Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Good tools for measuring frame geometry

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Good tools for measuring frame geometry

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-19-11 | 12:22 AM
  #1  
sailorbenjamin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,630
Likes: 18
From: Rhode Island (an obscure suburb of Connecticut)

Bikes: one of each

Good tools for measuring frame geometry

I'm gonna measure my favorite bikes to try to unravel this frame geometry thing. I was holding my dime store protractor up to them tonight and I see that it;
A;is too small for an accurate reading,
B;has trouble reading around the lugs.
I've got a big shipwright's bevel guage that is pretty darn accurate but you need a bevel board to go with it. Maybe I'll cut some triangles out of thin plywood with a range of angles that I can hold up to the bike. Cut them to 71, 72, 73 degree angles and cut the corners off so the lugs don't get in the way.
Any of you ever monkey with this kind of stuff?
sailorbenjamin is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-11 | 12:33 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 7
From: Boulder County, CO

Bikes: '92 22" Cannondale M2000, '92 Cannondale R1000 Tandem, another modern Canndondale tandem, Two Holy Grail '86 Cannondale ST800s 27" (68.5cm) Touring bike w/Superbe Pro components and Phil Wood hubs. A bunch of other 27" ST frames & bikes.

I picked up a set of digital vernier calipers at Harbor freight on sale for $14 a couple of years ago. Like anything truly decent they can recalibrate to zero. Checked against a reference they are very very accurate (to within .01 mm). I take 'em with me to bike swaps and Veloswap to instantly identify what size a stem/seatpost are (so I don't end up with anything weird and French). In context when I'm looking for a 27.2 seatpost they return readings of say 27.21 or 27.19. So I still now exactly what I'm looking at. I wouldn't machine with 'em but for bicycles I certainly didn't need more precision. The plastic $3 vernier calipers I bought at HF that were slide read worked fine, but I wanted digital. Only issue is to remove battery after every use or it will drain. No issue as the hard case includes a space to store the button cell.

Another thing that Harbor Freight has is a very accurate digital scale. I picked one up for $12, but they typically sell for $14.99 and I've seen 'em on sale for as low as $9-10. Not the Cen-tech, but a decent brand. 1000g capacity. Dead on accurate. Great for counting out spoke nipples (just tare and drop in nipples until you reach 32 x average weight). I like to geek out when I buy old bits to know their weight.

However, what you're looking for here is also available at HF for cheap:

https://www.harborfreight.com/dial-ga...der-34214.html

Accurate enough angle finder for measuring bicycles. They have a $23 digital one, but that might be overkill unless you wanted it for fun.
mtnbke is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-11 | 01:10 AM
  #3  
bigbossman's Avatar
Dolce far niente
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,710
Likes: 33
From: Southwest Idaho
This is pretty handy:
https://www.amazon.com/Wixey-WR300-Di...1686591&sr=8-4

This might work pretty well, too:
https://www.harborfreight.com/multipu...nder-1028.html
__________________
"Love is not the dying moan of a distant violin, it’s the triumphant twang of a bedspring."

S. J. Perelman
bigbossman is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-11 | 01:14 AM
  #4  
Scooper's Avatar
Decrepit Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,488
Likes: 94
From: Santa Rosa, California

Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts

Here's how I measure frame angles using a Wixey digital angle gauge.



Finding fork offset (rake)



BB drop and wheelbase.



Here's the 1940 Paramount geometry after carefully measuring frame angles with the Wixey, BB drop, fork rake, wheelbase, and tubing lengths.

__________________
- Stan

my bikes

Science doesn't care what you believe.
Scooper is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-11 | 01:49 AM
  #5  
chi-james's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 354
Likes: 0

Bikes: team miyata, '73 p-14, MB-3, centurion lemans, Mystery TT, mongoose atb '85

... *crickets* ...

Originally Posted by Scooper
Here's how I measure frame angles using a Wixey digital angle gauge.



