Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Nitto 132 vs 135?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Nitto 132 vs 135?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-21-14, 02:01 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
trailmix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 684

Bikes: 50+/-

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 48 Posts
Nitto 132 vs 135?

Does anybody know what the difference is between these two rando bars? I have 132s and was looking to order another set but not sure which one is better. Does anybody have experience with both. If so, which do you prefer and why? Thanks.
trailmix is offline  
Old 03-21-14, 02:57 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
smallpox champ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 154

Bikes: '84 specialized expedition, '87 specialized sirrus, '84 specialized stumpjumper sport

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 32 Post(s)
Liked 61 Times in 14 Posts
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-vi...fferences.html

and from the thread: Nitto Road Drop Bars : La Rueda Tropical


It looks like the B135 has less drop and reach.
smallpox champ is offline  
Old 03-21-14, 09:04 PM
  #3  
Extraordinary Magnitude
 
The Golden Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,647

Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT

Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,702 Times in 937 Posts
This post from the linked thread was the Rosetta Stone of Rando bars for me:
Originally Posted by ColonelJLloyd




B135 45cm





B132 44cm





Just for fun, here's the 44cm Noodle.


B177 44cm






I chose the B132 and the Noodle. I really like the long ramps. What I don't like is that they still feel narrow- as the width is measured at the drops- since they flare out- riding on the ramps or hoods on a 44 is the same as riding a 40.

The B177 feels wider.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*

Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!

"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.

Last edited by The Golden Boy; 03-21-14 at 09:09 PM.
The Golden Boy is offline  
Old 03-24-14, 07:32 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
trailmix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 684

Bikes: 50+/-

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 48 Posts
Thanks for the links. I like my 132s but after I bought them I had to buy a shorter stem because the hoods are long. I went from a 100 to a 60 or 70 to keep from feeling so stretched out in the hoods. I like the width of my 44cm so that isn't an issue for me. Now I am torn between the 132 and the Noodles. I wish they both used the same diameter stem.
trailmix is offline  
Old 03-24-14, 07:39 AM
  #5  
Extraordinary Magnitude
 
The Golden Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,647

Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT

Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,702 Times in 937 Posts
Originally Posted by trailmix
Thanks for the links. I like my 132s but after I bought them I had to buy a shorter stem because the hoods are long. I went from a 100 to a 60 or 70 to keep from feeling so stretched out in the hoods. I like the width of my 44cm so that isn't an issue for me. Now I am torn between the 132 and the Noodles. I wish they both used the same diameter stem.
I noticed the same thing about the B132 coming from some Belleri bars. There's more of a reach to the hoods. But I also like that ramp space- so there's a tradeoff.

The Noodle feels wider- I ride primarily on the ramps and hoods- and it's wider there than on the B132s. The B132s are measured at the drops- and because they're more splayed outward, that's where they're the widest; the drops on the B177 are not as splayed out. If you're comfortable on 44cm B132, and you ride on the hoods most- measure that distance center to center from the hoods- get that size B177.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*

Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!

"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
The Golden Boy is offline  
Old 03-24-14, 10:32 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
trailmix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 684

Bikes: 50+/-

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 48 Posts
Originally Posted by The Golden Boy
I noticed the same thing about the B132 coming from some Belleri bars. There's more of a reach to the hoods. But I also like that ramp space- so there's a tradeoff.

The Noodle feels wider- I ride primarily on the ramps and hoods- and it's wider there than on the B132s. The B132s are measured at the drops- and because they're more splayed outward, that's where they're the widest; the drops on the B177 are not as splayed out. If you're comfortable on 44cm B132, and you ride on the hoods most- measure that distance center to center from the hoods- get that size B177.
Do you refer the 132 or 177? What are the reasons? I am trying to justify buying a 26mm stem just to try the noodle. All my other bars and stems are 25.4.
trailmix is offline  
Old 03-24-14, 11:05 AM
  #7  
Extraordinary Magnitude
 
The Golden Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,647

Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT

Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,702 Times in 937 Posts
Originally Posted by trailmix
Do you refer the 132 or 177? What are the reasons? I am trying to justify buying a 26mm stem just to try the noodle. All my other bars and stems are 25.4.
I honestly can't give you a really good, informed answer right now.


I've gotten the bikes, stem and bars over winter. So I really have less than 100 miles combined on all 3 of my tourers. Two of the bikes are new to me, and the "old" one received the B177 AND a Dirt Drop stem- so there's 2 things to get used to there.

