Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

Commuter Bike Frame Material

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

Commuter Bike Frame Material

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-10-15, 11:15 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
RoderWrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Northern Wisconsin
Posts: 280

Bikes: Cannondale Slate and the rest don't matter anymore.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by spare_wheel
It may be less crash resistant than metal but in terms of fatigue resistance -- carbon beats any metal frame.
IMO if you want a commuter frame to last 20 years, crash resistance should be a high priority. The bike is likely to get banged around some in that much time. If it were me, I would look at Ti built to a touring spec, something similar to a Lynskey Backroad.

Originally Posted by spare_wheel
For example, on my commute home I often take 6 deep road ruts at 25+ (I get a bit of air). I also bunny hop a fair amount.
The design of the frame matching it's intended use is more important than the material it's made from. Ernesto didn't design his lightweight road bike to be bunny hopped for 10 years. That's MTB riding!
RoderWrench is offline  
Old 03-10-15, 12:48 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267

Bikes: NA

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by RoderWrench
IMO if you want a commuter frame to last 20 years, crash resistance should be a high priority. The bike is likely to get banged around some in that much time. If it were me, I would look at Ti built to a touring spec, something similar to a Lynskey Backroad.
I broke my carbon frame (crash) 6 years ago. Calfee repaired it for $300 without voiding the lifetime warranty. I've also personally patched up the surface coat of my carbon frames with nail polish and some fine grit paper over a dozen times. The idea that carbon is not ready to be commuted on is utter nonsense.

That's MTB riding!
Nah. That's a metal frame with inherently flawed bottom bracket design. I will never total a carbon frame by cracking the bottom bracket via use. For me, carbon is inherently more fatigue and wear resistant.

YMMV.
spare_wheel is offline  
Old 03-10-15, 12:58 PM
  #28  
Señor Member
 
Wilfred Laurier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,066
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 649 Post(s)
Liked 293 Times in 216 Posts
Originally Posted by KenshiBiker
the only frame material I'm just dead set against is Al (after riding a C'dale oversize Al frame, I vowed I'd never get an aluminum frame...

I'd welcome any thoughts (with the exception of recommending that I reconsider aluminum - not gonna happen).
I recommend you reconsider aluminum. If you are going custom then no, but for off the shelf frames and bikes, aluminum will give you the best value and the best bike. Things most people need to consider when getting a commuter bike are reliability and resistance to theft (or resistance to heartbreak when theft occurs), and lightweight steel generally fails on both those points.

FWIW, I have a 14 year old custom Ti mtb and it is one of my most prized possessions, and I hope it lasts another 14 years. I am considering getting a Ti touring frame that the same company has left over from a previous year (non custom).
If you have the means to afford, and a safe place to keep it hidden while you are at work, then a Ti sport-touring or touring bike would be the bee's knees....
Here is a non-custom model to get your imaginations flowing...
Fargo Ti | Bikes | Salsa Cycles
Wilfred Laurier is offline  
Old 03-10-15, 03:11 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
RoderWrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Northern Wisconsin
Posts: 280

Bikes: Cannondale Slate and the rest don't matter anymore.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by spare_wheel
I will never total a carbon frame by cracking the bottom bracket via use.
Never say never.... Busted Carbon

Plenty of catastrophic, non-impact related failures there.

I'm not a carbon hater, every material has it's pro's and con's. Pick the one you like, make sure it's design is sound and maintain it properly.
RoderWrench is offline  
Old 03-10-15, 03:24 PM
  #30  
Señor Member
 
Wilfred Laurier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,066
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 649 Post(s)
Liked 293 Times in 216 Posts
Originally Posted by RoderWrench
Never say never.... Busted Carbon

Plenty of catastrophic, non-impact related failures there.

