Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Re-face bottom bracket or not?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Re-face bottom bracket or not?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-01-13 | 07:19 AM
  #1  
jonwvara's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,060
Likes: 943
From: Washington County, Vermont, USA

Bikes: 1973-4 Gitane Tour de France, early 1970's Lejeune, 1970 Italvega Super Speciale, 2010 Surly Long Haul Trucker 26

Re-face bottom bracket or not?

Some years back when building up a Gitane TdF frame, I took it to the LBS and had them face the bottom bracket shell and chase the threads. When I built it back up with the original French bottom bracket, I could never get it adjusted properly. If I removed all the play, the crank would bind slightly at one spot--would "index" in that position if you gave the crank a spin. I don't think there was any damage to the cups--the bearing surfaces looked very smooth. I don't know if the bike had that problem when I got it, since the crankset was set quite loose.
I eventually sidestepped the problem by installing a cartridge bottom bracket. But now I've moved a bunch of parts around and want to go back to a cup-and-cone bottom bracket--not the original, but a NOS French-thread Sugino. So here's the question--was the binding I experienced before a result of the shop improperly/inadequately facing the BB shell? That would seem to be one likely cause. Or was it perhaps a bike-boom era manufacturing defect with the original bottom bracket cups?
I could just build it back up with the new BB and see what happens, but being naturally lazy I hate to think of having to install and then remove the fixed cup if it does bind again. On the other hand, I don't want to have the shell faced again if that might not be the problem.
Any advice? Good advice preferred, but all advice accepted.
__________________
www.redclovercomponents.com

"Progress might have been all right once, but it has gone on too long."
--Ogden Nash

Last edited by jonwvara; 03-01-13 at 09:13 AM.
jonwvara is offline  
Reply
Old 03-01-13 | 07:28 AM
  #2  
20grit's Avatar
Curmudgeon in Training
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,956
Likes: 11
From: Rural Retreat, VA

Bikes: 1974 Gazelle Champion Mondial, 2010 Cannondale Trail SL, 1988 Peugeot Nice, 1992ish Stumpjumper Comp,1990's Schwinn Moab

I am of the mind that if there hasn't been any oxidation or damage in that area, I'm not doing anything to it. I don't chase threads or face the shell. If a cup is overly difficult to remove, then I'll consider doing some work on the threads.
20grit is offline  
Reply
Old 03-01-13 | 08:21 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,212
Likes: 3,123
It could have been the cups, spindle, bearings or the BB shell. The only way you'll know for sure if it is the shell is to install the new bottom bracket and see if the problem recurrs. It may take a little longer but at least you'll have peace of mind and not wonder whether you spent money on an uneccessary facing .
T-Mar is offline  
Reply
Old 03-01-13 | 09:11 AM
  #4  
jonwvara's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,060
Likes: 943
From: Washington County, Vermont, USA

Bikes: 1973-4 Gitane Tour de France, early 1970's Lejeune, 1970 Italvega Super Speciale, 2010 Surly Long Haul Trucker 26

Thanks, T-Mar, that sounds right. And if it does bind with the new bottom bracket, I guess it will be safe to assume that it's a facing problem.
__________________
www.redclovercomponents.com

"Progress might have been all right once, but it has gone on too long."
--Ogden Nash
jonwvara is offline  
Reply
Old 03-01-13 | 09:25 AM
  #5  
Thrill Bikes's Avatar
just a bike guy
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, Arizona

Bikes: There’s a fleet.

Jon, I suspect that if after a reface and chase of the BB shell, that if the old BB still had the issue and the new cartridge did not, that the problem was most likely the old BB. I've seen a bent spindle exhibit the symptom you are describing. Unless something adverse has happened to the BB shell since the reface, I find it difficult to imagine it needs it again.

good luck!
Thrill Bikes is offline  
Reply
Old 03-01-13 | 10:02 AM
  #6  
unworthy1's Avatar
Stop reading my posts!
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 14,042
Likes: 2,234
I'd guess that any binding you had in the original BB might be more to do with a faulty spindle or cups (but you say they looked good) or the threading of the BB shell. Having good parallel flat surfaces on the BB shell is really only a factor in getting a good tight fit for the conventional fixed cup and the lockring: if the threads were not cut accurately (on-axis), a well-faced shell will do nothing to straighten them out. Good tight fit IS important with a FR or Ital BB, and the conventional wisdom is that an "open" BB allows for more slight misalignment that a sealed unit.
If you had no binding with the sealed unit then I'd look at the old one (and probably the spindle) as the culprit...and if you run sealed units like a Shimano, the facing need only be done on the fixed side, run a Phil-type BB and it doesn't have to be faced at all.

Oh well, Thrill Bikes beat me to it on some of this, but we both agree^
unworthy1 is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
YourCousin
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
12
07-22-16 07:51 PM
scapegrace
Classic & Vintage
1
07-10-12 09:24 PM
Tristanh666
Bicycle Mechanics
10
12-29-11 03:18 PM
anthony691
Bicycle Mechanics
8
05-27-11 10:40 AM
TeddyVarious
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
3
07-01-10 12:26 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.