Re-Simplex-ing a PX10?
#1
Re-Simplex-ing a PX10?
So I've found a bit of information on here for converting a Simplex hanger to allow Campy/Suntour/Shimano derailleurs, but I'm in the opposite situation. My Peugeot already has a Campy NR RD/FD/Shifter.
The problem is, I don't really like em. At the very least, I'm hoping to put on some Simplex retrofriction shifters, but I'm curious what my RD options are. Is it feasible or even possible to go back to a Simplex RD? If not, a first-gen Superbe would look at least as appropriate as the NR, and probably work a bit better.

The problem is, I don't really like em. At the very least, I'm hoping to put on some Simplex retrofriction shifters, but I'm curious what my RD options are. Is it feasible or even possible to go back to a Simplex RD? If not, a first-gen Superbe would look at least as appropriate as the NR, and probably work a bit better.
#2
I was about to tell you that both a Simplex and a Suntour will mount no problem, but then I noticed something odd on the backside of your hanger. I would expect to see only the end of the hanger bolt there. Something strange has been added.
I suggest that you look for one of the drop-parallelogram Super LJs or an SX610.
I don't like NR derailers either.
I suggest that you look for one of the drop-parallelogram Super LJs or an SX610.
I don't like NR derailers either.
Last edited by Grand Bois; 05-11-12 at 03:24 PM.
#4
#6
Senior Member



Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 447
From: Niagara Region, Canada
Bikes: 1970s Alex Singer, 1960s Peugeot PX 10, 1960s Bertin C37, 1973 Carre Bertin C 37, 1972 Carlton Kermesse, 1981 Peugeot PX 14 Super Competition
Hi, Suncake-
An LJ or SX series Simplex should still fit. I just measured the bolt diameter on an LJ and it is slightly smaller than the bolt diameter of the stock Simplex Criterium. Nonetheless, it should fit in the back of the Simplex dropout even given the Dremelling and threading to accomodate the Campy derailleur. Simplexes all have a stamped steel tab to act as a range of motion limiter and it is fixed to the derailleur body so the cut to the dropout will not affect it. Have you considered a Criterium? It's a straight fit to the Simple dropout and despite the scorn heaped on plastic Simplexes, the metal reinforcements make them quite effective. I have been using one on a PX 10 on an old Maillard freewheel and it shifts quite well. Just a possibility to consider and much cheaper than than trying to find a reasonably priced LJ.
An LJ or SX series Simplex should still fit. I just measured the bolt diameter on an LJ and it is slightly smaller than the bolt diameter of the stock Simplex Criterium. Nonetheless, it should fit in the back of the Simplex dropout even given the Dremelling and threading to accomodate the Campy derailleur. Simplexes all have a stamped steel tab to act as a range of motion limiter and it is fixed to the derailleur body so the cut to the dropout will not affect it. Have you considered a Criterium? It's a straight fit to the Simple dropout and despite the scorn heaped on plastic Simplexes, the metal reinforcements make them quite effective. I have been using one on a PX 10 on an old Maillard freewheel and it shifts quite well. Just a possibility to consider and much cheaper than than trying to find a reasonably priced LJ.
#7
The bolt sticks out slightly, but there isn't anything attached to it. Is the hanger naturally recessed like that on the inside? The bolt doesn't look the best, but the threads haven't caused any problems.
#8
Super LJs can be expensive, but you can still find good deals if you're patient. I paid $40 for this one, but it was a couple of years ago. The price included the matching FD.

The SX610 is a favorite of mine. I had a bunch of them at one time, but I've sold most of them. I don't think I ever paid more than $20 for one. It's pretty much the same as the super LJ above, but it has a steel cage and the arms are plastic under the metal. It weighs something like 35 grams more. I have them on two bikes and I've kept a couple of spares. I replace the pulleys on all Simplexes with Bullseyes. The Criterium that was on my PX10 lasted for 10 years before a pulley disintegrated and left me stranded miles from home.
The SX610 is a favorite of mine. I had a bunch of them at one time, but I've sold most of them. I don't think I ever paid more than $20 for one. It's pretty much the same as the super LJ above, but it has a steel cage and the arms are plastic under the metal. It weighs something like 35 grams more. I have them on two bikes and I've kept a couple of spares. I replace the pulleys on all Simplexes with Bullseyes. The Criterium that was on my PX10 lasted for 10 years before a pulley disintegrated and left me stranded miles from home.
Last edited by Grand Bois; 05-11-12 at 09:12 PM.
#9
So I picked up a 5500 SLJ from Kurt (who else?), but I'm not quite sure how to tighten it, considering the back part of the hanger seems to have been flattened to accept a Campy derailer. I can tighten the hanger enough to prevent the mounting bolt to move, but I'm afraid that the upper pivot will be too tight.

