Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

Pannier recommendation

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

Pannier recommendation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-12-25 | 02:47 PM
  #51  
phughes's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,862
Likes: 2,218
Originally Posted by iiibusta
I'm always afraid of panniers throwing off the balance of the bike. I may be wrong.
Yep, You're wrong, and you just resurrected and old thread.
phughes is offline  
Reply
Old 07-13-25 | 01:03 PM
  #52  
Korina's Avatar
Happy banana slug
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 2,503
From: Arcata, California, U.S., North America, Earth, Saggitarius Arm, Milky Way

Bikes: 1984 Araya MB 261, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper Sport, 1993 Hard Rock Ultra, 1994 Trek Multitrack 750, 1995 Trek Singletrack 930

Originally Posted by iiibusta
I'm always afraid of panniers throwing off the balance of the bike. I may be wrong.
The only time panniers throw the balance off is when I have only one and overload it. No problems otherwise.

Now trunk bags and baskets on the rear, not so much fun, at least for me. IME if I put a substantial amount of weight (over 5 lbs.) above the rear wheel it causes the back end to wag side-to-side. YMMV, of course; trunk bags and baskets are very popular, just not for me.
Korina is offline  
Reply
Old 07-14-25 | 11:13 AM
  #53  
Darth Lefty's Avatar
Disco Infiltrator
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 15,328
Likes: 3,518
From: Folsom CA

Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem

A pannier on one side of the rear rack does change the balance but hardly enough to notice. You might notice you need to lean a little against it when hands-off peeling your breakfast banana. I have not tried panniers in the front but imagine they might be a little more challenging. I like rear racks but somehow don't presently have a bike with one. For my commute as it is now, since they gave us all big laptops, I carry the laptop backpack.

I've also gotten tank-slapper with a trunk bag. Both bikes that did it were classic steel road bikes. A MTB from circa Y2K, on which I also used the same bag, had no such behavior.

Originally Posted by phughes
Yep, You're wrong, and you just resurrected and old thread.
It's ok. Traffic on this subforum feels welcome.
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
"Well, well!" said Holmes, impatiently. "A good cyclist does not need a high road. The moor is intersected with paths and the moon is at the full."
Darth Lefty is offline  
Reply
Old 07-14-25 | 11:22 AM
  #54  
phughes's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,862
Likes: 2,218
Originally Posted by Darth Lefty
A pannier on one side of the rear rack does change the balance but hardly enough to notice. You might notice you need to lean a little against it when hands-off peeling your breakfast banana. I have not tried panniers in the front but imagine they might be a little more challenging. I like rear racks but somehow don't presently have a bike with one. For my commute as it is now, since they gave us all big laptops, I carry the laptop backpack.

I've also gotten tank-slapper with a trunk bag. Both bikes that did it were classic steel road bikes. A MTB from circa Y2K, on which I also used the same bag, had no such behavior.


It's ok. Traffic on this subforum feels welcome.
I understand. I do get a little annoyed at times by random comments by newbies that really do not address the question posed by an OP. They often reek of bots.
phughes is offline  
Reply
Old 07-14-25 | 12:07 PM
  #55  
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2025
Posts: 6
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by phughes
I understand. I do get a little annoyed at times by random comments by newbies that really do not address the question posed by an OP. They often reek of bots.
Thanks for your warm welcome. I made no intention of making a point. I was simply asking if it does indeed a make a difference in balance. Sorry to have annoyed you.
iiibusta is offline  
Reply
Old 07-14-25 | 12:24 PM
  #56  
phughes's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,862
Likes: 2,218
Originally Posted by iiibusta
Thanks for your warm welcome. I made no intention of making a point. I was simply asking if it does indeed a make a difference in balance. Sorry to have annoyed you.
Not a problem, and seriously, welcome to the forum. There is however, an accepted etiquette to forums in general, and often new users don't understand them. Sorry to have jumped on you. One forum I frequent has been getting newbie posts a lot lately, with comments such as yours, always on older threads. The majority of them have come from AI bots. We generally ask them to reply with some sort of information that would prove they are real, and if not, they are deleted and blocked.

