Stop signs on multi-use paths
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wichita KS USA
Posts: 486
Bikes: Surly Crosscheck w Nexus 8 drivetrain set up as a commuter/tourer. Old and quick '89 Trek 1200. 08 Fisher Cobia 29er
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Stop signs on multi-use paths
I'm beginning to see this a lot. A couple cities around here (S Hutch and Wichita) have built wide MUPs along busy roads. Just recently they have begun putting stop signs at every intersection (every block) for users of the path. The path is just like any sidewalk. The legal stop line for cars is still behind the path, and that is where the cross street stop sign is located. Cars are supposed to stop for the path, just like any path. IMHO, cars are ignoring the law so they are just making path intersections all-way stops. Cars never stop behind the crosswalk here, and it is never enforced. When I used to be a runner I was nearly run over by local cops because one failed to yeild the crosswalk on red. Are other cities making sidewalks and bike paths legally stop for cars who fail to stop where legal?
Personally, I think enforcement of the stop line should be the first step. The second step should be adding a warning-sign to the car's stop sign that they must stop behind crosswalk (which should be a given). A sign on the car's stop sign is more reasonable than putting up twice as many extra stop signs for the path.
I'm not advocating that cyclists and runners should be unaware of drivers who fail to stop, it just steams me that the paths are nearly unusable with a legal full-stop 6 to 10 times every mile.
Personally, I think enforcement of the stop line should be the first step. The second step should be adding a warning-sign to the car's stop sign that they must stop behind crosswalk (which should be a given). A sign on the car's stop sign is more reasonable than putting up twice as many extra stop signs for the path.
I'm not advocating that cyclists and runners should be unaware of drivers who fail to stop, it just steams me that the paths are nearly unusable with a legal full-stop 6 to 10 times every mile.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 56
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
All the bike paths on my campus are that way. I find its more dangerous, slower, and takes more work for me. So I use the road. All of campus is 20mph limit any way So I am not slowing any one down who is following the law!
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wichita KS USA
Posts: 486
Bikes: Surly Crosscheck w Nexus 8 drivetrain set up as a commuter/tourer. Old and quick '89 Trek 1200. 08 Fisher Cobia 29er
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I agree, and I also usually just use the road (depending on the road). What angers me about it is that they were installed because the crosswalk stops are never enforced.
#4
Trans-Urban Velocommando
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lenexa, KS
Posts: 2,400
Bikes: 06 Trek 1200 - 98 DB Outlook - 99 DB Sorrento
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm beginning to see this a lot. A couple cities around here (S Hutch and Wichita) have built wide MUPs along busy roads. Just recently they have begun putting stop signs at every intersection (every block) for users of the path. The path is just like any sidewalk. The legal stop line for cars is still behind the path, and that is where the cross street stop sign is located. Cars are supposed to stop for the path, just like any path. IMHO, cars are ignoring the law so they are just making path intersections all-way stops. Cars never stop behind the crosswalk here, and it is never enforced. When I used to be a runner I was nearly run over by local cops because one failed to yeild the crosswalk on red. Are other cities making sidewalks and bike paths legally stop for cars who fail to stop where legal?
Personally, I think enforcement of the stop line should be the first step. The second step should be adding a warning-sign to the car's stop sign that they must stop behind crosswalk (which should be a given). A sign on the car's stop sign is more reasonable than putting up twice as many extra stop signs for the path.
I'm not advocating that cyclists and runners should be unaware of drivers who fail to stop, it just steams me that the paths are nearly unusable with a legal full-stop 6 to 10 times every mile.
Personally, I think enforcement of the stop line should be the first step. The second step should be adding a warning-sign to the car's stop sign that they must stop behind crosswalk (which should be a given). A sign on the car's stop sign is more reasonable than putting up twice as many extra stop signs for the path.
I'm not advocating that cyclists and runners should be unaware of drivers who fail to stop, it just steams me that the paths are nearly unusable with a legal full-stop 6 to 10 times every mile.
#5
Infamous Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360
Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
and of course cyclists riding on the same road or on the paths prolly don't feel the need to stop either
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
#6
Señior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13,749
Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 446 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
Ride on the road. That MUP is too dangerous.
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,242
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The MUP I ride on is in a metropark and is littered with STOP signs. These are at every driveway to every parking lot and even at interesections that have traffic lights. They are illegal, imo, and no one pays attention to them.
My biggest worry is the driver of the car who enters a driveway, going to a ball field or parking lot. He won't stop, so you have to be on the look out to the road side of the MUP. Sometimes your vision is blocked by trees.
