BB drop effect for commuting/touring?
#26
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,828
Likes: 1
From: West Georgia
Bikes: K2 Mod 5.0 Roadie, Fuji Commuter
Aurora Elite = 65mm BB drop
Marrakesh = 77mm BB drop
i'm wondering what sort of advantage one would have over the other, and what sort of real world difference i could expect to feel on each bike. None. i've heard that the lower the bottom bracket the more stable the ride is, especially when loaded, but is that enough of a reason to choose a bike with a 77mm drop a opposed to 65mm? No.
Marrakesh = 77mm BB drop
i'm wondering what sort of advantage one would have over the other, and what sort of real world difference i could expect to feel on each bike. None. i've heard that the lower the bottom bracket the more stable the ride is, especially when loaded, but is that enough of a reason to choose a bike with a 77mm drop a opposed to 65mm? No.
Answers in quote apply if you are paying for your bike yourself. Of course, if you could tell the difference you wouldn't be asking. Your sponsor would know what bike to give you.
#29
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 206
Likes: 1
From: North Shore, MA
Bikes: Jamis Aurora, Rivendell Sam Hillborne, Surly ECR, Serotta CSI
Not to beat a dead horse, but I've been doing some commuting back to days on the two bikes I mentioned earlier and I have an additional observation.
The bike with bottom bracket higher off the ground (the lower 'bb drop') banks when I turn it, meaning I lean to that side and off I go.
The bike with the lower bb, (higher 'bb drop') is more of a "turn the handlebars" experience - it's more agile because of that.
The rake is similiar between the two (2mm difference) and the stems are about 15mm different so that is a likely contributor, but if I had to guess, the BB drop is mainly responsible for the different feels.
The bike with bottom bracket higher off the ground (the lower 'bb drop') banks when I turn it, meaning I lean to that side and off I go.
The bike with the lower bb, (higher 'bb drop') is more of a "turn the handlebars" experience - it's more agile because of that.
The rake is similiar between the two (2mm difference) and the stems are about 15mm different so that is a likely contributor, but if I had to guess, the BB drop is mainly responsible for the different feels.
#30
aka Tom Reingold




Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,160
Likes: 6,382
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Not to beat a dead horse, but I've been doing some commuting back to days on the two bikes I mentioned earlier and I have an additional observation.
The bike with bottom bracket higher off the ground (the lower 'bb drop') banks when I turn it, meaning I lean to that side and off I go.
The bike with the lower bb, (higher 'bb drop') is more of a "turn the handlebars" experience - it's more agile because of that.
The rake is similiar between the two (2mm difference) and the stems are about 15mm different so that is a likely contributor, but if I had to guess, the BB drop is mainly responsible for the different feels.
The bike with bottom bracket higher off the ground (the lower 'bb drop') banks when I turn it, meaning I lean to that side and off I go.
The bike with the lower bb, (higher 'bb drop') is more of a "turn the handlebars" experience - it's more agile because of that.
The rake is similiar between the two (2mm difference) and the stems are about 15mm different so that is a likely contributor, but if I had to guess, the BB drop is mainly responsible for the different feels.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#31
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 206
Likes: 1
From: North Shore, MA
Bikes: Jamis Aurora, Rivendell Sam Hillborne, Surly ECR, Serotta CSI
Case in point, for these two similarly spec'd bikes, one has toe overlap and one doesn't. That's makes a strong case for your point, right there.
Last edited by Marc40a; 11-24-15 at 11:28 AM.