Generally speaking, if you have a question about something, start a new thread. You will get more advice.

Oh, and in response to an old thread being resurrected...




phughes is offline  
Reply
Old 07-14-25 | 12:43 PM
  #57  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 9,685
Likes: 2,603
From: northern Deep South

Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee

Originally Posted by Korina
The only time panniers throw the balance off is when I have only one and overload it. No problems otherwise.
Originally Posted by Darth Lefty
A pannier on one side of the rear rack does change the balance but hardly enough to notice. You might notice you need to lean a little against it when hands-off peeling your breakfast banana.
For years, I'd bring dress shoes to work at the beginning of the week, leave them there for a few days, and take them home at the end of the week. Call it close to 15 years of commuting, with two panniers (one for clothes, coffee, and lunch, the other for shoes) somewhere between a quarter and a half of all commute rides. The only times I noticed the second pannier were the times I had a stiff (20 mph or better) headwind. The rest of the time, I never noticed how many bags I was carrying after I started rolling.
pdlamb is offline  
Reply
Old 07-14-25 | 04:40 PM
  #58  
rekmeyata's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,954
Likes: 388
From: NE Indiana

Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS

Originally Posted by iiibusta
I'm always afraid of panniers throwing off the balance of the bike. I may be wrong.
Of course, you are totally wrong, people have been riding bikes for over 100 years with panniers all over the world and no one worried about balance.

This guy rode around the world like this:

Image result for heavyly loaded expedition bicycle

This is an oddity, check out the size of the bike, it's one of those suitcase bikes, and he also traveled around the world on this thing:
Image result for heavyly loaded expedition bicycle

Image result for heavyly loaded expedition bicycle

Speaking of balance issues, try riding these:
Image result for heavyly loaded expedition bicycle

Image result for heavyly loaded expedition bicycle

Image result for heavyly loaded expedition bicycle
rekmeyata is online now  
Reply
Old 07-14-25 | 05:25 PM
  #59  
noglider's Avatar
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,172
Likes: 6,391
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

I commuted with front panniers for a while. With front panniers, they should be balanced. It's not necessary for them to be precisely balanced, but if they are substantially unbalanced, it takes a notable amount of work to ride. With rear panniers, it's not a concern for me at all.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.

Last edited by noglider; 07-14-25 at 11:27 PM.
noglider is offline  
Reply
Old 07-15-25 | 04:56 PM
  #60  
RidingMatthew's Avatar
Let's Ride!
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,588
Likes: 42
From: Lexington, VA USA

Bikes: --2010 Jamis 650b1-- 2016 Cervelo R2-- 2018 Salsa Journeyman 650B

Same for me rear panniers balanced seems better but I have totally rode with just on pannier of a few recreational rides. I wanted to carry thing but did not need both panniers. & Ortlieb is the only way to go in my opinion.
RidingMatthew is offline  
Reply
Old 07-16-25 | 02:17 PM
  #61  
rekmeyata's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,954
Likes: 388
From: NE Indiana

Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS

The older touring bikes from the 60s to the 80s preferred all the touring weight on the rear of the bike, in fact they had no fork connections for panniers just for fenders. The interesting thing is that those bikes ran great that way, the better the bike the less chance of bike shimmy. For example, the regular Schwinn Le Tour shimmied like crazy according to a friend who use to tour many years ago, but my first touring bike was an 85 Schwinn Le Tour Luxe that used the Voyageur frame, never shimmied. But my 2019 Masi Giramondo shimmied like crazy no matter where the load weight was, so Hario/Masi exchanged the frame for a 2024 frame, it too shimmied a bit, but not as bad. I took the bike to a bike shop, and they put a plastic shim into the headset area and now it doesn't shimmy at all no matter where I put the weight.
rekmeyata is online now  
Reply
Old 07-17-25 | 07:23 AM
  #62  
noglider's Avatar
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,172
Likes: 6,391
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Originally Posted by rekmeyata
The older touring bikes from the 60s to the 80s preferred all the touring weight on the rear of the bike, in fact they had no fork connections for panniers just for fenders. The interesting thing is that those bikes ran great that way, the better the bike the less chance of bike shimmy. For example, the regular Schwinn Le Tour shimmied like crazy according to a friend who use to tour many years ago, but my first touring bike was an 85 Schwinn Le Tour Luxe that used the Voyageur frame, never shimmied. But my 2019 Masi Giramondo shimmied like crazy no matter where the load weight was, so Hario/Masi exchanged the frame for a 2024 frame, it too shimmied a bit, but not as bad. I took the bike to a bike shop, and they put a plastic shim into the headset area and now it doesn't shimmy at all no matter where I put the weight.
What is it about the later bikes that eliminated the shimmy?

