Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

What may annoy you when commuting?

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

What may annoy you when commuting?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-28-19, 02:30 PM
  #201  
Unlisted member
 
no motor?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 6,192

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock

Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1376 Post(s)
Liked 432 Times in 297 Posts
Originally Posted by Hypno Toad
Y Bike-commuting was a great way to perfect the best utilization of profane words.
So are home and auto repairs.
no motor? is offline  
Old 03-28-19, 03:12 PM
  #202  
meh
 
Hypno Toad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Hopkins, MN
Posts: 4,704

Bikes: 23 Cutthroat, 21 CoMotion Java; 21 Bianchi Infinito; 15 Surly Pugsley; 11 Globe Daily; 09 Kona Dew Drop; 96 Mondonico

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1111 Post(s)
Liked 1,013 Times in 519 Posts
Originally Posted by no motor?
So are home and auto repairs.
^^^ truth
Hypno Toad is offline  
Old 03-28-19, 04:27 PM
  #203  
Portland Fred
 
banerjek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,548

Bikes: Custom Winter, Challenge Seiran SL, Fuji Team Pro, Cattrike Road/Velokit, РOS hybrid

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 232 Post(s)
Liked 53 Times in 35 Posts
Originally Posted by caloso
Not all MUPs are created equal. And even the same MUP can be a totally different place Monday at 730am than it is Saturday at 10am. Our local MUP, the American River Bike Trail, is a bike highway on weekday mornings where it's mostly commuters, people riding for fitness/training, and riders who are combining the two. On weekend mornings, it's a zoo and I will avoid it at all costs.
I don't doubt some paths are good to ride fast some or even all of the time. If you can see and the path is clear, there's no harm in going as fast as you want.

There's no excuse for colliding with a dog on a retracto leash. You can see the dog before you get to them, you know dogs do unpredictable things, and you know the control is not there. It's an obvious threat that's easy to avoid. If you simply go slowly, you can stop in one foot and it doesn't even matter if they suddenly charge you. Doing anything else is counting on luck which eventually runs out.

Failing to take precautions near animals is nuts -- do it with any regularity and a crash is guaranteed.
banerjek is offline  
Old 03-28-19, 04:58 PM
  #204  
hoppipola
 
holytrousers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 424

Bikes: fausto coppi

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 512 Post(s)
Liked 228 Times in 164 Posts
Cars

Anyone complaining about pedestrians, dogs and birds should remember that they were here first. WE are taking THEIR space, We are the danger to them, not the other way around. The only thing we can (and should) complain about is cars. Our precious air is unbreathable. No one gave them the right to take it away.
Cheers.
holytrousers is offline  
Old 03-28-19, 05:19 PM
  #205  
Disco Infiltrator
 
Darth Lefty's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446

Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem

Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,105 Times in 1,369 Posts
Originally Posted by caloso
Not all MUPs are created equal. And even the same MUP can be a totally different place Monday at 730am than it is Saturday at 10am. Our local MUP, the American River Bike Trail, is a bike highway on weekday mornings where it's mostly commuters, people riding for fitness/training, and riders who are combining the two. On weekend mornings, it's a zoo and I will avoid it at all costs.
At least the section up to the landslide is pretty empty!
Darth Lefty is offline  
Old 03-28-19, 07:58 PM
  #206  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 146
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by no motor?
The wind, bumps, traffic, dogs, trash, bugs.....
agreed on the trash! Especially glass.
schiavonec is offline  
Old 03-28-19, 08:41 PM
  #207  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: La-la Land, CA
Posts: 3,623

Bikes: Cannondale Quick SL1 Bike - 2014

Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3405 Post(s)
Liked 240 Times in 185 Posts
Originally Posted by caloso
Not all MUPs are created equal. And even the same MUP can be a totally different place Monday at 730am than it is Saturday at 10am. Our local MUP, the American River Bike Trail, is a bike highway on weekday mornings where it's mostly commuters, people riding for fitness/training, and riders who are combining the two. On weekend mornings, it's a zoo and I will avoid it at all costs.
They're as good as local planners make them. Some are wide properly designed and maintained with designated sections for cyclist, runners, and walkers with stroller.