The other frustration is that some cyclists ride in the middle of the MUP. Get on your frickin' side!!!
If I had a road bike, I'd be on the road. But the MUP isn't too bad. There aren't too many driveways. Also, lots of the MUP follows the river and there are many areas that go deep into the woods, away from the road. That part is a lot of fun.
My biggest worry is the driver of the car who enters a driveway, going to a ball field or parking lot. He won't stop, so you have to be on the look out to the road side of the MUP. Sometimes your vision is blocked by trees.
The other frustration is that some cyclists ride in the middle of the MUP. Get on your frickin' side!!!
If I had a road bike, I'd be on the road. But the MUP isn't too bad. There aren't too many driveways. Also, lots of the MUP follows the river and there are many areas that go deep into the woods, away from the road. That part is a lot of fun.
#8
Prefers Cicero
Are you saying you want the cross traffic to stop behind the MUP so the MUP bike traffic can blow through the intersection at speed? That sounds disastrous. You make an analogy to sidewalks, but pedestrians approach intersections much more slowly than bikes, and still get hit by right turners and some left turners who failed to look for them. Even if the cars on the cross street stop, they won't necessarily expect a bike to shoot out in front of them as they start to proceed. As well, car drivers turning off the main road into the side street won't always expect a bike to enter the intersection at that offset position.
EDIT. Traffic coming in any direction is likely to collide with bikes using that MUP, if the cyclists don't have to stop - see diagram
EDIT. Traffic coming in any direction is likely to collide with bikes using that MUP, if the cyclists don't have to stop - see diagram
Last edited by cooker; 04-10-08 at 12:31 PM.
#9
52-week commuter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,929
Bikes: Redline Conquest, Cannonday, Specialized, RANS
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Check your local codes. In many states, stop signs on MUP's have no legal enforceability. For instance, in many states, cyclists using sidewalks and crosswalks have the "rights and duties" of pedestrians. Pedestrians have no duty to stop for a stop sign at a crosswalk, so neither do cyclists.
The statute for some states regarding stop signs says that operators of vehicles must stop for a stop sign "on a roadway." But a MUP is not a roadway.
Around here, the local authorities have responded to these objections by adding signs below the stop signs on MUP's that say "Required by Law." Even though it isn't.
That's the legal perspective. It's a tough problem. What do you do if you're a public official charged with protecting public safety, and people just won't obey the law?
The statute for some states regarding stop signs says that operators of vehicles must stop for a stop sign "on a roadway." But a MUP is not a roadway.
Around here, the local authorities have responded to these objections by adding signs below the stop signs on MUP's that say "Required by Law." Even though it isn't.
That's the legal perspective. It's a tough problem. What do you do if you're a public official charged with protecting public safety, and people just won't obey the law?
__________________
The United States of America is the only democratic nation in the world to deny citizens living in the nation's capital representation in the national legislature. District residents have no vote in either the U.S. Senate or U.S. House of Representatives. www.dcvote.org
The United States of America is the only democratic nation in the world to deny citizens living in the nation's capital representation in the national legislature. District residents have no vote in either the U.S. Senate or U.S. House of Representatives. www.dcvote.org
#10
The Improbable Bulk
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA
Posts: 8,379
Bikes: Many
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
While I am sure it would be handy for a cyclist to never have to slow down on a MUP, which state do you live in that you think it is illegal to make cyclists stop for an intersection just because they are on a MUP? Do they also get a free pass if they are on another sidewalk?
__________________
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA
People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA
People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 11,375
Bikes: '08 Surly Cross-Check, 2011 Redline Conquest Pro, 2012 Spesh FSR Comp EVO, 2015 Trek Domane 6.2 disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Check the legality of the signs. There's a constant battle up here between some persnicketty residents of Lake Forest Park (LFP) and the users of the Burke-Gilman Trail (BGT) which runs through their neighbourhood. The argument goes like this:
-LFP passes city ordinance and places stop signs on BGT at all road crossings.
-Cascade Bike Club (CBC) works with King County and wins court case overturning LFP ordinance, because BGT is ruled a county thoroughfare, while LFP roads are private. City property trumps private road.
- LFP passes new ordinance one year later, and presents council with plan to place traffic bollards at all trail intersections. "Nyah. It's not a stop sign, so it's not illegal."
- CBC and King County Dep't of Transportation step in and say "You're kidding, right? You realize we're just going to overturn this one, too."
- Current situation sits as win for cyclists; no traffic calming measures on BGT through LFP private roads. Stop signs face residential streets. No bollard construction has started.
-LFP passes city ordinance and places stop signs on BGT at all road crossings.
