Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Lame things about C&V

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Lame things about C&V

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-11-09 | 03:15 PM
  #101  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 962
Likes: 30
Classic and vintage means "old school". people wish they could jump in the "way back machine" and live in the past. It's a little lame to yearn for the old days, and yet get yourself an old bike, put on some vintage tires, and go take a ride down some old country road. There you go, you're live in the past!
bikerosity57 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-11-09 | 03:21 PM
  #102  
Oldpeddaller's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,638
Likes: 14
From: Maidstone, Kent, England

Bikes: 1970 Holdsworth Mistral, Vitus 979, Colnago Primavera, Corratec Hydracarbon, Massi MegaTeam, 1935 Claud Butler Super Velo, Carrera Virtuoso, Viner, 1953 Claud Butler Silver Jubilee, 1954 Holdsworth Typhoon, 1966 Claud Butler Olympic Road, 1982 Claud

Originally Posted by CravenMoarhead
Tip: While viewing any webpage, Hold the CTRL key on your keyboard and roll the mouse wheel up. The font size will increase. Roll down to decrease the font size.

Its great for crappy eyes

WOW! Didn't know that - it really works! You've changed my life!!!
Oldpeddaller is offline  
Reply
Old 11-11-09 | 05:51 PM
  #103  
bbattle's Avatar
.
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Donating
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,769
Likes: 38
From: Rocket City, No'ala

Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Treviso, 1990 Gardin Shred, 2006 Bianchi San Jose

Originally Posted by bigbossman
Naw - just requires some sort of membership to the forum. Used to be, $25 got you membership for life. Now, some corporate entity is running the show and the membership fee structure is different.

Luckily, some of us got grandfathered in. Lifetime memberships.
bbattle is offline  
Reply
Old 11-11-09 | 05:54 PM
  #104  
bbattle's Avatar
.
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Donating
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,769
Likes: 38
From: Rocket City, No'ala

Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Treviso, 1990 Gardin Shred, 2006 Bianchi San Jose

Originally Posted by CravenMoarhead
Tip: While viewing any webpage, Hold the CTRL key on your keyboard and roll the mouse wheel up. The font size will increase. Roll down to decrease the font size.

Its great for crappy eyes

"command +" works for me.
bbattle is offline  
Reply
Old 11-11-09 | 06:55 PM
  #105  
mickey85's Avatar
perpetually frazzled
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 9
From: Linton, IN

Bikes: 1977 Bridgestone Kabuki Super Speed; 1979 Raleigh Professional; 1983 Raleigh Rapide mixte; 1974 Peugeot UO-8; 1993 Univega Activa Trail; 1972 Raleigh Sports; 1967 Phillips; 1981 Schwinn World Tourist; 1976 Schwinn LeTour mixte; 1964 Western Flyer

Originally Posted by bikerosity57
Classic and vintage means "old school". people wish they could jump in the "way back machine" and live in the past. It's a little lame to yearn for the old days, and yet get yourself an old bike, put on some vintage tires, and go take a ride down some old country road. There you go, you're live in the past!
While I may yearn for some things of the past (i.e. 1969 Olds H/O), I ride old bikes simply because they're honestly better than anything I could get nowadays. For instance, I could buy a Riv Roadeo for $3,000, or I can spend $800 fixing up my Raleigh Pro and have a better bike that looks better, is full Campy Record and Neuvo Record, and has a heritage. I could get a surly cross check, or I could ride my Activa Trail that is almost the same thing that I nabbed for $80. I could buy one of those new Schwinn Coffee or some such city bike, or I can ride my Phillips 3 speed.

In every instance, they look better (IMO), they work just as well, if not better, and as they're old and (in the case of the second two) rather worthless, I don't feel bad modifying them out the wazoo. The Pro I kinda regard as a 1971 Dodge Challenger Hemi/4 speed. Don't modify it (my only exception is to swap clincher rims), and ride the piss out of it.
mickey85 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-11-09 | 08:40 PM
  #106  
ShawnBeau's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Trampa Florida

Bikes: 1985 Fuji Opus III - 1985 Fuji Club Fuji

Originally Posted by bikerosity57
Classic and vintage means "old school". people wish they could jump in the "way back machine" and live in the past. It's a little lame to yearn for the old days, and yet get yourself an old bike, put on some vintage tires, and go take a ride down some old country road. There you go, you're live in the past!
I know you are probably joking, but I am only 30, and it would have been impossible for me to own a Fuji Opus III back in 1984! And after trying newer road bikes, and then one of these I find the vintage bike to have more character and be more comfortable to ride. I even like the old suntour shifters on the downtube instead of the finger shifters!

