Tire sizes?
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,687
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1126 Post(s)
Liked 253 Times
in
204 Posts
you guys are funny.
to stir the pot even further - i'd like to make a prediction: Within the next three years, bicycle manufacturers will discover that the 27in wheel is THE IDEAL wheel size. This should roughly correspond to market being saturated by everyone who just bought a 27.5in (650b) wheeled bike, and just barely got their 29er sold (which is a 700mm off road wheel...).
As for me - I'll be sticking with my 26in wheeled bikes and 700C bikes. Should be about 7~10 years from now when 26in will be THE IDEAL wheel size.
(unless, of course, you're after an EXPEDITION bike, then 26in already is THE IDEAL size)
to stir the pot even further - i'd like to make a prediction: Within the next three years, bicycle manufacturers will discover that the 27in wheel is THE IDEAL wheel size. This should roughly correspond to market being saturated by everyone who just bought a 27.5in (650b) wheeled bike, and just barely got their 29er sold (which is a 700mm off road wheel...).
As for me - I'll be sticking with my 26in wheeled bikes and 700C bikes. Should be about 7~10 years from now when 26in will be THE IDEAL wheel size.
(unless, of course, you're after an EXPEDITION bike, then 26in already is THE IDEAL size)
#27
Senior Member
It would be a lot easier if the industry would stop using 27" or 26" to identify tires and rims and use the ERTRO designations 630, 622, 590, 584 etc., which are based on the bead seat diameter of the tire.
The strangest designation of tire size is the 27 1/2" for 650b ((584mm) mountain bike tires and rims.
The Autumn issue of Bicycle Quarterly has a brief history of tire sizes and how they came to be named.
The strangest designation of tire size is the 27 1/2" for 650b ((584mm) mountain bike tires and rims.
The Autumn issue of Bicycle Quarterly has a brief history of tire sizes and how they came to be named.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 346
Bikes: 2013 Rivendell Sam, 1996 Bianchi Milano, 1994 Trek 820
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
4 Posts
I just opened the thread to see how in the world this question could have 27 replies
#30
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,480
Mentioned: 93 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1361 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 424 Times
in
283 Posts
27" is NOT obsolete, your choices are smaller but there are still plenty of very good 27" tires on the market. Vittoria Zaffiro, Panaracer Pasela or the better Pasela TG, Schwalbe Marathon (finest touring tire on the market regardless of size!), Conti makes several models like the Gatorskin, Ultra Sport, Tour Ride, and Super Sport Plus, and Michelin World Tour.
#31
incazzare.
LOL. The arguments people get into around here are sometimes pretty amazing.
__________________
1964 JRJ (Bob Jackson), 1973 Wes Mason, 1974 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1986 Schwinn High Sierra, 2000ish Colian (Colin Laing), 2011 Dick Chafe, 2013 Velo Orange Pass Hunter
1964 JRJ (Bob Jackson), 1973 Wes Mason, 1974 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1986 Schwinn High Sierra, 2000ish Colian (Colin Laing), 2011 Dick Chafe, 2013 Velo Orange Pass Hunter
#32
The Improbable Bulk
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA
Posts: 8,379
Bikes: Many
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
__________________
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA
People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA
People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
#33
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,194
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1565 Post(s)
Liked 1,296 Times
in
866 Posts
This explains everything! No doubt these are the same guys who failed to warn the rest of the world of the problems caused by not sticking with their French Metric standards for road bikes.
As for the OP's tube-size dilemma, any 700c or 27" tube would be ok diameter-wise, and there are still plenty of narrow-enough tubes out there with Shraeder-valve stems on them.
I put just enough air in a tube to give produce it's basic shape, and if it fits within the tire and not sticking out beyond the beaded edges of the tire, the width is not too big.
And I refer to use the fattest tube that will fit, regardless of the tire's designated width, because a tube that doesn't have to stretch to fill a given width of tire will not lose air as fast when punctured. I can sometimes even ride home after a ride with such a generously-wide leaking tube that doesn't leak too fast, then fix it at home!
Last edited by dddd; 12-23-14 at 04:11 PM.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,687
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1126 Post(s)
Liked 253 Times
in
204 Posts
#35
Decrepit Member
As Darwin says, "27 inch tubulars" was a term erroneously used by manufacturers (like Schwinn) who should have known better. What they called 27" tubulars are the same 622mm diameter sew-up tires that have been used for decades.
Tubular Tires|Sheldon Brown
This 1973 Schwinn Paramount catalog page was probably written by some marketing person who wouldn't know a sew-up tubular tire if he saw it.
Tubular Tires|Sheldon Brown
Originally Posted by Sheldon Brown
Back in the 1970s, 622 mm clinchers were very rare in the U.S., and most sporty bikes used either 630 mm (27 inch) clinchers, or standard (622 mm) tubulars.
