Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Fifty Plus (50+)
Reload this Page >

How do you calculate %gradient of a hill?

Search
Notices
Fifty Plus (50+) Share the victories, challenges, successes and special concerns of bicyclists 50 and older. Especially useful for those entering or reentering bicycling.

How do you calculate %gradient of a hill?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-18-11, 10:24 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 177 Posts
Originally Posted by Wogster
Don't be so sure about the GPS giving you earth-is-flat distance, for bicycle riding, car driving, jogging or walking, that would be almost completely useless for anything other then figuring the grade of a hill.
Why would the horiz distance be useless? Consumer grade GPS devices can't even measure the distance around a 400m track accurately so I'm not sure why you think they'd incorporate elevation into the distance calculations.
gregf83 is offline  
Old 08-18-11, 11:37 PM
  #27  
Banned.
 
Mr. Beanz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Upland Ca
Posts: 19,895

Bikes: Lemond Chambery/Cannondale R-900/Trek 8000 MTB/Burley Duet tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by LesterOfPuppets
I've found mapmyride to be pretty inaccurate with grades. If you go too granular it over estimates grade and if you go too broad it underestimates them, IME.
.
Yup, that's why I included the "some argue about accuracy" in my post. But IME, the elevation gains have been close on rides like our GMR to the shack (8 mile climb 2200 ft) to what those using Garmins record. But again, I'm not really into exact numbers as long as they are similar. Plus I'll get a Garmin sooner or later.

When it comes down to it, I us it as a reference for my rides. Only to categorize them as "this will be ok" and "this is going to hurt".

BTW, are you using a Garmin?
Mr. Beanz is offline  
Old 08-18-11, 11:41 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Poulsbo WA (west of Seattle)
Posts: 57

Bikes: 2002 Lemond Buenos Aires

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
For what it is worth, I have been using www.ridewithgps.com and find that the grade data and total elevation gain/loss values are much more accurate than www.mapmyride.com.
JohnTP is offline  
Old 08-18-11, 11:54 PM
  #29  
Banned.
 
Mr. Beanz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Upland Ca
Posts: 19,895

Bikes: Lemond Chambery/Cannondale R-900/Trek 8000 MTB/Burley Duet tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnTP
For what it is worth, I have been using www.ridewithgps.com and find that the grade data and total elevation gain/loss values are much more accurate than www.mapmyride.com.
Does that work without a GPS as well? If so thanks, I'll take a look at it, MMR seems very limited in its view.

I'm new to map sites so I'm still picking up info on them.
Mr. Beanz is offline  
Old 08-19-11, 12:37 AM
  #30  
cowboy, steel horse, etc
 
LesterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,851

Bikes: everywhere

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12778 Post(s)
Liked 7,695 Times in 4,084 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr. Beanz
Yup, that's why I included the "some argue about accuracy" in my post. But IME, the elevation gains have been close on rides like our GMR to the shack (8 mile climb 2200 ft) to what those using Garmins record. But again, I'm not really into exact numbers as long as they are similar. Plus I'll get a Garmin sooner or later.

When it comes down to it, I us it as a reference for my rides. Only to categorize them as "this will be ok" and "this is going to hurt".

BTW, are you using a Garmin?
No Garmin but I did recently get one of them fancy smart phones. Strava's rendering of the route recorded on my Droid said 4.4% average on that quarter mile with a peak grade of 6.7%.

I've yet to ride that section with iMapMyRide running on the phone. I'd imagine the gradients would be slightly more accurate than the gradients from their online maps.
LesterOfPuppets is online now  
Old 08-19-11, 04:21 AM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
kr32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Waldorf Md.
Posts: 2,045

Bikes: Cannondale Six Carbon 5 and Gary Fisher Wahoo

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnTP
For what it is worth, I have been using www.ridewithgps.com and find that the grade data and total elevation gain/loss values are much more accurate than www.mapmyride.com.
I will agree with this as well.
kr32 is offline  
Old 08-19-11, 04:26 AM
  #32  
just keep riding
 
BluesDawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Milledgeville, Georgia
Posts: 13,560

Bikes: 2018 Black Mountain Cycles MCD,2017 Advocate Cycles Seldom Seen Drop Bar, 2017 Niner Jet 9 Alloy, 2015 Zukas custom road, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB, 1980ish Fuji S-12S

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 173 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times in 22 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr. Beanz
Does that work without a GPS as well? If so thanks, I'll take a look at it, MMR seems very limited in its view.

I'm new to map sites so I'm still picking up info on them.
Yes. RidewithGPS.com is very good for mapping routes. I like the site a lot and do think the grade info for the mapped routes is much more useful for the short and steep hills around here than MapMyRide. But RidewithGPS.com gives crazy elevation readings from my Garmin Forerunner 305. Sometimes about double what it shows for the same route mapped on the same site. Also, their latest software update has made the site not play well with Firefox, so I have to open it in IE to map routes.
BluesDawg is offline  
Old 08-19-11, 04:27 AM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,880

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times in 506 Posts
Originally Posted by BluesDawg
Actually it would be the elevation change divided by the square root of the distance traveled squared minus the elevation change squared.
No, I think it really represents the tangent of the average climb angle, rather than the solution of a right triangle using Pythagoras.

