![]() |
Originally Posted by nlerner
(Post 12809901)
In my view, 650B-sized wheels are terrific for two kinds of conditions. One is for riding roads like these without using a mountain bike:
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-j...1000000251.JPG |
Originally Posted by southpawboston
(Post 12811497)
Neal, is that Bob and his converted SR? Upon close examination, it's downright eery how similarly our conversions turned out! We had a terrific trail ride led by Rich last weekend. I had no idea so many long trails exist near here! I'm heading back for more, soon!
Neal |
|
I’m coming to the conclusion that the main reason for converting to 650B is so you can use Hetre tires.
I have some light fast road bikes that are wonderful on smooth pavement, and a couple heavy-duty bikes with big fat tires that are great for the rough stuff, so I can do either kind of riding with no problem. But it’s one or the other-- neither type of bike can fill both roles well. Maybe my Trek 520, but it’s still kind of slow on the pavement, and I’d want to change the tires for different conditions. What seems new to me is that the Hetres allow you to fly on the pavement and float over the gravel equally well with the same tires. This would allow you to combine gravel and paved roads on the same trip. In my case that would open up a lot of new and really interesting routes around here. |
I hope my new build will have clearance for the Hetre. Have room for 28mm w fender, 32 without on my current 700 set up.
|
Originally Posted by kroozer
(Post 12812300)
I'm coming to the conclusion that the main reason for converting to 650B is so you can use Hetre tires.
|
Originally Posted by southpawboston
(Post 12812842)
For lots of people, yes. The bike in the photo that Neal posted is running 38mm Pari-Motos (if I remember correctly). But they are touted as being exceptionally supple tires as well. I would say that for conversion, the candidate frame should fit at least 38mm tires with room to spare. On my converted frame, I can fit 42mm Hetres with about 3mm of clearance between the chainstays.
Neal |
Originally Posted by tcs
(Post 12809162)
What is said of the Hetres agrees with the general findings on tires by Velocio back in the 1920s. Is there or has there been an empirical test of the Hetres by:
1) Someone who isn't selling them, and 2) Someone who isn't justifying having paid $136 + shipping to put two on their bike?
Originally Posted by Amesja
(Post 12809266)
+1,000,000
I see you are a student of human behavior.... I bought these tires, and when I found out that they're trash, one single thought popped into my head: "Hey. I can make everything feel better if I go on the interwebz and tell everyone that I'm tickled to death at how fun these tires are to ride." Whatever. If you don't want to buy any, then don't buy any. Besides... you're wrong about the money part. I didn't spend $136.00 + shipping. I spent over $2000 building a whole new bike! :thumb: |
Originally Posted by lukasz
(Post 12800657)
A very simple question: could we rattle off some frames that would make good 650b conversion candidates? I'm looking for steel, obviously, but nothing heavy duty. I don't plan to go touring on this thing, so the lighter/more sporty the tubing the better. I am also fine with never sticking something like a 42 in there. 38 would be plenty for me. Have at it!
(or link me to the website that I missed when using google to try to figure this out on my own) http://www.flickr.com/photos/mr_wasa...7625227549739/ |
i converted a raleigh comp that came with 27s... worked perfectly. i have a nice 38 in there with room to spare. if anything it feels faster to me (although i was running marathons before so undoubtedly it was the tires) and i have a nice low bb that is hard to find in production bikes.
|
Originally Posted by Creme Brulee
(Post 15090884)
i converted a raleigh comp that came with 27s... worked perfectly. i have a nice 38 in there with room to spare. if anything it feels faster to me (although i was running marathons before so undoubtedly it was the tires) and i have a nice low bb that is hard to find in production bikes.
-D |
My Bilenky tandem isn't a conversion, but rides on Hetre tires. I've gotten really spoiled riding on these tires. I'm looking for something else to convert to 650B, but with 650A (EA3) being as affordable as it is, it is hard to justify. The Panaracer CdlV isn't a Hetre, but might fit the bill nicely. I have a Dawes Galaxy frameset sitting in the basement and a pair of freshly built CR-18 650A rims laced to a SA 3-speed hub. This might just be the ticket.
