![]() |
Originally Posted by genec
(Post 8091186)
Long distance tourists know that steel is easily repaired with simple brazing... brazing that can be found in almost any auto shop anywhere in the world... thus making a steel frame easier to repair.
|
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 8092034)
Aluminum is also easily repaired with only slightly more sophisticated equipment that can probably be found in most auto shops around the world now. And even if it can't be repaired in some podunk town in outer Wyrunthysonehorstwnistan, we live in the era of FedEx. No place on the planet is more than 2 days away from parts:rolleyes:
If you want aluminum, may I suggest the Salsa Fargo? http://www.salsacycles.com/fargoComp09.html Yes, I think the Salsa is better, but not for the price. The problem I have with cheap is, you get what you didn't pay for. |
surlys are cheap steel tanks that ride like.....bikes
I have 3 and love each one. I also have 8 other high-zoot bikes so i know what is what |
Originally Posted by CliftonGK1
(Post 8091841)
QBP is a distributor. The companies they represent are still independently owned (BMC, Civia, Salsa, Surly, etc.)
EDIT: (See post below. I was wrong. QBP does own Surly.) QBP owns Salsa also: QBP Brands All-City Track frames and parts born from the streets of Minneapolis Civia High-end bikes and products designed for practical everyday transportation Dimension Quality parts and fashionable, fun bike accessories Handspun First choice in wheels Problem Solvers Solution-oriented bike parts designed to resolve challenging mechanical issues Salsa Cycles Premium road, mountain and cyclocross bikes Surly Sturdy, no-frills road, mountain and cross bikes Winwood High-end specialty bike components and accessories ---------------------- anyhow the point is, Surly bikes ride like bikes should, and don't break the bank, and are tough as nails and they have the Pugsley, w/Large Marge, and Endomorph. which I have. this thing rocks all that can be rocked |
Originally Posted by Santaria
(Post 8092198)
The cost to get aluminum repaired by a shop is SIGNIFICANTLY more according to the auto repair dude up the street (and that's in MEXICO brah).
If you want aluminum, may I suggest the Salsa Fargo? http://www.salsacycles.com/fargoComp09.html Yes, I think the Salsa is better, but not for the price. The problem I have with cheap is, you get what you didn't pay for. |
Originally Posted by Shimagnolo
(Post 8089343)
Omigosh! I was just skimming through the article; They slept in a graveyard one night.
|
Originally Posted by Santaria
(Post 8092198)
If you want aluminum, may I suggest the Salsa Fargo? http://www.salsacycles.com/fargoComp09.html
Originally Posted by 127.0.0.1
QBP owns Salsa also:
|
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 8092034)
Aluminum is also easily repaired with only slightly more sophisticated equipment that can probably be found in most auto shops around the world now. And even if it can't be repaired in some podunk town in outer Wyrunthysonehorstwnistan, we live in the era of FedEx. No place on the planet is more than 2 days away from parts:rolleyes:
Heck, I lived in a place in the continental US just back in the early 90s where FedEx only serviced when they got enough stuff to bother sending a truck - overnight delivery might take as much as 4 days, and that was from 300 miles away. The rate sheets all said "Overnight guaranteed...except to these places. There, we'll do our best to get it there, eventually." A friend worked at a hospital, and he told stories of having medical supplied ruined because the supplier INSISTED on sending stuff FedEx overnight instead of USPS overnight. USPS did get there the next day - FedEx, well, maybe that week. The guy at the supplier simply didn't believe that there was anywhere FedEx wouldn't deliver to overnight. I don't know if they still have such exclusion zones in the US, but it wasn't that long ago that they did. |
Originally Posted by CliftonGK1
(Post 8092310)
So all the QPB distributed brands are under their full ownership, then? (I was not aware of this. I thought that QBP was just a distribution company to consolidate orders for shops.) Not always. for instance BMC is strictly coming from QBP,. but BMC is BMC, not QBP the others are owned and controlled by QBP. |
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 8092034)
Aluminum is also easily repaired with only slightly more sophisticated equipment that can probably be found in most auto shops around the world now. And even if it can't be repaired in some podunk town in outer Wyrunthysonehorstwnistan, we live in the era of FedEx. No place on the planet is more than 2 days away from parts:rolleyes:
There are auto repair shops in the little towns along the way... but the odds that they have TIG welding gear are pretty small... and FedEX... yeah it delivers... provided you already have an import permit for the materials you want sent to you. Otherwise you have to go to a main town (Ensenada or La Paz) and go through customs to get the parts that were sent to you. Yeah we live in the era of the WWW and instant overnight delivery... unless you happen to be in a 3rd world location. And yes, being down there, indeed you are no more than a 2-3 day bus ride back to the US. But how much nicer if someone can just braze something for you that afternoon and you can continue your tour. BTW I once busted a spoke while touring the southern US... It was two days before I got to a bike shop that had any real variety in spokes enough to have the 14 ga. spoke to fit my Mavic wheels with Phil Wood hubs... Schwinn type parts I could have had. Now I'll roll my eyes... :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by ItsJustMe
(Post 8092321)
You really should read some of the journals up on CrazyGuyOnABike - specifically the guys touring South America. There aren't any bike shops that stock anything besides the crappiest 26" components around, and getting a FedEx (or ANY) delivery is simply impossible in many of the areas. You break a frame in some areas these guys have been to, you might get steel brazed somewhere within 50 miles, otherwise you're walking and hoping a bus comes by to get you to a town 300 miles away where FedEx will even go. And then you're looking at 5 or 6 days for FedEx "overnight" service, AND paying as much as a hundred bucks for the delivery of a few pound package.
