![]() |
Originally Posted by SDRider
(Post 5447289)
Dude, you can live your life in fear, constantly worrying about your loved ones or you can relax and enjoy life.
It's just not something that would even enter my mind. |
Originally Posted by Cosmoline
(Post 5466957)
Why do you assume those are mutually exclusive? I pack a firearm AND I relax and enjoy life. My Ruger is fine with that. And if someone comes and tries to take my relaxing life away from me and mine, I at least have a chance to blow some holes in the SOB. I've never understood how sitting back and letting violence happen to you is morally superior to stopping it. The fact that "we're all going to die" really has no bearing on whether some a-hole should be able to kill you or worse without any fear of danger to himself.
|
Originally Posted by CliftonGK1
(Post 5461349)
1) Colloquialisms don't translate well to writing. Incorrect use of the word "like". It becomes apparent that these are not mere "typing mistakes", but problems with your grammar in general.
2) Your instead of You're. Misused homonym; again, not a typo. 3) Ackward / run-on sentence. 4) Redundant, misused synonyms. "A bit of" or "A tad of". Not both. 5) Thats (sic) instead of "who's" 6) Entire sentence is ackwardly phrased. Not that I wish to turn this into the Spell Check forum, but when you are attempting to sway an audience, it's critical to do the following: a) maintain your composure, which you have not; and b) maintain a convincing level of intelligence, if that is the basis for your argument. You argue that common sense and brains/intelligence will not get people out of a situation when facing an armed assailant, and that a firearm is a necessity in these situations. I maintain that common sense and intelligence can keep people from entering a situation where a firefight is the outcome. It seems to me that much of your facade is based on the fact that you carry a firearm and are convinced of your own ability to wield it in a more efficient manner than any opponent. How would your commuting outlook differ without the firearm? |
"As far as i remember from history, the 'fighting against tyrants' bit was started by the french (they had this little revolution thing which spread across the atlantic), and you lot copied it. 'Course, we were standing up to nazi germany while your current president's grandpappy was selling them weapons, but that doesn't count does it?"
Haha...ummm...you don't remember much from history class then do you? The French Revolution started in 1789. Anyways...I agree about Prescott Bush, he's a giant arse. And most sensible people here (though there is a frighteningly small number of them) don't like that celebrity family crap. |
I have always relied on being faster than anything that wanted to catch me and barring that, have some mad skills that have served me well when running wasn't an option.. . and let's not forget that if you are aware of your surrounding and have your wits at hand you can get out of many bad situations.
On my ride home the other night I came across a woman being accosted by some street person / thug... despite being warned to back off he opted to try and go through me... he never knew what hit him. I was walking to the store one night and was stopped by two youths and one demanded I give them a smoke or they'd kick my ass... My reply: "Do you know what will kill you faster than smoking ?" They wisely backed off and left me alone. I'm not afraid of guns and am actually quite handy with them but even if it was legal here, would not carry one on my ride for any reason. |
Originally Posted by Cyclaholic
(Post 5462080)
It seems that those that carry weapons couldn't care less that someone else chooses not to, yet those that choose not to carry seem to get their panties in a bunch because others do choose to arm themselves. Why is that?
...and if you choose not to arm yourself then find yourself cornered by several thugs who are about to beat/rob/****/kill you and a citizen pulls his gun and offers to defend you would you ask him not to on principle, and to allow the attackers to continue? BTW, my primary weapon of choice is my brain, but I don't mind the force projection optional extra attachments that my primary weapon allows me use whether that be U-lock, knife, gun, execution of evation tactics, etc. |
Originally Posted by Schwinnrider
(Post 5468265)
You are quite wrong. I don't think that those who choose to carry weapons "get their panties in a bunch" because some don't. I've yet to see the post where someone says---"Everybody needs to carry a gun or they're crazy nuts" or something. But the people who have a problem with carrying firearms LOVE to pass judgement on those who do.
Ahh, disregard that. It's way too early here for reading comprehension. Duh. |
I can't believe I just waded through 7 pages of this.