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5196/7...60b6e920_b.jpg Bilenky 650B Constructeur Tandem - First Ride - 20 by Sallad Rialb, on Flickr |
Originally Posted by djkashuba
(Post 15091135)
What brakes are you using on your Comp? Thanks.
-D |
Originally Posted by kroozer
(Post 12812300)
I’m coming to the conclusion that the main reason for converting to 650B is so you can use Hetre tires.
I have some light fast road bikes that are wonderful on smooth pavement, and a couple heavy-duty bikes with big fat tires that are great for the rough stuff, so I can do either kind of riding with no problem. But it’s one or the other-- neither type of bike can fill both roles well. Maybe my Trek 520, but it’s still kind of slow on the pavement, and I’d want to change the tires for different conditions. What seems new to me is that the Hetres allow you to fly on the pavement and float over the gravel equally well with the same tires. This would allow you to combine gravel and paved roads on the same trip. In my case that would open up a lot of new and really interesting routes around here. |
Since this thread has turned into a tire debate, I'll put in this bit for the Soma B-line. While I own three sets of Hetres for three bikes and like them a lot, I have heard nothing but positive feedback for the Soma B-lines, which are rebranded Panaracers Paselas in 650 x 38B size. In particular, the "skinwall" version (not the hypertex version also offered) has been compared very favorably with the Hetre for its smooth ride and low rolling resistance, yet it costs only about $45, or about 2/3 that of a Hetre.
|
Originally Posted by southpawboston
(Post 15093033)
Since this thread has turned into a tire debate, I'll put in this bit for the Soma B-line. While I own three sets of Hetres for three bikes and like them a lot, I have heard nothing but positive feedback for the Soma B-lines, which are rebranded Panaracers Paselas in 650 x 38B size. In particular, the "skinwall" version (not the hypertex version also offered) has been compared very favorably with the Hetre for its smooth ride and low rolling resistance, yet it costs only about $45, or about 2/3 that of a Hetre.
Fork: 46mm, Seatstays: ~65mm, Chainstays: 44mm if axle is set back in drop outs. Maybe 45mm if all the way back. |
1 Attachment(s)
I've posted a few photos of it elsewhere, but here it is again, my 650b Trek 820:
http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=294485 Older MTBs (especially from the 80s, before the frame geometry became more aggressive, more like enduro motorcycles) are pretty good frames to convert since they have very long wheelbases (+ 100cm) whose proportions & slack geometry will overcome the routine 45mm BB drop to maintain a stable ride and handling even with the larger wheel size. I've tried a 650b conversion on a shorter-framed MTB (97cm) and it was proportionally too high-centered for city riding; the handling became tricky, awkward in the turns. Bear in mind that most 700c road frames have deeper BB drops and work better with 650b wheels; even with a compact frame, the ride is stable due to the bike's overall lower center of gravity. My current winter/ summer project is an (apparently) native 650b hybrid frame, a Panasonic from the early '80s- 26" frame w/ 60mm BB drop & 107cm wheelbase; 366mm fork w/ low-mounted canti bosses: smells like 650b to me. |
Originally Posted by Hydrated
(Post 12813087)
Yep. You guys caught me.