Heck, I lived in a place in the continental US just back in the early 90s where FedEx only serviced when they got enough stuff to bother sending a truck - overnight delivery might take as much as 4 days, and that was from 300 miles away. The rate sheets all said "Overnight guaranteed...except to these places. There, we'll do our best to get it there, eventually." A friend worked at a hospital, and he told stories of having medical supplied ruined because the supplier INSISTED on sending stuff FedEx overnight instead of USPS overnight. USPS did get there the next day - FedEx, well, maybe that week. The guy at the supplier simply didn't believe that there was anywhere FedEx wouldn't deliver to overnight. I don't know if they still have such exclusion zones in the US, but it wasn't that long ago that they did. Currently I ride a steel bike in the winter and an aluminum bike with some cf parts the rest of the year. I don't have a strong opinion either way on aluminum vs steel. Anyway as far as Surly vs BD goes, you have a lot of the same arguments (pro and con) when it comes to buying from BD vs buying at an LBS. Suffice it to say that while you may be quite happy with a bike bought from BD, Surly has an earned a good reputation from commuters, utility cyclists, and touring types alike. My main problem with BD is that they bought the rights to use defunct bicycle brand names rather than working on building a reputation with their own brand. |
Originally Posted by tjspiel
(Post 8092462)
I can understand wanting a steel frame if you're going to be touring in a remote place but for commuting in the wilds of Minneapolis or any other reasonably sized city/metropolitan area it's not going to make much difference if you're broken frame is Aluminum or Steel. Frame breakage isn't hight on the list of likely mechanical problems anyway.
Currently I ride a steel bike in the winter and an aluminum bike with some cf parts the rest of the year. I don't have a strong opinion either way on aluminum vs steel. Anyway as far as Surly vs BD goes, you have a lot of the same arguments (pro and con) when it comes to buying from BD vs buying at an LBS. Suffice it to say that while you may be quite happy with a bike bought from BD, Surly has an earned a good reputation from commuters, utility cyclists, and touring types alike. My main problem with BD is that they bought the rights to use defunct bicycle brand names rather than working on building a reputation with their own brand. |
Originally Posted by bikebuddha
(Post 8092479)
A lot of people, myself included just find that steel rides better than aluminum.
I've put in a lot of miles on 4 different road bikes in the last 18 months. Three were steel, and 1 is an aluminum/cf combo. The smoothest ride was a steel sport touring bike with 28mm tires, but the next smoothest was a competition oriented aluminum/cf bike with 23s. Another steel bike with 23s and a similar geometry actually had a marginally harsher ride than the aluminum/cf bike. It's not all about the frame material. |
Originally Posted by agarose2000
(Post 8089223)
Can't help you, unfortunately. I live in sunny SoCal - it was 56F today, and sunny. Went for a nearly 3hr bike ride up a beautiful canyon road. It's really ridiculous how nice it is down here, although the strange downside is that you start beating yourself up mentally every day that you don't ride long!
The worst part of it all is that virtually nobody bike commutes in LA. Traffic's a bear, and it's far from bike-friendly, and drivers are impatient as all heck around rush hour. Total waste of gorgeous weather. I rode up the 2 a bit yesterday, ~35mi and 4.2k ft of climbing, but also about 6 pounds of exhaust in my lungs and 3-4 close calls of being hit by asshat drivers. |
Originally Posted by genec
(Post 8092415)
Ever been to Baja?