-Cascade Bike Club (CBC) works with King County and wins court case overturning LFP ordinance, because BGT is ruled a county thoroughfare, while LFP roads are private. City property trumps private road.
- LFP passes new ordinance one year later, and presents council with plan to place traffic bollards at all trail intersections. "Nyah. It's not a stop sign, so it's not illegal."
- CBC and King County Dep't of Transportation step in and say "You're kidding, right? You realize we're just going to overturn this one, too."
- Current situation sits as win for cyclists; no traffic calming measures on BGT through LFP private roads. Stop signs face residential streets. No bollard construction has started.
__________________
"I feel like my world was classier before I found cyclocross."
- Mandi M.
"I feel like my world was classier before I found cyclocross."
- Mandi M.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,242
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Are you saying you want the cross traffic to stop behind the MUP so the MUP bike traffic can blow through the intersection at speed? That sounds disastrous. You make an analogy to sidewalks, but pedestrians approach intersections much more slowly than bikes, and still get hit by right turners and some left turners who failed to look for them. Even if the cars on the cross street stop, they won't necessarily expect a bike to shoot out in front of them as they start to proceed. As well, car drivers turning off the main road into the side street won't always expect a bike to enter the intersection at that offset position.
EDIT. Traffic coming in any direction is likely to collide with bikes using that MUP, if the cyclists don't have to stop - see diagram
EDIT. Traffic coming in any direction is likely to collide with bikes using that MUP, if the cyclists don't have to stop - see diagram
The cyclist has stop signs for every driveway he encounters while riding the MUP. They are a joke!
The road only has a traffic light or two. There are few intersecting roads, as this metropark is in a valley and the cars that cross it travel above it via bridges. The cars that enter the driveways (note--these aren't driveways going to houses, but driveways going to parking lots in the park, that service a ball field, hiking trail, a golf course, or stables) from the metropark road have the right of way, and I yield to them. But those that are leaving the driveway don't have the right of way over the MUP!
Also, cars that come from atop the valley down to the metropark on the intersecting roads, which mostly dead end at the metropark road, have a stop sign. So does the MUP. That's stupid--I've got the right of way since I'm on the MUP minding my business. The car needs to stop for me, and then again for the road, which is a bit further down.
Last edited by thdave; 04-10-08 at 01:44 PM.
#13
Non-Custom Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,613
Bikes: 1975-1980 SR road bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
A MUP is pretty useless if it has intersections at intervals that small. It's just a pretty sidewalk.
#14
Prefers Cicero
#15
Prefers Cicero
Re the legality of stop signs: legality is one thing, safety is another. In the situation described by the OP I can't see how crashes can be avoided if cyclists are under the impression that it's ok to ride through that intersection without regard for car traffic.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 519
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Check the legality of the signs. There's a constant battle up here between some persnicketty residents of Lake Forest Park (LFP) and the users of the Burke-Gilman Trail (BGT) which runs through their neighbourhood. The argument goes like this:
-LFP passes city ordinance and places stop signs on BGT at all road crossings.
-Cascade Bike Club (CBC) works with King County and wins court case overturning LFP ordinance, because BGT is ruled a county thoroughfare, while LFP roads are private. City property trumps private road.
- LFP passes new ordinance one year later, and presents council with plan to place traffic bollards at all trail intersections. "Nyah. It's not a stop sign, so it's not illegal."
- CBC and King County Dep't of Transportation step in and say "You're kidding, right? You realize we're just going to overturn this one, too."
- Current situation sits as win for cyclists; no traffic calming measures on BGT through LFP private roads. Stop signs face residential streets. No bollard construction has started.
-LFP passes city ordinance and places stop signs on BGT at all road crossings.
-Cascade Bike Club (CBC) works with King County and wins court case overturning LFP ordinance, because BGT is ruled a county thoroughfare, while LFP roads are private. City property trumps private road.
- LFP passes new ordinance one year later, and presents council with plan to place traffic bollards at all trail intersections. "Nyah. It's not a stop sign, so it's not illegal."
- CBC and King County Dep't of Transportation step in and say "You're kidding, right? You realize we're just going to overturn this one, too."
- Current situation sits as win for cyclists; no traffic calming measures on BGT through LFP private roads. Stop signs face residential streets. No bollard construction has started.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 11,375
Bikes: '08 Surly Cross-Check, 2011 Redline Conquest Pro, 2012 Spesh FSR Comp EVO, 2015 Trek Domane 6.2 disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
hmm, interesting. I should email king county or the cascade bicycle club about some of the very annoying stop signs on the interurban trail through tukwila. And my annoying I mean the cross street basically is a "T" street and the cars are required to stop pretty much right in the bike path.