Last edited by Road Fan; 08-19-11 at 04:32 AM. Reason: had it wrong the first time.
Road Fan is offline  
Old 08-19-11, 04:32 AM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,880

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times in 506 Posts
Ok, wikipedia says it's the percent rise divided by run. If the base of a right triangle is horizontal then it is the run. The rise is the vertical leg of the right triangle. Divide rise by run and multiply by 100. The hypotenuse does not enter into the calculation.
Road Fan is offline  
Old 08-19-11, 07:21 AM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
ericm979's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Santa Cruz Mountains
Posts: 6,169
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Web sites and GPS readings can be inaccurate, sometimes by quite a bit.

The % grade road signs show the steepest grade on the road, not the average. They're to let drivers of heavy rigs know what they'll have to get up/down.
ericm979 is offline  
Old 08-19-11, 10:30 AM
  #36  
Banned.
 
Mr. Beanz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Upland Ca
Posts: 19,895

Bikes: Lemond Chambery/Cannondale R-900/Trek 8000 MTB/Burley Duet tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by BluesDawg
Yes. RidewithGPS.com is very good for mapping routes. I like the site a lot and do think the grade info for the mapped routes is much more useful for the short and steep hills around here than MapMyRide. .
Thanks, I'll give it a try.
Mr. Beanz is offline  
Old 08-19-11, 02:33 PM
  #37  
just keep riding
 
BluesDawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Milledgeville, Georgia
Posts: 13,560

Bikes: 2018 Black Mountain Cycles MCD,2017 Advocate Cycles Seldom Seen Drop Bar, 2017 Niner Jet 9 Alloy, 2015 Zukas custom road, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB, 1980ish Fuji S-12S

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 173 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times in 22 Posts
Originally Posted by Road Fan
Ok, wikipedia says it's the percent rise divided by run. If the base of a right triangle is horizontal then it is the run. The rise is the vertical leg of the right triangle. Divide rise by run and multiply by 100. The hypotenuse does not enter into the calculation.
I could easily be getting in over my head here , but the reason I used the hypotenuse was to take known values (the distance traveled and the elevation gain) to solve the unknown value (the run).
BluesDawg is offline  
Old 08-19-11, 02:59 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,243
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 343 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by BluesDawg
I could easily be getting in over my head here , but the reason I used the hypotenuse was to take known values (the distance traveled and the elevation gain) to solve the unknown value (the run).
Rise over run works and is so simple, it is what we use to determine departure climb gradients in air transport. Whether the GPS thinks the world is flat doesn't matter a damn. Can I lose an engine and still get me and the passengers and crew over that hill is all that counts! If it is good enough for that, it is good enough for riding a bike.
jdon is offline  
Old 08-19-11, 04:26 PM
  #39  
Banned.
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Southern california
Posts: 3,498

Bikes: Lapierre CF Sensium 400. Jamis Ventura Sport. Trek 800. Giant Cypress.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Mr. Beanz
Thanks, I'll give it a try.
I duplicate my routes on RWGPS and MMR. Rwgps doesn't load on my Iphone and MMR does. It seems as if Iphones don't like Adobe Flash.
Robert Foster is offline  
Old 08-19-11, 05:02 PM
  #40  
just keep riding
 
BluesDawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Milledgeville, Georgia
Posts: 13,560

Bikes: 2018 Black Mountain Cycles MCD,2017 Advocate Cycles Seldom Seen Drop Bar, 2017 Niner Jet 9 Alloy, 2015 Zukas custom road, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB, 1980ish Fuji S-12S

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 173 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times in 22 Posts
Originally Posted by jdon
Rise over run works and is so simple, it is what we use to determine departure climb gradients in air transport. Whether the GPS thinks the world is flat doesn't matter a damn. Can I lose an engine and still get me and the passengers and crew over that hill is all that counts! If it is good enough for that, it is good enough for riding a bike.
Fine and dandy. I have no argument with anyone using whatever tool they wish to enrich his/her ride. I never made any reference to GPS and a flat world. Please read the post I replied to (#2) which said the calculation was rise over run using distance traveled in place of run. My response was (not so) simply that distance traveled was not the same as run. It was a response about definition.

I agree that using rise over distance traveled is a close enough approximation for practical use. This whole discussion is much ado about nothing.
BluesDawg is offline  
Old 08-19-11, 05:26 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,243
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 343 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by BluesDawg
Fine and dandy. I have no argument with anyone using whatever tool they wish to enrich his/her ride. I never made any reference to GPS and a flat world. Please read the post I replied to (#2) which said the calculation was rise over run using distance traveled in place of run. My response was (not so) simply that distance traveled was not the same as run. It was a response about definition.