Finding fork offset (rake)



BB drop and wheelbase.



Here's the 1940 Paramount geometry after carefully measuring frame angles with the Wixey, BB drop, fork rake, wheelbase, and tubing lengths.

chi-james is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-11 | 01:49 AM
  #6  
RFC's Avatar
RFC
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,466
Likes: 24
From: Scottsdale, AZ

Bikes: many

I'm impressed.
RFC is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-11 | 03:03 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 946
Likes: 2
From: beantown

Bikes: '89 Specialized Hardrock Fixed Gear Commuter; 1984? Dawes Atlantis

Just remember to place the UCI calibrated pebble below that aluminum angle or else your readings will be off!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
randomgear is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-11 | 04:36 AM
  #8  
miamijim's Avatar
Senior Member
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Donating
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 13,973
Likes: 145
From: Tampa, Florida
Originally Posted by Scooper
Here's how I measure frame angles using a Wixey digital angle gauge.


Plus an iPhone with the 'carpenter' ap. Not a good pic but the 'X' axis shows th tube angle:

miamijim is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-11 | 06:51 AM
  #9  
AZORCH's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,123
Likes: 98
From: Liberty, Missouri

Bikes: 1966 Paramount | 1971 Raleigh International | ca. 1970 Bernard Carre | 1989 Waterford Paramount | 2012 Boulder Brevet | 2019 Specialized Diverge

Originally Posted by Scooper
Here's how I measure frame angles using a Wixey digital angle gauge.



Finding fork offset (rake)



BB drop and wheelbase.



Here's the 1940 Paramount geometry after carefully measuring frame angles with the Wixey, BB drop, fork rake, wheelbase, and tubing lengths.

Nice post!
AZORCH is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-11 | 09:09 AM
  #10  
sailorbenjamin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,630
Likes: 18
From: Rhode Island (an obscure suburb of Connecticut)

Bikes: one of each

Originally Posted by AZORCH
Nice post!
Yeah, impressive.
sailorbenjamin is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-11 | 09:10 AM
  #11  
sailorbenjamin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,630
Likes: 18
From: Rhode Island (an obscure suburb of Connecticut)

Bikes: one of each

Originally Posted by bigbossman
I have one of these. The incriments are really small. Maybe today, since I've been drinking coffee instead of wine, like last night.
sailorbenjamin is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-11 | 09:30 AM
  #12  
Scooper's Avatar
Decrepit Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,488
Likes: 94
From: Santa Rosa, California

Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts

Originally Posted by randomgear
Just remember to place the UCI calibrated pebble below that aluminum angle or else your readings will be off!
That's the beauty of the Wixey WR300; you don't need a level surface, you just need a straight one. After you "zero" the WR300 on the straight surface, the measured tubing angles are relative to the straight surface the wheels are on.

As bigbossman pointed out in his post, the WR300 is $29.95 through amazon.com (and it has 0.1° resolution, accuracy, and repeatability).
__________________
- Stan

my bikes

Science doesn't care what you believe.

Last edited by Scooper; 11-19-11 at 09:48 AM.
Scooper is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-11 | 09:38 AM
  #13  
Charles Wahl's Avatar
Disraeli Gears
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,349
Likes: 616
From: NYC
Originally Posted by sailorbenjamin
Maybe I'll cut some triangles out of thin plywood with a range of angles that I can hold up to the bike. Cut them to 71, 72, 73 degree angles and cut the corners off so the lugs don't get in the way.
With a good protractor, or a CAD program, you could make them out of cardboard and save the plywood. Or take a protractor and trim the ends that overhang the pivot off, to clear lugs. But the protractors I have would be no good for measuring obtuse angles (head tubes), so I think that cardboard templates are the best approach.

