Recommendations for Lights
#26
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 157
Likes: 3
From: Scotland
Bikes: Diamondback Topanga, Scott CX Comp
Thanks for all the help in this thread. I decided to follow the advice of some of the earlier suggestions here and settled on this:
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/112603916459
I am aware that you get what you pay for, but as I have mentioned, I do not ride at night but do ride frequently in Scotland. That means riding in wet, dull conditions often. So, my main requirement is to be seen rather than to illuminate the road ahead. So, I am hoping that this will satisfy my needs without a sizeable outlay and they are certainly better than my current set of lights.
Thanks to all who contributed.
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/112603916459
I am aware that you get what you pay for, but as I have mentioned, I do not ride at night but do ride frequently in Scotland. That means riding in wet, dull conditions often. So, my main requirement is to be seen rather than to illuminate the road ahead. So, I am hoping that this will satisfy my needs without a sizeable outlay and they are certainly better than my current set of lights.
Thanks to all who contributed.
#27
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,945
Likes: 255
From: Sin City, Nevada
Bikes: Catrike 700, Greenspeed GTO trike, , Linear LWB recumbent, Haluzak Horizon SWB recumbent, Balance 450 MTB, Cannondale SM800 Beast of the East
Looks like an intelligent choice. German standard lights are usually more expensive than other lights. This one tells you the battery capacity in both lights and they are reasonable. A lot of the more expensive lights seem to consider battery capacity a state secret. USB rechargeable batteries are good for between 300 and 500 recharges so when it finally dies tossing the light is not major tragedy. It has more bells and whistles than I would expect for the price.
I found it on Ebay from a China seller but with a much cheaper USB tail light for $18. That's OK since you can buy a 100 lumen light identical to the Blitzu 100 lumen tail light for less than $4.
The run times there are
(15LM/48H)-normal(200LM/8H)- very bright(400LM/4H)-flashing(400LM/16H).
Automatic light adjusting energy-saving mode+ bilateral warning lamp
I found it on Ebay from a China seller but with a much cheaper USB tail light for $18. That's OK since you can buy a 100 lumen light identical to the Blitzu 100 lumen tail light for less than $4.
The run times there are
(15LM/48H)-normal(200LM/8H)- very bright(400LM/4H)-flashing(400LM/16H).
Automatic light adjusting energy-saving mode+ bilateral warning lamp
#28
Newbie

Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 67
Likes: 11
From: PNW
Bikes: 1989 Trek 7000, 1992 Bianchi Project 5
OK I looked at a couple of pages about the Ravemen CR900. It looks excellent, and the price of $77 isn't bad at all. But the beam doesn't look SVTZO compliant. I know I'm being picky, but I love my B&M lights. I have a bad reflex of looking into a beam's hot spot. This beam's hot spot isn't as bad as round beams, but it's not as good as a B&M beam. The B&M beam is a trapezoid, and I can aim it so there is no wasted light anywhere. That's why 200 lumens (my estimate) suffices for me. It's not enough for some people, but it's more useful than some higher power lights because of the shape of the beam.
I am not serious enough yet to spend up for a B&M, but I definitely do want an automotive-style low beam cutoff. I think I'm going to try the Ravemen PR900. The combination of both low and high beams, with different light distribution, makes more sense to me than adjustable brightness does.
Last edited by DarkMonohue; 11-24-17 at 10:22 PM.
#29
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 431
Likes: 7
From: Europe
I am not serious enough yet to spend up for a B&M, but I definitely do want an automotive-style low beam cutoff.
I think I'm going to try the Ravemen PR900.
The combination of both low and high beams, with different light distribution, makes more sense to me than adjustable brightness does.
I think I'm going to try the Ravemen PR900.
The combination of both low and high beams, with different light distribution, makes more sense to me than adjustable brightness does.
It's not a real cutoff, so very far away from aotomotive-style cutoff-beam.
Take a look:
StVZO bike lights - what it is really about ? - Light-Test.info
If you need more information, just ask.
By the way, lamps with real cutoff-beam are available already below $40.
https://www.ebay.com/sch/Lights-Refl...9&LH_PrefLoc=2
https://www.ebay.com/itm/MEILAN-X1-B...sAAOSw4PxaCivG
Last edited by angerdan; 11-25-17 at 06:32 AM.
#30
Newbie

Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 67
Likes: 11
From: PNW
Bikes: 1989 Trek 7000, 1992 Bianchi Project 5
I thought that the Ravemen stuff could be toggled between low and high beam via the remote button, but apparently not. That's a little disappointing.
Thanks for the links. I'll take a look. I am still sorting out the options for a rechargeable light (I have no dynamo). Unfortunately there are so many counterfeit products and so much shameless junk available that it can be hard to know what you are actually getting.
#31
Member
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: midwest
Bikes: trek 29er ht, 4100 commuter conversion.
In this case, you're going to stick to the marketing of this lamp.
It's not a real cutoff, so very far away from aotomotive-style cutoff-beam.
Take a look:
StVZO bike lights - what it is really about ? - Light-Test.info
If you need more information, just ask.
By the way, lamps with real cutoff-beam are available already below $40.
https://www.ebay.com/sch/Lights-Refl...9&LH_PrefLoc=2
https://www.ebay.com/itm/MEILAN-X1-B...sAAOSw4PxaCivG
It's not a real cutoff, so very far away from aotomotive-style cutoff-beam.
Take a look:
StVZO bike lights - what it is really about ? - Light-Test.info
If you need more information, just ask.
By the way, lamps with real cutoff-beam are available already below $40.
https://www.ebay.com/sch/Lights-Refl...9&LH_PrefLoc=2
https://www.ebay.com/itm/MEILAN-X1-B...sAAOSw4PxaCivG
They arent the hard cut off of more expensive lights but there is nothing "marketing" about it. The cut off still allows for a small amount of spill to spread above. Just as automotive lights do.
#32
Newbie

Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 67
Likes: 11
From: PNW
Bikes: 1989 Trek 7000, 1992 Bianchi Project 5
Outside of North America, automotive low/dipped beam lights typically have a very crisp cutoff with little or no light above it. US lights were different (read: terrible) for decades because our regulations actually required a soft blob of light with no sharp cutoff. Cibie, Marchall, Hella, et all sold a lot of lights to the sports car crowd back in those days because they actually produced a useful spread of light, unlike the sealed beam glow worms our cars came with.
Some US market cars still have poorly designed headlights with spillage above the cutoff.
At any rate, the Ravemen stuff is probably good enough to be effective, and at a reasonable price.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MileHighMark
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
0
01-26-11 10:34 PM