But then again, I collect guitars and amplifiers that are 40+ years old and they really do sound and feel better. And I tool around on old 1970's Honda CB motorcycles, and a rusty 64 corvette. Am I nostalgic for these things? Impossible! I wasn't even alive yet when they were made!

I will +1 for the C&V forums being one of the kindest and coolest forums that I have ever participated in on the web.

The down side is that there are too many bikes on here that I wish I had.
ShawnBeau is offline  
Reply
Old 11-11-09 | 08:50 PM
  #107  
Marrock's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,885
Likes: 0
From: Used to be there, now I'm here.
Originally Posted by noglider
Not only that, another lame thing is that we encourage each other, no matter what material goods we own, even if it's something very humble.
Not entirely true, I have one bike here I wont normally admit to owning on a public forum mainly because I know I'd be mocked mercilessly for having it despite the face it works fine for what I got it for and doesn't have any of the problems most folks assign to this sort of bike.
Marrock is offline  
Reply
Old 11-11-09 | 09:07 PM
  #108  
Buh'wah?!
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,086
Likes: 2
From: Charlottesville VA

Bikes: 2014 Giant Trance

Originally Posted by Marrock
Not entirely true, I have one bike here I wont normally admit to owning on a public forum mainly because I know I'd be mocked mercilessly for having it despite the face it works fine for what I got it for and doesn't have any of the problems most folks assign to this sort of bike.
Alright... I've got to know what it is after this vague yet elaborate description.
-Gene-
Amani576 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-11-09 | 09:18 PM
  #109  
Marrock's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,885
Likes: 0
From: Used to be there, now I'm here.
Originally Posted by Amani576
Alright... I've got to know what it is after this vague yet elaborate description.
-Gene-
Clues are out there, one just has to put them all together.
Marrock is offline  
Reply
Old 11-11-09 | 10:54 PM
  #110  
Bam42685's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
From: Big Rapids, MI

Bikes: 81 or 82 Mayata 912, Mystery Peugeot

Originally Posted by Marrock
Clues are out there, one just has to put them all together.
Mr. Green... in the dining room... on the NEXT?
Bam42685 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-11-09 | 10:56 PM
  #111  
jgedwa's Avatar
surly old man
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,393
Likes: 44
From: Carlisle, PA

Bikes: IRO Mark V, Karate Monkey half fat, Trek 620 IGH, Cannondale 26/24 MTB, Amp Research B3, and more.

Originally Posted by Bam42685
Mr. Green... in the dining room... on the NEXT?
Best line of the day.

j
__________________
Cross Check Nexus7, IRO Mark V, Trek 620 Nexus7, Karate Monkey half fat, IRO Model 19 fixed, Amp Research B3, Surly 1x1 half fat fixed, and more...
--------------------------
SB forever
jgedwa is offline  
Reply
Old 11-11-09 | 11:31 PM
  #112  
Chicago Al's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,660
Likes: 286
From: Chicago, the leafy NW side

Bikes: 1974 Motobecane Grand Record, 1987 Miyata Pro, 1988 Bob Jackson Lady Mixte (wife's), others in the family

Originally Posted by Marrock
Not entirely true, I have one bike here I wont normally admit to owning on a public forum mainly because I know I'd be mocked mercilessly for having it despite the face it works fine for what I got it for and doesn't have any of the problems most folks assign to this sort of bike.
What kind of Magna is it?
Chicago Al is offline  
Reply
Old 11-12-09 | 12:04 AM
  #113  
DavidW56's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 2
From: Metro Detroit
Originally Posted by Marrock
Not entirely true, I have one bike here I wont normally admit to owning on a public forum mainly because I know I'd be mocked mercilessly for having it despite the face it works fine for what I got it for and doesn't have any of the problems most folks assign to this sort of bike.
Actually, this is a seriously lame aspect of C&V. "Everybody knows" that Huffy, Columbia, et. al. made crappy bikes, and Schwinn Varsinentals are boat anchors, and anything from China or x-mart will fall apart before you roll it down the driveway, by definition. This attitude has caused a rather contrarian reaction in me; I'm planning to restore just such an unworthy bike, then ride it in the company of much higher-class bikes, just to prove it works well enough.