From initial impressions...

As I mentioned- I have a short (60mm?) stem that I had my Belleri bars on- I put the B132s on there. There seems to be a longer reach to the hoods. But I do like the ramp positions available. I don't know if it's "too much" or "more than I'd use, realistically" so I'll be figuring that out. The 44s don't seem to be quite wide enough for me. I'm not particularly big or broad shouldered- however, I do like the old Command Shifters, and I don't know how much room I'll have to use the shifters if I have my front bag on there. I'm not totally used to the Rando raise from the flats to the ramps- it's kind of the same on my 3TTT bars; but that hasn't been any issue at all. I think I need to learn how to use that raise.

The B177... Again, I got a new stem and the 44cm B177 bars together. The first ride I've done with it- I needed to lower the saddle and the stem, I haven't ridden it much after adjusting. I did like the width of the bars- again, they felt much wider- even though they're also 44- but they don't splay out at the bottom- so if they're measured at the drops, it's the same measurement at the hoods. Again, I mostly ride on the ramps and hoods- and they did feel very nice. I'm not so sure about the area that's swept back- I don't like or dislike it yet at this point- but it's a little different. I do kind of like the lack of the Rando raise, but I sort of miss the Rando splay on the brake levers. A little.

I've come from riding 39-42cm "normal" bars (like "SR Road Champion" style). That width is comfortable to me, as is the "true" 44 of the B177. They're each different bars and do their own things.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*

Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!

"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
The Golden Boy is offline  
Old 03-24-14, 01:10 PM
  #8  
Catching Smallmouth
 
BradH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: In a boat
Posts: 590

Bikes: 1990 Specialized Sirrus Triple, 1985 Trek 460, 2005 Lemond Tourmalet, 1984 Schwinn LeTour 'Luxe, 1988 Trek 400T, 1985 Trek 450, 1997 Lemond Zurich, 1993 Diamond Back Apex, 1988 Schwinn Circuit, 1988 Schwinn Prologue, 1978 Trek TX700, Sannino

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 88 Post(s)
Liked 134 Times in 79 Posts
Get the 132 if you are using bar end shifters, otherwise the 135 works well.
BradH is offline  
Old 03-24-14, 02:20 PM
  #9  
Hoards Thumbshifters
 
mechanicmatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Signal Mountain, TN
Posts: 1,157

Bikes: '23 Black Mtn MC, '87 Bruce Gordon Chinook, '08 Jamis Aurora, '86 Trek 560, '97 Mongoose Rockadile, & '91 Trek 750

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 246 Post(s)
Liked 335 Times in 192 Posts
Noodle's are for me really comfortable. Have it on a Road bike with a 70mm reach Nitto long stem and really like the setup. I have used Salsa Bell Laps and Short and shallows in the past and like this way better.
mechanicmatt is offline  
Old 03-24-14, 07:21 PM
  #10  
Decrepit Member
 
Scooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Santa Rosa, California
Posts: 10,488

Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 634 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times in 57 Posts
132 has 110mm drop, 122mm reach.

135 has 120mm drop, 105mm reach.

There is a significant difference.

__________________
- Stan

my bikes

Science doesn't care what you believe.
Scooper is offline  
Old 03-25-14, 08:22 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
trailmix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 684

Bikes: 50+/-

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 48 Posts
I wish they had a bar with the drop of132s and the reach of 135s.
trailmix is offline  
Old 03-25-14, 10:15 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
trailmix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 684

Bikes: 50+/-

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 48 Posts
According to Rivendell B177 has a reach of 95mm and 140mm drop.
trailmix is offline  
Old 03-25-14, 11:09 AM
  #13  
Decrepit Member
 
Scooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Santa Rosa, California
Posts: 10,488

Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 634 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times in 57 Posts
I've got a B115 on my Waterford. 100mm reach, 140mm drop.

I'm considering a switch to B135.
__________________
- Stan

my bikes

Science doesn't care what you believe.
Scooper is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Wspsux
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
24
09-09-16 10:21 PM
corrado33
Fitting Your Bike
10
04-30-16 10:29 PM
Ivo_Shandor
Touring
9
02-09-16 05:36 PM
wphamilton
Fitting Your Bike
17
08-30-13 06:54 AM
Bike Gremlin
Road Cycling
4
10-22-12 01:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.