Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

steel and tubes.....differences in quality

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

steel and tubes.....differences in quality

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-30-12 | 11:14 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 18
steel and tubes.....differences in quality

Heres another thread on this topic.

I guess im lost

Here is my dillema. I have a fuji sports 10 that i have converted into a rain bike with full fenders and SS. IT has 661 tubing.

I just ran into a great deal on a Raleigh Olympian with 502 tubing. It fits meet well and i believe is the same size as the fuji.

I cant decide which to keep. I could redo the raleigh and sell the fuji....although i dont have any problems with the fuji.

which is the better quality. THe Raleigh will take some TLC to get cleaned and redone but i plan to do that regardless if it goes or if it stays.

I think i read that the 661 fuji tubes were bottom of the line in the fuji offerings. Not sure how it compares to the 502 tubing of the raleigh.

Thoughts? IM thinking of just cleaning and selling the raleigh and banking the cash unless someone can convince me otherwise. I realize both are nothing special

Last edited by scale; 06-30-12 at 11:28 AM.
scale is offline  
Reply
Old 06-30-12 | 11:34 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,045
Likes: 15
From: Lancaster County, PA

Bikes: '39 Hobbs, '58 Marastoni, '73 Italian custom, '75 Wizard, '76 Wilier, '78 Tom Kellogg, '79 Colnago Super, '79 Sachs, '81 Masi Prestige, '82 Cuevas, '83 Picchio Special, '84 Murray-Serotta, '85 Trek 170, '89 Bianchi, '90 Bill Holland, '94 Grandis

Asking which to keep based on the tubing type is asking the wrong question. That should be one of your last criteria.
Picchio Special is offline  
Reply
Old 06-30-12 | 11:41 AM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 18
thats about the response i expected

Ill give both a chance...figure out which i like best and which fits best......and choose from there.

I was thinking build quality over fit/personal enjoyment.

Makes sense..
scale is offline  
Reply
Old 06-30-12 | 11:48 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,045
Likes: 15
From: Lancaster County, PA

Bikes: '39 Hobbs, '58 Marastoni, '73 Italian custom, '75 Wizard, '76 Wilier, '78 Tom Kellogg, '79 Colnago Super, '79 Sachs, '81 Masi Prestige, '82 Cuevas, '83 Picchio Special, '84 Murray-Serotta, '85 Trek 170, '89 Bianchi, '90 Bill Holland, '94 Grandis

Originally Posted by scale
thats about the response i expected

Ill give both a chance...figure out which i like best and which fits best......and choose from there.

I was thinking build quality over fit/personal enjoyment.

Makes sense..
Build quality is not a non-factor, but it doesn't necessarily correlate to the tubing choice. Plenty of bikes have been been with over-heated, top-quality tubing, and plenty of beautifully built bikes have been constructed of "lesser" tubing.
Picchio Special is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
since6
Classic & Vintage
10
02-04-19 10:25 AM
cuda2k
Classic & Vintage
80
10-29-18 11:30 AM
NukeouT
Classic & Vintage
27
02-25-17 10:18 PM
Lolita123
Hybrid Bicycles
0
10-21-14 04:23 PM
fez_
Road Cycling
5
10-23-11 10:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.