Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Framebuilders
Reload this Page >

Fork Rake Question

Search
Notices
Framebuilders Thinking about a custom frame? Lugged vs Fillet Brazed. Different Frame materials? Newvex or Pacenti Lugs? why get a custom Road, Mountain, or Track Frame? Got a question about framebuilding? Lets discuss framebuilding at it's finest.

Fork Rake Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-12 | 03:27 PM
  #1  
GMM
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Fork Rake Question

Need an replacement fork, dealer says maker has none.

The headtube angle is 72.5 - the original fork rake is 50mm.

Would going with a 45mm rake make any differance in handling?
GMM is offline  
Reply
Old 04-05-12 | 03:42 PM
  #2  
Randomhead
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 25,930
Likes: 4,825
From: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
it will matter a little. Is the axle to crown distance the same? Those little changes can add up
unterhausen is offline  
Reply
Old 04-05-12 | 03:52 PM
  #3  
GMM
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
The original fork = 370mm axle to crown
A replacement(Bontrager) would be 371mm at 45mm offset.
GMM is offline  
Reply
Old 04-05-12 | 05:45 PM
  #4  
Randomhead
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 25,930
Likes: 4,825
From: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
You are increasing the trail. That will stiffen up the steering a little, which you might feel is fairly obvious during sharp turns at low speed. It will also be a little less forgiving of a front load. A handlebar bag will make things a little unstable.
unterhausen is offline  
Reply
Old 04-05-12 | 06:42 PM
  #5  
Scooper's Avatar
Decrepit Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,488
Likes: 92
From: Santa Rosa, California

Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts

Originally Posted by unterhausen
You are increasing the trail. That will stiffen up the steering a little, which you might feel is fairly obvious during sharp turns at low speed. It will also be a little less forgiving of a front load. A handlebar bag will make things a little unstable.
+1

You'll be increasing trail by 5mm (from 54mm with original fork to 59mm with the Bontrager fork, assuming 700c x 23c tires).

__________________
- Stan

my bikes

Science doesn't care what you believe.
Scooper is offline  
Reply
Old 04-24-12 | 11:54 PM
  #6  
GMM
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Update:

Hey guys,

I checked around, found two reasonably priced forks, ran the numbers and here’s what I came up with.
Based on a 1mm lower stack height.

Original geometry: curved bladed fork
74-degree seat angle, 72.5 degree headtube angle, 370 axle-to-crown fork @ 50mm offset = 54mm trail, 70mm BB-drop.

With replacement Bontrager fork: straight bladed fork
73.85 seat angle, 72.35 headtube angle, 371mm axle-to-crown fork @45mm offset = 59.3mm trail, 69mm bb-drop.

With replacement Ritchey Fork: curved bladed fork
74.02 seat angle, 72.52 headtube angle, 368mm axle-to-crown fork @45mm offset = 59.2mm trail, 70.2mm bb-drop.

The questions are:
1. Do the numbers seem correct?
2. Should I ignore the “altered” seat/head tube angles the replacement forks will produce and simply note the new trail values?
3. Does anyone have any experience with Bontrager or Ritchey forks?
4. How does a straight bladed fork’s ride differ from curved?

The Forks:
https://www.ritcheylogic.com/dyn_prodfamily.php?k=451879
https://www.bontrager.com/model/04037
GMM is offline  
Reply
Old 04-25-12 | 08:35 AM
  #7  
Framebuilder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
1. Yes, but they are all so close, for all intents and purposes, they are the same.
2. See #1, and if you were able to feel the difference in steering with the higher trail (you probably won't) the sensation will be gone after riding for 30 min and you'll forget about it.
3. Two name brands, never had trouble with either of their higher end products.
4. Generally speaking, ride characteristics depend more on materials, blade thickness, and amount of offset than on blade shape. Between these two carbon forks I doubt there would be any appreciable differences.
So get the Ritchey, because I always thought Tom was cooler than Keith

Last edited by Live Wire; 04-25-12 at 08:44 AM.
Live Wire is offline  
Reply
Old 04-25-12 | 12:13 PM
  #8  
Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 19,344
Likes: 5,462
From: Rochester, NY

Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB

GMM- As said before the Bont. fork will change the feel of the steering a bit. The Ritchey for won't make much difference from your origonal. The ST and HT angle changes are pretty minor with all three. Perhaps a little bit of seat set back change with the Bont fork, but 3mm is still a small difference for most people to feel. Maybe the other differences will make your decission for you. Stuff like eyelets, tire to blade clearances, visual style or color. Since I'm a curved blade guy and like the other Ritchey stuff I used I'd choose it (assuming the eyeletts and tire clearances were right). Andy.
Andrew R Stewart is online now  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tradarcher
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
10
02-08-17 06:17 PM
rms13
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
10
05-05-14 02:22 PM
GENESTARWIND
General Cycling Discussion
1
01-15-12 08:42 AM
beebe
Bicycle Mechanics
3
04-08-11 01:51 PM
will015
Bicycle Mechanics
13
02-11-10 09:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.