The very best even have barrier for cyclist. Others are precious more the crudely paved strips of asphalt where its every man for himself.
KraneXL is offline  
Old 03-28-19, 09:51 PM
  #208  
Senior Member
 
Jim from Boston's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,384
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Liked 218 Times in 171 Posts
Originally Posted by KraneXL
They're as good as local planners make them. Some are wide properly designed and maintained with designated sections for cyclist, runners, and walkers with stroller.

The very best even have barrier for cyclist. Others are precious more the crudely paved strips of asphalt where its every man for himself.
This thread has deteriorated into another pointless popcorn thread about MUPS, after a stint as a popcorn thread about even just riding on the road at all.
Originally Posted by Jim from Boston
Please don't close this thread because of this dust-up. I think it has been useful and refreshing to learn and be aware of the "little," i.e non-life-threatening realities of cycle-commuting.
Just yesterday I posted elsewhere:
Originally Posted by Jim from Boston
…Reading the A&S threads, it is obvious that any cyclist should be worried being hit by a car, anywhere. There was even a recent fatality on metro Boston’s best MUP.
and on a now-closed thread
Originally Posted by Jim from Boston
They [replies] are usually lost in the morass of often scores of replies, both in agreement and dispute with mine.
Originally Posted by Daniel4
I don't think anybody has posted anything that would stop him or her from cycling. These are annoyances the OP asked and we complied.

And then we go on our merry way - at least most of us.

Last edited by Jim from Boston; 03-29-19 at 05:12 AM.
Jim from Boston is offline  
Old 03-29-19, 07:42 AM
  #209  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,794
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 326 Times in 204 Posts
Originally Posted by Hypno Toad
Based on riding in a number different cities around the US, I'm gonna say that MUPs are variable as a good place for a 'fast' bike. Even in my region, some MUPs are GREAT for biking fast and some MUPs are total crap.
Agreed. Even the same MUP can be great or terrible depending on the conditions, time of day, how crowded it is etc.
OBoile is offline  
Old 03-29-19, 07:45 AM
  #210  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,794
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 326 Times in 204 Posts
Originally Posted by holytrousers
Anyone complaining about pedestrians, dogs and birds should remember that they were here first. WE are taking THEIR space, We are the danger to them, not the other way around. The only thing we can (and should) complain about is cars. Our precious air is unbreathable. No one gave them the right to take it away.
Cheers.
I don't agree with this post. No one "owns" a space.
OBoile is offline  
Old 03-29-19, 07:59 AM
  #211  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: La-la Land, CA
Posts: 3,623

Bikes: Cannondale Quick SL1 Bike - 2014

Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3405 Post(s)
Liked 240 Times in 185 Posts
Originally Posted by holytrousers
Anyone complaining about pedestrians, dogs and birds should remember that they were here first. WE are taking THEIR space, We are the danger to them, not the other way around. The only thing we can (and should) complain about is cars. Our precious air is unbreathable. No one gave them the right to take it away.
Cheers.
On the contrary, MUP were created for bikes. It later advanced and opened to occupy the latter as a matter of PC. What you're referring to above are sidewalks.

Last edited by KraneXL; 03-29-19 at 08:14 AM.
KraneXL is offline  
Old 03-29-19, 08:10 AM
  #212  
meh
 
Hypno Toad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Hopkins, MN
Posts: 4,704

Bikes: 23 Cutthroat, 21 CoMotion Java; 21 Bianchi Infinito; 15 Surly Pugsley; 11 Globe Daily; 09 Kona Dew Drop; 96 Mondonico

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1111 Post(s)
Liked 1,013 Times in 519 Posts
Originally Posted by OBoile
I don't agree with this post. No one "owns" a space.
Right!

The Midtown Greenway in Minneapolis is an organized, high-speed freeway during commuter hours and dumpster fire on warm weekends.

Also, I love to brag about Minneapolis' Cedar Lake Trail - a divided bike freeway - This is a MUP turned up to 11 in all the best ways!

