Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

BB drop effect for commuting/touring?

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

BB drop effect for commuting/touring?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-30-15 | 05:37 PM
  #26  
gregjones's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,828
Likes: 1
From: West Georgia

Bikes: K2 Mod 5.0 Roadie, Fuji Commuter

Originally Posted by blujosh
Aurora Elite = 65mm BB drop
Marrakesh = 77mm BB drop

i'm wondering what sort of advantage one would have over the other, and what sort of real world difference i could expect to feel on each bike. None. i've heard that the lower the bottom bracket the more stable the ride is, especially when loaded, but is that enough of a reason to choose a bike with a 77mm drop a opposed to 65mm? No.

Answers in quote apply if you are paying for your bike yourself. Of course, if you could tell the difference you wouldn't be asking. Your sponsor would know what bike to give you.
gregjones is offline  
Reply
Old 11-02-15 | 01:37 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,741
Likes: 12
From: Gaseous Cloud around Uranus
None....Comfort is more important.
Booger1 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-02-15 | 01:43 PM
  #28  
jfowler85's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 0
From: Zinj

Bikes: '93 911 Turbo 3.6

Originally Posted by fietsbob
That is not like actually measuring the actual wheel radius.
The rough calculation is not that difficult. You do it.
jfowler85 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-11-15 | 11:17 AM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 206
Likes: 1
From: North Shore, MA

Bikes: Jamis Aurora, Rivendell Sam Hillborne, Surly ECR, Serotta CSI

Not to beat a dead horse, but I've been doing some commuting back to days on the two bikes I mentioned earlier and I have an additional observation.

The bike with bottom bracket higher off the ground (the lower 'bb drop') banks when I turn it, meaning I lean to that side and off I go.

The bike with the lower bb, (higher 'bb drop') is more of a "turn the handlebars" experience - it's more agile because of that.

The rake is similiar between the two (2mm difference) and the stems are about 15mm different so that is a likely contributor, but if I had to guess, the BB drop is mainly responsible for the different feels.
Marc40a is offline  
Reply
Old 11-11-15 | 04:09 PM
  #30  
noglider's Avatar
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,160
Likes: 6,382
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Originally Posted by Marc40a
Not to beat a dead horse, but I've been doing some commuting back to days on the two bikes I mentioned earlier and I have an additional observation.

The bike with bottom bracket higher off the ground (the lower 'bb drop') banks when I turn it, meaning I lean to that side and off I go.

The bike with the lower bb, (higher 'bb drop') is more of a "turn the handlebars" experience - it's more agile because of that.

The rake is similiar between the two (2mm difference) and the stems are about 15mm different so that is a likely contributor, but if I had to guess, the BB drop is mainly responsible for the different feels.
I disagree. There are probably differences in head angle which would account for the different ways the bikes steer.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Reply
Old 11-12-15 | 01:21 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 206
Likes: 1
From: North Shore, MA

Bikes: Jamis Aurora, Rivendell Sam Hillborne, Surly ECR, Serotta CSI

Originally Posted by noglider
I disagree. There are probably differences in head angle which would account for the different ways the bikes steer.
Only half a degree between them, but you're probably right... I'm likely underestimating the the factors between the two or oversimplifying.

Case in point, for these two similarly spec'd bikes, one has toe overlap and one doesn't. That's makes a strong case for your point, right there.

Last edited by Marc40a; 11-24-15 at 11:28 AM.
Marc40a is offline  
Reply
Old 11-24-15 | 01:32 AM
  #32  
agmetal's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 28
From: Boston, MA

Bikes: Bianchi Volpe, ANT 3-speed roadster, New Albion Privateer singlespeed, Raleigh One Way singlespeed, Raleigh Professional "retro roadie" rebuild, 198? Fuji(?) franken-5-speed, 1937 Raleigh Tourist, 1952 Raleigh Sports, 1966 Raleigh Sports step-through

Originally Posted by blujosh
the crank arm lengths for the Salsa Marrakesh are listed at the bottom of the "build kit" tab: here

i'd be going for a 54cm in a Marrakesh, whereas i'd go for a 50cm in an Aurora Elite (standover of the 53cm is too high for me).

with all that said, i'm now also considering throwing one more option into the mix:

building up a 52cm New Albion Privateer, with gearing (48/36/26t + 11-32t) and components (brakes + shifters) similar to a Long Haul Trucker.

i like that the geo of the Privateer is pretty much right in between touring geo and CX geo, and similarly that the BB drop of the Privateer is kind of right in the middle of that range at 72mm.
i am aware that the tubing isn't as beefy on the Privateer, but i'm wondering if that would be an issue since i will only be using it for more med/fully loaded touring about 10% (would be using it with a rear rack and single pannier the rest of the time).

any opinions on that?