I've never been uneasy enough while riding to warrant carrying a weapon of any kind. However, if I lived in Philly things would be different. I'd carry a gun just in case I needed to defend myself from ilikebikes! |
I'm sure you're quite a bit faster.
|
Originally Posted by Machka
(Post 5446979)
You speak from a very US point of view. Fortunately, many other parts of the world have a very different perspective. :)
------------------------------------- Threads like these just reinforce my thoughts that I would NEVER want to live in the US, and they make me appreciate my country and the other countries I've visited all the more. I respect the rights of them what want to carry guns, but don't personally carry or own a firearm. There's a New Age thought that if you prepare for the worst, the worst will happen to you--own a gun and you are sending out a message to the universe to f**k with you. Not that I believe that any more than "better to have it and not need it, than need it and not have it." I do carry a small knife, a neat little Kershaw with one-handed, spring-assist opening, that works great for cutting packing tape and prying out staples, but I doubt I would ever use it as a weapon. In a firearm store the other day I saw this neat little job called a "Carriage Gun" or what anyone in their right mind would call a sawed-off shotgun. Might fit just right where a frame pump would on a bike, with just a little mod or two... I usually ride with my 3' On Guard chain wrapped around my handlebars. Never thought of it before, but could be a reason I haven't been too severely messed with at all. Not that I could get it unwrapped in time to do much of anything in an emergency situation, but now I'm wondering if just having it in a conspicuous place that looks like it's easy to access is some kind of deterrent. |
Originally Posted by Percist
(Post 5469344)
I can't believe I just waded through 7 pages of this.
I've never been uneasy enough while riding to warrant carrying a weapon of any kind. However, if I lived in Philly things would be different. I'd carry a gun just in case I needed to defend myself from ilikebikes! |
Originally Posted by Bklyn
(Post 5469606)
I'm sure you're quite a bit faster.
|
Originally Posted by Schwinnrider
(Post 5468265)
You are quite wrong. I don't think that those who choose to carry weapons "get their panties in a bunch" because some don't. I've yet to see the post where someone says---"Everybody needs to carry a gun or they're crazy nuts" or something. But the people who have a problem with carrying firearms LOVE to pass judgement on those who do.
My guns (4 rifles and a handgun) are all locked away, far out of reach...impracticably so if there was ever someone in the house. Then again, I have no problem with that bc a criminal in the house is far less likely than a kid finding a gun. As I recall there are far fewer uses of guns in justifiable self defense in the home than there are kids who shoot themselves accidentally, and those that get used in domestic violence, etc. Gun ownership requires rationalizations based on statistical likelihoods that are often ridiculous. Myself included. The best weapon for commuting is the grey matter between the ears and the ability to sprint. |
Originally Posted by littlewaywelt
(Post 5471066)
well...I'll add this. kids don't find guns in the houses of families that choose not to own them.
My guns (4 rifles and a handgun) are all locked away, far out of reach...impracticably so if there was ever someone in the house. Then again, I have no problem with that bc a criminal in the house is far less likely than a kid finding a gun. As I recall there are far fewer uses of guns in justifiable self defense in the home than there are kids who shoot themselves accidentally, and those that get used in domestic violence, etc. Gun ownership requires rationalizations based on statistical likelihoods that are often ridiculous. Myself included. |
Originally Posted by DVC45
(Post 5436982)
I think a big grin pisses them off more.
I usually carry a pepper spray. But during nighttime ridding or taking on unfamilliar routes, I have a little special I carry with me (no, its not attatched permanently to my body :D ). |
Originally Posted by Chrysiptera
(Post 5471223)
My GF smiles and waves
|
Originally Posted by ilikebikes
(Post 5446619)
OK, send me your addy and the next time some drugged out zombie tries to rob someone at gun point Ill send him to you so you can use your brain and talk him out of it, Im sure he'll be very understanding of your situation and walk away a new man :rolleyes: I know plenty of people that thought like you and guess what? their the ones that ended up without brains when they teid to talk some a55wipe out of a "situation!" Do I worry about my family 24-7? your damn right I do! and it would be the same no matter where I lived! anyone who doesnt worry aboout theirs 24-7 shouldnt have a family IMHO :rolleyes: also, how do you think the guys that "make the world safer for the rest of us" do it? do they go around tryin to talk the terrorist out blowing 5h1t up? or do they use weapons? wake up and smell the joe bro :rolleyes: youll be the one blowing your brains out should (god forbid) something ever happen to a member of your family because you didnt have a weapon to at least TRY to defend them!
|
Originally Posted by CastIron
(Post 5458387)
...skipping six pages worth.