There are Eastbound, Westbound, and foot paths, all 6 ft wide and separated. In this pic, we're on the Westbound lane, you can see the Eastbound lane, and the foot path is harder to see in this pic.
Hypno Toad is offline  
Old 03-29-19, 08:32 AM
  #213  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: North of LA, CA
Posts: 119

Bikes: FX3 Frankenbike, Emonda SL5

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 48 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by caloso
Not all MUPs are created equal. And even the same MUP can be a totally different place Monday at 730am than it is Saturday at 10am. Our local MUP, the American River Bike Trail, is a bike highway on weekday mornings where it's mostly commuters, people riding for fitness/training, and riders who are combining the two. On weekend mornings, it's a zoo and I will avoid it at all costs.
I've ridden the American River Trail before and found it quite pleasant, although it was coming up on 10 years ago the last time I rode it.
OhLylo is offline  
Old 03-29-19, 09:12 AM
  #214  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,904

Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2604 Post(s)
Liked 1,933 Times in 1,213 Posts
Originally Posted by banerjek
There's no excuse for colliding with a dog on a retracto leash. You can see the dog before you get to them, you know dogs do unpredictable things, and you know the control is not there. It's an obvious threat that's easy to avoid. If you simply go slowly, you can stop in one foot and it doesn't even matter if they suddenly charge you. Doing anything else is counting on luck which eventually runs out.

Failing to take precautions near animals is nuts -- do it with any regularity and a crash is guaranteed.
I vehemently disagree. A dog on a retractable lead is a dog without any significant restraint, with the added "benefit" of being able to block all traffic from the "owner" to the dog. How do you expect other traffic (pedestrians, cyclist, skateboarders, or even cagers) to "take precautions" when a dog can dart from the person on the other end of the lead to thirty feet on the other side? Best hope is it's a truck, no more dog to worry about and the "owner" might learn a lesson.
pdlamb is offline  
Old 03-29-19, 10:26 AM
  #215  
Senior Member
 
nayr497's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Nilbog
Posts: 1,705

Bikes: How'd I get this many?

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 88 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Low-light conditions and/or rain/snow and motorists NOT using their headlights, even when it is the state law. I wish there were a) more dedicated traffic cops b) more tickets given for not using headlights when it's the law (wipers on)
nayr497 is offline  
Old 03-29-19, 10:34 AM
  #216  
Disco Infiltrator
 
Darth Lefty's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446

Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem

Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,105 Times in 1,369 Posts
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/KickTheDog
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Darth Lefty is offline  
Old 03-29-19, 11:43 AM
  #217  
Senior Member
 
alan s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 6,977
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1496 Post(s)
Liked 189 Times in 128 Posts
Originally Posted by pdlamb
I vehemently disagree. A dog on a retractable lead is a dog without any significant restraint, with the added "benefit" of being able to block all traffic from the "owner" to the dog. How do you expect other traffic (pedestrians, cyclist, skateboarders, or even cagers) to "take precautions" when a dog can dart from the person on the other end of the lead to thirty feet on the other side? Best hope is it's a truck, no more dog to worry about and the "owner" might learn a lesson.
I agree with you. On a shared path, all parties have responsibilities to others. That means ensuring your dog is properly restrained and sufficiently off to the side to allow the safe passage of others. It has nothing to do with who was there first.
alan s is offline  
Old 03-29-19, 12:18 PM
  #218  
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,978

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,538 Times in 1,047 Posts
Originally Posted by KraneXL
On the contrary, MUP were created for bikes. It later advanced and opened to occupy the latter as a matter of PC.
Sez who, besides you?
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 03-29-19, 01:05 PM
  #219  
Portland Fred
 
banerjek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,548

Bikes: Custom Winter, Challenge Seiran SL, Fuji Team Pro, Cattrike Road/Velokit, РOS hybrid

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 232 Post(s)
Liked 53 Times in 35 Posts
Originally Posted by pdlamb
I vehemently disagree. A dog on a retractable lead is a dog without any significant restraint, with the added "benefit" of being able to block all traffic from the "owner" to the dog. How do you expect other traffic (pedestrians, cyclist, skateboarders, or even cagers) to "take precautions" when a dog can dart from the person on the other end of the lead to thirty feet on the other side? Best hope is it's a truck, no more dog to worry about and the "owner" might learn a lesson.
Real classy hoping for the violent death of an animal just because the owner annoys you.