I love my Privateer, but it's built as a single-speed. The geometry is quite similar to my Bianchi Volpe, and also to the All-City Space Horse, which I was also looking at when deciding which frame to do this build on.

agmetal is offline  
Reply
Old 11-24-15 | 07:59 AM
  #33  
tarwheel's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,896
Likes: 7
From: Raleigh, NC

Bikes: Waterford RST-22, Bob Jackson World Tour, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Soma Saga, De Bernardi SL, Specialized Sequoia

My favorite bike has a lot of BB drop, 80 mm. I don't know if that has anything to do with why I like that bike so much, but it rides really nice. That said, I have to be careful when riding that bike to remember not to pedal when cornering. My pedals have struck the pavement more times than I can remember on that bike, and it's always a bit of jolt when it happens but it's never caused me to spill. Anyway, that's something to keep in mind if you tend to pedal through the corners.
tarwheel is offline  
Reply
Old 11-24-15 | 08:36 AM
  #34  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 85
Likes: 4
Depends on a couple of things. First, how often you have put a foot down on your commute? If you are footing a lot at stop lights, the lower BB helps, especially if you can do it without getting off the saddle. Secondly and this is more subjective, how the bike feels and handles for YOU. I like low BB because I feel like I am riding "in" the bike rather than "on" it. On my old Mercier 300 I can dab with 700x35's. When it is converted to 650b it is really low- 254mm and I need to be careful pedaling around corners, but it rides and handles like a dream for me.
The full suspension bike I had in the 90's was like riding a tall horse and I hated it other than steep downhills.
It really is a matter of preference, but I prefer low BB always.
Ride both on your commute route, a preference will show itself if there is one.
Tom Palmer,
Twin Lake, MI
TomPalmer is offline  
Reply
Old 11-25-15 | 04:02 AM
  #35  
blujosh's Avatar
Thread Starter
_____________ø
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 102
Likes: 1
From: EssEff

Bikes: cross-check, kilo tt, privateer

Originally Posted by agmetal
I love my Privateer, but it's built as a single-speed. The geometry is quite similar to my Bianchi Volpe, and also to the All-City Space Horse, which I was also looking at when deciding which frame to do this build on.

what made you choose the privateer over the space horse? price?
blujosh is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-15 | 10:46 PM
  #36  
agmetal's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 28
From: Boston, MA

Bikes: Bianchi Volpe, ANT 3-speed roadster, New Albion Privateer singlespeed, Raleigh One Way singlespeed, Raleigh Professional "retro roadie" rebuild, 198? Fuji(?) franken-5-speed, 1937 Raleigh Tourist, 1952 Raleigh Sports, 1966 Raleigh Sports step-through

Originally Posted by blujosh
what made you choose the privateer over the space horse? price?
Pretty much, yeah. I was already pushing my budget as it was, and that $200 difference wasn't insignificant. Also, the listed weight limits for the rack-mounting braze-ons concerned me.
agmetal is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-15 | 11:29 PM
  #37  
blujosh's Avatar
Thread Starter
_____________ø
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 102
Likes: 1
From: EssEff

Bikes: cross-check, kilo tt, privateer

Originally Posted by agmetal
Pretty much, yeah. I was already pushing my budget as it was, and that $200 difference wasn't insignificant. Also, the listed weight limits for the rack-mounting braze-ons concerned me.
are the rack-mounting braze-ons for the privateer rated for a heavier load? i didn't see that listed anywhere.

also, just for reference, what size frame is that in the photo?
blujosh is offline  
Reply
Old 12-07-15 | 12:12 PM
  #38  
agmetal's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 28
From: Boston, MA

Bikes: Bianchi Volpe, ANT 3-speed roadster, New Albion Privateer singlespeed, Raleigh One Way singlespeed, Raleigh Professional "retro roadie" rebuild, 198? Fuji(?) franken-5-speed, 1937 Raleigh Tourist, 1952 Raleigh Sports, 1966 Raleigh Sports step-through

Originally Posted by blujosh
are the rack-mounting braze-ons for the privateer rated for a heavier load? i didn't see that listed anywhere.

also, just for reference, what size frame is that in the photo?
I don't think there's a weight rating listed anywhere. The Space Horse was the only one I looked at that had any mention of it.

