Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

Ticketed for Running a Red Light

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

Ticketed for Running a Red Light

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-20-10 | 01:20 PM
  #101  
pedalphile
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 0
From: ellington, ct

Bikes: trek 1200, 520, Giant ATX 970, Raleigh Talon

Originally Posted by NYCJohn170
I commute in Manhattan and may be somewhat more sympathetic than others here.

Fact is, to stay alive, you can't be looking at lights, you have to look at cars and people. So I run a lot of lights whather I want to or not simply because in looking around for them, I'm taking my eyes off where they need to be. Still, I agree with the thoughts we want to be good citizens and obey the laws. Cyclists have an anarchistic reputation and it contributes to the number of arrests by cops that want to housebreak us.

Hard to say how to play this. I've been popped twice, once at a "Critical Mass" demonstration and once for lifting my bike up to throw it though a Taxi windshield (he'd knocked me down in a game they sometimes play). Both times I went to court. The "Aggression" charge or whatever, I got 6 months Probation. The Advocate and the Judge just arranged it. Stay cool for 6 months and it's expunged. Get popped again and you get tried for it. The other one simply got dismissed. Officer said "I can't find my notes".

You ride a bike in NYC and it's a different world. Kind of like combat in the Army. Talk about it and people flame your sorry ass. It's a parallel universe and the civilized rules of normal society will get you killed. Outsiders simply don't understand it so you'll learn to keep your mouth shut about it.
+1

After watching joeybike's crazy videos and reading his take on urban biking, I am convinced this is way to ride in such conditions.

He has come to the conclusion that if you rely on anyone else to keep you from being smushed, you will eventually be smushed. Assume you are the invisible cyclist, because in reality, it's not far from the truth. And being invisible, you are reliant on getting yourself out of the way. So long as you have some sort of forward speed, you have the ability to do this. When you are stopped at a light, one foot on the pavement, you're a sitting duck, make that invisible sitting duck.
trekker pete is offline  
Reply
Old 09-20-10 | 02:22 PM
  #102  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Originally Posted by trekker pete
He has come to the conclusion that if you rely on anyone else to keep you from being smushed, you will eventually be smushed. Assume you are the invisible cyclist, because in reality, it's not far from the truth. And being invisible, you are reliant on getting yourself out of the way. So long as you have some sort of forward speed, you have the ability to do this. When you are stopped at a light, one foot on the pavement, you're a sitting duck, make that invisible sitting duck.
+1 on this.

Lights don't kill cyclists, cars do. It is important to know what is happening with the lights, but it is WAY more important to know what the cars are doing. That said: paying attention to the traffic does not excuse you from paying attention to lights and signage, you need to be aware of EVERYTHING, cars, pedestrians, cyclists, suicidal-delivery-cyclists, rollerbladers, skateboarders, dog-walkers, motorcyclists, potholes, signage, lights ... all of those things can take your life from you if you don't maintain acute awareness at all times.
cab chaser is offline  
Reply
Old 09-22-10 | 12:02 AM
  #103  
jputnam's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 2
From: Pacific, WA

Bikes: Custom 531ST touring, Bilenky Viewpoint, Bianchi Milano, vintage Condor racer

Originally Posted by trekker pete
what pisses me off is the cops trying to use "safety" as a justification for what is, in all honesty revenueing.
....
This same thing happens in my sleepy little town. The local cops sit in wait near very quiet stop signs with good sight lines. They know these stop signs will be rolled through by motorists frequently, so it is easy pickings. They can pay their salary for the day in a half hour. I haven't been the victim of one of these stings on my bike...yet.
Having spoken with more than one traffic safety officer on this, they pick signs with good sight lines because it's safer for them and you to be pulled over at one of those signs.

They don't really care about the safety of the specific sign you're violating. They want you to be in the habit of always coming to a complete stop at stop signs. If you get sloppy at the "safe" signs, some day you'll make a mistake about which sign is "safe," or you'll miss some poorly-lit cyclist on the cross-street, or a pedestrian, etc. Rolling through a right-on-red is particularly dangerous behavior, since most drivers look left for conflicting traffic, and it's easy to miss crosswalk or bicycle conflicts on the driver's right. Stop, look both ways, then proceed.
jputnam is offline  
Reply
Old 09-22-10 | 12:10 AM
  #104  
jputnam's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 2
From: Pacific, WA

Bikes: Custom 531ST touring, Bilenky Viewpoint, Bianchi Milano, vintage Condor racer

Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
But those people never put their money where their mouth is, and carry liability insurance for their bikes. Even though the "same roads same law" law requires this of cars, and even though people on bikes have (very rarely) killed and injured pedestrians in the past.
Cyclists generally have far more liability insurance for their bikes than the average motorist.

