Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

Fender size question

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

Fender size question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-22-17, 05:34 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Fender size question

My first forum question (I'm a beginner).

What are the size specs for road bike fenders?
Is it the fender's width and its wheel diameter specs?
If so, how do I measure a fender's wheel diameter spec?

Thanks?
NewBiking is offline  
Old 09-22-17, 05:43 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,696

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5774 Post(s)
Liked 2,571 Times in 1,423 Posts
The diameter is spec'd by the wheel size, ie. 700c, 26", etc. But the width is the actual width, so a 35mm fender will be 35mm wide.

You want a fender wider than the tire, but you don't need it much wider because the vast bulk of water thrown comes off the center zone of the tire. For mud, you might want a more generous overhang.

One thing they don't specify is how much radial clearance there is. But fenders are flexible, and that will be mostly determined by the height of the fork crown or seat stay bridge, with you adjusting the braces to maintain that all the way around.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 09-23-17, 06:51 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
mcours2006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Toronto, CANADA
Posts: 6,202

Bikes: ...a few.

Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2010 Post(s)
Liked 408 Times in 234 Posts
On a couple of sets of fenders I bought it specified on the packaging that your for 25mm tires you should have 35mm fenders, and 35mm tires 45mm fenders. This is a bit overkill, and it looks ridiculous with the 25mm tires. Like FBinNY said, you don't need much. In fact, My 35mm fenders work and look great on the 35mm tires. It's a pretty tight fit, but that helps keep the water spray down.

One other thing about fenders is that the front ones are much more important than you think. Make sure it comes down low enough so that the spray doesn't get at the BB, and hence your feet. Long mudflaps are good for this.
mcours2006 is offline  
Old 09-23-17, 09:59 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,549

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5224 Post(s)
Liked 3,581 Times in 2,342 Posts
in rare cases you have to cut the front fender in half & mount the halves independently on both sides (front/rear) of the fork crown. example cases include: some frames w tight clearances or when squeezing in larger than original tire sizes

Last edited by rumrunn6; 09-29-17 at 11:26 AM.
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 09-23-17, 04:58 PM
  #5  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks (and bike size?)

Thanks for the helpful replies!

If I'm clear, the wheel size (like 26") is the same number people use to describe their "bike size" -- a 26-inch bike.

So, sorry, now I wonder how I can learn the size of my bike. I bought it used and don't know much about it.

From where, to where, should I measure it in inches?

Thanks again. Very helpful forum!

Last edited by NewBiking; 09-23-17 at 05:05 PM.
NewBiking is offline  
Old 09-23-17, 06:01 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,696

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5774 Post(s)
Liked 2,571 Times in 1,423 Posts
Originally Posted by NewBiking
Thanks for the helpful replies!

If I'm clear, the wheel size (like 26") is the same number people use to describe their "bike size" -- a 26-inch bike.

So, sorry, now I wonder how I can learn the size of my bike. I bought it used and don't know much about it.

From where, to where, should I measure it in inches?

Thanks again. Very helpful forum!
Forget about bike size which is often confused by folks who don't know bikes. You only care about wheel or tire size, since that's what the fender wraps around. That's real easy because it's molded into the tire's sidewall.

So, check your tire and is should say something like either 26x1.75, or anything from 26x1.25 to 26x2.25, all of which are 26" tires.

Or it might say something like 700c x 28, or 700x28c, or anything 700x some width. Tat would be a 700c and take the corresponding fender. There are other sizes and fenders made for them, ie. 20" on folding bikes.

BTW you might also notice the ISO size designations which would be something like 40-559 or 25-622, which would 26" and 700c respectively.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 09-24-17, 02:36 AM
  #7  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: England / CPH
Posts: 8,543

Bikes: 2010 Cube Acid / 2013 Mango FGSS

Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1053 Post(s)
Liked 41 Times in 36 Posts
Def take a look at CRUD Road Racer series fenders, especially if you don't have proper mounting points for other systems.

I can't say enough good things about them and I think there are some others around here that would agree.

Excellent durable product.
acidfast7 is offline  
Old 09-24-17, 12:52 PM
  #8  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
From where, to where, should I measure it in inches?
center axis of BB, to top of seat tube.


Only children's bikes just use wheel size, because they only make one frame size.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 09-25-17, 02:48 PM
  #9  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Very hepful replies

I really appreciate the helpful replies! It's a great forum.

Everything was clear except one point:
BTW you might also notice the ISO size designations which would be something like 40-559 or 25-622, which would 26" and 700c respectively.