__________________
"I feel like my world was classier before I found cyclocross."
- Mandi M.
"I feel like my world was classier before I found cyclocross."
- Mandi M.
#18
Arizona Dessert
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,288 Posts
The bottom line is there is no way to patch a seriously flawed MUP design by band-aiding it with traffic controls that can not and will never guarantee fully compliance.
The only safe or appropriate way to deal with this is to have bridges/tunnels for where the side streets and MUP cross or to remove the MUP designation and call it what it is: a sidewalk.
Al
The only safe or appropriate way to deal with this is to have bridges/tunnels for where the side streets and MUP cross or to remove the MUP designation and call it what it is: a sidewalk.
Al
#20
Arizona Dessert
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,288 Posts
Well planned and placed MUPs can be and in cases are an effective part of the bicycle transport and/or recreation options.
Poorly designed and placed MUPs like this one only worsen the cycling experience, degrade the good name of MUPs overall and are a set-back for improving roadway cycling conditions.
Al
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Portland, Maine USA
Posts: 779
Bikes: Trek 850 Antelope
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Depending upon where you are, there is some sense for posting stop signs on bike paths and MUPs.
* For example, some bicyclists riding at speed tend to blow through intersections without stopping. They are only just crossing a road and continuing further on the trail, right? They are often able to do this many times without incident. However, there is a greater tendency that they would get clipped by motorists who don't pay attention or think they don't have to and blow through the intersection in their 2000 pound vehicles on the road.
* Not all bike paths and MUPs are the same. For instance, I've ridden for miles on many MUPs or bike paths before coming to an intersection where the path ends at or crosses a road. I've also ridden on paths with stop signs at shorter distances (i.e. urban areas).
So posting the stop signs do serve a good purpose. They are there for our safety, even if it does involve having to not ride at the ideal speed we get up to. Signs to warn motorists that they are coming to a bike path/MUP and that cyclists are approaching would also help.
* For example, some bicyclists riding at speed tend to blow through intersections without stopping. They are only just crossing a road and continuing further on the trail, right? They are often able to do this many times without incident. However, there is a greater tendency that they would get clipped by motorists who don't pay attention or think they don't have to and blow through the intersection in their 2000 pound vehicles on the road.
* Not all bike paths and MUPs are the same. For instance, I've ridden for miles on many MUPs or bike paths before coming to an intersection where the path ends at or crosses a road. I've also ridden on paths with stop signs at shorter distances (i.e. urban areas).
So posting the stop signs do serve a good purpose. They are there for our safety, even if it does involve having to not ride at the ideal speed we get up to. Signs to warn motorists that they are coming to a bike path/MUP and that cyclists are approaching would also help.
Last edited by powerhouse; 04-11-08 at 11:34 AM.
#22
POWERCRANK addict
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: North Acton, West London, UK
Posts: 3,783
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Unusable MUPs - no way On a more serious note either campaign for better ones or just stop using them.
https://www.warringtoncyclecampaign.co.uk/ - see facility of the month Sept. '07
https://www.warringtoncyclecampaign.co.uk/ - see facility of the month Sept. '07
__________________
shameless POWERCRANK plug
Recommended reading for all cyclists - Cyclecraft - Effective Cycling
Condor Cycles - quite possibly the best bike shop in London
Don't run red lights, wear a helmet, use hand signals, get some cycle lights(front and rear) and, FFS, don't run red lights!
shameless POWERCRANK plug
Recommended reading for all cyclists - Cyclecraft - Effective Cycling
Condor Cycles - quite possibly the best bike shop in London
Don't run red lights, wear a helmet, use hand signals, get some cycle lights(front and rear) and, FFS, don't run red lights!
#24
Goathead Magnet
All of this begs the question, what distinguishes a MUP parallel to a road from a sidewalk? For that matter, in places where it's illegal to ride on the sidewalk, what's to keep some overzealous cop from ticketing cyclists on the MUP?
#25
Plays in traffic
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,971
Bikes: 1996 Litespeed Classic, 2006 Trek Portland, 2013 Ribble Winter/Audax, 2016 Giant Talon 4
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 76 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
9 Posts
Out on the west side there are stop signs at grade highway crossings every mile or so.
But our claim to fame is a baby, MUP-sized railroad crossing, complete with gate and flashing lights.
Ain't it cute?
But our claim to fame is a baby, MUP-sized railroad crossing, complete with gate and flashing lights.
Ain't it cute?