I agree that using rise over distance traveled is a close enough approximation for practical use. This whole discussion is much ado about nothing.
I wasn't pickin' on ya BD. Just adding to your post. Someone mentioned "flat earth" and GPS earlier and while true, it is so insignificant it isn't important. Much like this thread!
jdon is offline  
Old 08-19-11, 08:55 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 249
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ok, okay, ok... let's all agree to go out and buy a meter! How accurate they may be, your legs will tell you how accurate they are. When it starts to hurt more, I bet the grade is getting steeper!
tandemnh is offline  
Old 08-19-11, 11:21 PM
  #43  
Banned.
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Southern california
Posts: 3,498

Bikes: Lapierre CF Sensium 400. Jamis Ventura Sport. Trek 800. Giant Cypress.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by tandemnh
Ok, okay, ok... let's all agree to go out and buy a meter! How accurate they may be, your legs will tell you how accurate they are. When it starts to hurt more, I bet the grade is getting steeper!
Or you are getting a flat?
Robert Foster is offline  
Old 08-19-11, 11:32 PM
  #44  
Bent
 
Cranks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Carlos, CA
Posts: 166

Bikes: 2017 Trek FX S 6, 2010 Trek Madone 4.5, 2002 Gary Fisher Sugar 3+, 199? Trek 930 Singletrack

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BluesDawg
Actually it would be the elevation change divided by the square root of the distance traveled squared minus the elevation change squared.
I don't understand why you would take the square root of the distance and then square it.
Cranks is offline  
Old 08-19-11, 11:39 PM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 790
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Robert Foster
Or you are getting fat?
Fixed it to reflect my own problems.
All this talk of slopes, triangles and such has me yearning for some pi(e).
TheHen is offline  
Old 08-20-11, 06:37 AM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
Wogster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,931

Bikes: Old Bike: 1975 Raleigh Delta, New Bike: 2004 Norco Bushpilot

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by gregf83
Why would the horiz distance be useless? Consumer grade GPS devices can't even measure the distance around a 400m track accurately so I'm not sure why you think they'd incorporate elevation into the distance calculations.
It's useless unless your trying to compute the %grade on a hill, think about it this way, you really don't care if point A and point B are 400m apart, if your 40m higher up you want the running distance, 401.996m because that is how far the wheels have turned. A GPS actually makes a lousy odometer, for a simple reason, it needs to see 3 satellites to do a ground based measurement, it needs 4 to do elevation, if it has fewer it will do an approximation. It's rather simple, if you have elevation to do the calculation, based on a horizontal measurement, thanks to an ancient greek Mathematician, named Pythagoras. GPS isn't all that accurate anyway, I've heard more stories of people joyfully following the GPS until they are so lost, they need a local to figure it out. For thousands of years, all you needed was a compass and a half decent map.
Wogster is offline  
Old 08-20-11, 06:42 AM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
TomD77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Florida Panhandle
Posts: 572
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Rise divided by run is correct; % grade is important in several contexts to my profession and industry. Reality is that you can use hypotenuse if you want. Using a 10% grade as an example, that gives a 5.71 degree angle, the cosine of which is .995. That means that your answer will change out in the 2nd or 3rd decimal point. Big fat deal for biking calculations.
TomD77 is offline  
Old 08-20-11, 06:51 AM
  #48  
Banned.
 
DnvrFox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 20,917
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 10 Posts
You engineering types just don't get the big picture, you are so engrossed in the finer details.

The real issue is "Is there a piece of blueberry pie at the top of the hill?" If there is, the hill becomes a lot less steeper. So, please don't forget to add the "blueberry pie" coefficient into your calculations.
DnvrFox is offline  
Old 08-20-11, 07:16 AM
  #49  
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225

Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times in 364 Posts
Originally Posted by teachme
And can one calculate the %gradient of a hill one has just climbed?
I'm an analog kind of guy who feels trapped in a digital world.

Big chain ring = easy.
Middle chain ring = medium.
Granny ring = OMG!
Retro Grouch is offline  
Old 08-20-11, 09:50 AM
  #50  
just keep riding
 
BluesDawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Milledgeville, Georgia
Posts: 13,560

Bikes: 2018 Black Mountain Cycles MCD,2017 Advocate Cycles Seldom Seen Drop Bar, 2017 Niner Jet 9 Alloy, 2015 Zukas custom road, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB, 1980ish Fuji S-12S

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 173 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times in 22 Posts
Originally Posted by Cranks
I don't understand why you would take the square root of the distance and then square it.
Bearing in mind that none of this really matters...

This is stretching the capabilities of my very non-engineer type mind. My last math class was in highschool in 1973.
It's hard to write this without knowing how to type formulas.

It's all in the grouping. Subtract the elevation change squared from the distance traveled squared and then take the square root of that.

elevation change / the square root of (the distance traveled squared minus the elevation change squared)

Last edited by BluesDawg; 08-20-11 at 09:54 AM.
BluesDawg is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.