I'm not a carbon hater, every material has it's pro's and con's. Pick the one you like, make sure it's design is sound and maintain it properly.
Mostly roof-rack/garage-door and crash damage, though. And also either hasn't been updated in 4 years or nobody has broken any carbon since 2011.
Wilfred Laurier is offline  
Old 03-10-15, 03:31 PM
  #31  
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721

Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times in 1,286 Posts
Originally Posted by spare_wheel
My LBS's nickname for me was "the bike destroyer". I tend to ride as fast as I can and pay little attention to bad pavement. For example, on my commute home I often take 6 deep road ruts at 25+ (I get a bit of air). I also bunny hop a fair amount.
I also ride hard and aggressive , hit potholes, bad pavement, ride up and down the curbs and all that stuff. Never broken any of my steel frames in the past 8 years. I also have an aluminium framed MTB and I beat the crap out of it, never wash winter salt out of it, it's still solid, no cracks. Sometimes I wish that my aluminium frame would crack so I could justify buying myself another steel framed bike.
wolfchild is offline  
Old 03-10-15, 03:48 PM
  #32  
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721

Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times in 1,286 Posts
Originally Posted by tsl
I've also found that brushed Ti is pretty much invisible to the criminal element around here. When riding one of my painted bikes to work, I'm routinely offered a few bags by cornerboys.
It's very easy to take a painted bicycle and make it less attractive to thieves and other lowlifes with criminal element. I just don't see Ti as having some magical properties to prevent theft. There are plenty of painted bikes for sale out there, which are less attractive and don't attract unwanted attention....Then again , professional bike thieves know exactly what Ti is and it's impossible to fool them, OTOH a crackhead who is desperate to get his fix will steel anything including a Ti bike or a Wallmart BSO with a child seat on it.
wolfchild is offline  
Old 03-10-15, 07:57 PM
  #33  
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,506

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7352 Post(s)
Liked 2,479 Times in 1,439 Posts
I'm going to guess that if @KenshiBiker is having a frame custom made, he has a place to keep it secure inside and theft is not a primary concern. Who routinely locks up a custom bike outside?
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 03-10-15, 10:37 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Napa, California
Posts: 470
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
Meh. I don't think I'd ever want a custom commuter. Even with wads of disposable income. There's such a weight lifted from riding a beater places, especially when it comes time to pop into a store, or lock it in front of a restaurant for a few hours. Even if losing a custom bike would be no worse to you than me dropping my big mac on the ground, it's still just that nagging thought in your head.
This is why I recently hung up my new, nice, shiny CX bike as a commuter and bomb around on a mid nineties rigid MTB with balloon tires on it. I go a few mph slower usually. I get a tad more tired climbing hills. But I get a whole lot of peace of mind.

Originally Posted by spare_wheel
I broke my carbon frame (crash) 6 years ago. Calfee repaired it for $300 without voiding the lifetime warranty. I've also personally patched up the surface coat of my carbon frames with nail polish and some fine grit paper over a dozen times. The idea that carbon is not ready to be commuted on is utter nonsense.
The only reason I'd say they're usually not great commuters is because most people who make carbon bikes market them to people who *need* a "racing bike" only(to do slow weekend rides on), and think the inclusion of fender/rack mounts would somehow make it no longer a race bike. Obviously some companies utilize these mounts though.

Though it's rare for most people to actually wear out frames, it is technically correct. A properly built CF frame should never wear out, it will take something catastrophic to make it fail, which would most likely destroy a light steel bike anyways. All steel faces the potential future of simply failing from a lifetime of use.

Last edited by AlTheKiller; 03-10-15 at 10:41 PM.
AlTheKiller is offline  
Old 03-10-15, 10:59 PM
  #35  
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
 
Sixty Fiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: YEG
Posts: 27,267

Bikes: See my sig...

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked 129 Times in 96 Posts
A properly built frame should last decades... I would discourage any of my customers from having a custom built commuter with such a high parts specification.

You will not be able to wear out a well made steel frame if you take care of it and if it was designed for the task it is given.
Sixty Fiver is offline  
Old 03-10-15, 11:02 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
cale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,248

Bikes: Kuota Ksano. Litespeed T5 gravel - brilliant!

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Ti frame + fenders + lights + rack/pannier and commuting just don't seem well matched. Has the price of a Ti frame come down to the level where folks don't care that much about OA weight? If I were to buy a Lightspeed, or some other superb (why do I want to spell that suberb? Ha ha) bike, I'd set it up with a balance of lightweight components and wheels fitting of such a nice bike. I wouldn't put together a commuter with a Ti frame.

If you won't have aluminum, then I submit that steel would be your next best choice. Something like this Nasbar TR1 Touring I see a lot of Surly LHTs in my area and they seem to make a really good commuter.

Carbon makes for a good frame building material but there is limited availability where fenders, rack, and canti/disc bosses are all available.