Measuring frame angles isn't where my ambition to measure frames hits the wall -- it's the BB drop and fork geometry that's complicated enough to get my attention distracted by other things. You have to be dedicated to this to do what Scooper's illustrated. Maybe if I had some purpose-built wooden stick tools that allowed me to measure these without disassembling a complete bike, or fitting fork to frame for those already torn down. Having a CAD template to draw the relevant "critical nodes" for a frame's geometry using input from measurements is also something that would help to visualize (and overlay multiple bikes) would be great too.
Charles Wahl is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-11 | 10:23 AM
  #14  
noglider's Avatar
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,320
Likes: 6,606
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Stan! You the man!
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-11 | 12:32 PM
  #15  
bigbossman's Avatar
Dolce far niente
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,710
Likes: 33
From: Southwest Idaho
Originally Posted by Scooper
That's the beauty of the Wixey WR300; you don't need a level surface, you just need a straight one. After you "zero" the WR300 on the straight surface, the measured tubing angles are relative to the straight surface the wheels are on.

As bigbossman pointed out in his post, the WR300 is $29.95 through amazon.com (and it has 0.1° resolution, accuracy, and repeatability).
Yeah - what I do with my bikes is I zero out the Wixley on the top tube or the floor, and then take my readings relative to that.
__________________
"Love is not the dying moan of a distant violin, it’s the triumphant twang of a bedspring."

S. J. Perelman
bigbossman is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-11 | 12:51 PM
  #16  
c_bake's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 762
Likes: 0

Bikes: Kestrel RT900SL, 1975 Viner, Specialized StumpJumper

I use an app for my Android device called Angle Meter..it works flawlessly.
c_bake is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-11 | 09:38 PM
  #17  
Road Fan's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 17,196
Likes: 761
From: Ann Arbor, MI

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Yes the iPhone has angle/carpenter apps available, but both it and the Wixey share the issue that you have to lay the phone or the Wixey square against the surface to be measured. I know it's difficult on the phone, I'd expect it's easier on a Wixey. I use an 8 inch Craftsman digital level for the long tubes. If I lay it against the headset bearings I can get the angle across them. By measuring the ODs of those bearings, I can compute the deviation angle and get the head angle. I get the fork offset by fixturing it. I use a different technique than Scooper that is, I think, a little more consistent since it does not require aligning the fork tube with a specific pencil line. It only depends on getting the steer tube parallel to a flat table surface, then to measure the altitude of the axle center and the altitude of the steer tube axis. The difference between them is the fork offset.

Last edited by Road Fan; 11-19-11 at 09:46 PM.
Road Fan is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-11 | 09:49 PM
  #18  
Road Fan's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 17,196
Likes: 761
From: Ann Arbor, MI

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Originally Posted by Charles Wahl
With a good protractor, or a CAD program, you could make them out of cardboard and save the plywood. Or take a protractor and trim the ends that overhang the pivot off, to clear lugs. But the protractors I have would be no good for measuring obtuse angles (head tubes), so I think that cardboard templates are the best approach.

Measuring frame angles isn't where my ambition to measure frames hits the wall -- it's the BB drop and fork geometry that's complicated enough to get my attention distracted by other things. You have to be dedicated to this to do what Scooper's illustrated. Maybe if I had some purpose-built wooden stick tools that allowed me to measure these without disassembling a complete bike, or fitting fork to frame for those already torn down. Having a CAD template to draw the relevant "critical nodes" for a frame's geometry using input from measurements is also something that would help to visualize (and overlay multiple bikes) would be great too.
Charles, what are you trying to do that is so demanding?
Road Fan is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-11 | 10:00 PM
  #19  
Charles Wahl's Avatar
Disraeli Gears
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,349
Likes: 616
From: NYC
Originally Posted by Road Fan
Charles, what are you trying to do that is so demanding?
Just trying to get past my innate laziness; I thought that was obvious!
Charles Wahl is offline  
Reply
Old 12-01-11 | 08:07 AM
  #20  
chi-james's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 354
Likes: 0

