S and S coupled Pinion drive frame
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Bikes: Many bikes in three states and two countries, mainly riding Moots Vamoots, Lynskey R265 disc and a Spot Denver Zephyr nowadays
S and S coupled Pinion drive frame
Any makers looking into offering an S and S coupled Pinion drive frame? It would seem like a custom frame builder who already does S and S coupling might be in a good position to do so, or is that mixed up thinking?
#4
Senior Member


Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 19,373
Likes: 5,516
From: Rochester, NY
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Looks to be just another method of taking apart a bike. I'd like to see one in person to better tell if this is a better way. But I doubt it.
By pinion frame do you mean a drive shaft instead of a chain? Andy.
By pinion frame do you mean a drive shaft instead of a chain? Andy.
#5
Randomhead
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 25,930
Likes: 4,825
From: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
I assume that he was talking about the Pinion gearbox
#7
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Bikes: Many bikes in three states and two countries, mainly riding Moots Vamoots, Lynskey R265 disc and a Spot Denver Zephyr nowadays
It also makes taking the rear wheel off both for travel purposes and fixing flats much simpler than with an IGH.
Other than the weight, it seems a perfect match for an S and S coupled configuration to me for a travel bike.
#9
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Bikes: Many bikes in three states and two countries, mainly riding Moots Vamoots, Lynskey R265 disc and a Spot Denver Zephyr nowadays
I've flown with my Bike Friday and Terns and Bromptons without issue, and the Bike Friday has a Rohloff, but I understand the current 18 speed Pinion is heavier still, so I guess the question would be, can a Pinion drive bike frame be made out of lightweight enough steel to keep the overall weight down without impacting safety?
Also the upcoming 12 and 9 gear Pinion versions should be somewhat lighter I'm guessing... if I were loaded touring I would want that incredible gear range from the 18 speed Pinion and a tandem grade steel frame and fork , but for a dedicated travel bike I would certainly look at a 12 speed Pinion.
Not that I need yet another travel bike, of course, but the technology fascinates me.
#10
Decrepit Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,488
Likes: 94
From: Santa Rosa, California
Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts
My 61cm Reynolds 953 OS frame (frame only, no headset or bottom bracket) weighs 1650g (a little over 3.6 lbs) and is quite dent resistant in spite of tubing walls as thin as 0.3mm. It would be an interesting project.
#11
Banned
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 43,586
Likes: 1,380
From: NW,Oregon Coast
Bikes: 8
Pinions advantage is weight is being centered and low, builders were using Rohloffs as a mid drive..
Using the 4 bolt disc mount to put a chainring on the left end of the hub casing, driving a left end cog
on a fully suspended long travel rear suspension bike .. actual mass of wheel on the end of the suspension, minimal.
best use fast downhill single track.. and cliff dropping slaloms.
Using the 4 bolt disc mount to put a chainring on the left end of the hub casing, driving a left end cog
on a fully suspended long travel rear suspension bike .. actual mass of wheel on the end of the suspension, minimal.
best use fast downhill single track.. and cliff dropping slaloms.
#14
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Bikes: Many bikes in three states and two countries, mainly riding Moots Vamoots, Lynskey R265 disc and a Spot Denver Zephyr nowadays
However, an S and S coupled large framed 20" (large) mountain or hybrid geometry might well fit if the rider is OK with riding that geometry rather than road bike geometry.
#15
Decrepit Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,488
Likes: 94
From: Santa Rosa, California
Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts
I'm confused. The S&S website allegedly shows a 62cm Waterford road bike packed into the 26" x 26" x 10" case. Admittedly, the crank has to come off, but it would appear to fit (I used a Gerber Variable Scale to verify the case in the 3-D images of the packing sequence is a 10" case).
Packing sequence for a 62cm road bike with ergo style shifters
Packing sequence for a 62cm road bike with ergo style shifters
#16
Randomhead
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 25,930
Likes: 4,825
From: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
I certainly wouldn't think that a 58 would have any problem. I guess the worst problem area is the front triangle, but that could be mitigated by having the downtube cut a little further away from the bb shell. That 62 even has the fork on it
#17
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Bikes: Many bikes in three states and two countries, mainly riding Moots Vamoots, Lynskey R265 disc and a Spot Denver Zephyr nowadays
I'm confused. The S&S website allegedly shows a 62cm Waterford road bike packed into the 26" x 26" x 10" case. Admittedly, the crank has to come off, but it would appear to fit (I used a Gerber Variable Scale to verify the case in the 3-D images of the packing sequence is a 10" case).
Packing sequence for a 62cm road bike with ergo style shifters
Packing sequence for a 62cm road bike with ergo style shifters
#18
Decrepit Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,488
Likes: 94
From: Santa Rosa, California
Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts
I put this together from some of the photos and drawings on the S&S website. I'm seriously considering having Waterford put S&S couplers on my 61cm RS-22, so I've been interested in verifying it would actually fit in a 26 x 26 x 10 S&S hard case. Based on what I've been able to determine so far, it should work.

Here's the yellow Waterford 62cm bike in the S&S website photos ready to ride.

Here's the yellow Waterford 62cm bike in the S&S website photos ready to ride.
#19
Banned
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 43,586
Likes: 1,380
From: NW,Oregon Coast
Bikes: 8
I had some one charged any how, in the Shop, recently .
Airport Conversation went Q; whats in the case? A ; Bike parts .
Q; can I Look? (Company ticket counter, not TSA) A; I have no objections
Opening case Airline employee says "It's a Bike , thats another $150.-"
Airport Conversation went Q; whats in the case? A ; Bike parts .
Q; can I Look? (Company ticket counter, not TSA) A; I have no objections
Opening case Airline employee says "It's a Bike , thats another $150.-"
#20
Decrepit Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,488
Likes: 94
From: Santa Rosa, California
Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts
I would have raised holy hell. If it fit within the weight and linear dimensions specifications for "no surcharge" checked luggage, it shouldn't make any difference what's in it as long as it's not classified as too dangerous to be checked.
#22
Decrepit Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,488
Likes: 94
From: Santa Rosa, California
Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts
#23
Banned
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 43,586
Likes: 1,380
From: NW,Oregon Coast
Bikes: 8
It all depends on the individual employee and the airline policy.
they could be under pressure to boost revenue where ever possible.
I havent been on a plane since my Father's Funeral in august of 2000.. PDX-SFO-PDX.
they could be under pressure to boost revenue where ever possible.
I havent been on a plane since my Father's Funeral in august of 2000.. PDX-SFO-PDX.







