Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

Pannier

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

Pannier

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-29-14 | 07:34 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,782
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta, GA. USA

Bikes: Surly Long Haul Disc Trucker

For commuting I like smaller front panniers better than rear ones. I find pushing the load up hills is easier than pulling the load up hills.
Walter S is offline  
Reply
Old 10-29-14 | 10:20 AM
  #27  
Spld cyclist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 1
From: Springfield, MA

Bikes: 2012 Motobecane Fantom CXX, 2012 Motobecane Fantom CX, 1997 Bianchi Nyala, 200? Burley Rock 'n Roll

Originally Posted by totops1
I am very new to all the commuting gear but I have heard about heelstriking with the panniers. Is that common ??
Yes, it's common. That's one reason to get panniers with adjustable hooks - you can shift the whole pannier to the rear as necessary.

The other reason is that not all racks have the same configuration of struts and cross supports. A pannier that works well with one rack may not work well with another. Although most any pannier will sit somewhere on most any rack, your choices about where the pannier will go may be seriously constrained. That could mean that the pannier has to go too far forward, resulting in heel strike.

You can also adjust the hooks so that one of them butts up against a cross support on the top of the rack. That will help prevent the pannier from shifting out of place during the ride.

This is from experience. I've used three pairs of panniers on four different models of racks on various bikes over the years, which is a lot of different combinations. The panniers with fixed hooks just didn't work well in some of those combinations.

Last edited by Spld cyclist; 10-29-14 at 12:24 PM.
Spld cyclist is offline  
Reply
Old 10-29-14 | 10:45 AM
  #28  
noglider's Avatar
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,198
Likes: 6,432
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

I agree about the Ortliebs. I think of all the cheap stuff I've bought and get annoyed at myself. I bought a small pair of Ortliebs a few months ago and have no regrets at all. They are so amazingly convenient because of the easy on and off.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is online now  
Reply
Old 10-29-14 | 10:54 AM
  #29  
BobbyG's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,645
Likes: 2,373
From: Colorado Springs, CO

Bikes: 2015 Charge Plug, 2007 Dahon Boardwalk, 1997 Specialized Rockhopper, 1984 Nishiki International, 2006 Felt F65, 1989 Dahon Getaway V

FWIW I bungee a backpack on my back rack. The bungees loop from the seat rail to the en of the back rack, and stay there. I merely stretch them to the sides and slide the backpack in. They hold the backpack to the seat post. With my new backpack I was able to put a D-clip on each side for even more security, although withe the previous set-up (pictured) I had never had a backpack fall off, even when I dropped the bike or fell, and that was over 20 years.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMG_20131001_135055_676.jpg (90.2 KB, 37 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_20131001_120606_470.jpg (102.6 KB, 38 views)
BobbyG is offline  
Reply
Old 10-29-14 | 11:46 AM
  #30  
Fork and spoon operator
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 577
Likes: 11
From: Hopkins, Minnesota

Bikes: 2013 Surly Crosscheck, 1990 Schwinn Impact, 1973 Schwinn Continental

Everything Banjo Brothers makes is good, and pretty inexpensive.
Tough. Practical. Affordable. Bike Bags. | Banjo Brothers
I've used their waterproof panniers every day for 2 or 3 years with no problems, and my wife uses (and likes) the market pannier.
PennyTheDog is offline  
Reply
Old 10-30-14 | 10:25 AM
  #31  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Thanks again everybody for all your input, it's definitely helping!

It looks like I will go for the cheap solution.... Ortlieb's :-)
totops1 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-30-14 | 02:11 PM
  #32  
old's'cool's Avatar
curmudgineer
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,417
Likes: 113
From: Chicago SW burbs

Bikes: 2 many 2 fit here

Originally Posted by Walter S
For commuting I like smaller front panniers better than rear ones. I find pushing the load up hills is easier than pulling the load up hills.
I would love to see a physics analysis behind that.
old's'cool is offline  
Reply
Old 10-30-14 | 08:37 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 14
Originally Posted by spoiledrotten
I had no idea what a "pannier" was until I opened this thread. So a dry bag for kayaks is a pannier for bikes. I didn't even know I had a few panniers.
Sort of...Some of the Ortlieb bags are rolled closed like dry bags. The surface that faces inboard towards the bike generally has something inside to stiffen it like a plastic sheet to prevent it from going into the wheel. Usually there are two or three hooks attached to secure the bag to the rack - 2 upper hooks to hold the weight and a lower hook to prevent the bag from swinging out sideways.
jsdavis is offline  
Reply
Old 10-31-14 | 06:40 AM
  #34  
noglider's Avatar
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,198
Likes: 6,432
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Originally Posted by old's'cool
I would love to see a physics analysis behind that.
With panniers on the front, the panniers are near my hands when I stand up and pull on the bars. This means I don't have to twist the frame as I do when the panniers are instead on the rear. I discovered this in the summer.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is online now  
Reply
Old 10-31-14 | 10:06 AM
  #35  
spoiledrotten's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: South of the Mason-Dixon

Bikes: 2015 Scott Speedster XL Frame, 2014 Diamondback hybrid, and a 20" Schwinn Unicycle (does that count?)

