![]() |
I always wanted a pair of these
1 Attachment(s)
|
Agreed and agreed. Yowza.
|
I'd rather pay $1400 for a crankset than $2400 for a jersey and corkscrew (same seller)--not that there's a chance I will do either.
|
Ummm ... not to get too weenie ... but I know an alternative design to save a few grams. :innocent:
|
What, you don't want to hold out for the triple-bend crank arm?
http://i850.photobucket.com/albums/a...e/PMPfiniL.jpg |
I would like to see the five angle version where the rings bolt directly to the arm at each bend.
|
I saw this listing and can't figure out what is the reasoning behind this contraption. What are they trying to accomplish with these? Are they designed to flex in some direction? How would they increase efficiency?
|
The same seller lists this commemorative jersey and corkscrew for $2400.
I suppose I could always use a jersey, but what would I do with the corkscrew? Wine comes in boxes now. http://i254.photobucket.com/albums/h...ecorkscrew.jpg |
Originally Posted by Henry III
(Post 14083430)
I would like to see the five angle version where the rings bolt directly to the arm at each bend.
|
I think its just one of those ideas that periodically pops up as an "improvement", like chainrings that aren't round.
|
And I always wanted a pair of these, but we don't always get what we want.
http://yeselguapo.com/wp-content/upl...-twins-042.jpg |
Originally Posted by lostarchitect
(Post 14083838)
And I always wanted a pair of these, but we don't always get what we want.
http://yeselguapo.com/wp-content/upl...-twins-042.jpg |
...ummm wait what were we talking about? They've got some pretty shoes too.
|
Originally Posted by lostarchitect
(Post 14083838)
And I always wanted a pair of these, but we don't always get what we want.
http://yeselguapo.com/wp-content/upl...-twins-042.jpg |
No offense but you can probably get a doctor to give you a pair of those!
|
Originally Posted by Wulf
(Post 14084616)
No offense but you can probably get a doctor to give you a pair of those!
|
Originally Posted by Wulf
(Post 14084616)
No offense but you can probably get a doctor to give you a pair of those!
|
Originally Posted by Mort Canard
(Post 14085383)
Prolly wouldn't look the same on lostarchitect! :roflmao2:
|
Originally Posted by lostarchitect
(Post 14085497)
Yeah something tells me all the chest hair would ruin the effect.
|
Hey, the 2 lovely girls dont have any bicycles- no interest.
the cranks, I have seen them on the net before....what is it? where there really people stupid enough to believe in the idea? I just dont get it! |
1 Attachment(s)
now here you have a good set with their prioritys straight!
(but wait! they are fake! 2 handbrakes??) http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=244758 |
Originally Posted by Mort Canard
(Post 14083486)
I saw this listing and can't figure out what is the reasoning behind this contraption. What are they trying to accomplish with these? Are they designed to flex in some direction? How would they increase efficiency?
Flex? Why would anyone want their cranks to flex under load? |
Originally Posted by lostarchitect
(Post 14083838)
And I always wanted a pair of these, but we don't always get what we want.
http://yeselguapo.com/wp-content/upl...-twins-042.jpg |
Originally Posted by shnibop
(Post 14086189)
Right, what's the point? The point at which the pedal mounwill and where your foot will be) will be equally distant from the spindle at all times during normal rotation of the cranks, right? So what's the point?
Flex? Why would anyone want their cranks to flex under load? |
Originally Posted by lostarchitect
(Post 14083838)
And I always wanted a pair of these, but we don't always get what we want.
http://yeselguapo.com/wp-content/upl...-twins-042.jpg |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:32 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.