I think life is too uncertain to make choices about what I'll be riding in 20 years time.
cale is offline  
Old 03-11-15, 12:13 AM
  #37  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,075
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for all the responses - really interesting reading. I'll try to respond to some of the main points,

I will be the first to admit, some of my "requirements" have no technical basis, but I'm OK with it, e.g., I had a bad experience with aluminum a long time ago. I will be the first to acknowledge that manufacturers have most-likely tweaked their designs such that it no longer feels like I'm riding a jackhammer, and if aluminum was the only frame material that checked all the other boxes, perhaps I'd consider it further. However, I know both Ti and SS do check all the boxes (and allow my anti-aluminum prejudice to continue unchecked), especially for a bike that I plan on keeping for 20+ years. As far as carbon goes, I'm not convinced that it's the best choice for a bike that will be used for 20+ years (besides, Calfee never returned my email inquiry - a sample of one, I know, but it just adds fuel to the fire). One of the main attractions of both Ti and SS is the ability to forego paint and not worry about scratches (until I'm ready to deal with them). Cro-Moly steel with a powder coat finish would be another alternative (although the local custom framebuilder insists on using wet paint - looks great, for a while . . .).

As far as cost goes, I'm aware this exercise will not be inexpensive, regardless of material. This likely will be the last bike I buy (well, there may be one more . . . ). I do have relatively secure parking at work (enclosed bike lockers in a parking lot that is patrolled by security guards); besides, that's what insurance is for. There is the concern about running errands after work, but in the past two years, I've only done that once or twice.

I also am a bit concerned about the ride characteristics of Ti, but I figured one of the advantages of working with companies like Seven or Moots, is that I'm most likely to be able to have the ride tuned to my needs. Same goes with SS, in which case the local custom frame builder would get the nod. My (custom steel) road bike rides like a dream. I'd happily commute on it (and I have), but I do worry a bit about scratches as I put it into the bike locker, and while it does have fender mounts, it doesn't have rack mounts, so I see it more as my Sunday, fair weather bike (maybe a few years down the road this will change); this commuter will be the foul weather, commuter, maybe even a little off-road. It may get wiped down after a rainy commute, but likely it won't, especially on the ride in to work (that's why corrosion resistance also is high on the wish list).
KenshiBiker is offline  
Old 03-11-15, 10:50 AM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
tjspiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 8,101
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by KenshiBiker
Thanks for all the responses - really interesting reading. I'll try to respond to some of the main points,

I will be the first to admit, some of my "requirements" have no technical basis, but I'm OK with it, e.g., I had a bad experience with aluminum a long time ago. I will be the first to acknowledge that manufacturers have most-likely tweaked their designs such that it no longer feels like I'm riding a jackhammer, and if aluminum was the only frame material that checked all the other boxes, perhaps I'd consider it further. However, I know both Ti and SS do check all the boxes (and allow my anti-aluminum prejudice to continue unchecked), especially for a bike that I plan on keeping for 20+ years. As far as carbon goes, I'm not convinced that it's the best choice for a bike that will be used for 20+ years (besides, Calfee never returned my email inquiry - a sample of one, I know, but it just adds fuel to the fire). One of the main attractions of both Ti and SS is the ability to forego paint and not worry about scratches (until I'm ready to deal with them). Cro-Moly steel with a powder coat finish would be another alternative (although the local custom framebuilder insists on using wet paint - looks great, for a while . . .).

As far as cost goes, I'm aware this exercise will not be inexpensive, regardless of material. This likely will be the last bike I buy (well, there may be one more . . . ). I do have relatively secure parking at work (enclosed bike lockers in a parking lot that is patrolled by security guards); besides, that's what insurance is for. There is the concern about running errands after work, but in the past two years, I've only done that once or twice.

I also am a bit concerned about the ride characteristics of Ti, but I figured one of the advantages of working with companies like Seven or Moots, is that I'm most likely to be able to have the ride tuned to my needs. Same goes with SS, in which case the local custom frame builder would get the nod. My (custom steel) road bike rides like a dream. I'd happily commute on it (and I have), but I do worry a bit about scratches as I put it into the bike locker, and while it does have fender mounts, it doesn't have rack mounts, so I see it more as my Sunday, fair weather bike (maybe a few years down the road this will change); this commuter will be the foul weather, commuter, maybe even a little off-road. It may get wiped down after a rainy commute, but likely it won't, especially on the ride in to work (that's why corrosion resistance also is high on the wish list).
Since you really like your steel bike my gut says to go with SS since that will have similar qualities. It might come down to which builder you feel most comfortable with.

