people find that c-pulls feel mushier but actually stop with more force.
Here's a test to do on the work stand.. Squeeze the brake lever and look at the brake shoes. You'll see that the c-pull visibly squash the pad. That mushyness that you feel is the really the power of the c-pull caliper. With side pull brakes, you get a more immediate and solid feedback in the lever when you begin to compress the lever. At least, that's what I notice.
My understanding of the situation is this....
More mechanical advantage = crisper feel to the brakes but less force applied to the rims
Less mechanical advantage = mushier feel to the brakes but more force applied to the rims.
C-pulls offer significantly less mechanical advantage than dual pivots. That's neither good nor bad. Just dramatically different feeling. Long story short, many people find that c-pulls feel mushier but actually stop with more force.
Here's a test to do on the work stand.. Squeeze the brake lever and look at the brake shoes. You'll see that the c-pull visibly squash the pad. That mushyness that you feel is the really the power of the c-pull caliper. With side pull brakes, you get a more immediate and solid feedback in the lever when you begin to compress the lever. At least, that's what I notice.
#17
Senior Member

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 575
Likes: 59
From: NE Florida
Bikes: '84 Lotus Supreme, '85 Club Fuji, '86 Schwinn Peloton, '87 DS Ironman Expert, '87 Maruishi Professional, '88 Takara
Hiya Dirtdrop,
I have a complete set of NOS NIB Weinmann Vainqueur 750's circa Jan. 1980. Set includes cables, quick release levers, and hardware. PM me if interested.
I have a complete set of NOS NIB Weinmann Vainqueur 750's circa Jan. 1980. Set includes cables, quick release levers, and hardware. PM me if interested.
__________________
"If there hadn't been women we'd still be squatting in a cave eating raw meat, because we made civilization in order to impress our girl friends. And they tolerated it and let us go ahead and play with our toys." Orson Welles
"If there hadn't been women we'd still be squatting in a cave eating raw meat, because we made civilization in order to impress our girl friends. And they tolerated it and let us go ahead and play with our toys." Orson Welles
#18
Woops, I got it very much backwards!!
Yes, yes. More mechanical advantage means more power and more mushyness in the feel of the brake lever. See Sheldon Brown's excellent write up here. In particular, he addresses this in the "Feel vs Function" section.
https://sheldonbrown.com/cantilever-geometry.html
IME, caliper brakes go from lower mechanical advantage (feel crisper) to higher (feel mushier) as follows:
+ Single pivot side pulls
+ Dual pivot side pulls
+ Centerpulls
As Sheldon (and others) note, canti brakes have adjustable mech advantage when you adjust the straddle cable to different lengths. Longer means less. Shorter means more. I think this suggests why Weimann/DiaCompe c-pulls can feel mushy. They have comparatively short straddle cables and hence even more mech advantage.
If the OP is using modern Aero style levers, which them selves have more mech advantage than non-aero levers, then he's adding even more mushiness to the system. Sheldon correctly warns that too much mech advantage and you can bottom out the lever on the bars before the brake is at full power.
My c-pulls are set up with similar vintage non-area levers. They feel mushy compared to my single pivot side pulls but they definitely stop fast. And again, following Sheldon's observations in his essay (above), the difference the 2 brakes compress the shoes is quite visible on the work stand.
Sorry for the confusion. I got it way wrong on that other post!!
Yes, yes. More mechanical advantage means more power and more mushyness in the feel of the brake lever. See Sheldon Brown's excellent write up here. In particular, he addresses this in the "Feel vs Function" section.
https://sheldonbrown.com/cantilever-geometry.html
IME, caliper brakes go from lower mechanical advantage (feel crisper) to higher (feel mushier) as follows:
+ Single pivot side pulls
+ Dual pivot side pulls
+ Centerpulls
As Sheldon (and others) note, canti brakes have adjustable mech advantage when you adjust the straddle cable to different lengths. Longer means less. Shorter means more. I think this suggests why Weimann/DiaCompe c-pulls can feel mushy. They have comparatively short straddle cables and hence even more mech advantage.
If the OP is using modern Aero style levers, which them selves have more mech advantage than non-aero levers, then he's adding even more mushiness to the system. Sheldon correctly warns that too much mech advantage and you can bottom out the lever on the bars before the brake is at full power.
My c-pulls are set up with similar vintage non-area levers. They feel mushy compared to my single pivot side pulls but they definitely stop fast. And again, following Sheldon's observations in his essay (above), the difference the 2 brakes compress the shoes is quite visible on the work stand.
Sorry for the confusion. I got it way wrong on that other post!!
#20
<chuckle>
Hey Dirtdrop, nothing wrong with that approach!!
One thought though... sometimes some of those older upright style brake levers have limited amount of throw/cable travel. You may bottom out your brake levers against the grips.
Definitely try the Koolstops first.
Hey Dirtdrop, nothing wrong with that approach!!
One thought though... sometimes some of those older upright style brake levers have limited amount of throw/cable travel. You may bottom out your brake levers against the grips.
Definitely try the Koolstops first.