#32
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 28
From: Boston, MA
Bikes: Bianchi Volpe, ANT 3-speed roadster, New Albion Privateer singlespeed, Raleigh One Way singlespeed, Raleigh Professional "retro roadie" rebuild, 198? Fuji(?) franken-5-speed, 1937 Raleigh Tourist, 1952 Raleigh Sports, 1966 Raleigh Sports step-through
the crank arm lengths for the Salsa Marrakesh are listed at the bottom of the "build kit" tab: here
i'd be going for a 54cm in a Marrakesh, whereas i'd go for a 50cm in an Aurora Elite (standover of the 53cm is too high for me).
with all that said, i'm now also considering throwing one more option into the mix:
building up a 52cm New Albion Privateer, with gearing (48/36/26t + 11-32t) and components (brakes + shifters) similar to a Long Haul Trucker.
i like that the geo of the Privateer is pretty much right in between touring geo and CX geo, and similarly that the BB drop of the Privateer is kind of right in the middle of that range at 72mm.
i am aware that the tubing isn't as beefy on the Privateer, but i'm wondering if that would be an issue since i will only be using it for more med/fully loaded touring about 10% (would be using it with a rear rack and single pannier the rest of the time).
any opinions on that?
i'd be going for a 54cm in a Marrakesh, whereas i'd go for a 50cm in an Aurora Elite (standover of the 53cm is too high for me).
with all that said, i'm now also considering throwing one more option into the mix:
building up a 52cm New Albion Privateer, with gearing (48/36/26t + 11-32t) and components (brakes + shifters) similar to a Long Haul Trucker.
i like that the geo of the Privateer is pretty much right in between touring geo and CX geo, and similarly that the BB drop of the Privateer is kind of right in the middle of that range at 72mm.
i am aware that the tubing isn't as beefy on the Privateer, but i'm wondering if that would be an issue since i will only be using it for more med/fully loaded touring about 10% (would be using it with a rear rack and single pannier the rest of the time).
any opinions on that?
I love my Privateer, but it's built as a single-speed. The geometry is quite similar to my Bianchi Volpe, and also to the All-City Space Horse, which I was also looking at when deciding which frame to do this build on.
#33
Senior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,896
Likes: 7
From: Raleigh, NC
Bikes: Waterford RST-22, Bob Jackson World Tour, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Soma Saga, De Bernardi SL, Specialized Sequoia
My favorite bike has a lot of BB drop, 80 mm. I don't know if that has anything to do with why I like that bike so much, but it rides really nice. That said, I have to be careful when riding that bike to remember not to pedal when cornering. My pedals have struck the pavement more times than I can remember on that bike, and it's always a bit of jolt when it happens but it's never caused me to spill. Anyway, that's something to keep in mind if you tend to pedal through the corners.
#34
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 85
Likes: 4
Depends on a couple of things. First, how often you have put a foot down on your commute? If you are footing a lot at stop lights, the lower BB helps, especially if you can do it without getting off the saddle. Secondly and this is more subjective, how the bike feels and handles for YOU. I like low BB because I feel like I am riding "in" the bike rather than "on" it. On my old Mercier 300 I can dab with 700x35's. When it is converted to 650b it is really low- 254mm and I need to be careful pedaling around corners, but it rides and handles like a dream for me.
The full suspension bike I had in the 90's was like riding a tall horse and I hated it other than steep downhills.
It really is a matter of preference, but I prefer low BB always.
Ride both on your commute route, a preference will show itself if there is one.
Tom Palmer,
Twin Lake, MI
The full suspension bike I had in the 90's was like riding a tall horse and I hated it other than steep downhills.
It really is a matter of preference, but I prefer low BB always.
Ride both on your commute route, a preference will show itself if there is one.
Tom Palmer,
Twin Lake, MI
#35
Thread Starter
_____________ø
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 102
Likes: 1
From: EssEff
Bikes: cross-check, kilo tt, privateer
what made you choose the privateer over the space horse? price?
#36
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 28
From: Boston, MA
Bikes: Bianchi Volpe, ANT 3-speed roadster, New Albion Privateer singlespeed, Raleigh One Way singlespeed, Raleigh Professional "retro roadie" rebuild, 198? Fuji(?) franken-5-speed, 1937 Raleigh Tourist, 1952 Raleigh Sports, 1966 Raleigh Sports step-through
#37
Thread Starter
_____________ø
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 102
Likes: 1
From: EssEff
Bikes: cross-check, kilo tt, privateer
also, just for reference, what size frame is that in the photo?