Originally Posted by jsdavis
Sort of...Some of the Ortlieb bags are rolled closed like dry bags. The surface that faces inboard towards the bike generally has something inside to stiffen it like a plastic sheet to prevent it from going into the wheel. Usually there are two or three hooks attached to secure the bag to the rack - 2 upper hooks to hold the weight and a lower hook to prevent the bag from swinging out sideways.
Thanks for taking the time to explain, Jsdavis.
spoiledrotten is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-14 | 06:35 AM
  #36  
old's'cool's Avatar
curmudgineer
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,417
Likes: 113
From: Chicago SW burbs

Bikes: 2 many 2 fit here

Originally Posted by noglider
With panniers on the front, the panniers are near my hands when I stand up and pull on the bars. This means I don't have to twist the frame as I do when the panniers are instead on the rear.
I would love to see a physics analysis behind that.
old's'cool is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-14 | 06:41 AM
  #37  
TransitBiker's Avatar
contiuniously variable
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 9
From: Southeastern Pennsylvania

Bikes: 2012 Breezer Uptown Infinity, Fuji Varsity

Originally Posted by old's'cool
I would love to see a physics analysis behind that.
I "lol'd".

- Andy
TransitBiker is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-14 | 08:10 AM
  #38  
noglider's Avatar
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,198
Likes: 6,432
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Originally Posted by old's'cool
I would love to see a physics analysis behind that.
OK, OK, I don't know how to do this. Does it make any sense at all to you? Can I improve my description? I was surprised at what an improvement it was, especially since I expected no improvement at all.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is online now  
Reply
Old 11-01-14 | 08:24 AM
  #39  
TransitBiker's Avatar
contiuniously variable
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 9
From: Southeastern Pennsylvania

Bikes: 2012 Breezer Uptown Infinity, Fuji Varsity

Originally Posted by noglider
OK, OK, I don't know how to do this. Does it make any sense at all to you? Can I improve my description? I was surprised at what an improvement it was, especially since I expected no improvement at all.
The fork on most bikes only flexes fore and aft, not laterally, so maybe that is what you are experiencing?

- Andy
TransitBiker is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-14 | 09:26 AM
  #40  
noglider's Avatar
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,198
Likes: 6,432
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

I'm experiencing the lack of frame flex. The more weight on the back, the more the frame flexes when I stand up to pedal.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is online now  
Reply
Old 11-01-14 | 09:35 AM
  #41  
TransitBiker's Avatar
contiuniously variable
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 9
From: Southeastern Pennsylvania

Bikes: 2012 Breezer Uptown Infinity, Fuji Varsity

Originally Posted by noglider
I'm experiencing the lack of frame flex. The more weight on the back, the more the frame flexes when I stand up to pedal.
I can't "even"....

You mean the rear triangle follows the bottom bracket/seat tube more cooperatively vs with stuff on rear rack? My old cruiser had quite a bit of frame flex, with no racks of any kid, but it was ALU with big diameter tubing, are you using alu or steel? Narrow or big tubes?

- Andy
TransitBiker is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-14 | 11:31 AM
  #42  
noglider's Avatar
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,198
Likes: 6,432
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Yes that's right. It's a 1982 McLean with Reynolds 531 tubing, standard diameter.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is online now  
Reply
Old 11-01-14 | 02:22 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 3
From: Cascadia

Bikes: Jamis Quest Comp

Originally Posted by Clyde1820
Heel strike shouldn't be an issue on a bike that's long enough for basic stability, one with long enough chain stays, a rack that's not tucked closely to the seat tube. Get the fattest, largest panniers that exist, and you'll likely be hitting your feet against them, sure. But if just commuting, you can generally get by with panniers smaller than the larger, typically rear-oriented bags. Such as, going down from the Ortlieb Back Roller bag to the Front Roller bag. It'll take up less space, be less likely to strike.
If you have size 15 feet like, that bolded part is super important. 415mm chain stays aren't going to cut it! I suspect I need a full on touring bike with 450mm+ chain stays to avoid heel strike.

I always have heel strike-even with panniers shifted all the way back on my rack. Which is why I use a trunk bag. Topeak MTX TrunkBag DXP with Expandable Side Panniers fits a change of clothes, iPad, and lunch with no issues.
Sullalto is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kookaburra1701
Commuting
45
11-14-12 03:05 AM
paintplongo
Touring
4
07-06-12 11:23 AM
Arnock
Commuting
15
01-09-11 07:10 PM
scrapser
Recumbent
13
05-04-10 07:36 PM
zeppinger
Touring
27
01-05-10 09:55 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.