__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Reply
Old 07-17-25 | 08:23 PM
  #63  
rekmeyata's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,954
Likes: 388
From: NE Indiana

Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS

Originally Posted by noglider
What is it about the later bikes that eliminated the shimmy?
I have no idea why the better older bikes did not shimmy, or at least the 85 Schwinn Le Tour luxe, Voyageur, and Voyageur SP didn't shimmy, not sure about other manufactures. I did have a friend who years ago toured on the regular Schwinn Le Tour and he had shimmy issues, but I don't know what year his Le Tour was; but my 85 Luxe did not. The 85 Le Tour Luxe and the Voyageur both used Columbus Tenax Chrome Moly double butted main tubes but the Voyageur used a custom blend, not sure what that blend was, there was a difference in the fork between those two as well; and of course, the SP was the top of the line and had a better tube set and fork. 1985 was the best year for Schwinn bikes of any mid-level and up model.
rekmeyata is online now  
Reply
Old 07-18-25 | 06:32 AM
  #64  
noglider's Avatar
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,172
Likes: 6,391
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

One day I want to make a study of bike geometry and how it affects a bike's ride. I still don't know much. And it seems that subtle changes in dimensions can make big changes in characteristics.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Reply
Old 05-01-26 | 11:33 PM
  #65  
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2024
Posts: 65
Likes: 51
From: Tinui, New Zealand

Bikes: 90s Fisher Celerity mtb, Reid 1x7 utility, Viva 45x18 fg, 93 Avanti rb, 70s pac-rim 46x17 ss

Ortlieb Bikepacker Sport for commuting. Anything else is a waste of money.

https://us.ortlieb.com/collections/p...ke-bags?page=2
Kiwisaver is offline  
Reply
Old 05-02-26 | 06:39 AM
  #66  
john m flores's Avatar
Rider. Wanderer. Creator.
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,937
Likes: 4,191
From: New Jersey

Bikes: Bike Friday All-Packa, Zizzo Liberte, Ozark Trail G.1 Explorer

Since we're resurrecting an old thread...

This Ortlieb convertible pannier/backpack works reasonably well, converting from one to the other in about 15 seconds, 10 seconds with practice, 5 seconds with practice + luck.
This Ortlieb convertible pannier/backpack works reasonably well, converting from one to the other in about 15 seconds, 10 seconds with practice, 5 seconds with practice + luck.
The Bike Friday wasn't great though with just one bag on front. With two, it's great
The Bike Friday wasn't great though with just one bag on front. With two, it's great
__________________
Rider. Wanderer. Creator.
JohnMFlores.com | YouTube: JohnMFlores
Insta: JohnMichaelFlores | Substack: https://followingwyman.substack.com/


john m flores is offline  
Reply
Old 05-02-26 | 11:32 AM
  #67  
noglider's Avatar
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,172
Likes: 6,391
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Originally Posted by Kiwisaver
Ortlieb Bikepacker Sport for commuting. Anything else is a waste of money.

https://us.ortlieb.com/collections/p...ke-bags?page=2
I would not go as far as to say others are a waste. But having read how much people say Ortliebs are worth it, I bought a pair of their least expensive panniers, and yes, they are excellent. They are waterproof, they hold on well, they detach by simply pulling up on them, and I expect them to last a long time.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Reply
Old 05-02-26 | 04:29 PM
  #68  
catatonik's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2024
Posts: 24
Likes: 19
From: Bellingham, WA