There are auto repair shops in the little towns along the way... but the odds that they have TIG welding gear are pretty small... and FedEX... yeah it delivers... provided you already have an import permit for the materials you want sent to you. Otherwise you have to go to a main town (Ensenada or La Paz) and go through customs to get the parts that were sent to you. Yeah we live in the era of the WWW and instant overnight delivery... unless you happen to be in a 3rd world location. And yes, being down there, indeed you are no more than a 2-3 day bus ride back to the US. But how much nicer if someone can just braze something for you that afternoon and you can continue your tour. BTW I once busted a spoke while touring the southern US... It was two days before I got to a bike shop that had any real variety in spokes enough to have the 14 ga. spoke to fit my Mavic wheels with Phil Wood hubs... Schwinn type parts I could have had. Now I'll roll my eyes... :rolleyes: If you don't like aluminum frames, just say so. Some people like it and some don't. But I bet you have lots of aluminum parts on whatever you ride. We all do. Do you worry about that breaking? I hope you learned your lesson about the spokes. I carry spares of my own;) |
:deadhorse:
|
Originally Posted by GV27
(Post 8092860)
:deadhorse:
|
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 8092837)
We can play "what if" all day long. And I'm sure someone will come up with some better horror stories than you and Itsjustme.:rolleyes: If I were touring in a third world country, I might consider a steel frame, however the idea that a steel frame is 'better' than an aluminum one because you might be able to get it fixed is in the same category as saying that STI is too delicate to use for touring. Frame breakage is pretty rare in any event and having the village smithy would be an iffy proposition anyway. I've had a steel frame fixed by a master welder who I trust with my life (he welds my pressure vessels) and he was amazed at how difficult it was to fix.
If you don't like aluminum frames, just say so. Some people like it and some don't. But I bet you have lots of aluminum parts on whatever you ride. We all do. Do you worry about that breaking? I hope you learned your lesson about the spokes. I carry spares of my own;) And it is not the Al that I don't like... I have an Al bike with index shifters... it just ain't my touring bike. :D (MTB actually) And yeah, indeed my touring bike has friction shifters. You got me there. And yes, frame breakage is darn rare... more likely I'd screw up a deraileur or something. (have had those "blow up" in odd places too...) Do take note however even the current Trek touring bikes are "just" steel. |
Originally Posted by tjspiel
(Post 8092462)
I can understand wanting a steel frame if you're going to be touring in a remote place but for commuting in the wilds of Minneapolis or any other reasonably sized city/metropolitan area it's not going to make much difference if you're broken frame is aluminum or steel. Frame breakage isn't high on the list of likely mechanical problems anyway.
I'd like to get steel myself simply because I can fix it myself, though I suppose if my aluminum frame breaks, it's just an excuse to go out and buy that gas conversion kit for my welder. |
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 8092267)
For aluminum touring bikes, Cannondale is the only way to go;) On the same par as the LHT and they've been making them for 25 years. Lifetime warranty, too. The LHT (and the Salsa)...5 years.
However, I still think steel is much superior to aluminum for one simple reason: comfort. Aluminum is a lot more rigid than steel, which might mean better performance in a road bike, but which also translates into a much more jarring ride over long distances. My steel-framed LHT isn't the perfect bike; it's heavy, maybe even boring, and will never win any races, but it's durable and really, really comfortable to ride, and if you're putting in a lot of miles on a tour, or even on your daily commute, that can mean the difference between true joy and utter misery. |
Originally Posted by ItsJustMe
(Post 8093021)
The stuff I wrote was in direct response to someone's statement that "FedEx can get you stuff in 2 or 3 days ANYWHERE ON THE PLANET." It's not true. Not at all. I don't expect that I, personally, would ever get somewhere that it's not true, but you can't make blanket statements like that in a context where the person clearly really was talking about ANYWHERE on the planet including 3rd world countries.
I'd like to get steel myself simply because I can fix it myself, though I suppose if my aluminum frame breaks, it's just an excuse to go out and buy that gas conversion kit for my welder. |
Which is okay because they spec steel steerer tubes on their forks.
Originally Posted by tarwheel
(Post 8090646)
My only real grip with Surley is their frame geometries -- their frames tend to have long top tubes and short head tubes. So it would be hard to set one up with handlebars level with the saddle height unless you use a lot of spacers.
|
their frames tend to have long top tubes and short head tubes. I also waited a month for a Fedex 5-day delivery in Canada (2-day was not offered). There are plenty of places in "1st world countries" with no bike shops around and no 2-day Fedex or UPS. I've even seen places where stores were closed on sunday. :p |
Originally Posted by bikebuddha
(Post 8092479)
A lot of people, myself included just find that steel rides better than aluminum.
|
Originally Posted by dynaryder
(Post 8096072)
Depends on the entire bike,not just the frame. My daily commuter is a Novara Safari;alloy frame,cromo fork,26x2" tires. Rides sweet. I had a Kona Sutra;all steel with 700x37 tires. Commuted on it a couple times,and it didn't ride any better than my Safari,so it got sold. The Safari also rides smoother than my Coda,which is steel with a carbon fork. No doubt do to the 120psi 28mm tires.
|
Originally Posted by tjspiel
(Post 8096259)
And that was kind of my point. Steel has its advantages. So does aluminum. As someone who regularly rides both, I think it's a mistake assume that a steel bike is always going to give you a better ride. You may end up passing over what could have turned out be the perfect bike for you.
|
Originally Posted by bragi
(Post 8095184)
I don't think aluminum frames are any more questionable than steel- aluminum has been around for a while, and people know its properties. I'd feel WAY better about riding an aluminum bike than a carbon frame.
