Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Front or Rear Dynohub?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Front or Rear Dynohub?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-11-13 | 02:44 PM
  #1  
kevistopheles's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: Bellingham, WA

Bikes: 73 Raleigh Sport, 93 Giant Sedona

Front or Rear Dynohub?

I am rebuilding my 70's era Raleigh Sport and I am pretty keen on putting a dynohub on it. I have been looking and so far the SA GH6 dynohubs that have come up on eBay have all been based in the UK (makes sense really) but the postage to get one from there to Washington State is almost as much as the cost of the hub. OTOH I have seen a number of SA 3 speed+dynohub combos come up (some of them in the U.S.) and they appear to be both more plentiful and a bit cheaper. My question is for those of you that have some experience here...I have a working (and in nice shape) SA AW 3 speed hub on the bike now, is it worth it to simply replace it with a 3 speed dynohub or better to wait? I briefly considered gong with a newer hub like the Sanyo from Peter White. I may do that for my MTB commuter, but after looking at the front forks of the Raleigh I'm really skeptical about my ability to bend them to fit the larger size needed to accommodate a modern hub without cocking them up.

Dopes anyone know if the rear dynohubs are any better or worse than the front ones? Alternately, am I just being silly about bending the front forks on the Raleigh? I have some friends that are telling me that it's a piece of cake and others telling he to avoid it all costs. Neither of them is enough of an expert to give me confidence either way. Oddly the need to file the forks doesn't faze me a bit...maybe because I have some experience with doing stuff like that.
kevistopheles is offline  
Reply
Old 08-11-13 | 02:56 PM
  #2  
JohnDThompson's Avatar
Old fart
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,411
Likes: 5,350
From: Appleton WI

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

The alternator mechanism in the SA rear Dynohubs is identical to that used in the front Dynohubs, so I wouldn't expect any performance difference. If you can get a rear Dynohub with 3-speed for a decent price, go for it.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Reply
Old 08-11-13 | 03:39 PM
  #3  
kevistopheles's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: Bellingham, WA

Bikes: 73 Raleigh Sport, 93 Giant Sedona

I figured it would be. I'm rebuilding both wheels anyway so it's not sweat to swap out the hub. I even have another bike I could put the displaced AW 3 speed on. Now to find a 36 or 40 hole one.
kevistopheles is offline  
Reply
Old 08-11-13 | 03:46 PM
  #4  
rhm's Avatar
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,810
Likes: 597
From: NJ, NYC, LI

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Some people say that having all that steel right next to the dynamo magnets weakens them and the result is less power. I have not noticed this to be the case.

I have found it more difficult to attach the wires to the rear hub than the front, especially in the dark.
rhm is offline  
Reply
Old 08-11-13 | 06:41 PM
  #5  
wahoonc's Avatar
Membership Not Required
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 16,853
Likes: 18
From: On the road-USA

Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG

I have bench tested several AG/FG hubs and a few GH-6 hubs. The rear hubs produce a bit less than the front hub, typically about .2 watts less. If you use LED lights it is moot. I run FG, AG and GH6 and have had zero problems with any of them.

Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(

ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.

"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"
_Nicodemus

"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"
_krazygluon
wahoonc is offline  
Reply
Old 08-11-13 | 07:19 PM
  #6  
SirMike1983's Avatar
Sturmey Archer Hub
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 2,013
From: New England

Bikes: Old Schwinns and old Raleighs

I prefer the front for ease of access to it and because I just don't like having to deal with the magnet portion if I ever have to totally tear down the rear hub for repairs (yes it does happen sometimes). Either will work for you though, just a question of preference/convenience for me.
__________________
Classic American and British Roadsters, Utility Bikes, and Sporting Bikes (1935-1979): HERE
SirMike1983 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-11-13 | 07:38 PM
  #7  
kevistopheles's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: Bellingham, WA

Bikes: 73 Raleigh Sport, 93 Giant Sedona

Originally Posted by wahoonc
I have bench tested several AG/FG hubs and a few GH-6 hubs. The rear hubs produce a bit less than the front hub, typically about .2 watts less. If you use LED lights it is moot. I run FG, AG and GH6 and have had zero problems with any of them.

Aaron
I have some old vintage lights I'll be rewiring for LED.
kevistopheles is offline  
Reply
Old 08-12-13 | 06:52 AM
  #8  
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 28
Likes: 1
From: Northern VA

Bikes: 1949 Comrade Roadster, several Raleigh Sports, Custom 531 10-speed

Originally Posted by wahoonc
I have bench tested several AG/FG hubs and a few GH-6 hubs. The rear hubs produce a bit less than the front hub, typically about .2 watts less. If you use LED lights it is moot. I run FG, AG and GH6 and have had zero problems with any of them.

Aaron
+1 on the slightly less output from the rear dyno. If you go with the GH6 make sure it has good cones, replacements are difficult to find.
73emgee is offline  
Reply
Old 08-12-13 | 01:40 PM
  #9  
kevistopheles's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: Bellingham, WA

Bikes: 73 Raleigh Sport, 93 Giant Sedona

I read somewhere that it is possible to use a modern SA dynohub/drum brake combo without needing to spread the forks. Is that true?
kevistopheles is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
werwer2012
Bicycle Mechanics
11
03-11-14 04:57 AM
kevistopheles
Classic & Vintage
31
08-04-13 07:48 AM
conradpdx
Classic & Vintage
13
07-23-12 06:03 PM
jamesj
Classic & Vintage
5
03-30-10 10:57 PM
ps6000
Classic & Vintage
11
03-03-10 04:24 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.