Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Fitting Your Bike
Reload this Page >

How much handling changes with different fork?

Search
Notices
Fitting Your Bike Are you confused about how you should fit a bike to your particular body dimensions? Have you been reading, found the terms Merxx or French Fit, and don’t know what you need? Every style of riding is different- in how you fit the bike to you, and the sizing of the bike itself. It’s more than just measuring your height, reach and inseam. With the help of Bike Fitting, you’ll be able to find the right fit for your frame size, style of riding, and your particular dimensions. Here ya’ go…..the location for everything fit related.

How much handling changes with different fork?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-09-17 | 01:35 PM
  #1  
kuroba's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 497
Likes: 22
From: Chile
How much handling changes with different fork?

I have a custom steel bike. Given my height (5') it was impossible for me to find a gravel/CX bike for my size and, being somewhat new to the world of bike geometry, I trusted my builder's design. However, people often mention how much offset my fork has (Framebuilder said this was to avoid toe overlap in a very small frame). Will this be a problem if I want to use a different fork? (I wanted to upgrade to a carbon fork, eventually). I'm assuming there *will* be toe overlap, but how will handling be affected?

Here's the original diagram from before it was made and an actual pic of the bike.

HT Angle is 69º.

Modelo Any Road Estivalia.jpg
IMG_6325_2.jpg

Thanks in advance for any insight (:

Last edited by kuroba; 08-09-17 at 09:56 AM.
kuroba is offline  
Reply
Old 02-09-17 | 05:13 PM
  #2  
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
just another gosling
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 20,555
Likes: 2,667
From: Everett, WA

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

I don't know the answer to your question, but I do know that toe overlap is not really a problem. You'd get used to it quickly.

Here are a couple of articles that talk about this issue:
https://calfeedesign.com/tech-papers/...bike-handling/
https://www.cyclingabout.com/understa...rame-geometry/
__________________
Results matter


Last edited by Carbonfiberboy; 02-09-17 at 05:21 PM.
Carbonfiberboy is offline  
Reply
Old 02-10-17 | 04:49 AM
  #3  
AnthonyG's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,135
Likes: 420
From: Queanbeyan, Australia.
That huge amount of fork offset is there to compensate for the very slack head tube angle.

Short answer. The builder knows what he is doing. It all comes out in the wash. It may look weird but don't change forks without understanding the geometry.

I'm not expert enough to teach you either but I know enough to say that it actually looks right to my eye.

The number that is REALLY important is, "trail".

Bicycle Steering Geometry

EDIT: having read your question again. I don't recommend you change the fork. The head tube angle, NEEDS that amount of fork rake. Don't change anything without understanding it back to front.

Last edited by AnthonyG; 02-10-17 at 04:53 AM.
AnthonyG is offline  
Reply
Old 02-10-17 | 05:23 AM
  #4  
kuroba's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 497
Likes: 22
From: Chile
Thanks guys. I have no immediate plans to change the fork, it was something I had in the back of my mind for the future. It's good to know that this bike is made to work with this fork only. I'll ride the heck out of it and hopefully by the time I can afford/fancy a new frame+fork there will be more options in my size.

Originally Posted by Carbonfiberboy
I don't know the answer to your question, but I do know that toe overlap is not really a problem. You'd get used to it quickly.
At my height, I'm sure I've had a bike with overlap at least once, but I've never noticed. I didn't even know there was such a thing until I started getting into road bikes lol.
kuroba is offline  
Reply
Old 02-13-17 | 06:00 AM
  #5  
AnthonyG's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,135
Likes: 420
From: Queanbeyan, Australia.
OK, I was reluctant to directly answer the question, "How will the handling be affected by a new fork", earlier because I had forgotten some of the details but now I've done some reading and reminded myself so here goes.

Short answer. If you fit a new fork with less Rake (Offset) to this frame you will slow down the steering and it will feel sluggish. All that Rake is there to speed up the steering by compensating for the VERY relaxed (68 degree) head tube angle.

Longer answer. The concept/measurement that is important here is, TRAIL. See the link I posted above for a diagram and it works like this. Draw a line along the axis of the head tube to the ground. Draw another line from the front axle vertically to the ground. The point where the vertical line from axle hits the ground is ALWAYS behind (trailing) the point where the line parallel with the head tube hits the ground. The less this distance, the more direct and fast the steering feels. The greater this distance the slower and more stable the steering feels.

Now, lets say you have one fork with a fixed rake already made and you fit it to bikes with different head tube angles. The bike with the steeper head tube angle (larger number, lets say 72 degrees) will have LESS trail(shorter distance between where the two lines fall on the ground), and more direct feel to the steering. The bike with a slacker head tube angle (lets say 68-69 degrees) will have more trail (greater distance between where the two lines fall on the ground) and less direct steering but feel more stable.

Now, the head tube angle is not the only factor in this equation that can be adjusted. You can change the rake of the fork. So, lets say we have a frame with a 68 degree head tube angle. To speed up the steering and make it feel more like a bike with a steeper head tube angle what you do is fit a fork with a greater Rake (offset). This pushes the axle forwards so its closer to the line from the head tube and consequently reducing the Trail.

With me?

It can get more complicated than this and wheel size is another factor in calculating Trail.

Last edited by AnthonyG; 02-13-17 at 03:59 PM.
AnthonyG is offline  
Reply
Old 02-23-17 | 04:05 PM
  #6  
noglider's Avatar
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,171
Likes: 6,396
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Some people panic when their foot hits the front wheel. As a result, some bike makers avoid the possibility. The collision happens only when you are going at very low speed, and there is enough time to move your foot or the wheel.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gabiker
Mountain Biking
35
11-07-19 03:22 AM
Camilo
Framebuilders
13
06-23-19 11:28 AM
Tradarcher
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
10
02-08-17 06:17 PM
theoretical
Bicycle Mechanics
11
04-29-12 12:39 AM
pocketaf
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
6
12-11-09 02:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.