Bikes: yes, please

Ortlieb for sure



Took this photo about a year ago, when the bag was new. Laptop sleeve, zippered pocket. Kept everything dry during my Pacific Northwest winter slog ... err, commute. Got the 20 liter, but probably should have opted for 24 liter with just one bag. Will probably get a second 20L for xtra clothes etc during the winter.
catatonik is offline  
Reply
Old 05-04-26 | 09:46 PM
  #69  
rekmeyata's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,954
Likes: 388
From: NE Indiana

Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS

I bought a set of Axiom Monsoon Oceanweave 45 panniers about 5 or 6 years ago, been through quite a few horrible storms, and never once had any remote dampness get inside. Having said that, you should never trust any pannier not even Ortlieb, which I don't think they're the best, there have been a few complaints about the PVC lamination peeling but usually that's after about 5 to 10 years of use. Anyway, I bought a pair of Axiom rain covers for the bags, not so much to keep water out as to prevent abrasion wear. I also line the bags with white trash compactor bags because those are the toughest plastic bags you can buy, and white so you can see easier inside, then I roll those plastic bags closed before closing the panniers. I also use Ziplock bags to make sure things I don't want to get wet don't and things I don't want to leak out and get all over stuff ruined doesn't.

What panniers do I think are the best? Not mine though they are doing great so far, but I got mine on a huge, discounted sale price so that was my enticement. I do believe that the Ortlieb is better than the Axioms. However, I believe the best pannier on the market for long lasting durability is the Carradice Super C, these have a track record of lasting 20 to 30 years with rewaxing. They are made from 1000D cotton duck which is extremely abrasion‑resistant, which means there is zero chance of the lamination peeling, the bags are field‑repairable with needle and thread. The hardware is simple, metal, and rebuildable. However, they are not as waterproof, but if you line the bag with a plastic compactor bag everything will be fine. Although if you treat the bag as soon as you get them with a couple of extra coats of wax and reapply it each season you would be surprised as to how much water it will repel; plus, you can buy generic rain covers for them, Carradice the last time I checked does not make rain covers...odd. The Carradice weighs a tad more than the Ortlieb's, a potential downfall if you are trying to reduce weight as much as possible. I have a friend who has a pair of those Carradice panniers, and he claims he's never had anything get wet inside, but again, never take a chance, he doesn't take chances either, in fact he's the one that told me to use compactor bags as a pannier liner, and he uses a generic rain cover.

Another really nice set of panniers is the Vaude Aqua Back Plus, probably last about as long as the Ortlieb but it's a tad lighter than the Ortlieb if you are counting grams, and less expensive if you're counting money. They also use recycled materials which a lot of people like because it feels more responsible. Vaude does make rain covers for their bags.

Those are the only 2 bag companies that make something better or close to the same as the Ortlieb.

If the prices for those 3 bags are too expensive, there is a bag that is shockingly good for the money, those are the RockBros Waterproof Bike Panniers, these cost less than $55! The claim is that these are about 90% as good as the Ortlieb's!! RockBros does not sell a rain cover so you would have to buy the generic ones. So, you get 90% of the bag that Ortlieb is at a cost that is 70% less unless you get it on sale then it could be as much as 80% less! That is a solid deal if you are not wanting to use it a lot, but even with daily use the reported longevity is 4 to 7 years, only about a third less life than an Ortlieb would have, so in the long haul even if you replace the RockBros, you will come out ahead. These RockBros are noticeably lighter than even the Vaude bags, so if you are counting grams these are the panniers to buy.

Whatever pannier you buy it is wise to buy a set of rain covers regardless of if their Ortlieb's or whatever brand for the reasons I already mentioned, as well as using compactor trash bags inside, and Ziplock bags for whatever stuff.
rekmeyata is online now  
Reply
Old 05-07-26 | 10:33 AM
  #70  
Junior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 137
Likes: 37
I've used an Arkel Bug to commute to work for quite a long while. The fact it converts to a backpack is great, since I usually hike up into the local mountains for lunch every day. I have a rain cover for it. They seem exceedingly durable. I had Ortliebs at one point, but for some reason I never got used to all that rolling and unrolling of the top.
carfreefamily is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.