The fact that these sizes are so close led to an in-accurate habit of referring to "27 inch" tubulars. This careless nomenclature still causes confusion, and people often imagine that there is a different "27 inch" size in tubulars as there is in clinchers.
This is not true. THERE IS ACTUALLY NO SUCH THING AS A "27 INCH" TUBULAR.
All full-size tubulars fit all full-size tubular rims.
The fact that these sizes are so close led to an in-accurate habit of referring to "27 inch" tubulars. This careless nomenclature still causes confusion, and people often imagine that there is a different "27 inch" size in tubulars as there is in clinchers.
This is not true. THERE IS ACTUALLY NO SUCH THING AS A "27 INCH" TUBULAR.
All full-size tubulars fit all full-size tubular rims.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,687
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1126 Post(s)
Liked 253 Times
in
204 Posts
As Darwin says, "27 inch tubulars" was a term erroneously used by manufacturers (like Schwinn) who should have known better. What they called 27" tubulars are the same 622mm diameter sew-up tires that have been used for decades.
Tubular Tires|Sheldon Brown
This 1973 Schwinn Paramount catalog page was probably written by some marketing person who wouldn't know a sew-up tubular tire if he saw it.
Tubular Tires|Sheldon Brown
This 1973 Schwinn Paramount catalog page was probably written by some marketing person who wouldn't know a sew-up tubular tire if he saw it.
#37
Senior Member
27" tires were mainly found in the USA and England but not other English speaking countries, and found mostly on low to mid end bikes and rarely on high end bikes. So yes, in most of the World 27" were odd ducks which is why America and England switched to 700c in the mid 80's.[/COLOR]
635 is also very common on certain types of Dutch bikes.
#38
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,480
Mentioned: 93 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1361 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 424 Times
in
283 Posts
Its done to mess with our heads. Goofy as the ATB scene and the 29er. The 700c is basically the same as 29er's but they had to make that subtle difference. For another I have vintage rims AND tires stated for 28" clincher. It is weird though and might be Michelins oddity but the 28" rubber fits loose on the 28" Weinmann rim, yet it all works...lol.
Many Japanese 80's bikes listed 27" tubulars. Then you have the Continental brand doing the same with 27 - 3/4 tubular.
Or this:
Vintage Used 27 inch Wheel Sew Up Tubular for Road Bike Ukai Rim Sunshine Hub | eBay
Many Japanese 80's bikes listed 27" tubulars. Then you have the Continental brand doing the same with 27 - 3/4 tubular.
Or this:
Vintage Used 27 inch Wheel Sew Up Tubular for Road Bike Ukai Rim Sunshine Hub | eBay
#39
Decrepit Member
Its done to mess with our heads. Goofy as the ATB scene and the 29er. The 700c is basically the same as 29er's but they had to make that subtle difference. For another I have vintage rims AND tires stated for 28" clincher. It is weird though and might be Michelins oddity but the 28" rubber fits loose on the 28" Weinmann rim, yet it all works...lol.
Many Japanese 80's bikes listed 27" tubulars. Then you have the Continental brand doing the same with 27 - 3/4 tubular.
Or this:
Vintage Used 27 inch Wheel Sew Up Tubular for Road Bike Ukai Rim Sunshine Hub | eBay
Many Japanese 80's bikes listed 27" tubulars. Then you have the Continental brand doing the same with 27 - 3/4 tubular.
Or this:
Vintage Used 27 inch Wheel Sew Up Tubular for Road Bike Ukai Rim Sunshine Hub | eBay
#40
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
It would be a lot easier if the industry would stop using 27" or 26" to identify tires and rims and use the ERTRO designations 630, 622, 590, 584 etc., which are based on the bead seat diameter of the tire.
The strangest designation of tire size is the 27 1/2" for 650b ((584mm) mountain bike tires and rims.
The Autumn issue of Bicycle Quarterly has a brief history of tire sizes and how they came to be named.
The strangest designation of tire size is the 27 1/2" for 650b ((584mm) mountain bike tires and rims.
The Autumn issue of Bicycle Quarterly has a brief history of tire sizes and how they came to be named.
The "27.5" nomenclature isn't so weird in context -- the MTB industry likes coming up with their own jargon for everything, and after years of "26" and "29er" wheels, the 650B (oops, ISO 584) standard gives them a middle ground, something new to sell whether or not it solves any problems. And of course, they needed a special term for it, so they took the average of the other two nominal wheel sizes.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,687
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1126 Post(s)
Liked 253 Times
in
204 Posts
#42
Banned.
Join Date: May 2011
Location: on the beach
Posts: 4,816
Bikes: '73 falcon sr, '76 grand record, '84 davidson
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 59 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times
in
17 Posts
i don't like 27" wheels, 'cause you can't get a tire more narrow than 1" (25mm), and 1" paselas are usually more expensive and harder to find than 23c.
