Which rack and panniers
#101
#102
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,681
Likes: 253
From: Minnesota
Bikes: N+1=5
Well the Bug arrived and I fitted it on the rack, it's a slightly better fit than the Ortlieb Vario as the lower securing hook is attached to a more flexible bungee rather than the stiff rubber strap used by the Vario (which just didn't work to secure to lower part of the bag). However, with the Bug mounted as far back as possible on the rack, I've found that the bag does move forward about 1cm which is enough for heel-strike to occur. I'll try wrapping some insulating tape around part of the rack to prevent the movement but the Arkel's cam-lock fixing system doesn't strike me as being as durable or as secure as the Ortlieb systems. I did try to pull the Bug off the rack but it stayed put, but after years of use I wouldn't be surprised if the spring-loaded cam-lock mechanism became weaker, but only time would tell I guess.
For me though, the Bug is a bit disappointing given the price - it has no inner pocket or organiser which is essential for a commuter bag; granted you can buy a separate laptop bag with mesh pockets but this adds an extra £26 to an already expensive bag. The addition of a mesh organiser pocket inside the outer zippered compartment would be a great improvement to the Bug.
But it does seem that convertible pannier/backpacks all seem to suffer from the same problem, that the lower securing system is always a hook on an elasticated strap and unless that hook can be fixed directly below on the rack then the bag will move as it's pulled forward by the elastic strap. Unless your rack has horizontal dog-legs long emough to allow the elasticated hook to be attached vertically with the bag mounted at the furthest rear position on the rack, then you're more likely to encounter problems - I think a rack like the Tortec Expedition would work well in this case so maybe I should have bought one of those instead of the RackTime AddIt, but I didn't want a full-on touring rack for my commuting bike.
For bikes with short chainstays (435mm on my bike) and for riders with large feet, the elastic strap is more likely to be an issue, as I've found, so I'm starting to think that I'm better off just getting giving up on the convertible backpack/pannier and just plump for the Ortlieb panniers with their rigid QuickLock adjustable lower fixing system which would (I think) alleviate the issue with the pannier moving forward.
If The Ortlieb Vario and Arkel Bug dispensed with the elastic lower securing strap/hook and used a moveable plastic clip to secure the lower part of the bag, there'd be none of the issues I've encountered.
For me though, the Bug is a bit disappointing given the price - it has no inner pocket or organiser which is essential for a commuter bag; granted you can buy a separate laptop bag with mesh pockets but this adds an extra £26 to an already expensive bag. The addition of a mesh organiser pocket inside the outer zippered compartment would be a great improvement to the Bug.
But it does seem that convertible pannier/backpacks all seem to suffer from the same problem, that the lower securing system is always a hook on an elasticated strap and unless that hook can be fixed directly below on the rack then the bag will move as it's pulled forward by the elastic strap. Unless your rack has horizontal dog-legs long emough to allow the elasticated hook to be attached vertically with the bag mounted at the furthest rear position on the rack, then you're more likely to encounter problems - I think a rack like the Tortec Expedition would work well in this case so maybe I should have bought one of those instead of the RackTime AddIt, but I didn't want a full-on touring rack for my commuting bike.
For bikes with short chainstays (435mm on my bike) and for riders with large feet, the elastic strap is more likely to be an issue, as I've found, so I'm starting to think that I'm better off just getting giving up on the convertible backpack/pannier and just plump for the Ortlieb panniers with their rigid QuickLock adjustable lower fixing system which would (I think) alleviate the issue with the pannier moving forward.
If The Ortlieb Vario and Arkel Bug dispensed with the elastic lower securing strap/hook and used a moveable plastic clip to secure the lower part of the bag, there'd be none of the issues I've encountered.
I also find the Bug virtually impossible to move on the Addit rack when the cams are engaged. It's locked on there.
Also, have you adjusted the position of the hooks, You should be able to adjust the hooks so that it's almost an extreme mount with the bag hanging off the back of the rack. I ride a Gunnar Crosshairs 56cm frame with 172.5mm cranks with not especially long chainstays (430mm according to Gunnar so shorter than yours). My shoes are 44.5" (10-5 to 11 US) and I'm a lo-o-ong way from having a heel strike problem. The size difference from my shoes to yours shouldn't be all that big of a deal.