My frame is the 48cm one, which is essentially the same as my 51cm Volpe and similar to my 53cm Raleigh One-Way.
agmetal is offline  
Reply
Old 12-07-15 | 12:27 PM
  #39  
79pmooney's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 14,159
Likes: 5,284
From: Portland, OR

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

As others posted above, low BB is better for touring almost always; more stable, easier to put a foot down, etc. But we need to keep perspective. A lot goes into a bike. BB drop is one small factor. Small enough that unless you are racing fix gears, rarely anything close to a deciding factor.

I have owned (and still tend to choose) a few high BB bikes. Several had superb handling. (I don't like pedal strike In my racing days, I used the very high BB on my racing bike, a full 11", to advantage all the time, pedaling deeper into and sooner out of corners.)

If you are set on choosing between the Aurora Elite and Marrakesh, you could use the BB drop as a tie-breaker but make sure you actually have a tie. Don't pick the bike that will not suit you as well because it has a lower BB. (I haven't looked at either bike. I'm talking about the importance of BB height and don't want to sway my argument with opinions on the two bikes.)

Ben
79pmooney is offline  
Reply
Old 12-07-15 | 01:23 PM
  #40  
GovernorSilver's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 1
From: Washington DC Metro Area

Bikes: Breezer Uptown 8, Jamis Renegade Expert

Originally Posted by agmetal
I love my Privateer, but it's built as a single-speed. The geometry is quite similar to my Bianchi Volpe, and also to the All-City Space Horse, which I was also looking at when deciding which frame to do this build on.

Where did you get the pirate flags?
GovernorSilver is offline  
Reply
Old 12-07-15 | 02:12 PM
  #41  
agmetal's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 28
From: Boston, MA

Bikes: Bianchi Volpe, ANT 3-speed roadster, New Albion Privateer singlespeed, Raleigh One Way singlespeed, Raleigh Professional "retro roadie" rebuild, 198? Fuji(?) franken-5-speed, 1937 Raleigh Tourist, 1952 Raleigh Sports, 1966 Raleigh Sports step-through

Originally Posted by GovernorSilver
Where did you get the pirate flags?
They're just cheap things from a costume shop in Boston, about $3 each, maybe less. I got them for the Treasure Island themed Boston Bike Party ride over the summer, and kept them on there until about a month ago.
agmetal is offline  
Reply
Old 12-07-15 | 03:51 PM
  #42  
CliffordK's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 27,576
Likes: 5,454
From: Eugene, Oregon, USA
A few reasons for high BB.

Fixed Gear? No coasting on corners.
Long Cranks? 200mm?

It doesn't sound like you will be in either of these categories.

I wonder if all pedals are created equal. Perhaps some of the new power pedals are also thicker and wider, and might also benefit from a higher bottom bracket.
CliffordK is offline  
Reply
Old 12-07-15 | 04:13 PM
  #43  
PatrickGSR94's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 7,391
Likes: 13
From: Memphis TN area

Bikes: 2011 Felt Z85 (road/commuter), 2006 Marin Pine Mountain (utility/commuter E-bike), 1995 KHS Alite 1000 (gravel grinder)

Originally Posted by CliffordK
A few reasons for high BB.

Fixed Gear? No coasting on corners.
Long Cranks? 200mm?

It doesn't sound like you will be in either of these categories.

I wonder if all pedals are created equal. Perhaps some of the new power pedals are also thicker and wider, and might also benefit from a higher bottom bracket.
Another can be large platform pedals. My old 90's MTB with 175 cranks and large pinned platform pedals scraped one time when I accidentally had the inside pedal in the 6-o'clock position through a corner. That was when I was still a relative n00b.
PatrickGSR94 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-07-15 | 04:16 PM
  #44  
CliffordK's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 27,576
Likes: 5,454
From: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Oh, maybe I should add to the list.

Those people with toeclips and like to ride with the toeclips downward (ok, at least a few pedal strokes).
CliffordK is offline  
Reply
Old 12-07-15 | 04:54 PM
  #45  
GovernorSilver's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 1
From: Washington DC Metro Area

Bikes: Breezer Uptown 8, Jamis Renegade Expert

Originally Posted by agmetal
They're just cheap things from a costume shop in Boston, about $3 each, maybe less. I got them for the Treasure Island themed Boston Bike Party ride over the summer, and kept them on there until about a month ago.
Thanks. I went with a pirate theme for this year's Halloween group ride. Might do it again next year but with flags.
GovernorSilver is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Wattsup
General Cycling Discussion
6
08-27-18 09:53 PM
Cyclist0383
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
0
06-29-14 04:00 PM
adamskiboy
Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area
8
07-02-12 01:38 PM
Sevalecan
Bicycle Mechanics
3
09-15-11 02:04 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.