Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Fitting Your Bike
Reload this Page >

Between Sizes, Which Way to Go?

Search
Notices
Fitting Your Bike Are you confused about how you should fit a bike to your particular body dimensions? Have you been reading, found the terms Merxx or French Fit, and don’t know what you need? Every style of riding is different- in how you fit the bike to you, and the sizing of the bike itself. It’s more than just measuring your height, reach and inseam. With the help of Bike Fitting, you’ll be able to find the right fit for your frame size, style of riding, and your particular dimensions. Here ya’ go…..the location for everything fit related.

Between Sizes, Which Way to Go?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-26 | 08:31 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Newbie
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 10
Likes: 3
From: NE Ohio

Bikes: 2008 Cannondale Super Six, 1999 Trek 2000

Between Sizes, Which Way to Go?

Hi all! So I'm pretty set on the Trek Domane SL6 but between sizes. Also, I don't really have options for test rides and a fit in my area. I could drive an hour to see more inventory but really don't want to waiste a shops time and then buy local.

About me, 55, 5'11", 33.5" inseam, not great neck and kness can get weird, back on the bike last year after some years off with health issues, got up to 30 miles at 17 mph avg. I will get the fit worked out, have done it many times, but being right in the middle of sizes kinda stinks. Goals this year, improve to max 60 mile rides and 19 mph avg.

Looking at Trek I fall exactly at the top end of a 56 and the bottom end of a 58. One thing I notice is the 56 comes with a 170 crank and the 58 a 172.5 crank, my current bikes are 175 cranks. I'm leaning towrd the 58 cause I figure I can always shorten the stem from 100 to 90 for a bit reduced reach if needed. Thoughts please and thank you!

Patrick

Last edited by Darion; 04-07-26 at 04:45 PM.
Darion is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-26 | 09:27 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
Community Builder
 
Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 979
From: New Jersey
I thought the rule of thumb was to always go smaller. You can always pull stuff out, but you can't push it in more than it goes. You can change cranks all day until you find what works.
ScottCommutes is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-26 | 10:39 AM
  #3  
Iride01's Avatar
Facts just confuse people
Titanium Club Membership
5 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 19,270
Likes: 7,025
From: Mississippi

Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020

I'm 5'11" with a 34.5" inseam. The sizing guide for my Tarmac gave me the choice of a 56 or 58 cm frame. Since I knew I wanted to have a lower and more aero body position, I went with the smaller size.

Frame stack, which affects the height of the handlebars is lower as the bike size gets smaller. Reach is also affected. But not to as large of an extent. And that can more easily be dealt with by shorter or longer stems.

Without going to weirdly angled stems, riser bars and steerer tube extenders that to me will make the pretty bike a fugly bike, your choice of handle bar height is more restricted and only the 40 to 35mm or so of spacers that they give you with a new bike. So for certain, get the size that puts the handle bar at the height you will want.

And realize that the new bike is usually set to the max handlebar height the designers intended. And should only go lower from there.

Last edited by Iride01; 04-07-26 at 10:43 AM.
Iride01 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-26 | 03:48 PM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Newbie
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 10
Likes: 3
From: NE Ohio

Bikes: 2008 Cannondale Super Six, 1999 Trek 2000

Originally Posted by ScottCommutes
I thought the rule of thumb was to always go smaller. You can always pull stuff out, but you can't push it in more than it goes. You can change cranks all day until you find what works.
Thanks for the comment.

Originally Posted by Iride01
I'm 5'11" with a 34.5" inseam. The sizing guide for my Tarmac gave me the choice of a 56 or 58 cm frame. Since I knew I wanted to have a lower and more aero body position, I went with the smaller size.

Frame stack, which affects the height of the handlebars is lower as the bike size gets smaller. Reach is also affected. But not to as large of an extent. And that can more easily be dealt with by shorter or longer stems.

Without going to weirdly angled stems, riser bars and steerer tube extenders that to me will make the pretty bike a fugly bike, your choice of handle bar height is more restricted and only the 40 to 35mm or so of spacers that they give you with a new bike. So for certain, get the size that puts the handle bar at the height you will want.

