Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

Got to love this graphic/the final part

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

Got to love this graphic/the final part

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-15-13 | 07:07 AM
  #1  
Ridefreemc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 6
From: Western Florida

Bikes: 2017 Kona TI, 2011 Mezzo D9, Gazelle Ultimate C380

Got to love this graphic/the final part

Ultimate Fuel Efficiency...

https://thumbnails.visually.netdna-cdn.com/fuel-efficiency-in-the-us_50290f5304ca1.jpg
Ridefreemc is offline  
Reply
Old 03-15-13 | 07:20 AM
  #2  
jrickards's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,647
Likes: 6
From: Sudbury, ON, CA

Bikes: 2012 Kona Sutra, 2002 Look AL 384, 2018 Moose Fat bike

= 0.26 L/100km

Put it this way, all I have to do is by the end of 100km, consume just 1 Cup of gasoline, yeah, I could do that!
jrickards is offline  
Reply
Old 03-15-13 | 07:44 AM
  #3  
Ridefreemc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 6
From: Western Florida

Bikes: 2017 Kona TI, 2011 Mezzo D9, Gazelle Ultimate C380

And for those that live in the Twin Cities - sounds as though you have it goin' on!

https://thumbnails.visually.netdna-cd...90f78ad9cf.jpg

jrickards - do the coffee man - better mileage!
Ridefreemc is offline  
Reply
Old 03-15-13 | 07:47 AM
  #4  
Ridefreemc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 6
From: Western Florida

Bikes: 2017 Kona TI, 2011 Mezzo D9, Gazelle Ultimate C380

I am looking for good inforgraphics for a work project, but keep coming across those that would be of interest to you here:

https://thumbnails.visually.netdna-cd...90f2110a6d.jpg
Ridefreemc is offline  
Reply
Old 03-15-13 | 09:32 AM
  #5  
smasha's Avatar
Vegan on a bicycle
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 23
From: wellington NZ (via NJ & NC)
and for those who are really concerned about the environment... GO VEGAN!

https://www.foodnavigator-usa.com/Sci...meat-and-dairy

Vegans’ GHG emissions were 41.7% lower than the non-vegetarians, lacto-ovo vegetarians’ emissions were 27.8% lower, pesco-vegetarians’ were 23.8% lower and semi-vegetarians were just under 20% lower.”

Combined, the vegans and vegetarians generated 30% fewer GHG emissions than meat eaters, he told FoodNavigator-USA:

"The differences we have estimated are based on the AHS-2 non-vegetarian population as the reference or benchmark group. The consumption of animal products by this non-vegetarian population is less than that of the general population. This means that if we compared our vegetarian population against the average American diet, the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions would be even more dramatic."
it's easy to forget that animal agriculture causes MORE environmental harm than all the world's transportation combined! from Livestock's Long Shadow...

The livestock sector is a major player [in climate change], responsible for 18% of greenhouse gas emissions measured in CO2 equivalent. This is a higher share than transport.
smasha is offline  
Reply
Old 03-15-13 | 10:22 AM
  #6  
Burton's Avatar
Certified Bike Brat
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,251
Likes: 6
From: Montreal, Quebec
But I really really wanted one of those NASA crawlers!

What if I just look at it and don't actually drive it ...
Burton is offline  
Reply
Old 03-15-13 | 10:32 AM
  #7  
jrickards's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,647
Likes: 6
From: Sudbury, ON, CA

Bikes: 2012 Kona Sutra, 2002 Look AL 384, 2018 Moose Fat bike

Originally Posted by smasha
and for those who are really concerned about the environment... GO VEGAN!

https://www.foodnavigator-usa.com/Sci...meat-and-dairy

it's easy to forget that animal agriculture causes MORE environmental harm than all the world's transportation combined! from Livestock's Long Shadow...
Huh? Whenever I consume less meat and eat more beans and cabbage, my GHG emissions go way up! I guess my wife must be an environmentalist because she kicks me out at those times.
jrickards is offline  
Reply
Old 03-15-13 | 04:26 PM
  #8  
dynaryder's Avatar
DancesWithSUVs
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,454
Likes: 341
From: Wash DC
Originally Posted by Ridefreemc
The average annual cost for diesel is wrong;it should be $783something,not $1895.
__________________

