Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Classic & Vintage (https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-vintage/)
-   -   I always wanted a pair of these (https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-vintage/810509-i-always-wanted-pair-these.html)

dbakl 04-10-12 03:22 PM

I always wanted a pair of these
 
1 Attachment(s)
but not at this price:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/PMP-PEDAL-CR...69165957288117

kiwigem 04-10-12 04:09 PM

Agreed and agreed. Yowza.

gaucho777 04-10-12 04:43 PM

I'd rather pay $1400 for a crankset than $2400 for a jersey and corkscrew (same seller)--not that there's a chance I will do either.

iab 04-10-12 04:51 PM

Ummm ... not to get too weenie ... but I know an alternative design to save a few grams. :innocent:

gaucho777 04-10-12 04:52 PM

What, you don't want to hold out for the triple-bend crank arm?

http://i850.photobucket.com/albums/a...e/PMPfiniL.jpg

Henry III 04-10-12 05:02 PM

I would like to see the five angle version where the rings bolt directly to the arm at each bend.

Mort Canard 04-10-12 05:15 PM

I saw this listing and can't figure out what is the reasoning behind this contraption. What are they trying to accomplish with these? Are they designed to flex in some direction? How would they increase efficiency?

auchencrow 04-10-12 05:16 PM

The same seller lists this commemorative jersey and corkscrew for $2400.

I suppose I could always use a jersey, but what would I do with the corkscrew? Wine comes in boxes now.

http://i254.photobucket.com/albums/h...ecorkscrew.jpg

Lamplight 04-10-12 05:23 PM


Originally Posted by Henry III (Post 14083430)
I would like to see the five angle version where the rings bolt directly to the arm at each bend.

Hey, at least then it would kind of make sense!

dbakl 04-10-12 05:25 PM

I think its just one of those ideas that periodically pops up as an "improvement", like chainrings that aren't round.

lostarchitect 04-10-12 06:47 PM

And I always wanted a pair of these, but we don't always get what we want.

http://yeselguapo.com/wp-content/upl...-twins-042.jpg

hueyhoolihan 04-10-12 07:20 PM


Originally Posted by lostarchitect (Post 14083838)
And I always wanted a pair of these, but we don't always get what we want.

http://yeselguapo.com/wp-content/upl...-twins-042.jpg

well... to be completely accurate that's TWO pair. :)

Henry III 04-10-12 07:24 PM

...ummm wait what were we talking about? They've got some pretty shoes too.

RobE30 04-10-12 07:52 PM


Originally Posted by lostarchitect (Post 14083838)
And I always wanted a pair of these, but we don't always get what we want.

http://yeselguapo.com/wp-content/upl...-twins-042.jpg

Glad you have your priorities straight!

Wulf 04-10-12 10:42 PM

No offense but you can probably get a doctor to give you a pair of those!

Mort Canard 04-11-12 08:15 AM


Originally Posted by Wulf (Post 14084616)
No offense but you can probably get a doctor to give you a pair of those!

Prolly wouldn't look the same on lostarchitect! :roflmao2:

NormDeplume 04-11-12 08:18 AM


Originally Posted by Wulf (Post 14084616)
No offense but you can probably get a doctor to give you a pair of those!

But they might cost more than $2400...

lostarchitect 04-11-12 09:27 AM


Originally Posted by Mort Canard (Post 14085383)
Prolly wouldn't look the same on lostarchitect! :roflmao2:

Yeah something tells me all the chest hair would ruin the effect.

20grit 04-11-12 09:29 AM


Originally Posted by lostarchitect (Post 14085497)
Yeah something tells me all the chest hair would ruin the effect.

They'd get in the way of your parallel bar. (Assuming those are still used in your office. Right now mine is preventing redlines from sliding off my drawing board)

puchfinnland 04-11-12 10:08 AM

Hey, the 2 lovely girls dont have any bicycles- no interest.

the cranks, I have seen them on the net before....what is it?
where there really people stupid enough to believe in the idea?

I just dont get it!

puchfinnland 04-11-12 10:15 AM

1 Attachment(s)
now here you have a good set with their prioritys straight!
(but wait! they are fake! 2 handbrakes??)

http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=244758

shnibop 04-11-12 12:20 PM


Originally Posted by Mort Canard (Post 14083486)
I saw this listing and can't figure out what is the reasoning behind this contraption. What are they trying to accomplish with these? Are they designed to flex in some direction? How would they increase efficiency?

Right, what's the point? The point at which the pedal mounwill and where your foot will be) will be equally distant from the spindle at all times during normal rotation of the cranks, right? So what's the point?

Flex? Why would anyone want their cranks to flex under load?

echo 04-11-12 12:52 PM


Originally Posted by lostarchitect (Post 14083838)
And I always wanted a pair of these, but we don't always get what we want.

http://yeselguapo.com/wp-content/upl...-twins-042.jpg

Holy smokes Batman! :)

kiwigem 04-11-12 12:58 PM


Originally Posted by shnibop (Post 14086189)
Right, what's the point? The point at which the pedal mounwill and where your foot will be) will be equally distant from the spindle at all times during normal rotation of the cranks, right? So what's the point?

Flex? Why would anyone want their cranks to flex under load?

I figured it was just for looks! Shows what I know. I do think the arc- shaped type cranks are very pretty.

ilikebikes 04-11-12 01:26 PM


Originally Posted by lostarchitect (Post 14083838)
And I always wanted a pair of these, but we don't always get what we want.

http://yeselguapo.com/wp-content/upl...-twins-042.jpg

Speak for yourself!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:32 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.