And realize that the new bike is usually set to the max handlebar height the designers intended. And should only go lower from there.
Thanks for the input, I'm not looking for that extra aero we can get from lower bar, my neck just isn't good for it anymore. I'm looking for comfort allowing me ro cover longer distances. Your comment was helpful, thanks.
Darion is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-26 | 06:54 PM
  #5  
Forum Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 22,903
Likes: 10,327
From: Kalamazoo
What size does your dealer recommend?
__________________


Carbon: Fuji SL2.1 Di2.......Aluminum: Cannondale Synapse 105........Steel: Vintage Specialized Sirrus
...
cb400bill is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-26 | 08:27 PM
  #6  
SpedFast's Avatar
Just Pedaling
 
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 1,099
I've always found larger to be more comfortable and smaller to be faster. Decisions decisions...
SpedFast is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-26 | 08:54 PM
  #7  
Thread Starter
Newbie
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 10
Likes: 3
From: NE Ohio

Bikes: 2008 Cannondale Super Six, 1999 Trek 2000

Originally Posted by cb400bill
What size does your dealer recommend?
I guess thats part of my issue, they really aren't committing either way. My local shops, only two, don't get bikes in this price range except on order. The other local shop isnt even ordering in carbon framed bikes this year at all, they have Speciaized, Cannondale and Giant. They also don't do test rides or even have the two sizes in the aluminum frame for me to throw a leg over. I'm probably going to have to go outside the area for better info. Thanks for asking.

Originally Posted by SpedFast
I've always found larger to be more comfortable and smaller to be faster. Decisions decisions...
Not all that concerned with faster anymore, just happy to be out biking again. Thank you.
Darion is offline  
Reply
Old 04-08-26 | 06:20 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Active Streak: 30 Days
Active Streak: 60 Days
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,031
Likes: 792
From: in a house

Bikes: Specialized Aethos, Specialized Diverge Comp E5 and 2025 Spesh Tarmac SL8 Expert

58cm...more comfortable considering your physical description
Kai Winters is offline  
Reply
Old 04-08-26 | 08:22 AM
  #9  
Thread Starter
Newbie
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 10
Likes: 3
From: NE Ohio

Bikes: 2008 Cannondale Super Six, 1999 Trek 2000

Originally Posted by Kai Winters
58cm...more comfortable considering your physical description
Thank you Kai, that's the way I am leaning.
Darion is offline  
Reply
Old 04-08-26 | 02:19 PM
  #10  
Thread Starter
Newbie
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 10
Likes: 3
From: NE Ohio

Bikes: 2008 Cannondale Super Six, 1999 Trek 2000

Took a ride to a dealer an hour away, think the 58 is the better fit for me. The bar being that .75 inch higher was better on my neck. Didn't really notice the bit of extra reach tbh. Thanks for the info and opinions all.
Darion is offline  
Reply
Old 04-21-26 | 05:14 PM
  #11  
Newbie
Titanium Club Membership
 
Joined: Sep 2023
Posts: 65
Likes: 77
From: texass, USA

Bikes: Custom Waterford R-33, 2025 Trek Domane SL5, 1987 Schwinn Prologue

Originally Posted by Darion;[url=tel:23724758
23724758]Took a ride to a dealer an hour away, think the 58 is the better fit for me. The bar being that .75 inch higher was better on my neck. Didn't really notice the bit of extra reach tbh. Thanks for the info and opinions all.
Not surprised that you didn't notice the reach much.
Gen 4 Domane' frames have really short effective top tube lengths and reach numbers when compared to a lot of competitors and older Domanes as well.

Glad you like the 58.

I am a little surprised that you are able to size up though.
Gen 3 and Gen 4 Domanes tend to be taller than the size chart would have most believe.
I am 5'10" with a 33" inseam.
Trek's size chart puts me squarely onto a 56cm Domane SL, but when I tried one out, I had to nearly bottom out the seat post in the frame.
I purchased a 54, removed 10mm of stem spacer to keep the bars from being higher than the saddle, swapped the bar down to a 40cm, and swapped the stem up to a 120mm (still -6 degree). It's a pretty normal looking road bike now, and I have replicated the fit from my Made-to-measure 55.5cm Waterford.


Glad you were able to find your own preferred position on one. It's a perfect example of why you really have to get yourself onto one in person when shopping for a mass production model bike.


Last edited by Eddy_G; 04-21-26 at 05:59 PM.
Eddy_G is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.