I bought these tires, and when I found out that they're trash, one single thought popped into my head: "Hey. I can make everything feel better if I go on the interwebz and tell everyone that I'm tickled to death at how fun these tires are to ride." Whatever. If you don't want to buy any, then don't buy any. Besides... you're wrong about the money part. I didn't spend $136.00 + shipping. I spent over $2000 building a whole new bike! :thumb: If you're going to built with Hetres and fenders, you need a frame that is wide enough between the chainstays near the chainstay bridge to clear the tire and the fender. We can argue about the right number and the right fender, but I think you need at least 6 mm on each side of the tire (42+6+6=54), and a total clearance between that and 60 mm to handle fenders not larger than 60 mm Grand Bois. Similar width is needed near the top of the fork blades. That requirement alone makes a 42 mm fendered bike hard to make without a specialized frame. Vintage Treks don't have nearly that much width in either position. Between the chainstays both my 1984 610 and my 1983 620 measure about 47 mm. So there's an available 2.5 mm clearance for the inflated tire alone. Whether or not its adequate depends on correct rear-triangle alignment, wheel trueness, wheel dish, accurate tire mounting, and accurate wheel positioning based on the dropout adjusting screws. Break a spoke and you might not be riding home. Needless to say, adding fenders in this case is a non-starter. I'm interested in converting one of these to 650b, but I think the opportunity is to go for 650x32b with fenders, on a vintage trek. But this only speaks to lateral wheel and fender clearance, not to trail adjustment or brake choice. I'd probably go for Mafac CP pivots front and rear and install Mafac Racer brake arms. Racers work on 27" tires that are 32 mm (1 1/4") wide with fenders, so they should work on 650x32c. Why would I do this, why not just use 700x32c with Honjos? Well, I've already tried it with 45 mm plastic (Zefal) fenders, and that bike just does not have enough radial clearance for that tire/fender combination. It does work with 28s, which I use now. So for a vintage Trek, it's an expensive way to go to 32 mm tire width with good fenders, and more if you're going to adjust the trail to either make it like Trek had it for 27's or 700c's, or you're going to adjust it for a front load. But these fork issues are significant no matter what frame you are going to do it to. So I'd say if you really have to have fenders and 32 mm cushiness, one of these Treks is a good choice. I don't think it can get you "home" if you want 42 mm with fenders. I'm assuming no frame work (replacing/recontouring chain stays) beyond adding brake pivots and possibly rear cable housing hangers to convert to centerpulls or cantilever brakes. If you're going to remake major sections of a bike frame, anything is possible, but it just gets more expensive. |
Originally Posted by whatwolf
(Post 15175763)
I am considering both of these tires. I want to go wider than 38mm if possible, and I wonder if you could tell me what you think of my clearance measurements. I know you have a lot of experience with this... is my bike too tight for a Hertre? This is a late 70s(?) Colner road racing frame, measured at 320mm from axle centers:
Fork: 46mm, Seatstays: ~65mm, Chainstays: 44mm if axle is set back in drop outs. Maybe 45mm if all the way back. On second thought, I guess 38s would not be bad, but the margin is getting lower. |
Originally Posted by ColonelJLloyd
(Post 12802542)
I think if the frame was built for 700c and has ample clearance, yes. Certainly not a 700c bike that fits a 23mm tire max. A bike with cantilevers positioned for 700C won't allow the use of those brakes with a 650B wheel.
It's International Danger Orange! The end result will look like a push up on wheels! http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Lt6Yc4rAb6...00/push-up.jpg As to a conversion, J.P. Weigle has stated he likes the Raleigh Competition (before the G.S.) as a suitable conversion frame, he does not like the International for some reason, but the geometry between the two is not very different. I never read a follow up to as to the why, there have been a number of public inquiries of late that never get answers. |
Originally Posted by repechage
(Post 15177387)
That was the color chosen by McLaren Cars during the Can-Am days, just so everyone would see them coming up from behind and move over.
As to a conversion, J.P. Weigle has stated he likes the Raleigh Competition (before the G.S.) as a suitable conversion frame, he does not like the International for some reason, but the geometry between the two is not very different. I never read a follow up to as to the why, there have been a number of public inquiries of late that never get answers. |
Weigle installs cantilever posts on frames originally equipped with sidepulls. The Competitions have a higher BB than the Internationals as I understand it. And not every Competition is a good candidate for the conversions he does, according to him. As we all know, Raleigh set the bar for inconsistency.
|
I have recently discovered that 1982-85 Lotus' (Loti?) make excellent conversion cannidates.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:42 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.