Frame choice: New vs old
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 556
Likes: 3
Frame choice: New vs old
I am interested in a commuter/touring/rando type rig. I have my 72 Raleigh Super Course frameset, but I have also considered a new Nashbar Touring frame or a new Surly LHT frameset. Almost leaning towards the cheapo Nashbar because of my assumed (right or wrong) bb stiffness (alu vs steel). I'm relatively big and strong (gym and wattage) and although I understand commuting/touring is more about 120-180watts, occasionally I do like to put down some wattage (could make my brother's beautiful steel Guerciotti's inner chainring rub the chainstays). Any thoughts? If i get the Nashbar or Surly I am getting the Surly LHT fork...Once again most of my riding will be effortless 120-180 watts, but occasionally might need to represent...




#2
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,930
Likes: 5
From: Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
Bikes: Old Bike: 1975 Raleigh Delta, New Bike: 2004 Norco Bushpilot
Frame stiffness has little to do with frame material and a lot to do with frame design, although due to the increased chance of fatigue failure with AL, they tend to be built quite stiff. A stiffer frame also means a less comfortable ride, something that can be an issue on a longer ride. There are a couple of reasons for using a newer frame over an older frame, less issues with fitting newer components, which is something you may want for a long haul bike, you may be able to fit wider tires to a frame like the LHT. No reason why you couldn't build up the Super Course as a commuter with moustache bars and then get an LHT frame for your touring and rando.
#4
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 115
Likes: 1
#6
#7
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,930
Likes: 5
From: Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
Bikes: Old Bike: 1975 Raleigh Delta, New Bike: 2004 Norco Bushpilot
#8
Senior Member

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 17,196
Likes: 761
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Material can't be discounted, since the elasticity (springiness) parameters of steel, Ti, and aluminum(s) are pretty different. Both factors are key.
Meek, have you ever ridden an aluminum Cannondale? I'd see that as very stiff.
Is your friend going to build you a frame? Perhaps with such a ready source of expertise, you can learn about what to look for, in a frame that can handle a strong rider without chainstay rub. Clearly it's possible, otherwise the early decades of the TdF would not have happened!
Meek, have you ever ridden an aluminum Cannondale? I'd see that as very stiff.
Is your friend going to build you a frame? Perhaps with such a ready source of expertise, you can learn about what to look for, in a frame that can handle a strong rider without chainstay rub. Clearly it's possible, otherwise the early decades of the TdF would not have happened!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FromTheForest
Touring
12
03-19-13 09:58 PM
longhaultrucker
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
17
07-13-12 04:54 AM