Just to muddy the waters:



This is a custom carbon framed bike. On these the carbon is raw, there is no paint to chip or scratch. I've met the builder. His background is in materials engineering. He makes road bikes, cyclocross/gravel bikes like above, and mountain bikes. Frames are guaranteed for 25 years. He's not taking off the shelf tubing and just welding them together in a custom geometry (like your other options likely are). The tubes themselves are custom engineered with the qualities you want.

Appleman Bicycles sells to people across the globe and he does repairs as well so if anything should ever happen, you can send it back to him. As far as I know it's a one person operation so there might be a wait involved in getting the bike. The plus side is that you're dealing with the same person from start to finish.

They are also pretty stealthy looking if you leave off the anodized blue components.

Last edited by tjspiel; 03-11-15 at 10:57 AM.
tjspiel is offline  
Old 03-11-15, 11:08 AM
  #39  
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267

Bikes: NA

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by KenshiBiker
one of the advantages of working with companies like Seven or Moots
Seven also has Ti-carbon frames.
spare_wheel is offline  
Old 03-11-15, 12:24 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
tjspiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 8,101
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by spare_wheel
Seven also has Ti-carbon frames.
A friend of mine had an older Trek Carbon-Ti frame. The Ti part cracked around the water bottle mounts. He got a new frame under warranty but it does demonstrate that Ti doesn't mean it'll last forever.
tjspiel is offline  
Old 03-11-15, 01:12 PM
  #41  
Señor Member
 
Wilfred Laurier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,066
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 649 Post(s)
Liked 293 Times in 216 Posts
Originally Posted by tjspiel
A friend of mine had an older Trek Carbon-Ti frame. The Ti part cracked around the water bottle mounts. He got a new frame under warranty but it does demonstrate that Ti doesn't mean it'll last forever.
I am not aware of any carbon/ti bike that trek made. THey did a lot of aluminum/carbon BITD (which were notorious for having water bottle bosses come loose), but I don't know of any Ti. Do you know what model your friend had?
Wilfred Laurier is offline  
Old 03-11-15, 01:20 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
grolby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BOSTON BABY
Posts: 9,788
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 288 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times in 60 Posts
As a general rule, buying a bicycle with the expectation that it will be "the last bike you buy," is misguided and a great way to set yourself up for disappointment. Especially if you've only been riding for two years (I'm not clear on whether you've been riding longer and only just started commuting or if commuting is all of your riding). Time goes by, and your preferences change, and often your capabilities change as well. Sometimes because you're just older, sometimes because something happens and you get sick or injured. Planning to spend a big chunk of money on a bike is totally fine and great, but I think rationalizing it by thinking you're going to amortize it over two decades is pretty unrealistic. It might work out and that's fine, but it's not like buying a house. Justifying the size of a consumer goods purchase by how long you imagine yourself owning it at this particular moment in time is just not wise.
grolby is offline  
Old 03-11-15, 01:28 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
tjspiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 8,101
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Wilfred Laurier
I am not aware of any carbon/ti bike that trek made. THey did a lot of aluminum/carbon BITD (which were notorious for having water bottle bosses come loose), but I don't know of any Ti. Do you know what model your friend had?
It was a Lemond (made by Trek). Don't know the exact model.
tjspiel is offline  
Old 03-11-15, 03:49 PM
  #44  
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,506

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7352 Post(s)
Liked 2,479 Times in 1,439 Posts
Most people who have Ti bikes love them and say it's better than anything they've ridden. Of course, part of that is self-reinforcing, since the investment cost is high. This leads people to want to believe it was money well spent. Blind tests are hard to do on bikes. But Ti sure is light, so it can't be all bunk.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 03-12-15, 05:29 PM
  #45  
DancesWithSUVs
 
dynaryder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Griffin Cycle Bethesda,MD
Posts: 6,983
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I loved my old Ti Motobecane cross bike. Rode really nice. Zero issues with locking it up outside,it was when it was locked in my building's basement garage,with a U and chain,with security cameras,that someone used power tools to take it. Now everything nice stays in the apt.