In my commute yesterday, I carried clothes (shorts and shirt), laptop, iPad, work shoes, and misc stuff. I had a water bottle in the mesh pocket and thought it quite secure. This was for a 15 mile ride over some fairly bumpy pavement. The Bug was locked on steady to the rack.
So I'm thinking something isn't quite right or it is attached incorrectly. Are you sure you have the cams set up properly? Is the release strap properly attached to the cams (if it isn't, the cams won't operate properly). Also, did you adjust the hooks to sit the bag aft on the rack?
#103
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: UK
Bikes: Kona Jake the Snake
I also find the Bug virtually impossible to move on the Addit rack when the cams are engaged. It's locked on there.
Also, have you adjusted the position of the hooks, You should be able to adjust the hooks so that it's almost an extreme mount with the bag hanging off the back of the rack.
So I'm thinking something isn't quite right or it is attached incorrectly. Are you sure you have the cams set up properly? Is the release strap properly attached to the cams (if it isn't, the cams won't operate properly). Also, did you adjust the hooks to sit the bag aft on the rack?
Also, have you adjusted the position of the hooks, You should be able to adjust the hooks so that it's almost an extreme mount with the bag hanging off the back of the rack.
So I'm thinking something isn't quite right or it is attached incorrectly. Are you sure you have the cams set up properly? Is the release strap properly attached to the cams (if it isn't, the cams won't operate properly). Also, did you adjust the hooks to sit the bag aft on the rack?
Are the hooks on your Bug made with the same plastic inserts? I seem to recall reading that the hooks and cams on earlier models were entirely metal and had a habit of chewing up some racks.
#104
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,681
Likes: 253
From: Minnesota
Bikes: N+1=5
My cams are plastic. I cannot conceive of how a bug with the maximum load you could reasonably put in it, could even move if the cams are properly locked on the rack. They'd have to break first. There has got to be something wrong. Could you take a picture or something showing how you have it set up and how you have it locked into place? I had mine loaded to the gills yesterday and it was locked on tight on the rack.
Like I said, my chainstays are 5mm shorter than yours and I have plenty of clearance with feet that are not much smaller. Same rack, same bag.
J.
Like I said, my chainstays are 5mm shorter than yours and I have plenty of clearance with feet that are not much smaller. Same rack, same bag.
J.
#105
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: UK
Bikes: Kona Jake the Snake
The bag is loaded with a change of clothes and a few odds and ends so the load is pretty light. If your Bug is empty, does it move along the rack when clipped on?
#106
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: UK
Bikes: Kona Jake the Snake
Major user error.
#107
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: UK
Bikes: Kona Jake the Snake
LOL, thanks for Pendantic thread. I'm looking for a rack too and this saved me from starting my own Pendantic thread. 
I'll probably go with the Topeak rack. I have a GT and unfortunately the funky frame looks like may present a challenge, but I won't know until I have the rack in hand. Good luck with the rack and panniers.

I'll probably go with the Topeak rack. I have a GT and unfortunately the funky frame looks like may present a challenge, but I won't know until I have the rack in hand. Good luck with the rack and panniers.
#108
Banned
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,082
Likes: 1
I appreciate the advice and feedback I've received in this thread and you mentioned the RackTime Addit and the German vendor from who I ordered my Addit. I found your response saying that I should "Go find someone to teach you how to properly set up your panniers" patronising, rude and given that you know very little about me, ignorant.
Are you actually reading and understanding my posts? I've never said anything was faulty nor have I been unable to properly install it, but what I did say was that the Vario and Bug the bags I tried didn't work for me, not because I'm unable to fit them properly, but because there are heel strike problems because the bags move on the rack when I attach the lower securing hook.
How about the size of my feet? That's a logical reason and obviously one you've failed to consider.
The Bug 2011 doesn't have the zippered pockets you mention, just mesh pockets either side and nothing at the front other than the helmet holder and a small open pocket behind that. Arkel have changed the Bug since you bought yours years ago but you obviously didn't consider that before posting your patronising response.
