5' 10" tall what darn size??
#51
Senior Member
If you like the "feel" of the Paramount and the fit of the 23" Voyageur, then get a 23" Paramount. Too much is made of the "advantages" of a smaller frame, IMO.
SP
OC, OR
SP
OC, OR
#52
Retro Grouch
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Santa Cruz
Posts: 2,210
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Rivendell has has more about sizing than almost anything else; the Readers Digest version is big frames good; small frames bad
Learn About Bikes with Rivendell Bicycle Works
Learn About Bikes with Rivendell Bicycle Works
#53
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wherever
Posts: 16,748
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 132 Times
in
78 Posts
Hunnert percent. A too-small bike is painful. That Paramount is way too small for someone 5' 10, IMO.
Smaller frames were popularized for Criteriums and such. Want to cruise comfortably? Get a frame near the upper limit of your range. If I were 5' 10", I'd probably be on a 58.
2 cents.
Smaller frames were popularized for Criteriums and such. Want to cruise comfortably? Get a frame near the upper limit of your range. If I were 5' 10", I'd probably be on a 58.
2 cents.
Last edited by rootboy; 12-20-14 at 06:08 PM.
#54
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,196
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1565 Post(s)
Liked 1,297 Times
in
866 Posts
Hunnert percent. A too-small bike is painful. That Paramount is way too small for someone 5' 10, IMO.
Smaller frames were popularized for Criteriums and such. Want to cruise comfortably? Get a frame near the upper limit of your range. If I were 5' 10", I'd probably be on a 58.
2 cents.
Smaller frames were popularized for Criteriums and such. Want to cruise comfortably? Get a frame near the upper limit of your range. If I were 5' 10", I'd probably be on a 58.
2 cents.
A Mark Nobilette-framed bike I picked up last week seems to be such an animal, it's a tall 59.5cm C-T, with parallel 73.5-degree angles and a short 56cm toptube.
Not surprisingly, it has a Cinelli 135mm stem extension, to allow the tall rider some reach. And the fork is raked minimally, so that on the first ride my shoe kept hitting the tire in sharp turns!
So here's this ~60cm frame, and the last thing I expected is that the distance from the bottom bracket to the front axle is shorter than on even the shortest couple of 54cm frames that I own!
At least the bike handles very well, and actually fits this 5'9" rider perfectly with that 135mm stem clamping a #64-42 handlebar.
Here's a picture, I paid 180 for it and it has D-A 7400 parts (but for the newer Campag headset and badly-cracked Campagnolo crankset).
I foolishly test-rode the bike for a half-hour with the 1/2"-long crack in the driveside arm near the spider, and it is definitely a racer's machine. I will have to avoid using certain of my cleated shoes to avoid heavy contact with the front tire while cornering at low speeds.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
67tony
Classic and Vintage Bicycles: Whats it Worth? Appraisals.
9
02-26-13 07:59 AM
silvercreek
Classic & Vintage
11
11-10-11 07:20 AM
Team Ogre
Classic and Vintage Bicycles: Whats it Worth? Appraisals.
5
11-24-10 07:16 AM