However, I still think steel is much superior to aluminum for one simple reason: comfort. Aluminum is a lot more rigid than steel, which might mean better performance in a road bike, but which also translates into a much more jarring ride over long distances. My steel-framed LHT isn't the perfect bike; it's heavy, maybe even boring, and will never win any races, but it's durable and really, really comfortable to ride, and if you're putting in a lot of miles on a tour, or even on your daily commute, that can mean the difference between true joy and utter misery. I don't want to turn this into a steel v. aluminum debate (thought that train may have left the station) but everytime someone says "aluminum is more rigid/harsher/etc than steel" they open up another ignorance vortex on BikeForums. It's tubing diameter. Aluminum is 1/3 the stiffness of Reynolds 531...however, increasing tubing diameter 50% increases the stiffness of a tube by nearly a factor of 8. That is why aluminum bikes tend to be stiff and light...at 1/3 the weight of steel, you can make oversized tubing to get a frame that is 12%-15% stiffer than a steel frame, at the same weight as that flexier steel frame. To get corresponding frame stiffness out of steel, it would be insanely heavy, or you'd have to draw the steel to "beer can" thinness. No one would accuse an early Vitus aluminum bike of being anything other than a noodle. Aluminum can be made in smaller diamters to tune the ride. Steel could be made in large (and heavy) diameters to make for a harsh ride. Go find a Cannondale CAAD 9, squeeze the seat stays, then come back and tell me about "stiff" or "rigid" frames. If you want to look smart, next time you ride an Aluminum frame with a harsh feeling, tell someone about the harsh large tubing diameter ride of the bike. Any engineers present will likely applaud at your knowledge of materials and tubing construction. The other philistines will simply persist in believing that the harshness is simply a function of the material. |
Originally Posted by Banzai
(Post 8096699)
No, no, no.
I don't want to turn this into a steel v. aluminum debate (thought that train may have left the station) but everytime someone says "aluminum is more rigid/harsher/etc than steel" they open up another ignorance vortex on BikeForums. It's tubing diameter. Aluminum is 1/3 the stiffness of Reynolds 531...however, increasing tubing diameter 50% increases the stiffness of a tube by nearly a factor of 8. That is why aluminum bikes tend to be stiff and light...at 1/3 the weight of steel, you can make oversized tubing to get a frame that is 12%-15% stiffer than a steel frame, at the same weight as that flexier steel frame. To get corresponding frame stiffness out of steel, it would be insanely heavy, or you'd have to draw the steel to "beer can" thinness. No one would accuse an early Vitus aluminum bike of being anything other than a noodle. Aluminum can be made in smaller diamters to tune the ride. Steel could be made in large (and heavy) diameters to make for a harsh ride. Go find a Cannondale CAAD 9, squeeze the seat stays, then come back and tell me about "stiff" or "rigid" frames. If you want to look smart, next time you ride an Aluminum frame with a harsh feeling, tell someone about the harsh large tubing diameter ride of the bike. Any engineers present will likely applaud at your knowledge of materials and tubing construction. The other philistines will simply persist in believing that the harshness is simply a function of the material. The old Vitus frames are an anomaly as they flexed at the lugs. So it's the joint that's flexing and not the tube. That's the difference there - and why those frames last a long time. (that's my theory anyhow) This is one of the big advantages of Carbon - depending on how you lay down the layers you can tune it to be stiff in one direction and flexible in another. The other complication is that some steels are stiffer than others. Aframe built with oversized 853 can be super harsh. A 631 frame will never be harsh no matter how lousy the design is. So yeah, "aluminum is harsh, steel is not" is not an absolutely true statement but the average steel frame will offer a softer ride than the average aluminum frame. And that's a fact, Jack. ;) |
:popcorn:
NERD FIGHT! OK, no slide rules. No mechanical pencils. No drafting squares. Concrete mathematics only, no theory. Calculators ready, I want a nice clean fight. |
I don't think Surly's are that special?
Who thinks there special? Lots of others I would consider over a Surly anyday. And have. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:07 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.