Unlike motoring, bicycling carries such negligible risk that it is included in the basic personal liability coverage of renter's insurance or homeowner's insurance. A million dollars of liability insurance for a whole family on bikes costs less than a month of minimal auto liability coverage for one car with one driver.

Here in Washington, the Legislature requires a paltry $25,000 per person bodily injury liability, $10,000 per accident property damage liability -- limits low enough that it's easy to exceed them in a fender-bender.

Meanwhile, personal liability coverage on even minimal renter's insurance usually starts at $100,000 or more. Many homeowners carry personal liability limits of $500,000, a million, or more. And that coverage generally extends to all named insureds in the household, not just one operator.

In fact, liability coverage for cyclists is so easy to get, and so inexpensive, that it's hard to find a policy that only covers bicycling liability -- there's no need for such a policy.

[Disclaimer: insurance policies vary by company and state. If you don't see my name on your declarations page, I'm not your insurance agent and I've never read your policy.]
jputnam is offline  
Reply
Old 09-22-10 | 08:10 AM
  #105  
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by dscheidt
if they're properly set up, they should trip from a bike rim. Not a bike. Not even a whole wheel. Just the hoop. Complain to the people responsible for the light.
LOL the entire City of Chicago is set up incorrectly then. No, if the sensors were that sensitive, motorcycles would trip them more regularly, plus bicycles would trip the red-light cameras and get the flashy lights behind them when I see them sail through without even slowing down. But heck, with no license plates or identifying marks on bicycles to track them to an owner, what do bikes even care of a picture is taken from a red light camera?
ChicagoNative is offline  
Reply
Old 09-22-10 | 09:32 AM
  #106  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by NYCJohn170
Hard to say how to play this. I've been popped twice, once at a "Critical Mass" demonstration and once for lifting my bike up to throw it though a Taxi windshield (he'd knocked me down in a game they sometimes play). Both times I went to court. The "Aggression" charge or whatever, I got 6 months Probation. The Advocate and the Judge just arranged it. Stay cool for 6 months and it's expunged. Get popped again and you get tried for it. The other one simply got dismissed. Officer said "I can't find my notes".
It's my experience that drivers treat you like you treat them - ride aggressively, and you get aggression back. There is a big difference between being aggressive and being assertive. Heck, I've had taxi drivers slow down and drive in front of me so I could draft them.

Never ridden in New York, just cities in UK, France, Germany and Australia, so what do I know?
hairytoes is offline  
Reply
Old 09-22-10 | 10:03 AM
  #107  
Pug's Avatar
Pug
High Modulus
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
From: Madison, NJ

Bikes: Cervelo R3, Ridley X-Night

FWIW, aggressive driving in Manhattan is a rule and not an exception. If you aren't aggressive then you'll be eaten alive (or run over).
Pug is offline  
Reply
Old 09-22-10 | 11:37 AM
  #108  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 18
Originally Posted by ChicagoNative
LOL the entire City of Chicago is set up incorrectly then.
What's the problem with the two statements?
dscheidt is offline  
Reply
Old 09-22-10 | 12:52 PM
  #109  
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Mundelein, Fremont Township, Lake County, Illinois, USA, Earth

Bikes: Giant Sedona, black, large, named Blackie

I've got one version of my route that takes me to a light. I'm on a residential street and I have to turn left across a busy street. There are no sidewalks on my side and not pedestrian button or crosswalk to the far side of the busy street (basically they don't want you walking across). I can't get the sensors to trip and give me the light. There aren't any cars on my street for 3-5 min. A re-route at that point is a bit over a mile.

I wonder if the ticket for jaywalking is less than running the red on the bike?
Inner Prop is offline  
Reply
Old 09-22-10 | 01:33 PM
  #110  
ianbrettcooper's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 612
Likes: 1
From: Silver Spring, MD, USA
Originally Posted by Inner Prop
I've got one version of my route that takes me to a light. I'm on a residential street and I have to turn left across a busy street. There are no sidewalks on my side and not pedestrian button or crosswalk to the far side of the busy street (basically they don't want you walking across). I can't get the sensors to trip and give me the light...
Have you called the city and asked them to fix the sensor?
ianbrettcooper is offline  
Reply
Old 09-22-10 | 02:00 PM
  #111  
JPprivate's Avatar
Very, very Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 1
From: Chicago

Bikes: 2012 Surly Troll, 1999 Hardtail MTB

Originally Posted by AdamDZ
My BS meter just went off the scale. I commute from Queens over WillyB, then 1st Ave up to 34th Street, often run errands around Midtown, and I can stop at lights just fine. It's not that hard. No excuses.

