Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Fifty Plus (50+)
Reload this Page >

Compact Double versus Triple

Notices
Fifty Plus (50+) Share the victories, challenges, successes and special concerns of bicyclists 50 and older. Especially useful for those entering or reentering bicycling.

Compact Double versus Triple

Old 02-01-10 | 01:44 PM
  #51  
HiYoSilver's Avatar
Rides again
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,282
Likes: 1
From: SW. Sacramento Region, aka, down river

Bikes: Giant OCR T, Trek SC

ok, thanks for the explanation
HiYoSilver is offline  
Reply
Old 02-01-10 | 10:53 PM
  #52  
Retro-guy
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Danville, CA

Bikes: 1980 Raleigh Super Record

Originally Posted by DougG
Well, this saves me from starting a thread. I'm also a Sequoia owner who's thinking of a new bike with a compact/triple option. I did upgrade my Sequoia a couple years ago, trashing the Sora pieces and going to a 105 triple with 12-27 cassette. So I know what that feels like.

The bike I've got my eye on is a Synapse Carbon 5 that is available with the same 105 setup that I'm now using, or with a compact 54/30 and 12-25 cassette. From reading the posts here, I'm now thinking of going with the double, but maybe installing an almost-new 105 12-27 cassette that I happen to have. I hope this can be done without derailleur or chain-length issues.

In any case, I've almost never been in the 30/27 gear combo on the steepest hills that I'm likely to encounter, so the 34/27 low gear should be sufficient. Thanks for the excellent discussion -- this section always has good info without some of the stuff that goes on elsewhere.
I just got a new bike with a 50/34 compact crank, that came with a 12-25 cassette (105). I had the shop change the cassette out for the 12-27, just to get a lower gear. The only issue is that a short-cage 105 RD will not support the total tooth-range of 16+15=31. So basically I need to stay away from the two extremes of the 50/27 and the 34/12, which don't make sense, anyway.

A long-cage 105 RD will of course handle all of the above gear combinations, but they are normally only used with triple cranks.

For what it's worth, the new 2010 Ultegra RD has a somewhat better total tooth-range (I can't recall the correct term to use for this, but it is the sum of the tooth differences of the chain-rings, plus the cassette.)

The 2010 Ultegra RD will support all gear combinations of a 50/34 compact crank, and the 11-28 Ultegra cassette (and therefore also works with the 12-27 105 cassette).
rschleicher is offline  
Reply
Old 02-02-10 | 05:17 AM
  #53  
Trundlecreak's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: Sydney Australia

Bikes: Trek Pilot

Originally Posted by rschleicher
I had the shop change the cassette out for the 12-27, just to get a lower gear.
Thanks for this info. I'm interested to know how you've found this combination. Is hill-climbing appreciably easier?
Trundlecreak is offline  
Reply
Old 02-02-10 | 08:17 AM
  #54  
BluesDawg's Avatar
just keep riding
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,560
Likes: 44
From: Milledgeville, Georgia

Bikes: 2018 Black Mountain Cycles MCD,2017 Advocate Cycles Seldom Seen Drop Bar, 2017 Niner Jet 9 Alloy, 2015 Zukas custom road, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB, 1980ish Fuji S-12S

Originally Posted by rschleicher

The 2010 Ultegra RD will support all gear combinations of a 50/34 compact crank, and the 11-28 Ultegra cassette (and therefore also works with the 12-27 105 cassette).
You can get an older Ultegra mid cage RD 6500 for a fraction of the price of the newest model. Should work great for this application. I picked up a few of them on sale and I'm running them on both of my main road bikes.
https://www.cambriabike.com/shopexd.a...EAR+DERAILLEUR
BluesDawg is offline  
Reply
Old 02-03-10 | 12:07 AM
  #55  
Retro-guy
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Danville, CA

Bikes: 1980 Raleigh Super Record

I think it would qualify as noticeable, although I had the change-out done before I even picked up the bike. From the math it is about an 8% reduction in the lowest gear ratio. Since the replaced cassette was unused, the charge for the swap was $30, which I thought was reasonable. Swapping out both the rear derailleur and cassette for the Ultegra 11-28 cassette would have been a fair amount more money, although I didn't really get a firm price.

The bike I was replacing is (I still have it) a 1980 Raleigh, which has a 52/42 crank, and an "Alpine gearing" 5-speed freewheel with 14-17-23-30-34 cogs. The lowest gear combo on the new bike (34/27) is very close to the lowest gear combo on the old bike (42/34). Actually, since the new bike has longer crank arms, and also weighs a lot less, it's a lot nicer on the hills than my old beast.

As an aside, on the Shimano web site they list the available cassettes for each group, and also the restrictions that apply to the various derailleur choices.
rschleicher is offline  
Reply
Old 02-03-10 | 03:39 PM
  #56  
Monkey Face's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 619
Likes: 35
From: The Cotswolds, England

Bikes: Giant Revolt 2. Velo Orange Pass Hunter flat bar

I know all those gear inches charts are easy if you know what you're looking at, but my simplistic method is to divide the cassette into the cranks... as in:
34 divided by 27 = 1.259 and 30 divided by 24 = 1.25. So, as close as damn it... 34/27 = 30/24.
Monkey Face is offline  
Reply
Old 02-03-10 | 07:10 PM
  #57  
BluesDawg's Avatar
just keep riding
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,560
Likes: 44
From: Milledgeville, Georgia

Bikes: 2018 Black Mountain Cycles MCD,2017 Advocate Cycles Seldom Seen Drop Bar, 2017 Niner Jet 9 Alloy, 2015 Zukas custom road, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB, 1980ish Fuji S-12S

Originally Posted by Monkey Face
I know all those gear inches charts are easy if you know what you're looking at, but my simplistic method is to divide the cassette into the cranks... as in:
34 divided by 27 = 1.259 and 30 divided by 24 = 1.25. So, as close as damn it... 34/27 = 30/24.
Agree. Both are 34 gear inches.
BluesDawg is offline  
Reply
Old 02-03-10 | 09:44 PM
  #58  
tlc20010's Avatar
The Grampster
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
From: Washington, DC

Bikes: Eddy Merckx SXM, LeMond Buenos Aires, Cannondale Road Warrior 1000 plus a couple of comforts (Specialized Crossroads and Giant Cyprus) and a beater mtb for around town.

Ya know, guys, this was a really interesting string. Some thoughtful and useful info. I think that is what I like about the 50+ group the best. Good info, little flame, and thoughtful discussions.....Thanks.

I ride used to ride a triple, but switched to a 50/34 with a 12/27 and found that what has helped my climbing more than anything else....was losing 35 pounds.
__________________
The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.
--Ben Franklin
tlc20010 is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jtexfisher
Road Cycling
104
06-26-12 08:17 PM
reno94
Road Cycling
19
01-29-12 10:01 PM
creativepart
Road Cycling
28
04-24-11 08:00 PM
metalheart44
Fifty Plus (50+)
42
04-01-11 08:31 AM
lymansmtt
Road Cycling
25
06-28-10 09:32 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.