I'll say the single most effective weapon on the planet is a human brain that actually sees use. |
Originally Posted by littlewaywelt
(Post 5471066)
The best weapon for commuting is the grey matter between the ears and the ability to sprint. I'll weigh in here...personally, I like guns....a lot. I like their feel and weight in my hands. I love hunting rifles with their smooth wooden stocks and incredible accuracy. I like the folding tough guy guns with bannana clips that all the firefighter, cops, and paramilitary type guys seem to always have in their collections. I like the hand guns that I can't hit a thing with. My favorite gun is the 50 cal I fired in the military. The awesome and dreadful power of that weapon was thrilling. The men in my family enjoy shooting when we get together and it is a bonding and fun experience. I even used to love to use guns to blow living animals away. Over my short 35 years, however, I have become a kinder, gentler person and no longer find that fun in any way. I have owned a couple of guns but do not own one right now (largely because it would probably cause a divorce due to having small children in the home). l think the notion that everyone should carry a gun to thwart crime is just dead wrong. Rather, I believe that more crime would occur. There is currently an middle school teacher arguing that she should be allowed to carry a weapon to school to protect herself and her students. Having worked with hot-headed adolescents for years, I think this argument is erroneous. It is based on the assumption that she will be able to maintain possession of that weapon at all times. Kids are quick to anger, quick to move, and most of them are stronger than your average middle age woman. They don't think things through (for that matter, neither do many hot headed commuters). I could easily envision a situation where a kid got angry at someone, knew there was a gun available, took possession of it, and took his short term anger out their target; thereby creating a long term problem. There is a reason that most on-floor jailers and prison gaurds do not carry; they are not fooling themselves about their ability to maintain possession of their weapon on the floor. On the other hand, I think that those who argue against private gun ownership are fooling themselves about the ease with which those who have criminal tendencies can operate outside of the law to obtain anything they want and behave any way they choose. I don't think a truer statement has ever been uttered than "when guns are outlawed, only the outlaws will have guns". I believe that people need to be free to choose to protect themselves with deadly force if they want to. I think there is great wisdom in those who keep guns within the reach of little children making sure that those kids are socialized with guns (as ILIKEBIKES has claimed he has done), know how to use them, know how to respect them, and are allowed to use them often enough that they are not driven toward them in curiousity. For most kids, this means a LOT of time with guns, not having been taken to the range one day a year to watch dad shoot so they could see the power of the weapon. Rather, those kids need to be shooting so much that they are almost satiated with the experience and do not seek it on their own. So, for me....I am a supporter of private gun ownership but I don't think every hot-headed, tough-guy, reserve-deputy-sherriff-wantabe should be carrying at all times. |
Originally Posted by mconlonx
(Post 5470842)
And in still *other* parts of the world, you wouldn't think of leaving the house without a weapon of some kind.
|
Originally Posted by ilikebikes
(Post 5467744)
long paragraph ending with the phrase"and thank you for showing us how much better you are with your "fancy" reading and writing skills :) you just to dambded ejabacated for a po ignant man like myself to keep up wit ya!"deleted to save space
|
Originally Posted by ilikebikes
(Post 5471138)
I taught my kids from the moment they could understand that guns are dangerous, I also taught them how to safely handle, clean, load, shoot, and respect a weapon, Ive had guns in my home for 24 years and my children that are now grown never touched them, only when it was time to go to the range, my oldest will be graduating college soon and will be a registered Nurse, she owns an AR 15, a Glock, Remington 12 gauge, and a dragunov just like mine, my youngest attends the Barbara Sandanoto School of Ballet and she also buys and sells Japanese dolls, although she enjoys shooting she shows no interest in owning a gun :) see, its a personal choice to be made by the person, not any of us OR the US government, its all up to the person :)
I have as well (only to stay away from them at this point due to their ages), as my father did with me but I also remember how curious I was as a kid. I can't be sure that on a play date, some kid my kids are friends with has been "trained" or that his parents don't realize his big brother has a gun, or the wife thinks the husband has the weapon secured and locked when in fact it's within a 6yo's reach. The choices you refer to, while true, result in kids getting killed for no other reason than the parent needing something to feel secure and negate a threat that is less likely than a kid finding and discharging the weapon. They also result in dead spouses when emotions run high and logic is suppressed. |
Originally Posted by littlewaywelt
(Post 5471956)
I have as well (only to stay away from them at this point due to their ages), as my father did with me but I also remember how curious I was as a kid. I can't be sure that some kid my kids are friends with have a play date that the other kid has been "trained."
The choices you refer too, while true, result in kids getting killed for no other reason than the parent needing something to feel secure and negate a threat that is less likely than a kid finding and discharging the weapon. |
Here's an image that a cop acquaintance gave me.
Kids do not have very strong hands. To pull a trigger requires strength. So most kids who find a gun solve this problem by using their thumbs: two together, the barrel pointing back at them. |
I currently use common sense, patience, and failing that, a FOX 40 whistle.
There are days though that I would not mind some sort of non-lethal hand-grenade-type device, maybe something like pepper spray that I could drop in the path (or through the sunroof) of a threat, to give me some time to get away. I've also thought about obtaining a collapsing / telescopic billy club (3 ft length perfect for indicating the appropriate passing distance for automobiles) that could be stored in a jersey pocket, or pump holder, but never went the distance. Another option would have been a piece of broom handle cut and painted to mimic a Silca frame pump. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:11 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.