Adam
+1!!!!!!!!

"Kind of like combat in the Army. Talk about it and people flame your sorry ass.
What a load...
JPprivate is offline  
Reply
Old 09-22-10 | 11:56 PM
  #112  
jputnam's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 2
From: Pacific, WA

Bikes: Custom 531ST touring, Bilenky Viewpoint, Bianchi Milano, vintage Condor racer

Originally Posted by ChicagoNative
LOL the entire City of Chicago is set up incorrectly then. No, if the sensors were that sensitive, motorcycles would trip them more regularly, plus bicycles would trip the red-light cameras and get the flashy lights behind them when I see them sail through without even slowing down. But heck, with no license plates or identifying marks on bicycles to track them to an owner, what do bikes even care of a picture is taken from a red light camera?
Not sure about Chicago, but the red light cameras around here aren't tied to the inductive loops used for traffic signals, they trip optically.

But it's quite true the inductive signal loops can be adjusted to reliably detect bicycles. Had a long back-and-forth with King County, WA transportation engineers on that -- they started out saying it was impractical, and ended up changing county policy to make it standard procedure to adjust signals to detect bicycles, and to mark the "sweet spot" of the inductive loops.

Not too long after that, Washington State actually passed a law mandating bicycle detection at demand-actuated signals state-wide. (Starting with new construction and regular maintenance, so don't expect all the signals to work properly any time soon....)
jputnam is offline  
Reply
Old 09-23-10 | 04:41 AM
  #113  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Pug
FWIW, aggressive driving in Manhattan is a rule and not an exception. If you aren't aggressive then you'll be eaten alive (or run over).
Aggression and assertion aren't the same thing.

Maybe Manhattan is different to the rest of the world. Somehow, I doubt it.
hairytoes is offline  
Reply
Old 09-23-10 | 05:34 AM
  #114  
Lot's Knife's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by myrridin
No its to prevent a 26 pound bike from veering in front of that school bus and causing it to crash killing a dozen children....
Red lights exist to keep bikes from veering. Mark it.
Lot's Knife is offline  
Reply
Old 09-23-10 | 07:30 AM
  #115  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 1
From: Potashville

Bikes: Reynolds 531P road bike, Rocky Mountain Metropolis, Rocky Mountain Sherpa 10, Look 566

Originally Posted by hairytoes
It's my experience that drivers treat you like you treat them - ride aggressively, and you get aggression back. There is a big difference between being aggressive and being assertive. Heck, I've had taxi drivers slow down and drive in front of me so I could draft them.

Never ridden in New York, just cities in UK, France, Germany and Australia, so what do I know?
+++1. Behave like traffic, drivers will usually treat you like traffic. I've ridden through the downtown rush hour in Calgary for amost 30 years, off an on, and never had a problem. I don't run red lights, crawl into people's blind spots to pass them on the right as they're making a right-hand turn, or try to do left turns from the wrong side or the road.
I find that I can trip most light sensors by laying the bike over almost flat on top of them. As long as it's a metal, not carbon fiber, frame, it should be enough to trip it. There are a few that don't work this way, admittedly.
Rhodabike is offline  
Reply
Old 09-24-10 | 10:19 AM
  #116  
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Lot's Knife
Red lights exist to keep bikes from veering. Mark it.
Red lights exist so vehicles are controlled at intersections. Since bicycles are considered vehicles, they should also stop. Makes sense to me!
ChicagoNative is offline  
Reply
Old 09-24-10 | 11:24 AM
  #117  
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 23,208
Likes: 10,653
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by jputnam
Cyclists generally have far more liability insurance for their bikes than the average motorist.

Unlike motoring, bicycling carries such negligible risk that it is included in the basic personal liability coverage of renter's insurance or homeowner's insurance. A million dollars of liability insurance for a whole family on bikes costs less than a month of minimal auto liability coverage for one car with one driver.
This seems very dubious to me. I predict that if a cyclist were to try and use any of that million dollars of liability insurance to cover themselves for a cycling accident - for example, the guy in Renton who killed the old lady on the Cedar River Trail - the insurance company would refuse to pay. I very much doubt that any renter's or home owner's policy will cover liability from a bike accident that happened outside the home. ( Among many reasons, I suspect that if I were wrong here, drivers would be doing the same thing instead of carrying specialized driving insurance... )
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Reply
Old 09-24-10 | 12:54 PM
  #118  
GriddleCakes's Avatar
Tawp Dawg
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,221
Likes: 0
From: Anchorage, AK