Does 40-559 mean a 26" wheel/tire with a 40mm tire width?
Sorry, it's probably because I'm a beginner.

I'll keep reading the forum. Hope one day I can offer advice!
Thanks!

Last edited by NewBiking; 09-25-17 at 02:51 PM.
NewBiking is offline  
Old 09-26-17, 06:28 AM
  #10  
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
Originally Posted by NewBiking
...
Does 40-559 mean a 26" wheel/tire with a 40mm tire width?
...
Yes, in theory. So 559 is the bead seat diameter, 40 is the tire diameter (the section of the tire, that is). So the overall diameter of the wheel, with a 559-40 tire on it, is 559+40+40=638. That will usually be pretty close to the actual diameter of the wheel.

Note there are two different diameters: the wheel (rim), and the tire thickness. If you bend a fender out to make it fit a bigger wheel diameter, it will become narrower. If you bend it in, to make it fit a smaller wheel, it will get wider.
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.

Last edited by rhm; 09-26-17 at 07:36 AM.
rhm is offline  
Old 09-26-17, 06:59 AM
  #11  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: England / CPH
Posts: 8,543

Bikes: 2010 Cube Acid / 2013 Mango FGSS

Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1053 Post(s)
Liked 41 Times in 36 Posts
Originally Posted by rhm
Yes, in theory. So 559 is the bead seat diameter, 40 is the tire diameter (the section of the tire, that is). So the overall diameter of the wheel, with a 559-40 tire on it, is 559+40+40=638. That will usually be pretty close to the actual diameter of the wheel.

Note there are two different diameters: the wheel (rim), and the tire thickness. If you bend a fender out to make it fit a bigger wheel diameter, it will become narrower. If you bend it in, to make it fit a smaller wheel, it will get wider.
Actually that's not true ...

I believe that the OP is referring to the ETRTO (ISO-5775), which lists width of a tyre and the diameter of the wheel (see Figure 1).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_5775
acidfast7 is offline  
Old 09-26-17, 07:19 AM
  #12  
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
Originally Posted by acidfast7
Actually that's not true ...

I believe that the OP is referring to the ETRTO (ISO-5775), which lists width of a tyre and the diameter of the wheel (see Figure 1).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_5775
I'm sorry, but I don't follow. What part of my post is erroneous?
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.
rhm is offline  
Old 09-26-17, 07:27 AM
  #13  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: England / CPH
Posts: 8,543

Bikes: 2010 Cube Acid / 2013 Mango FGSS

Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1053 Post(s)
Liked 41 Times in 36 Posts
Originally Posted by rhm
I'm sorry, but I don't follow. What part of my post is erroneous?
When using the ETRTO, the overall height is not 2 x FN + SN (first number and second number). In the case of ETRTO the first number is the width of the tire rather than the height.

Sorry for the pedantry.
acidfast7 is offline  
Old 09-26-17, 07:39 AM
  #14  
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
Originally Posted by acidfast7
When using the ETRTO, the overall height is not 2 x FN + SN (first number and second number). In the case of ETRTO the first number is the width of the tire rather than the height.
Abbreviations like ISO and ETRTO are all well and good, if one uses them carefully, which is why I was careful to NOT use them. And I have now edited the quote to clarify which part of the post I was addressing. The numbers OP used, and which I quoted, were just numbers. Of those, 559 refers to an actual measurement of a nominal "26 inch" rim, and 40 refers to an actual measurement, the width (which is approximately the same as the height) of the tire. So to turn those numbers into an overall diameter of the wheel (wheel being defined as a rim with a tire on it) you really do need to count the tire twice.

The "26 inch" rim that measures 559 mm, for what it's worth, assumes a 2.0" (50 mm) tire to add up to 26 inches; so 559+50+50=659 which is, of course, just a little shy of 26 inches, but you get the idea.

Originally Posted by acidfast7
Sorry for the pedantry.
no worries, let's just get this right and not confuse anyone!
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.

Last edited by rhm; 09-26-17 at 07:43 AM.
rhm is offline  
Old 09-29-17, 09:28 AM
  #15  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I recommend u chick out topeak fenders, they are universal and very light and flexible, they have models according the tyre sizes. have one installed on my bike and they saved my clothes from many splashes.
eaglespeed is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lucillle
Beach Cruisers
4
05-17-19 04:16 PM
kdubin
Touring
7
08-21-17 06:21 PM
wobbooze
Bicycle Mechanics
30
02-11-13 08:39 PM
pwhallon
General Cycling Discussion
10
01-12-12 10:08 PM
KDC1956
Bicycle Mechanics
4
10-30-10 09:42 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.