#38
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 28
From: Boston, MA
Bikes: Bianchi Volpe, ANT 3-speed roadster, New Albion Privateer singlespeed, Raleigh One Way singlespeed, Raleigh Professional "retro roadie" rebuild, 198? Fuji(?) franken-5-speed, 1937 Raleigh Tourist, 1952 Raleigh Sports, 1966 Raleigh Sports step-through
My frame is the 48cm one, which is essentially the same as my 51cm Volpe and similar to my 53cm Raleigh One-Way.
#39
Senior Member


Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 14,159
Likes: 5,284
From: Portland, OR
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
As others posted above, low BB is better for touring almost always; more stable, easier to put a foot down, etc. But we need to keep perspective. A lot goes into a bike. BB drop is one small factor. Small enough that unless you are racing fix gears, rarely anything close to a deciding factor.
I have owned (and still tend to choose) a few high BB bikes. Several had superb handling. (I don't like pedal strike In my racing days, I used the very high BB on my racing bike, a full 11", to advantage all the time, pedaling deeper into and sooner out of corners.)
If you are set on choosing between the Aurora Elite and Marrakesh, you could use the BB drop as a tie-breaker but make sure you actually have a tie. Don't pick the bike that will not suit you as well because it has a lower BB. (I haven't looked at either bike. I'm talking about the importance of BB height and don't want to sway my argument with opinions on the two bikes.)
Ben
I have owned (and still tend to choose) a few high BB bikes. Several had superb handling. (I don't like pedal strike In my racing days, I used the very high BB on my racing bike, a full 11", to advantage all the time, pedaling deeper into and sooner out of corners.)
If you are set on choosing between the Aurora Elite and Marrakesh, you could use the BB drop as a tie-breaker but make sure you actually have a tie. Don't pick the bike that will not suit you as well because it has a lower BB. (I haven't looked at either bike. I'm talking about the importance of BB height and don't want to sway my argument with opinions on the two bikes.)
Ben
#40
Senior Member
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 1
From: Washington DC Metro Area
Bikes: Breezer Uptown 8, Jamis Renegade Expert
#41
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 28
From: Boston, MA
Bikes: Bianchi Volpe, ANT 3-speed roadster, New Albion Privateer singlespeed, Raleigh One Way singlespeed, Raleigh Professional "retro roadie" rebuild, 198? Fuji(?) franken-5-speed, 1937 Raleigh Tourist, 1952 Raleigh Sports, 1966 Raleigh Sports step-through
#42
A few reasons for high BB.
Fixed Gear? No coasting on corners.
Long Cranks? 200mm?
It doesn't sound like you will be in either of these categories.
I wonder if all pedals are created equal. Perhaps some of the new power pedals are also thicker and wider, and might also benefit from a higher bottom bracket.
Fixed Gear? No coasting on corners.
Long Cranks? 200mm?
It doesn't sound like you will be in either of these categories.
I wonder if all pedals are created equal. Perhaps some of the new power pedals are also thicker and wider, and might also benefit from a higher bottom bracket.
#43
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 7,391
Likes: 13
From: Memphis TN area
Bikes: 2011 Felt Z85 (road/commuter), 2006 Marin Pine Mountain (utility/commuter E-bike), 1995 KHS Alite 1000 (gravel grinder)
A few reasons for high BB.
Fixed Gear? No coasting on corners.
Long Cranks? 200mm?
It doesn't sound like you will be in either of these categories.
I wonder if all pedals are created equal. Perhaps some of the new power pedals are also thicker and wider, and might also benefit from a higher bottom bracket.
Fixed Gear? No coasting on corners.
Long Cranks? 200mm?
It doesn't sound like you will be in either of these categories.
I wonder if all pedals are created equal. Perhaps some of the new power pedals are also thicker and wider, and might also benefit from a higher bottom bracket.
#45
Senior Member
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 1
From: Washington DC Metro Area
Bikes: Breezer Uptown 8, Jamis Renegade Expert
Thanks. I went with a pirate theme for this year's Halloween group ride. Might do it again next year but with flags.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kazer
Bicycle Mechanics
4
02-09-10 08:13 PM






