A very hypothetical frame size question.
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 430
Bikes: 2008 Seven Axiom Steel, 1984 Colnago Nuovo Mexico, 2008 Cervelo P2C, 2000 Trek Multitrack 7200
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
A very hypothetical frame size question.
Suppose you're about to bid on two classic Italian road bikes. Both are in excellent condition, both are priced the same. One has a frame size of 56 cm and the other 58 cm. Your frame size is 57 cm. Which do you buy and why?
TSapp
TSapp
#3
incazzare.
The one you like better.
__________________
1964 JRJ (Bob Jackson), 1973 Wes Mason, 1974 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1986 Schwinn High Sierra, 2000ish Colian (Colin Laing), 2011 Dick Chafe, 2013 Velo Orange Pass Hunter
1964 JRJ (Bob Jackson), 1973 Wes Mason, 1974 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1986 Schwinn High Sierra, 2000ish Colian (Colin Laing), 2011 Dick Chafe, 2013 Velo Orange Pass Hunter
#4
Dolce far niente
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 10,704
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times
in
14 Posts
^ This.
But, assuming your 57cm bike and the other two are more or less square, I'd choose the 56cm. Going down one cm is easier on me than going up one cm.
But, assuming your 57cm bike and the other two are more or less square, I'd choose the 56cm. Going down one cm is easier on me than going up one cm.
__________________
"Love is not the dying moan of a distant violin, it’s the triumphant twang of a bedspring."
S. J. Perelman
"Love is not the dying moan of a distant violin, it’s the triumphant twang of a bedspring."
S. J. Perelman
#5
Half way there
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 1,109
Bikes: 69 Hercules, 73 Raleigh Sports, 74 Raliegh Competition, 78 Nishiki Professional, 79 Nishiki International, 83 Colnago Super, 83 Viner Junior
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I would lean towards the 56 cm frame because of the stiffness advantage of smaller frames. You would surely have enough saddle height and bar reach adjustability to suit your metrics with just a 2 cm difference.
-G
-G
#6
"Chooch"
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Prairieville, Louisiana
Posts: 1,659
Bikes: Late 1990s Ciocc Titan
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Will you be using the bike for the same purpose as your current ride? Assuming that it isn't for touring/rando, I'd go with the smaller size.
#7
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,397
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,698 Times
in
2,518 Posts
It really depends on your fit. I think C&V bikes look a little silly if they are too small. Then again, 1cm is not going to be particularly noticeable. It would be important to know the TT length though.
#8
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 38
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What is the effective toptube length of both bikes?
If the 56 and 58 numbers are the actual measurement, I'd go 56. It's whole lot easier to gain cockpit distance (with a longer stem, longer reach bars, and setback seatpost) than it is to try and shorten it.
If the 56 and 58 numbers are the actual measurement, I'd go 56. It's whole lot easier to gain cockpit distance (with a longer stem, longer reach bars, and setback seatpost) than it is to try and shorten it.
#9
Senior Member
Gee! Since it's hypothetical, the answer is easy!
Buy them both. Ride each of them until you decide which you like better. Then sell the other one for a profit.
All the items raised above are correct, which suggests that what you posit as known simply isn't adequate to decide.
One cm in seat tube length is rarely a significant difference. I have one bike that is 3 cm smaller than my "normal" frame size, but I've set it up to compensate thru use of a setback seat post and longer stem. For several reasons, I really love to ride it.
Having bikes with slight variations keeps you attentive to fit & feel. Changing wheels & tires does that, too.
Buy them both. Ride each of them until you decide which you like better. Then sell the other one for a profit.
All the items raised above are correct, which suggests that what you posit as known simply isn't adequate to decide.
One cm in seat tube length is rarely a significant difference. I have one bike that is 3 cm smaller than my "normal" frame size, but I've set it up to compensate thru use of a setback seat post and longer stem. For several reasons, I really love to ride it.
Having bikes with slight variations keeps you attentive to fit & feel. Changing wheels & tires does that, too.
__________________
1959 Hilton Wrigley Connoisseur (my favorite!)
1963 Hetchins Mountain King
1971 Gitane Tour de France (original owner)
* 1971 Gitane Super Corsa (crashed)
* rebuilt as upright cruiser
1971 Gitane Super Corsa #2 (sweet replacement)
1980 Ritchey Road Touring (The Grail Bike)
1982 Tom Ritchey Everest
(replacing stolen 1981 TR Everest custom)
1982 Tom Ritchey McKinley (touring pickup truck)
1985 ALAN Record (Glued & Screwed. A gift.)
1959 Hilton Wrigley Connoisseur (my favorite!)
1963 Hetchins Mountain King
1971 Gitane Tour de France (original owner)
* 1971 Gitane Super Corsa (crashed)
* rebuilt as upright cruiser
1971 Gitane Super Corsa #2 (sweet replacement)
1980 Ritchey Road Touring (The Grail Bike)
1982 Tom Ritchey Everest
(replacing stolen 1981 TR Everest custom)
1982 Tom Ritchey McKinley (touring pickup truck)
1985 ALAN Record (Glued & Screwed. A gift.)
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 12,054
Mentioned: 201 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3015 Post(s)
Liked 3,802 Times
in
1,408 Posts
I'd get the blue one.