(my riding conditions don't require paselas wider than 23c.)
and c&v bikes seem like they're more marketable with a 700c wheelset.
(my riding conditions don't require paselas wider than 23c.)
and c&v bikes seem like they're more marketable with a 700c wheelset.
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 1,597
Bikes: Too many 3-speeds, Jones Plus LWB
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 265 Times
in
119 Posts
You have to be really careful with 23mm 700cs in this town- I got tired of flats all the timet and went to 25s- then to 28s. I found that I could ride faster on the bigger carcass. So I don't find that the 27" size has any disadvantage.
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,687
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1126 Post(s)
Liked 253 Times
in
204 Posts
"Handling Why do larger wheels feel different? The front wheel’s rotational inertia affects how a bike holds its line, both on straightaways and in corners. Larger wheels and/or heavier tires/rims have more rotational inertia, making it harder to turn the front wheel to initiate cornering. If your front wheel has too much rotational inertia, it becomes difficult to change your line in mid-corner, for example, to avoid a pothole or to round
a curve with decreasing radius. With too little rotational inertia, your bike requires constant corrections to stay on course. You want a wheel/tire combination that is just right, with neither too much nor too little stability.
Another Bicycle Quarterly test had three people ride three bikes with identical geometries (fit, trail, bottom bracket height, etc.), but with different wheel sizes (26 inch, 650B, 700C). All test riders independently
found that they preferred smaller wheels for wider and heavier tires, and larger wheels for narrower, lighter tires. When we calculated the rotational inertia of the wheels, we found that these preferences all yielded similar values. Based on that test, we concluded that 700C wheels are best for narrow tires up to about 30 mm. For wider tires (30 to 42 millimeters), our testers preferred the somewhat smaller 650B wheels. Tires wider than 42 millimeters handled best on even smaller 26-inch wheels.
It is no coincidence that the outer diameter of bicycle wheels has remained relatively constant, somewhere between 26 and 27 inches, since chain-driven bicycles were first were developed 130 years ago, despite much experimentation with other sizes. Motorcyclists have arrived at similar conclusions; they went to smaller wheels when their tires became wider and heavier, so that the rotational inertia remained the same.
This means that you should first decide how wide you want your tires to be. The wheel size will follow from that. If you love narrow tires, you should use a larger wheel. If you prefer wide tires, your wheels should be smaller."
End of copy from Bicycle Quarterly, I hope that helps; if you want to read the entire article you can download this PDF file; see:
WHEEL SIZE MATTERS - Adventure Cycling Association
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Another Bicycle Quarterly test had three people ride three bikes with identical geometries (fit, trail, bottom bracket height, etc.), but with different wheel sizes (26 inch, 650B, 700C). All test riders independently
found that they preferred smaller wheels for wider and heavier tires, and larger wheels for narrower, lighter tires. When we calculated the rotational inertia of the wheels, we found that these preferences all yielded similar values. Based on that test, we concluded that 700C wheels are best for narrow tires up to about 30 mm. For wider tires (30 to 42 millimeters), our testers preferred the somewhat smaller 650B wheels. Tires wider than 42 millimeters handled best on even smaller 26-inch wheels.
found that they preferred smaller wheels for wider and heavier tires, and larger wheels for narrower, lighter tires. When we calculated the rotational inertia of the wheels, we found that these preferences all yielded similar values. Based on that test, we concluded that 700C wheels are best for narrow tires up to about 30 mm. For wider tires (30 to 42 millimeters), our testers preferred the somewhat smaller 650B wheels. Tires wider than 42 millimeters handled best on even smaller 26-inch wheels.
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,687
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1126 Post(s)
Liked 253 Times
in
204 Posts
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Maybe it's not a good idea to conclude universal "facts" about people's preferences based on what three individuals indicate they like.
But it would sure help polling companies, market research, medical trials, etc. if such small sample sizes were adequate.
But it would sure help polling companies, market research, medical trials, etc. if such small sample sizes were adequate.
#48
Shifting is fun!
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Holland, NL
Posts: 11,007
Bikes: Yes, please.
Mentioned: 280 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2198 Post(s)
Liked 4,613 Times
in
1,765 Posts
Koga-Miyata had a few 27"-wheeled touring models in the seventies, but I suspect those frames were shared with the US market. However, Raleigh was a very popular brand in Holland, which would explain the bike shops stocking that tire size.
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,687
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1126 Post(s)
Liked 253 Times
in
204 Posts
A few individuals is not correct, this has been a know fact for many years in the motorcycle world and the bicycle world.
#50
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,506
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7352 Post(s)
Liked 2,479 Times
in
1,439 Posts
I'm not convinced there is one ideal tire size, but having said that, I also can't believe that marketing and production costs have not weighed into the sizes we have. They can't be here purely from well-informed preferences.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.