#10
Senior Member


Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 10,044
Likes: 2,505
From: Fairplay Co
Bikes: Current 79 Nishiki Custum Sport, Jeunet 620, notable previous bikes P.K. Ripper loop tail, Kawahara Laser Lite, Paramount Track full chrome, Raliegh Internatioanl, Motobecan Super Mirage. 59 Crown royak 3 speed
I for one wouldn't go with the SX series simplex because they tend to break just below the hanger bolt like this.

I have seen several like this at the local bike coop and had one break on a build recently.

I have seen several like this at the local bike coop and had one break on a build recently.
#11
If I own it, I ride it


Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,685
Likes: 820
From: Cardinal Country
Bikes: Lejeune(14), Raleigh, Raysport, Jan De Reus, Gazelle, Masi, B. Carré(4), Springfield, Greg Lemond, Andre Bertin, Schwinn Paramount
RE: SX-610. I do not care for them. I found them to shift poorly compared to the SLJs I own.
#13
#15
If I own it, I ride it


Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,685
Likes: 820
From: Cardinal Country
Bikes: Lejeune(14), Raleigh, Raysport, Jan De Reus, Gazelle, Masi, B. Carré(4), Springfield, Greg Lemond, Andre Bertin, Schwinn Paramount
No reason why it should not work as is. Once you reposition the tab, that is.
#16
Old fart



Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,350
Likes: 5,262
From: Appleton WI
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
The SX-660 is also an affordable alternative to the SLJ units. Like the SLJs, it is all metal, but has a steel pulley cage like the SX-610 and isn't as nicely finished as the SLJ.
#17
#18
www.theheadbadge.com



Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 29,015
Likes: 5,514
From: Southern Florida
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
I don't have a photo of an early Simplex dropout hanger, but I do have a photo of an SLJ 5000 on a Simplex v2 hanger:

That tab position on Suncake's RD doesn't make sense though - I'm a bit concerned that there's something wrong with the spring on it. I might have to pull the RD off the Peugeot PY10 to see what the 5500's tab should look like at rest.
-Kurt

That tab position on Suncake's RD doesn't make sense though - I'm a bit concerned that there's something wrong with the spring on it. I might have to pull the RD off the Peugeot PY10 to see what the 5500's tab should look like at rest.
-Kurt
#19
Senior Member


Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 246
From: Southern Maryland
Bikes: A few
So I've found a bit of information on here for converting a Simplex hanger to allow Campy/Suntour/Shimano derailleurs, but I'm in the opposite situation. My Peugeot already has a Campy NR RD/FD/Shifter.
The problem is, I don't really like em. At the very least, I'm hoping to put on some Simplex retrofriction shifters, but I'm curious what my RD options are. Is it feasible or even possible to go back to a Simplex RD? If not, a first-gen Superbe would look at least as appropriate as the NR, and probably work a bit better.


The problem is, I don't really like em. At the very least, I'm hoping to put on some Simplex retrofriction shifters, but I'm curious what my RD options are. Is it feasible or even possible to go back to a Simplex RD? If not, a first-gen Superbe would look at least as appropriate as the NR, and probably work a bit better.
#20
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,128
Likes: 39
Bikes: 1986 Alan Record Carbonio, 1985 Vitus Plus Carbone 7, 1984 Peugeot PSV, 1972 Line Seeker, 1986(est.) Medici Aerodynamic (Project), 1985(est.) Peugeot PY10FC
From the pic though, it seems that the SX660 has aluminum arms too, I always thought the the difference between the 610 and the 660 was only the pulley cage legnth for different capacities.
Chombi
Last edited by Chombi; 06-01-12 at 03:23 PM.
#21
I'm failing at getting the tab in the right place. Better post here before I break something. From what I can tell, there's only one orientation that I can get the tab washer to fit...and this won't allow me to get on the other side of the hanger.

#23
www.theheadbadge.com



Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 29,015
Likes: 5,514
From: Southern Florida
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
#24
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,128
Likes: 39
Bikes: 1986 Alan Record Carbonio, 1985 Vitus Plus Carbone 7, 1984 Peugeot PSV, 1972 Line Seeker, 1986(est.) Medici Aerodynamic (Project), 1985(est.) Peugeot PY10FC
I'm kinda surpised to see that these older straight parallelogram Simplex RDs are also tensioned at the top pivot with a spring. Maybe because I never owned one of these model Simplex's. I always thought that they are only tensioned on the bottom pivot to control the jocky wheel cage movements (like the Campy NR RD). If this does indeed require upper pivot tension, It most likely needs to be pre-tensioned (twisted) before bolting on to a dropout. That might be why things don't seem to be lining up on you.
Chombi
Chombi
#25
If I own it, I ride it


Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,685
Likes: 820
From: Cardinal Country
Bikes: Lejeune(14), Raleigh, Raysport, Jan De Reus, Gazelle, Masi, B. Carré(4), Springfield, Greg Lemond, Andre Bertin, Schwinn Paramount
Last edited by CV-6; 06-01-12 at 06:16 PM. Reason: incorrect terminology