Bikes: team miyata, '73 p-14, MB-3, centurion lemans, Mystery TT, mongoose atb '85

sorry to awaken a sleeping thread, but the latest issue of Bicycle Quarterly has some interesting information about measuring frame angles from a photograph.
chi-james is offline  
Reply
Old 12-01-11 | 08:35 AM
  #21  
20grit's Avatar
Curmudgeon in Training
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,956
Likes: 11
From: Rural Retreat, VA

Bikes: 1974 Gazelle Champion Mondial, 2010 Cannondale Trail SL, 1988 Peugeot Nice, 1992ish Stumpjumper Comp,1990's Schwinn Moab

Or.... you could just modify an adjustable triangle to fit over lugs and more easily measure the angles. They make them in various sizes which would work on everything but small frames.


They'll work on anything up to 90 degrees and can work on others if you're feeling creative. For bike purposes, nothing is going to be over 90 degrees. Just put it up against the tubes and measure away.
Attached Images
20grit is offline  
Reply
Old 12-01-11 | 10:37 PM
  #22  
sailorbenjamin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,630
Likes: 18
From: Rhode Island (an obscure suburb of Connecticut)

Bikes: one of each

Originally Posted by chi-james
sorry to awaken a sleeping thread, but the latest issue of Bicycle Quarterly has some interesting information about measuring frame angles from a photograph.
Thanks, I'll look for that one.
I'm gonna wake this thread up in a couple of weeks when I've had the time to do some work.
sailorbenjamin is offline  
Reply
Old 12-02-11 | 07:47 AM
  #23  
Road Fan's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 17,196
Likes: 761
From: Ann Arbor, MI

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Originally Posted by 20grit
Or.... you could just modify an adjustable triangle to fit over lugs and more easily measure the angles. They make them in various sizes which would work on everything but small frames.


They'll work on anything up to 90 degrees and can work on others if you're feeling creative. For bike purposes, nothing is going to be over 90 degrees. Just put it up against the tubes and measure away.
Great for seat/top angles, not so good for top/head, down/head, or seat/down if you have a clamp derailleur, any computer wires, a water cage, or other stuff attached to the frame. I prefer the digital levels. You just have to work out a protocol for head tubes on smaller frames.
Road Fan is offline  
Reply
Old 12-02-11 | 08:42 AM
  #24  
20grit's Avatar
Curmudgeon in Training
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,956
Likes: 11
From: Rural Retreat, VA

Bikes: 1974 Gazelle Champion Mondial, 2010 Cannondale Trail SL, 1988 Peugeot Nice, 1992ish Stumpjumper Comp,1990's Schwinn Moab

Originally Posted by Road Fan
Great for seat/top angles, not so good for top/head, down/head, or seat/down if you have a clamp derailleur, any computer wires, a water cage, or other stuff attached to the frame. I prefer the digital levels. You just have to work out a protocol for head tubes on smaller frames.
I've seen some as small as 3". A bigger one can be made to work by attaching extensions the the pieces that would extend into the frame of the bike so the adjustable triangle can still be moved. Then you don't have to worry about fitting the triangle inside the frame, just the pins/pieces.
20grit is offline  
Reply
Old 12-02-11 | 09:02 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,868
Likes: 3,753
Originally Posted by RFC
I'm impressed.
I made up some hardwood slides that fit over an 80x20 alloy extrusion with axles. I am not crazy with the tires on the ground, I would go bare rims if the bike was together.
Referencing off the axle centers will give the best info though in my mind and is how a framebuilder would replicate a bike.
The little digital angle finder is a nice one it appears, small enough, most are not, I had to use a 1/2/3 block to offset mine for the head tube.
IF the axle plane or base plane is level then the angle measures will be good. the fork can be arrived at without taking it apart, but I appreciate the element accuracy.
I think noting bottom bracket drop is important.
One thing not to do is assume that the top tube is level, it more than not isn't.
For measuring top tube ctc length I place some masking tape on the joints and draw the intersections out.
repechage is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.