If you aren't prepared to stop in time for a threat you see right in front of you, you didn't take precautions. Riding in any kind of shared space requires adjusting for the mistakes and misdeeds of others regardless of whether you're on the road or a path.

If you ride in rural areas, dogs are never on any kind of restraint -- that's why you're encountering them. The dogs are significantly bigger, faster, far meaner, you typically have much less lead time, and you could have them coming from multiple sides at once. And yet those of us who've dealt with them countless times over the years don't crash because we don't pretend nothing is happening. A lot of dog owners are irresponsible idiots, but urban dogs are so much easier to work with it's not even funny.

When people ride as if everyone is doing what they're "supposed" to with regard for whether that is actually happening, the results are predictable. As a MUP user (I walk quite a bit), I've seen plenty of conflicts involving dogs, runners, and cyclists. So far, 100% could have been avoided if *any* of the individuals involved made an obvious adjustment.
banerjek is offline  
Old 03-29-19, 02:11 PM
  #220  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: La-la Land, CA
Posts: 3,623

Bikes: Cannondale Quick SL1 Bike - 2014

Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3405 Post(s)
Liked 240 Times in 185 Posts
Originally Posted by banerjek
Real classy hoping for the violent death of an animal just because the owner annoys you.
Indeed. Its just a dumb animal. But any harm comes from the owners negligence. The responsibility lies 100% with the owner.
If you aren't prepared to stop in time for a threat you see right in front of you, you didn't take precautions.
Its not the responsibility of the cyclist to look out for your dog or your kid for that matter. I would never let my kids run around on a busy thoroughfare particularly when there are cyclist, skaters, runners all around. I'm forced to slow down because of these irresponsible parents putting their kids in harms way, but even a slow moving cycle can cause harm.

At worst you sacrifice your own well-being for the sake of the child. Then the parent just moves on with their life completely oblivious to your injury or property damage.

If you take your kids for a walk there you need to be vigilant and give them your undivided attention. That's not the place to simply release them into the wild hoping strangers will babysit while you float away into your cell phone conversation. The MUPs is not a playground.
Riding in any kind of shared space requires adjusting for the mistakes and misdeeds of others regardless of whether you're on the road or a path.
Among the most important of those rules should be Keep to the Right, and be predictable. Something most of us learn early on but seem to forget in these environments and situation. Its not just up to the cyclist. Everyone using the MUP needs to cooperate.
If you ride in rural areas, dogs are never on any kind of restraint -- that's why you're encountering them. The dogs are significantly bigger, faster, far meaner, you typically have much less lead time, and you could have them coming from multiple sides at once. And yet those of us who've dealt with them countless times over the years don't crash because we don't pretend nothing is happening. A lot of dog owners are irresponsible idiots, but urban dogs are so much easier to work with it's not even funny.
I've never lived in a rural area so I have no idea about the expectations or responsibilities of dog owners there. But I can say with absolute certainty that the overwhelming majority of dog owner in the city don't have a clue, and should not be allowed to own a dog. The first understanding in dog ownership is -- dogs can be trained.
When people ride as if everyone is doing what they're "supposed" to with regard for whether that is actually happening, the results are predictable.
I've never found that particularly challenging. Have you?
As a MUP user (I walk quite a bit), I've seen plenty of conflicts involving dogs, runners, and cyclists. So far, 100% could have been avoided if *any* of the individuals involved made an obvious adjustment.
That obvious adjustment means following rules. The one things we all have to do to exist in a society. For example, I was at the hospital today and there is a stairway with a divider. Going up is on the right and going down is on the left.

Wouldn't you know that no matter what the group does there's always that one individual that defies logic and does the opposite. He takes the side of the stairway where others are going up to go down, against the flow of people.

Thing is, he ends up at the bottom at the same time as the rest of the group, so other than the chaos, what was his point? Is the carnage he causes as the line of people have to shift something you can predict or avoid?

