Swapping out my Surly LHT frame for a Cyclocross frame
#1
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Swapping out my Surly LHT frame for a Cyclocross frame
I built my LHT at a time when I was riding a lot more and had more bikes. These days I only have one so I'd like to move all the parts onto a more versatile frame primarily for commuting. I'd always had the cross check in mind but now i'm wondering what other options might be out there. My requirements are: rack+fender braze-ons, steel, nothing super fancy (under < 500$), and broadly compatible with my existing components (700c/no french or italian threading etc). I looked into the Pake C'mute but it's not clear that this frame is still manufactured. Any thoughts? Most threads on this subject here are several years old.
#2
Happy banana slug

Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,571
Likes: 2,524
From: Arcata, California, U.S., North America, Earth, Saggitarius Arm, Milky Way
Bikes: 1984 Araya MB 26L, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper Sport, 1993 Hard Rock Ultra, 1994 Trek Multitrack 750, 1995 Trek Singletrack 930
Ever think of becoming a Privateer? Arrr!
#3
Disco Infiltrator




Joined: May 2013
Posts: 15,345
Likes: 3,542
From: Folsom CA
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
So what's your build like? Because it's hard for me to imagine moving all the components over from a touring frame to a "cross commuter" frame and ending with a bike that's a lot different. It's just going to be a little taller and not as long.
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
"Well, well!" said Holmes, impatiently. "A good cyclist does not need a high road. The moor is intersected with paths and the moon is at the full."
Genesis 49:16-17
"Well, well!" said Holmes, impatiently. "A good cyclist does not need a high road. The moor is intersected with paths and the moon is at the full."
#4
I built my LHT at a time when I was riding a lot more and had more bikes. These days I only have one so I'd like to move all the parts onto a more versatile frame primarily for commuting. I'd always had the cross check in mind but now i'm wondering what other options might be out there My requirements are: rack+fender braze-ons, steel, nothing super fancy (under < 500$)
Yeah, this is like the opposite of the problem you're going to have unless you get into a really strange eBay rabbit hole.
#5
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 506
Likes: 19
From: CO
Bikes: Gunnar Hyper XF, Jamis Dragon Race, Surly LHT
Theres a lot you can do to your LHT that can really change how it rides. I recently took my rack off and got new wheels, plus added wider tires (went from 28 to 35mm), and wow, it feels like a new bike.
Attaching pic.
Attaching pic.
#6
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,067
Likes: 73
From: USA
Bikes: 84 Pinarello Trevisio, 86 Guerciotti SLX, 96 Specialized Stumpjumper, 2010 Surly Cross Check, 88 Centurion Prestige, 73 Raleigh Sports, GT Force, Bridgestone MB4
#7
Keepin it Wheel




Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,969
Likes: 5,255
From: San Diego
Bikes: Surly CrossCheck, Krampus
That's funny, I conceive of my CC as a pickup truck, but given that I bounce over trails of various rockiness sometimes, 'nimble Jeep Wrangler' seems apropos.
My Krampus with Jones H-Loop bars and a Brooks I visualize as a schoolbus.
OP you say you want a "more versatile frame primarily for commuting" -- what attributes of the LHT are bothering you during your commute, or other riding? I agree with KeatonR, change things up a little on your LHT and see if it feels more interesting. Take the racks off for a 'fast/light' ride.
Or, you just have some wanderlust after stripping down to N=1 bikes, which is OK. I respect your desire to stay N=1 rather than just 'solve' the problem by going back in the N+1 direction. But I think CC is going to be so similar to LHT that you won't get enough bang for your buck. Unfortunately I don't have any ideas what might be a spicier replacement frame.
My Krampus with Jones H-Loop bars and a Brooks I visualize as a schoolbus.
OP you say you want a "more versatile frame primarily for commuting" -- what attributes of the LHT are bothering you during your commute, or other riding? I agree with KeatonR, change things up a little on your LHT and see if it feels more interesting. Take the racks off for a 'fast/light' ride.
Or, you just have some wanderlust after stripping down to N=1 bikes, which is OK. I respect your desire to stay N=1 rather than just 'solve' the problem by going back in the N+1 direction. But I think CC is going to be so similar to LHT that you won't get enough bang for your buck. Unfortunately I don't have any ideas what might be a spicier replacement frame.
#8
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Thanks all for the input. These are good points. I guess the main things i'm picturing are:
- it's black, i'm sick of black and i've been unsuccessful in getting the surly decals off. I like virtually every other surly frame color.
- it feels heavy and awkward
- anything else that feels wrong or even makes me a little nervous commuting in the city (eg bottoming out my chainrings on a curb) is easy to blame on a bike that is fully at one end of the spectrum.
There is also the fact that this bike was stolen from me 5 years ago and I actually found the guy riding it a month later, chased him down and got it back from him, so possibly bad luck to
I suppose if i'm being honest listing these things out makes clear that buying a whole new frame is not the solution- maybe adding more stickers and considering an old golden era alloy road bike as a beater, or even a trek multitrack from back in the day or something. Thanks for your thoughts.
- it's black, i'm sick of black and i've been unsuccessful in getting the surly decals off. I like virtually every other surly frame color.
- it feels heavy and awkward
- anything else that feels wrong or even makes me a little nervous commuting in the city (eg bottoming out my chainrings on a curb) is easy to blame on a bike that is fully at one end of the spectrum.
There is also the fact that this bike was stolen from me 5 years ago and I actually found the guy riding it a month later, chased him down and got it back from him, so possibly bad luck to
I suppose if i'm being honest listing these things out makes clear that buying a whole new frame is not the solution- maybe adding more stickers and considering an old golden era alloy road bike as a beater, or even a trek multitrack from back in the day or something. Thanks for your thoughts.
#9
Unlisted member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,192
Likes: 435
From: Chicagoland
Bikes: Specialized Hardrock
I occasionally think about getting something that is less of a tug boat than my Hardrock but figure it would take a lot of effort to achieve that and it would make my commute a little easier (or maybe a lot) which would mean I'd need to ride more for the same health benefits. So I keep riding the Hradrock, much like when we got to the point of considering moving to a bigger house to fill up with more stuff or getting rid of some stuff we'd accumulated over the years and staying put in a house we liked.
Last edited by no motor?; 10-11-19 at 01:01 PM.
#10
Senior Member

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,161
Likes: 323
From: Mt Shasta, CA, USA
Bikes: Too many. Giant Trance X 29, Surly Midnight Special get the most time.
Current production CX bikes are almost all disc these days. I'm assuming you want to stick with cantis/linear pull brakes? CC is the only thing I can think of in current production except for a Gunnar Crossroads, which would be friggin sweet, but a bit expensive. So, yeah, a CC.
#11
Full Member

Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 435
Likes: 76
From: Richmond, VA
Bikes: 83 Bianchi Special 96 Specialized Stump Jumper Comp 09 Gary Fisher Paragon 09 Surly Cross Check 11 Surly Long Haul Trucker
I have both. The LHT is my geared bike and my CC is my fixed gear bike. The biggest difference, you guessed it, is one has no gears. There are other differences like the CC's BB height is great for not having to worry about pedal strike and it is more nimble. But in the big picture if I had only one bike it would be the LHT.
#12
aka Tom Reingold




Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,320
Likes: 6,605
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
I agree with [MENTION=23594]grolby[/MENTION]. The Cross Check may not be sufficiently different. In particular, it's pretty darned heavy for a cyclocross frame. I had two Cross Checks. I built the first one with very lightweight wheels, so it rode pretty well, and the heavy frame plus the light wheels made it feel moderately light. The second build was too damned heavy, so I got rid of that one, too. But weight may not matter as much to you as it does to me. You may want to look at vintage frames, because you get a good value, and they tend to be lighter. My current main bike is a 1974 Raleigh International with all Reynolds 531 tubing. I weighed it and the Cross Check. The Raleigh fork weighs (barely more than) HALF as much as the Surly fork! The Raleigh was originally spaced at 120 mm in the rear, so I spread it to 130 mm. Of course, it doesn't take cantilever brakes, and I put dual-pivot brakes on it. I couldn't be more satisfied with the braking unless I had disc brakes.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments. Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments. Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
healthie
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
3
11-23-15 05:53 PM
mycoatl
Touring
26
09-19-11 08:27 AM