#11
Designer
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,368
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
What length stem do you have on your 57?
If they are both square, and you can run a shorter stem I would probably go with the larger.
Theoretically, the larger will offer a lower seat height to bars distance without having to raise the bars too much.
(I prefer the look of a lower stem)
If they are both square, and you can run a shorter stem I would probably go with the larger.
Theoretically, the larger will offer a lower seat height to bars distance without having to raise the bars too much.
(I prefer the look of a lower stem)
__________________
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 3,419
Bikes: 1984 Miyata 310, 1986 Schwinn Sierra, 2011 Jamis Quest, 1980 Peugeot TH8 Tandem, 1992 Performance Parabola, 1987 Ross Mt. Hood, 1988 Schwinn LeTour, 1988 Trek 400T, 1981 Fuji S12-S LTD, 197? FW Evans
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 531 Post(s)
Liked 1,005 Times
in
514 Posts
I'd go with the smaller one for the same reasons stated above. It is easier to stretch a size to make it fit than to shorten a frame.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,674
Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma
Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1372 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,751 Times
in
938 Posts
This is a pretty good question, actually.
I used to ride 54cm seat tube, but these days I ride a 56cm. As I got older, I found it increasingly difficult to get into and maintain a road bicycle crouch while riding. With this in mind, I tried larger frames and found the comfort factor to improve considerably.
So, think about your comfort and how it will impact your enjoyment. For my money, I would go slightly bigger, but that is because I am old and liking relaxed riding positions more than I used to.
Also, two Italian bikes means little to me. I would need to know what makes, conditions, components fitted and lots more. Size is, indeed, an important consideration but so are the other things.
I used to ride 54cm seat tube, but these days I ride a 56cm. As I got older, I found it increasingly difficult to get into and maintain a road bicycle crouch while riding. With this in mind, I tried larger frames and found the comfort factor to improve considerably.
So, think about your comfort and how it will impact your enjoyment. For my money, I would go slightly bigger, but that is because I am old and liking relaxed riding positions more than I used to.
Also, two Italian bikes means little to me. I would need to know what makes, conditions, components fitted and lots more. Size is, indeed, an important consideration but so are the other things.
__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Normal, Illinois
Posts: 2,714
Bikes: Trek 600 ,1980Raleigh Competition G.S., 1986 Schwinn Passage, Facet Biotour 2000, Falcon San Remo 531,Schwinn Sierra, Sun Seeker tricycle recumbent,1985 Bianchi Squadra
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times
in
9 Posts
I found going to a smaller frame helped me with balance and stability,
Pedal choice makes a difference, too, as does crankarm length .
All things being equal, slightly small frame .
Pedal choice makes a difference, too, as does crankarm length .
All things being equal, slightly small frame .
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: WA state
Posts: 4,809
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
This thread is pretty pointless without more info. You need to tell us top tube and seat tube measurements on all bikes + stem size on your "57 cm" if you want to get an answer that is any more than a guess. For example my colnago has a 58cm seat tube and 56cm top tube, my bianchi is 57x57. If you go too small it might work dimensionally but there may be too much saddle to bar drop, that's why I can't fit on a 56cm square bike. All else being equal for the best handling I would go with whatever allows a comfortable amount of drop as well as a 110-120mm stem.
#17
Thrifty Bill
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,525
Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more
Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 964 Times
in
628 Posts
+487 top tube length. Then, the one with the best paint.
Also, if it is fleece-bay, seller reputation becomes important.
And unfortunately, don't be surprised if the seller has the size wrong. The last bike I bought on eBay was sold as a 58, it was actually a 55. Fortunately, that's what I needed (I ignored seller's sizing). The one before that, sold as a 56, was a 53 (not so good). It moved to another home anyway. I really can't remember a seller getting size right. Part of the reason is I am looking at the deals, which usually means sketchy info, seller who is less experienced, or whatever.
Also, if it is fleece-bay, seller reputation becomes important.
And unfortunately, don't be surprised if the seller has the size wrong. The last bike I bought on eBay was sold as a 58, it was actually a 55. Fortunately, that's what I needed (I ignored seller's sizing). The one before that, sold as a 56, was a 53 (not so good). It moved to another home anyway. I really can't remember a seller getting size right. Part of the reason is I am looking at the deals, which usually means sketchy info, seller who is less experienced, or whatever.
Last edited by wrk101; 12-17-11 at 08:58 AM.
#18
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 37
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
In this hypothetical case i would buy the one that could get rid off easier than the other in the future...if you pay a lot for something you finally dont like ,after all its only photos until it arrives,then your only option is to sell it to someone else without loosing 50% of your money...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Retep15
Fitting Your Bike
5
07-19-13 05:03 AM
Stickney
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
11
07-30-10 10:08 PM