Last edited by KraneXL; 03-29-19 at 02:14 PM.
KraneXL is offline  
Old 03-29-19, 02:23 PM
  #221  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,904

Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2604 Post(s)
Liked 1,933 Times in 1,213 Posts
Originally Posted by banerjek
As a MUP user (I walk quite a bit), I've seen plenty of conflicts involving dogs, runners, and cyclists. So far, 100% could have been avoided if *any* of the individuals involved made an obvious adjustment.
So tell me, Oh Classy MUP Walker, when a dog takes off running, the owner lets the mutt run, and the dog runs past you, the lead hits your legs, and almost knocks you down (or maybe the dog DID knock you down, if you're older or younger or smaller), how could YOU, the walker, have avoided it? Stay off the MUP and let the dogs run loose?
pdlamb is offline  
Old 03-29-19, 02:43 PM
  #222  
Senior Member
 
Jim from Boston's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,384
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Liked 218 Times in 171 Posts
Originally Posted by holytrousers
Anyone complaining about pedestrians, dogs and birds should remember that they were here first. WE are taking THEIR space,

We are the danger to them, not the other way around.
The only thing we can (and should) complain about is cars. Our precious air is unbreathable. No one gave them the right to take it away.
Originally Posted by KraneXL
On the contrary, MUP were created for bikes. It later advanced and opened to occupy the latter as a matter of PC. What you're referring to above are sidewalks.
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
Sez who, besides you?
I posted earlier on this thread:
Originally Posted by Jim from Boston
This thread has deteriorated into another pointless popcorn thread about MUPS, after a stint as a popcorn thread about even just riding on the road at all.

Just yesterday I posted elsewhere:
Originally Posted by Jim from Boston
Reading the A&S threads, it is obvious that any cyclist should be worried being hit by a car, anywhere. There was even a recent fatality on metro Boston’s best MUP.
I'm dismayed to read such “cyclo-centric” attitudes about MUPS, that would be astonishing to the non-cycling pubiic, who likely pay more in aggregate to maintain them.
Originally Posted by canklecat
If we ride often enough on MUPs we've all seen...wannabe racers riding too fast for conditions, sometimes two abreast, sometimes in mini-pelotons and not giving any consideration to other users -- slower cyclists, old folks walking with canes or walkers, families with strollers and toddlers and dogs on 50 yard retractable non-leashes (the dogs too), etc.

That's life on the multi-use path. Always been that way. Always will be. It's just the nature of the thing…

Jerks are gonna jerk. But most folks are pretty cool about using the MUP. I prefer to keep the latter in mind
Originally Posted by Jim from Boston
…My own thought is that a MUP is not so much a commuter route, or training venue, but a pastoral park, where people can enjoy themselves without too many worries, and needn’t be always vigilant, as is a cyclist on the Road.

A few years ago I went on a walking tour of the Boston’s Emerald Necklace park system designed by the great 19th century landscape architect Frederic Law Olmsted with the concept of a Promenade in mind.

According to the Park Ranger, it was planned “to take a leisurely walk, ride, or drive in public, especially to meet or be seen by others (Oxford Dictionary).

The strollers would be dressed in their best Sunday clothes, and running and horses (and ? bicycles) would be discouraged.

My own Golden Rule of Cycling is Do unto the Pedestrians, as you would have the Cagers do unto you.

Last edited by Jim from Boston; 03-29-19 at 04:41 PM.
Jim from Boston is offline  
Old 03-29-19, 05:09 PM
  #223  
Portland Fred
 
banerjek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,548

Bikes: Custom Winter, Challenge Seiran SL, Fuji Team Pro, Cattrike Road/Velokit, РOS hybrid

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 232 Post(s)
Liked 53 Times in 35 Posts
Originally Posted by pdlamb
So tell me, Oh Classy MUP Walker, when a dog takes off running, the owner lets the mutt run, and the dog runs past you, the lead hits your legs, and almost knocks you down (or maybe the dog DID knock you down, if you're older or younger or smaller), how could YOU, the walker, have avoided it? Stay off the MUP and let the dogs run loose?
Guys, this stuff is easy.