Bikes: '06 Surly Pugsley, '14 Surly Straggler, '88 Kuwahara Xtracycle, '10 Motobecane Outcast 29er, '?? Surly Cross Check (wife's), '00 Trek 4500 (wife's), '12 Windsor Oxford 3-speed (dogs')

Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
This seems very dubious to me. I predict that if a cyclist were to try and use any of that million dollars of liability insurance to cover themselves for a cycling accident - for example, the guy in Renton who killed the old lady on the Cedar River Trail - the insurance company would refuse to pay. I very much doubt that any renter's or home owner's policy will cover liability from a bike accident that happened outside the home. ( Among many reasons, I suspect that if I were wrong here, drivers would be doing the same thing instead of carrying specialized driving insurance... )
Personal liability coverage provided by homeowner's and renter's insurance often extends beyond the home. If you wreck someone else while skiing, for example, your homeowner's insurance will generally cover it. Insurance companies seem to accept that there are a number of gaps in the insurance net, and so allow homeowner's and renter's insurance to fill those liability gaps for low risk (for third party property and personal damage) activities like cycling and skiing. Autos require their own insurance because the risk of causing significant damage is high.

Obviously, you should check with your insurance provider and not just assume that you're covered. Most will happily accept an extension of your existing coverage to a low risk activity like cycling if it means keeping you as a customer; they will also happily deny payment on activities that haven't been explicitly outlined in your coverage beforehand, should an incident occur. Also, from what I understand, personal liability won't cover your medical costs, so you probably should still roll with health insurance.
GriddleCakes is offline  
Reply
Old 09-24-10 | 08:02 PM
  #119  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Lot's Knife
Red lights exist to keep bikes from veering. Mark it.
Red lights exist so I won't get T-boned by a cyclist as I ride through an intersection on green. Or at least, they reduce the chance--I always check for cyclists before proceeding on green.
afwen is offline  
Reply
Old 09-27-10 | 07:36 AM
  #120  
NYCJohn170's Avatar
nOOb
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 120
Likes: 17

Bikes: Gary Fisher Tassajara Specialized Tricross

Originally Posted by trekker pete
+1

After watching joeybike's crazy videos and reading his take on urban biking, I am convinced this is way to ride in such conditions.

He has come to the conclusion that if you rely on anyone else to keep you from being smushed, you will eventually be smushed. Assume you are the invisible cyclist, because in reality, it's not far from the truth. And being invisible, you are reliant on getting yourself out of the way. So long as you have some sort of forward speed, you have the ability to do this. When you are stopped at a light, one foot on the pavement, you're a sitting duck, make that invisible sitting duck.
So a day or so after I wrote that, I'm coming down the street, and there's a weekend warrior inching through a light. Couldn't take his eyes off it. I had the light and had to make a violent swerve to avoid this guy. Was still fixated on the light as I passed. I've gotten better about keeping my mouth shut in such situations and didn't comment. Seemed obvious though he'd be an NYC statistic one day. I flashed on this thread.

Originally Posted by hairytoes
It's my experience that drivers treat you like you treat them - ride aggressively, and you get aggression back. There is a big difference between being aggressive and being assertive. Heck, I've had taxi drivers slow down and drive in front of me so I could draft them.

Never ridden in New York, just cities in UK, France, Germany and Australia, so what do I know?
I agree that what goes around... That said, here in NYC, nearly all the cabbies are all from countries where life is cheap. Where you use horn rather than brake.
NYCJohn170 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-27-10 | 11:34 AM
  #121  
thdave's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,242
Likes: 0
I'd go to court. Not to get off, but to argue the fine down. It's clearly set that high because of 4000# cagers running lights, causing lots of damage. Your 30# vehicle isn't going to cause serious bodily harm to anyone.
thdave is offline  
Reply
Old 09-27-10 | 02:13 PM
  #122  
lubes17319's Avatar
Chronic 1st-timer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 1
From: Lakehood, CO

Bikes: ...take me places.

Originally Posted by Standalone
My wife gets tickets all the time in the city. Nabbed by a camera running yellows...

Her last one was $50. In a car. Nearly $300 for a bike running a red is over the top.
Same here, mrs. lubes has got a few citations over the past few years & nothing has topped $100.
$270 is reedickulouse!
lubes17319 is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
baron von trail
Advocacy & Safety
189
11-09-15 02:44 PM
JoeyBike
Commuting
152
08-07-14 04:48 PM
CB HI
Advocacy & Safety
26
01-13-12 08:32 PM
NABRXX
Commuting
82
04-03-11 08:53 PM
davisstraub
Advocacy & Safety
20
11-15-10 05:51 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.