why surly cross check over soma double cross?
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 336
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm with gerv on the chainring question. Smaller rings are always OK; it's bigger rings that can be a problem, for chainstay clearance.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,251
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
2 weeks past isn't as bad as 7 year resurrector. Okay, so imagine having both a Surly Cross Check and a Soma Double Cross disc, how would you build up these two similar frames to differentiate them, aside from the obvious lack of disc brakes on the Surly?
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: South Austin, Texas
Posts: 919
Bikes: 2010 Origin8 CX700, 2003 Cannondale Backroads Cross Country, 1997 Trek mtn steel frame converted commuter/tourer, 1983 Univega Sportour, 2010 Surly LHT, Others...
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 48 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times
in
12 Posts
Ease of IGH compatibility is the biggest pro to the Surly, IMO.
For a traditional drivetrain, I prefer the Soma w/ disc option.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nameless
South America, Latin America & Caribbean
0
01-28-12 09:23 PM