Question on stays
#1
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Bikes: Volae Club, Cannondale Jekyll, Orbea Opal, Rans F5, Diamondback Mtb, Murray Eliminator, Haro BMX, and more....
Question on stays
Hi! First post on this forum here. The talent is amazing here. I ride a recumbent much like the one pictured here. I am wanting to build one like it for a friend and am going to build out of 4130. My question is on the stays going to the rear wheel. Will it be strong enough if I do a good tight job of fitting them and then fillet braze? It seems like there will be a lot of pressure on the weld because there isn't really much triangulation with the seat stays. Any hints or tips on this?
#2
Senior Member


Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 19,381
Likes: 5,528
From: Rochester, NY
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Assuming good brazing (enough flow to establish an internal fillet, proper sized external fillet) and proper finishing (no undercutting of the tube) it will be a tube selection question. So if the tube choice is up to the task and you do a good job brazing and filing it will be OK. The difference in strength between a weld and a braze depends on how well each is done, not which is done.
But this design relies on the beam strength of the tubing. Adding some triangulation would increase the stiffness and reduce the need for a high beam strength. I have worked on many recumbent with this type of main frame/stays construction and still don't like them from a design standpoint. I understand why this simple design is used compared to a truss one (like a P-38) but I don't like it. Andy.
But this design relies on the beam strength of the tubing. Adding some triangulation would increase the stiffness and reduce the need for a high beam strength. I have worked on many recumbent with this type of main frame/stays construction and still don't like them from a design standpoint. I understand why this simple design is used compared to a truss one (like a P-38) but I don't like it. Andy.
#4
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
From: Boise, ID
Bikes: 2005 Performer Toscana, RANS V3 steel, RANS Citi, Kona Hoo-Ha
The seatstays on a recumbent don't have to be an integral part of the frame. Instead you can bolt them onto the dropouts or tabs on the chainstays if there's enough metal there to provide strength. On many bents, the primary job of the seatstays is to support the seat and adjust seat angle, and they don't contribute much to frame rigidity. BUT, it really depends on your frame design.
#5
Randomhead
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 25,930
Likes: 4,825
From: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
I believe the question was regarding the joint between the boom tube and the chain stays. I had the same initial reaction to the question because he mentions the lack of support from the seat stays.