Originally Posted by noglider
Most people who have Ti bikes love them and say it's better than anything they've ridden. Of course, part of that is self-reinforcing, since the investment cost is high. This leads people to want to believe it was money well spent. Blind tests are hard to do on bikes. But Ti sure is light, so it can't be all bunk.
FYI,there have been a couple postings over in the Folding forum stating the Superlight Bromptons ride better than the standard ones. The SL's have Ti forks and rear sub frames,and Ti or alloy(depending on the year) seatposts. Rest of the bike is the same,and the Ti parts have the same design as the steel ones(ie,one doesn't have a curved fork and the other a straight blade).
__________________

C'dale BBU('05 and '09)/Super Six/Hooligan8and 3,Kona Dew Deluxe,Novara Buzz/Safari,Surly Big Dummy,Marin Pt Reyes,Giant Defy 1,Schwinn DBX SuperSport,Dahon Speed Pro TT,Brompton S6L/S2E-X
dynaryder is offline  
Old 03-12-15, 07:00 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,075
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by grolby
As a general rule, buying a bicycle with the expectation that it will be "the last bike you buy," is misguided and a great way to set yourself up for disappointment. Especially if you've only been riding for two years (I'm not clear on whether you've been riding longer and only just started commuting or if commuting is all of your riding). Time goes by, and your preferences change, and often your capabilities change as well. Sometimes because you're just older, sometimes because something happens and you get sick or injured. Planning to spend a big chunk of money on a bike is totally fine and great, but I think rationalizing it by thinking you're going to amortize it over two decades is pretty unrealistic. It might work out and that's fine, but it's not like buying a house. Justifying the size of a consumer goods purchase by how long you imagine yourself owning it at this particular moment in time is just not wise.
Perhaps buying anything as "the last one I'll buy" is a bit misguided. However, I know me, and I have trouble getting rid of things that are "perfectly good, other than age". It explains why I'm currently using a 37-year old bicycle as my winter commuter, and why I drive a 21-year old Honda; I'd like to get a new car, but there's nothing wrong with this one - just passed its smog test with flying colors last week (maybe I should loosen the oil drain plug a bit ). If this new bike fits (and I have every intention of going to whatever length is necessary to make that happen, up to and including a frame built with custom geometry), I'll probably ride it until I retire in 10 to 15 years (and hopefully a few years beyond). Of course anything could happen, so who knows, whether I'll actually ride it for 15 years. Frankly, my real-life experience (for me, and me alone) is that whenever I've made a (relatively) large purchase (more than a few thousand $$$) with the intention that it was for the "short term", and I'd replace it soon, it's been a mistake - usually the item ends up sitting around, not getting used because I "settled".

As far as my riding experience goes. The Trek was my second "good" bike (the first one was so horribly oversized I couldn't stop without leaning the bike over about 45 degrees), so I've got about 40 years (more if you count the years on my stingray with the sissy bar and banana seat) in the saddle. Full disclosure: there was about 15 years there where I wasn't riding, due to recurring foot problems. As far as commuting goes, I've commuted by bicycle to other jobs in the past, but before these past two years, I was always a "fair weather" commuter, meaning I didn't commute if it was raining, or too cold, or if it was dark. Now, that none of those have stopped me for the past two years, I'd like to get a bike that is really more suitable for the purpose, even if it is more extravagant than most people would justify (I've known people who commuted using Corvettes and Porsches - I even had a boss once who would "commute" in his Ferrari 308 - I'm guessing the insurance on that thing is more than I'll spend on my "ultimate commuter", so everything is relative).

I'm not sure I'm trying to justify the purchase (especially to anyone except my wife and me). I thought I was just asking if anyone had any recommendations of whether to go with SS or Ti as a frame material. Pretty much everything else I wrote was just to provide context for those wishing to give their recommendations. Thank you for yours.
KenshiBiker is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rjcarter3
Road Cycling
7
07-03-19 10:40 AM
92Esquire
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
25
04-20-16 10:16 AM
The B
Commuting
32
01-23-14 11:05 AM
redclay
General Cycling Discussion
4
02-01-12 09:15 AM
monsterpile
Commuting
17
03-08-11 07:05 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.