C'dale BBU('05 and '09)/Super Six/Hooligan8and 3,Kona Dew Deluxe,Novara Buzz/Safari,Surly Big Dummy,Marin Pt Reyes,Giant Defy 1,Schwinn DBX SuperSport,Brompton S6L/S2E-X/M6L-X/S12 T Line












dynaryder is offline  
Reply
Old 03-15-13 | 04:32 PM
  #9  
dynaryder's Avatar
DancesWithSUVs
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,454
Likes: 341
From: Wash DC
Originally Posted by smasha
it's easy to forget that animal agriculture causes MORE environmental harm than all the world's transportation combined! from Livestock's Long Shadow...
It's also never talked about how bad pets are for the environment. Not just in ecological footprint,but also in the number of wild animals killed by pets every year.
__________________

C'dale BBU('05 and '09)/Super Six/Hooligan8and 3,Kona Dew Deluxe,Novara Buzz/Safari,Surly Big Dummy,Marin Pt Reyes,Giant Defy 1,Schwinn DBX SuperSport,Brompton S6L/S2E-X/M6L-X/S12 T Line












dynaryder is offline  
Reply
Old 03-15-13 | 05:50 PM
  #10  
David Bierbaum's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 35
From: St. Louis Metro East area

Bikes: 1992 Specialized Crossroads (red)

Now I want a Lamborgini Murcielago!

The NASA Crawler statistics are somewhat misleading, since they forget to mention the amount of freight it transports, which must be included in the calculation, as mpgpt -- Miles Per Gallon Per Ton.

I just tried to appear smart. Someone is going to give me a huge wallop with actual facts, and I'll end up feeling like the total idiot I am!
David Bierbaum is offline  
Reply
Old 03-15-13 | 07:10 PM
  #11  
Burton's Avatar
Certified Bike Brat
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,251
Likes: 6
From: Montreal, Quebec
Originally Posted by David Bierbaum
Now I want a Lamborgini Murcielago!

The NASA Crawler statistics are somewhat misleading, since they forget to mention the amount of freight it transports, which must be included in the calculation, as mpgpt -- Miles Per Gallon Per Ton.

I just tried to appear smart. Someone is going to give me a huge wallop with actual facts, and I'll end up feeling like the total idiot I am!
If we calculate how many Lamborginis it can transport in one shot - maybe the gas milage can be justified!
Burton is offline  
Reply
Old 03-15-13 | 08:18 PM
  #12  
smasha's Avatar
Vegan on a bicycle
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 23
From: wellington NZ (via NJ & NC)
Originally Posted by dynaryder
It's also never talked about how bad pets are for the environment. Not just in ecological footprint,but also in the number of wild animals killed by pets every year.
it's not that it's never talked about... but it's incredibly unpopular to talk about it, especially in the country with the highest ratio of domestic cats per person...

Morgan calls for cats to be wiped out - National - NZ Herald News
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/ar...ectid=10860618

That little ball of fluff you own is a natural born killer
https://garethsworld.com/catstogo/

for better or worse, that guy is branded as a loon. logically, what he's actually proposing makes sense, but it's fiercely opposed, even by most environmental/conservation groups.

Originally Posted by David Bierbaum
The NASA Crawler statistics are somewhat misleading, since they forget to mention the amount of freight it transports, which must be included in the calculation, as mpgpt -- Miles Per Gallon Per Ton.

I just tried to appear smart. Someone is going to give me a huge wallop with actual facts, and I'll end up feeling like the total idiot I am!
not so crazy... "Fuel efficiency for trains is measured in terms of ton-miles, because the length and weight of trains varies greatly" - https://www.csx.com/index.cfm/about-c...el-efficiency/

of course there's a little bit of self-congratulatory spin and green-washing in CSX's conclusions, but it's not entirely wrong.

the other thing to bear in mind with the NASA crawler is that almost half of the distance it covers, it's empty. it rarely does a round-trip with a full load.

there's also "passenger miles per gallon" which is a real metric - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passenger_miles_per_gallon

in simple terms, using round numbers, one person on a motorcycle is more fuel efficient than one person in a small SUV... but 2-3 people in a small SUV is more fuel efficient than 2-3 people on 2-3 motorcycles.
smasha is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jppe
Fifty Plus (50+)
9
08-25-16 04:34 PM
Mudu93
Classic & Vintage
5
05-16-12 10:40 PM
powpow
Road Cycling
47
07-14-10 09:18 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.