Major user error.
Are you actually reading and understanding my posts? I've never said anything was faulty nor have I been unable to properly install it, but what I did say was that the Vario and Bug the bags I tried didn't work for me, not because I'm unable to fit them properly, but because there are heel strike problems because the bags move on the rack when I attach the lower securing hook.
How about the size of my feet? That's a logical reason and obviously one you've failed to consider.
The Bug 2011 doesn't have the zippered pockets you mention, just mesh pockets either side and nothing at the front other than the helmet holder and a small open pocket behind that. Arkel have changed the Bug since you bought yours years ago but you obviously didn't consider that before posting your patronising response.
Major user error.
As it is, you have two panniers and can't seem to mount either of them on your rack. Are these the first panniers you've ever used? They can be tricky to mount for a new user. Really just ask a friend to help. Maybe they'll see something you missed.
BTW, there is no need to be a dick when someone is giving you advice, even if you don't like that advice.
#109
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,681
Likes: 253
From: Minnesota
Bikes: N+1=5

Note how the release handle, the strapping goes down in the inside of the cams, around underneath and on the outside then attaches to the cams. If this gets undone (easy to do), the cams won't operate properly and you will have *essentially* just hooked your bag on the rack instead of locking it in place. Do your cams look exactly like this and are they in the proper position (not upside down) when locked to the rack?
I don't know if you've seen this, but here is a link with detailed information on adjusting with some nice pictures of how the cams operate.
https://www.arkel-od.com/us/useful-03-attachment
J.
#110
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,681
Likes: 253
From: Minnesota
Bikes: N+1=5
#111
Banned
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,082
Likes: 1
#112
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: UK
Bikes: Kona Jake the Snake
How on earth do you come to that conclusion?? Have you actually read my posts? All of your responses indicate that you're not processing and understanding what I've said previously and that's your problem, not mine, so I'd rather not waste any more of my time.
#113
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: UK
Bikes: Kona Jake the Snake
I might take this up with Arkel directly, just in case my Bug is faulty, though I'm pretty sure it isn't. There's no problem mounting it on the rack, just that it moves forward with the bungee hook attached.
Thanks for your ongoing help and patience.
#114
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: UK
Bikes: Kona Jake the Snake
#115
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,681
Likes: 253
From: Minnesota
Bikes: N+1=5
Yes, they do and they are. Referring to the image you posted, when I pull the handle up the cams end up oriented facing from the outer sides of the hook, releasing the handle allows to springs to move the cams back towards their resting position and lock against the rack tubing. If you're saying that in that position the bag shouldn't move at all, even when applying some force to the side of the bag, then maybe the springs aren't applying enough force to the cams to lock the bag in place?
I might take this up with Arkel directly, just in case my Bug is faulty, though I'm pretty sure it isn't. There's no problem mounting it on the rack, just that it moves forward with the bungee hook attached.
Thanks for your ongoing help and patience.
I might take this up with Arkel directly, just in case my Bug is faulty, though I'm pretty sure it isn't. There's no problem mounting it on the rack, just that it moves forward with the bungee hook attached.
Thanks for your ongoing help and patience.
J.
#116
Banned
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,082
Likes: 1
Well, I've fitted the RackTime Addit to my bike, clipped on an Ortlieb Vario to see how well it fitted, and was disappointed. Whilst I can fit the bag further back on the rack to minimize heel-strike, I couldn't secure the lower part of the bag because the elasticated hook (not a bungee, just a rubber strap) can't be positioned at an angle to hook on to the rack. I tried a number of adjustments of the mounting system but to no avail, so the Vario is going back to the shop. I've also ordered an Arkel Bug so I'll see how that goes, hoping it'll work better than the Vario so I'll be able to use it on my daily commute.