If the dog runs and jumps on you, yes you could be knocked down. So if it looks like that could happen, you do what you do anywhere else -- slow down, stop if necessary, and put the bike between you and the dog.

Originally Posted by KraneXL
Everyone using the MUP needs to cooperate. I've never lived in a rural area so I have no idea about the expectations or responsibilities of dog owners there.
I don't recommend leaving the urban bubble. Seriously -- you'll get yourself hurt or worse fast.

Responsibilities are the same and everyone should cooperate. But that's just not how life works.

One thing I find amazing is the adventures some people manage to have in the easiest environments.
banerjek is offline  
Old 03-29-19, 05:24 PM
  #224  
hoppipola
 
holytrousers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 424

Bikes: fausto coppi

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 512 Post(s)
Liked 228 Times in 164 Posts
@OBoile:
I'm trying to say that the world is here for everyone. Me and You, that kid or that old lady, the homeless and the rich. Instead of taking bike lanes, sidewalks and skyscrapers for granted, imagine our planet as a shared ground.
Bicycles are a commodity, a tool. Thanks to them, you move faster. You have power over those who don't use them, but power isn't a right, it's a privilege. And being a privilege, you have to be grateful and think about those from whom you are taking a piece of earth to make it YOURS, so you can get ANNOYED. When complaining about a pedestrian standing on a bike lane, your way are basically acting like those disrespectful car drivers.
Let's all slow down a little and try to wake up, let's appreciate all those obvious things that empower us and make our lives easier instead of finding new opportunities to show how dissatisfied we are with our own selves.
Just look at all those car drivers, they don't even realize they are moving while sitting !
@KraneXL: all this infrastructure has been invented by man to solve problems that have arisen as a result of man's struggle to solve earlier problems. Don't get caught in this dilemma.
The rule should be simple : the more power you have, the less consideration you should get and the the more consideration you should give : power = 1/consideration

Who has the power ?
  1. Humans driving dangerous polluting vehicles
  2. Humans on Bicycles
  3. Humans
  4. Animals
  5. Plants
Who should get precedence:
  1. Plants
  2. Animals
  3. Humans
  4. Humans on Bicycles
  5. Humans driving dangerous polluting vehicles
@Jim from Boston : Your golden rule is in fact the only thing that should ever be taught in schools. Ever wondered why this isn't the case ?
holytrousers is offline  
Old 03-29-19, 05:38 PM
  #225  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,794
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 326 Times in 204 Posts
Originally Posted by holytrousers
@OBoile:
I'm trying to say that the world is here for everyone. Me and You, that kid or that old lady, the homeless and the rich. Instead of taking bike lanes, sidewalks and skyscrapers for granted, imagine our planet as a shared ground.
Bicycles are a commodity, a tool. Thanks to them, you move faster. You have power over those who don't use them, but power isn't a right, it's a privilege. And being a privilege, you have to be grateful and think about those from whom you are taking a piece of earth to make it YOURS, so you can get ANNOYED. When complaining about a pedestrian standing on a bike lane, your way are basically acting like those disrespectful car drivers.
Let's all slow down a little and try to wake up, let's appreciate all those obvious things that empower us and make our lives easier instead of finding new opportunities to show how dissatisfied we are with our own selves.
Just look at all those car drivers, they don't even realize they are moving while sitting !
@KraneXL: all this infrastructure has been invented by man to solve problems that have arisen as a result of man's struggle to solve earlier problems. Don't get caught in this dilemma.
The rule should be simple : the more power you have, the less consideration you should get and the the more consideration you should give : power = 1/consideration

Who has the power ?
  1. Humans driving dangerous polluting vehicles
  2. Humans on Bicycles
  3. Humans
  4. Animals
  5. Plants
Who should get precedence:
  1. Plants
  2. Animals
  3. Humans
  4. Humans on Bicycles
  5. Humans driving dangerous polluting vehicles
@Jim from Boston : Your golden rule is in fact the only thing that should ever be taught in schools. Ever wondered why this isn't the case ?
Yeah, I'm still going to go with not agreeing with you.
OBoile is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.