Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Brooks Saddle Quality going down the tubes

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Brooks Saddle Quality going down the tubes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-12-11, 03:26 AM
  #51  
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 39
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've got the Brooks Swallow-inspired Gyes, in honey, on its way to me (crows cycle). Price surely played a role ($60 vs $300)-- notably with the mixed reports on Brooks in recent years-- but also because I think the piece of fabric under the bottom looks like a great idea/improvement.

I'm avoiding proof ride-- and will go with Obaneuf's LP. It's got nothing in it to break down leather. No mineral spirits, nor petroleum products. Beeswax and propolis FTW.
justruss is offline  
Old 07-12-11, 03:48 AM
  #52  
Senior Member
 
Citoyen du Monde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,973
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 32 Times in 22 Posts
I have done some consulting work for a number of tanneries and they all lament the quality of the new hides that they get nowadays compared to decades ago. Today, there are fewer and fewer cattle that are grazed in areas where there is no barbed wire. This means fewer and fewer hides without scars. There are also more and more that are fattened almost exclusively in feed lots and seem not to produce as resistant a hide as previously. There is far more demand for leather than ever before, meaning there is more competition for the top hides. As Repechage says, there are also many ecological aspects that prevent the hides from being tanned as they were in the past. If you have ever visited a tannery, you will be aware of just how toxic the procedure is (or better yet, visit the town of Arzignano in the province of Vicenza in Italy on a hot day. It is the center of the Italian tannery world and back in the 80's, the place in the world with the highest density of Ferrari ownership in the world) All told it is unlikely that we will ever get as good overall quality in hides as in the past.
Citoyen du Monde is offline  
Old 07-12-11, 04:22 AM
  #53  
Yes.
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 110
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by justruss
I'm avoiding proof ride-- and will go with Obaneuf's LP.
DON'T do that!

Originally Posted by justruss
It's got nothing in it to break down leather. No mineral spirits, nor petroleum products. Beeswax and propolis FTW.
Wrong. Beeswax and propolis would be fine, but Obenauf's LP consists of oil (three oils to be precise), with b&p just added.
As we've had mixed experiences about Gyes saddles by now, be smart and don't ruin yours prematurly.
If you have to use anything (why should you at all? it's new, for chrissake!), use Sno-Seal or something similar, that won't soak in too far and/or soften the leather.
VintageR is offline  
Old 07-12-11, 06:54 AM
  #54  
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
Originally Posted by illwafer
consider this.

maybe lots of "newbs" kept buying and returning brooks saddles because they hurt and took forever to break in. i'm sure they get more returns than any other manufacturer (the retailers, that is).

so, maybe they are making the leather slightly thinner/softer for quicker break in (less life).

how long do we need saddles to last?
I have been thinking exactly the same thing.

I should say that though I've been riding Brooks and Wrights and other leather saddles for over 30 years I have not yet figured out what's the ideal in terms of saddle shape, hardness, etc. I have a couple that are hard as plywood, others that are considerably softened (not by me), and I'm really not sure which is more comfortable. But that new B17 I got a couple years ago, it was gloriously comfortable from day one. I thought this was unusual. And it was disappointing that it softened so rapidly.
rhm is offline  
Old 07-12-11, 07:09 AM
  #55  
Senior Member
 
southpawboston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Somerville, MA and Catskill Mtns
Posts: 4,134
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Liked 182 Times in 89 Posts
Originally Posted by auchencrow
I have an 40 year old Brooks Pro, some old B17's, and a new B17 which, I would venture to say, will outlive me.
The 40 year old Pro is still the stiffest, but they are all comfortable.
(I wish I could say the same for my 40 year old Fujita Pro, but it is still as hard as a rock.)
I've got a couple of old Brooks Pros, and they're both comfy for a long ride despite one being hard and the other soft:

The first is a 1966 pro (45 years old!) that has probably gotten wet many times and possibly oiled many times, there's no way of knowing the history. The leather is very soft, so much so that if you plied the leather with your hands, you would think it's too soft. However, I have no problems on 40-50 mile rides with this saddle. It also sags a bit if I put all my weight into it, but it's on an aggressive road bike where I'm rarely putting all my weight on it. In theory, this saddle shouldn't work, but it's not uncomfortable at all. Maybe if I rode longer distances on it, it would start to bother me.

The second is a 1973 Pro, and it's hard as a rock. I picked it up for cheap at a swap meet, it was unpliable and the shape was distorted. I imagine it had been stored underneath some object which had caused one side to push in. It was lopsided. With not much to lose, I soaked it under hot water, which softened it immediately, and re-molded it to what I thought would be the correct shape. After thorough drying, it maintained the remodeled shape. It has since been proofide-treated, and it's still very firm. It's also very comfortable and I have no problems riding it on long rides. It supports me in just the right places. Saddles don't need to be soft if they support you properly and don't intrude in the wrong places.

Bodies adapt, and different saddles can be comfortable to the same person.
southpawboston is offline  
Old 07-12-11, 08:11 AM
  #56  
Senior Member
 
himespau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,470
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4255 Post(s)
Liked 2,973 Times in 1,827 Posts
Originally Posted by justruss
I've got the Brooks Swallow-inspired Gyes, in honey, on its way to me (crows cycle). Price surely played a role ($60 vs $300)-- notably with the mixed reports on Brooks in recent years-- but also because I think the piece of fabric under the bottom looks like a great idea/improvement.
Do you know which Gyes corresponds to which Brooks? They say it for the sprung saddles, but the unsprungs, just say "like Brooks, but NOT Brooks"
__________________
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?), 1990 Concorde Aquila(hit by car while riding), others in build queue "when I get the time"





himespau is offline  
Old 07-18-11, 02:21 AM
  #57  
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 39
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by himespau
Do you know which Gyes corresponds to which Brooks? They say it for the sprung saddles, but the unsprungs, just say "like Brooks, but NOT Brooks"
Well, I haven't gotten it yet, but it should be here soon. That statement is based on i) experiences of others who have used one or both, and ii) visuals of the two saddles (though, obviously not the Gyes in person yet).

As for Obenauf's LP... I'm not sure what the "three natural oils" in it are, but the company says they're not petroleum, neatsfoot, or silicon based. It's quite possible I've missed it, but I haven't read a single complaint from using Obenauf's LP on a saddle-- and Rivendell recommends it for their Brooks sales-- which is more than I can say for Proofride. So, while I'll look for bad experiences with LP (do you have one?), I'm still planning on using it on the Gyes when it comes (or when it needs it, rather).
justruss is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Plimogz
Classic & Vintage
36
07-03-17 01:59 AM
Vexxer
General Cycling Discussion
4
05-06-16 07:20 AM
SoreFeet
Classic & Vintage
46
07-16-11 05:56 PM
newkie
Commuting
70
02-24-11 03:25 PM
Capecodder
Classic & Vintage
14
09-13-10 06:33 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.