Well the Bug arrived and I fitted it on the rack, it's a slightly better fit than the Ortlieb Vario as the lower securing hook is attached to a more flexible bungee rather than the stiff rubber strap used by the Vario (which just didn't work to secure to lower part of the bag). However, with the Bug mounted as far back as possible on the rack, I've found that the bag does move forward about 1cm which is enough for heel-strike to occur. I'll try wrapping some insulating tape around part of the rack to prevent the movement but the Arkel's cam-lock fixing system doesn't strike me as being as durable or as secure as the Ortlieb systems. I did try to pull the Bug off the rack but it stayed put, but after years of use I wouldn't be surprised if the spring-loaded cam-lock mechanism became weaker, but only time would tell I guess.
#117
Banned
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,082
Likes: 1
This happens to me once every few months. Simply wrap the webbing around the cam again and you're good to go. It takes about 5 seconds.
#118
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: UK
Bikes: Kona Jake the Snake
These two posts lead me to the conclusion that you have two different panniers, neither that you know how to properly mount on your rack. Hopefully with trial and error you'll be able to get one to work. Remember that the further forward the hooks are on a pannier the further back it sits on your rack. Heel strike shouldn't be a problem.
#119
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: UK
Bikes: Kona Jake the Snake
Try as much as I did to get the Arkel Bug to work for me on my bike, no success. The only way to fit the bag so that I've enough heel clearance is to position the cam hooks so that the bag is way way back on the rack, but the bag is so far back that a medium-heavy load makes the front-end feel very light and the bike's handling didn't inspire confidence at all. Also, the hooks were so close together that the bag's weight is concentrated on a relatively small area of the rack.
It's a shame as the Bug is a nice bag, even though it lacks a few things I'd have liked.
I have found a suitable bag for my commute, the Ortlieb City Bag 2, which is angled to avoid heel strike and didn't require much adjustment of the mounting hooks to provide around 4cm heel-clearance; it also uses the QL2 lock system which works much better so that the bag is secured at three points on the rack. It isn't quite as roomy (21 litres vs the Bug's 25) or as versatile as the Bug, but it can take my paperwork , some bits and pieces and a change of clothes, and it's waterproof without needing a raincover, so it suits me well. Also, because it's quite a short-height bag, it works fine on my Dahon folding bike, which was the main reason for wanting a bag that could convert to a backpack so I could wear it when riding the folder.
Thanks to all who replied to this thread and provided very useful info, I've certainly learnt a lot about what to look for in a rack and panner/bag and hopefully this (pedantic) thread will be useful to others choosing a rack and panniers for their bikes.
It's a shame as the Bug is a nice bag, even though it lacks a few things I'd have liked.
I have found a suitable bag for my commute, the Ortlieb City Bag 2, which is angled to avoid heel strike and didn't require much adjustment of the mounting hooks to provide around 4cm heel-clearance; it also uses the QL2 lock system which works much better so that the bag is secured at three points on the rack. It isn't quite as roomy (21 litres vs the Bug's 25) or as versatile as the Bug, but it can take my paperwork , some bits and pieces and a change of clothes, and it's waterproof without needing a raincover, so it suits me well. Also, because it's quite a short-height bag, it works fine on my Dahon folding bike, which was the main reason for wanting a bag that could convert to a backpack so I could wear it when riding the folder.
Thanks to all who replied to this thread and provided very useful info, I've certainly learnt a lot about what to look for in a rack and panner/bag and hopefully this (pedantic) thread will be useful to others choosing a rack and panniers for their bikes.
#121
$ sudo shift
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, California USA
Bikes: 2008 Dahon Curve SL | Some type of 20-inch foldie
I love the Topeak system on my Trek Fx 7.3 Disc. Why? Because when I arrive at my destination, its literally a press of the quick-release mounting and the whole bag slides off the rail and I can take it with me in 2 seconds. The panniers also fold up into the main compartment. The extra bottle carrier doesnt hurt either. Great engineering!


#123
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: UK
Bikes: Kona Jake the Snake
The bag angle provides a lot of heel clearance, about 5cm or 2 inches, and I didn't have to adjust the mounting hooks very much to achieve that.
On the last pic you can see the marks left on the rack by the bag's mounting system, but not too bad, just shows how tough the bag is.
You can see where the bottom of the bag is secured on the rack by the very adjustable QL2 system.
Last edited by giskard; 07-12-11 at 02:47 PM. Reason: Corrections and added info



