Define "Classic" and "Vintage," please
#26
Fat Guy on a Little Bike


Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 15,946
Likes: 371
From: Philadelphia, PA
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
I don't much disagree with any of youse guys so far. But based on age alone, it's only a matter of time before a Wal-Mart BSO becomes a "classic." As to aesthetic form, some would argue that their Electra Townies already qualify as "classics."
It's good to have a laissez faire attitude toward definitions, but I predict that your elasticity will eventually be challenged (not necessarily a bad thing). I might define somewhat differently: A classic bicycle is "a bicycle work of industrial art that was intended to have worth beyond that of an otherwise mass-produced appliance." It's a slippery definition, I admit, and it casts a broad net. But under my definition, the Wal-Mart BSO would NEVER inherit "classic" status.
I'm not trying to troll, nor am I trying to change anything in this forum. I was just curious.
It's good to have a laissez faire attitude toward definitions, but I predict that your elasticity will eventually be challenged (not necessarily a bad thing). I might define somewhat differently: A classic bicycle is "a bicycle work of industrial art that was intended to have worth beyond that of an otherwise mass-produced appliance." It's a slippery definition, I admit, and it casts a broad net. But under my definition, the Wal-Mart BSO would NEVER inherit "classic" status.
I'm not trying to troll, nor am I trying to change anything in this forum. I was just curious.
Defining classic is by nature subjective - we're a big tent regarding our opinions.
#27
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,492
Likes: 270
From: STP
Your qualification of industrial art is as slippery as any other definition. Like art, some will have more generalized appreciation and consensus as to status. I really don't think most guys like Ugo, Cino and Eisentraut were creating industrial art - they were making bicycles designed to be ridden and successfully marketed.
Defining classic is by nature subjective - we're a big tent regarding our opinions.
Defining classic is by nature subjective - we're a big tent regarding our opinions.
Thanks for the post.
#28
Banned.
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Likes: 1,463
I don't much disagree with any of youse guys so far. But based on age alone, it's only a matter of time before a Wal-Mart BSO becomes a "classic." As to aesthetic form, some would argue that their Electra Townies already qualify as "classics."
It's good to have a laissez faire attitude toward definitions, but I predict that your elasticity will eventually be challenged (not necessarily a bad thing). I might define somewhat differently: A classic bicycle is "a bicycle work of industrial art that was intended to have worth beyond that of an otherwise mass-produced appliance." It's a slippery definition, I admit, and it casts a broad net. But under my definition, the Wal-Mart BSO would NEVER inherit "classic" status.
I'm not trying to troll, nor am I trying to change anything in this forum. I was just curious.
It's good to have a laissez faire attitude toward definitions, but I predict that your elasticity will eventually be challenged (not necessarily a bad thing). I might define somewhat differently: A classic bicycle is "a bicycle work of industrial art that was intended to have worth beyond that of an otherwise mass-produced appliance." It's a slippery definition, I admit, and it casts a broad net. But under my definition, the Wal-Mart BSO would NEVER inherit "classic" status.
I'm not trying to troll, nor am I trying to change anything in this forum. I was just curious.
If you already knew the answers, and had your own definitions, why did you ask?
Were you only seeking a target at which to level volleys?
A man walks into a bar, he sees a classic bike and a vintage bike.
Which one does he steal? The one that fits......his definition.
Last edited by RobbieTunes; 12-08-14 at 05:31 PM.
#30
Senior Member


Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,875
Likes: 3,757
I see ads on Craigslist now for "Vintage" bikes with carbon frames. How old, exactly, does a bike need to be to be considered "classic;" to be considered "vintage?"
Is it just age or are there aesthetic considerations?
Is any bike with a "compact frame geometry" and a sloping top-tube not considered "classic" or "vintage?"
Is any bike with a threadless headset automatically not in the group?
Just curious...
FH
Is it just age or are there aesthetic considerations?
Is any bike with a "compact frame geometry" and a sloping top-tube not considered "classic" or "vintage?"
Is any bike with a threadless headset automatically not in the group?
Just curious...
FH
Plenty of sloping top tube bikes ARE vintage from near the turn of the 20th century. It went away then returned.
Threadless headsets are old too, my tricycle even had one.
You are going to have to do better and do more research.
This has by the way been discussed a number of times in this forum, every time with a bit of a twist.
#33
Banned.
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Likes: 1,463
#35
Banned.
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Likes: 1,463
the clothes are classic, the bike is vintage. In my opinion. And everyone else is wrong.
PS: if you've ever met sykerocker, he dresses like that, casually impeccable, and makes it look 100% normal in this day and age. Women were all over him at NAHBS Richmond.
PS: if you've ever met sykerocker, he dresses like that, casually impeccable, and makes it look 100% normal in this day and age. Women were all over him at NAHBS Richmond.
Last edited by RobbieTunes; 12-09-14 at 07:23 AM.
#37
Senior Member

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 840
Likes: 63
From: Gateway to the West
Bikes: You mean this week?
#38
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,869
Likes: 1,108
From: Tallahassee, FL
I'm not sure carbon frames with brifters will achieve the same classic appeal as steel tubing and DT shifters as long as they remain the dominant market model. It's hard to be old school without some significant distinctions from the modern.
#39
#40
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 310
Classic: A work of enduring excellence. (Age is irrelevant.)
Vintage: Referring to a specific year/time period (no mention of quality).
F'rinstance, my 2004 Merckx Team SC is a classic despite only being 10 years old. Definitely not "vintage" in the common parlance.
SP
OC, OR
Vintage: Referring to a specific year/time period (no mention of quality).
F'rinstance, my 2004 Merckx Team SC is a classic despite only being 10 years old. Definitely not "vintage" in the common parlance.
SP
OC, OR
#42
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 23
From: Okanagan, BC
Bikes: Cannondale Caad 8; Jamis Aurora Elite, Kona Disc road bike, Rocky Mntn Equipe, Apollo Imperial, KHS Aero Comp SS
Per the above I now know it's both classic and vintage
. 2012 DeRosa Neo Primato. (Okay - vintage may be a stretch)
#43
Fat Guy on a Little Bike


Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 15,946
Likes: 371
From: Philadelphia, PA
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
This is classic:

This is is vintage:

This is classic and vintage:
This is is vintage:
This is classic and vintage:
#44
Forum Moderator
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 22,999
Likes: 10,508
From: Kalamazoo
To quote my favorite gearhead author, Peter Egan, a Classic is "Something that never gets old, even when it is."
__________________
Carbon: Fuji SL2.1 Di2.......Aluminum: Cannondale Synapse 105........Steel: Schwinn Circuit 853
...
Carbon: Fuji SL2.1 Di2.......Aluminum: Cannondale Synapse 105........Steel: Schwinn Circuit 853
...
#46
Hoards Thumbshifters

Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 430
From: Signal Mountain, TN
Bikes: '23 Black Mtn MC, '87 Bruce Gordon Chinook, '08 Jamis Aurora, '86 Trek 560, '97 Mongoose Rockadile, & '91 Trek 750
#47
So, the brifters with aluminum levers are already headed to classic status, or being used in classic restorations.
8 Speed is also heading to Vintage/Classic, and perhaps 9 speed will be soon to follow as the 10/11 speed configurations now dominate at least the high-end markets.
#49
Thread Starter
Senior Curmudgeon
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,856
Likes: 2
From: Directly above the center of the earth
Bikes: Varies by day
Because it wasn't in a sticky, I should have assumed that I was opening a can of worms (that others had opened previously). And since it is an obvious question, I should have searched the forum before posting it again; mea culpa.
I do apologize for my errors, but I really and truly didn't want to create any controversy or to troll the forum. If the moderator would be so kind as to post a sticky about the elastic criteria for the terms, this (probably) wouldn't happen again.
By asking the unanswerable question (yet again), I've been accused of being "trollish," "grasping," and "presumptive" when I was merely curious (and somewhat foolish). So I apologize. I darned sure won't ask again.
Cordially - FH
Last edited by FarHorizon; 12-09-14 at 07:01 AM.