There are two threads on this forum from last year that helped adjust my opinion on the importance of a brand name or technological superiority of a bike: this one, at https://mjgradziel.com/thelmajones/lu...eopenroad.html, which is the story of two young women who rode their bikes across the US in 1944; and the other is a more recent feature on the Mexican immigrants in LA who depend upon cheap bikes like Magna and Next as their main transportation to get to work daily ( I don't have that link handy).
DavidW56 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-12-09 | 12:41 AM
  #114  
DavidW56's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 2
From: Metro Detroit
Originally Posted by RobbieTunes
Our work with him is now complete.
Thanks loads. I am doomed.
DavidW56 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-12-09 | 12:47 AM
  #115  
noglider's Avatar
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,338
Likes: 6,637
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Where is flammenwurfer? He just joined our ranks and is already entrenched in old bikes and project ideas.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Reply
Old 11-12-09 | 08:51 AM
  #116  
Marrock's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,885
Likes: 0
From: Used to be there, now I'm here.
Originally Posted by Chicago Al
What kind of Magna is it?
It's not a Magna, I'm not that bad off just yet.

Originally Posted by Bam42685
Mr. Green... in the dining room... on the NEXT?
Prof. Plum in the conservatory with the Ross, it was the heaviest thing he could find.

Originally Posted by DavidW56
Actually, this is a seriously lame aspect of C&V. "Everybody knows" that Huffy, Columbia, et. al. made crappy bikes, and Schwinn Varsinentals are boat anchors, and anything from China or x-mart will fall apart before you roll it down the driveway, by definition. This attitude has caused a rather contrarian reaction in me; I'm planning to restore just such an unworthy bike, then ride it in the company of much higher-class bikes, just to prove it works well enough.

There are two threads on this forum from last year that helped adjust my opinion on the importance of a brand name or technological superiority of a bike: this one, at https://mjgradziel.com/thelmajones/lu...eopenroad.html, which is the story of two young women who rode their bikes across the US in 1944; and the other is a more recent feature on the Mexican immigrants in LA who depend upon cheap bikes like Magna and Next as their main transportation to get to work daily ( I don't have that link handy).
Well, my old Huffy Mt. Storm is still in pieces till I can find an ashtabula crank that's long enough and I have an old Shimano FFS I'm thinking of dropping on it just for the freak factor, but that's not what I'm talking about.

I'm just biding my time till I can manage to somehow afford what I like to think of as a "real" bike.
Marrock is offline  
Reply
Old 11-15-09 | 06:06 PM
  #117  
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 53
From: Sunny Tampa, Florida
Originally Posted by DavidW56
Actually, this is a seriously lame aspect of C&V. "Everybody knows" that Huffy, Columbia, et. al. made crappy bikes, and Schwinn Varsinentals are boat anchors, and anything from China or x-mart will fall apart before you roll it down the driveway, by definition.
My God, man. Will you leave us NOTHING about which to snob.

We're the only cyclists on the planet who brag about how cheap our stuff is. We encourage one another to not pay more even when some of us sell bikes for money. We're cheapskates, we ride things that bike shops declared obsolete when Nixon was still popular and restore things that were used in rural chicken coop constructions.

And you think we are too discerning over brand names.

Leave us something, I beg of thee.
Ronsonic is offline  
Reply
Old 11-15-09 | 06:40 PM
  #118  
Banned.
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Likes: 1,463
Originally Posted by jgedwa
Blessed are the cheesemakers
Colby and baby Swiss until I die.
RobbieTunes is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.