Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

catalog weights

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

catalog weights

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-19-12 | 05:56 AM
  #1  
beech333's Avatar
Thread Starter
Fuji Fan
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,885
Likes: 338
From: Central IL

Bikes: Was Fuji and got my grails (Pro, Pro SR, Design Series, & Ti). Now I hunt 50's/60's road bikes.

catalog weights

I recall reading a post a few years ago stating that some components(pedals?) were removed from bikes for the catalog weights. Can someone tell me if that is all that was removed and did companies generally weigh the smallest bike available?

I'm a bit curious because I recently rebuilt a bike with new wheels and pedals that feel lighter than the originals, yet the bike weighs 0.2 lbs more than the catalog weight. I'm happy with the 20.8 lbs, including pedals, but a bit curious too.
beech333 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-12 | 06:40 AM
  #2  
Forum Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 22,904
Likes: 10,331
From: Kalamazoo
I believe there is/was no standardization for how a manufacturers measure the weight of their bikes.

Some mfgrs weighed their bikes with pedals, some did not. Some measured a 54cm frame and used that size as their overall official weight. Others I am sure just guessed and I am sure that many just lied.

YMMV.
__________________


Carbon: Fuji SL2.1 Di2.......Aluminum: Cannondale Synapse 105........Steel: Vintage Specialized Sirrus
...
cb400bill is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-12 | 07:52 AM
  #3  
JReade's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 4
From: Oregon City, OR
0.2 lbs is akin to using thicker housing than the original, rim strips, and bar tape.
JReade is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-12 | 08:26 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 3
From: Minnesota- the frozen tundra

Bikes: 1977 Raleigh Super Grand Prix, 1976 Gitane Tour de France

Viscount listed the 1974 Aerospace at 24 lbs and when I finished building my sons a couple weeks ago I weighed it and guess what?

It weighs 24 lbs.

I'm never, ever going to be concerned enough about weight to fuss about fractions of a pound (not that you were fussing).
SteveSGP is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-12 | 08:26 AM
  #5  
randyjawa's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 12,564
Likes: 2,739
From: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!

Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma

I believe there is/was no standardization for how a manufacturers measure the weight of their bikes.
Unless, of course, you believe, as I do, that every manufacturer tended to suggest a lower actual weight, than my digital scale suggests.

Funny thing, now that I think of it, so do most owners;-)
__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
randyjawa is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-12 | 09:08 AM
  #6  
jjhabbs's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 1,524
From: Chicagoland

Bikes: to many to list

in the 80s when I worked at a shop we noticed that a lot of the wieghts for some companys were right on. They would measure a 21 inch frame but at least it was fairly accurate. Some other brands were not even close and you would have to strip it down to meet their advertised weight..it all depended on the brand.
__________________
From Illinois. Collector of many fine bicycles from all over the world. Subscribe to my Youtube channel. Just search John's vintage road bike garage
jjhabbs is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-12 | 09:53 AM
  #7  
wahoonc's Avatar
Membership Not Required
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 16,853
Likes: 18
From: On the road-USA

Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG

I have never had one of my bikes meet the catalog weight listing...but then again I ride 64cm frames

Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(

ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.

"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"
_Nicodemus

"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"
_krazygluon
wahoonc is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-12 | 10:07 AM
  #8  
beech333's Avatar
Thread Starter
Fuji Fan
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,885
Likes: 338
From: Central IL

Bikes: Was Fuji and got my grails (Pro, Pro SR, Design Series, & Ti). Now I hunt 50's/60's road bikes.

Originally Posted by FORDSVTPARTS
I'm never, ever going to be concerned enough about weight to fuss about fractions of a pound (not that you were fussing).
Yes, I am by no means a weight weenie. My favorite bike is my 30lb Special Road Racer, but this one had me a little puzzled. I was just trying to get it down as low as possible, without going overboard on price.

2009 Mavic Ksyrium Elite wheelset
Ultegra Cassette
Dura Ace Downtube shifters
beech333 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-12 | 10:16 AM
  #9  
Chombi's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,128
Likes: 39

Bikes: 1986 Alan Record Carbonio, 1985 Vitus Plus Carbone 7, 1984 Peugeot PSV, 1972 Line Seeker, 1986(est.) Medici Aerodynamic (Project), 1985(est.) Peugeot PY10FC

The period between the 70's and 80's were a virtual weight battleground between most of the big manufacturers.
Their brochures and catalogues typically listed weights for most of their sport, race and touring bikes and it did affect sales as weight weenie fever was very contagious back then. But as noted, the weights listed were inconsistent with actual weights of the bike when you weigh them yourself. Some manufacturers seem to have manupilated their wieghing process to their advantage and did not weigh complete bikes (No pedals, reflectors, smallest size frame, no bottle cage....etc.) So it was not surprising to find out when you wiegh something like a Peugeot PSV back then and come up with a weight up to 2 pounds over what is in their catalogues.
I do remember seeing some catalogues evetually adding the word "Approx." in front of their wieght numbers which must have give them a bit of tolerance with the buying public for their innacuracies.

Chombi
Chombi is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rootboy
Classic & Vintage
76
12-30-19 11:25 PM
gman214
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
30
08-20-14 02:16 PM
dbikingman
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
29
11-17-13 01:26 AM
Genaro
Southern California
3
12-04-12 10:04 AM
NameWasTaken
Road Cycling
48
09-06-11 04:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.